« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s problem with the reality of unemployment.

Watching this Debbie Wasserman Schultz video is surprisingly difficult: you keep expecting her to crack up at the nonsense that she’s spouting off. But… no.

Fox News’ Gretchen Carlson: “Unemployment has gone up precipitously since he took office.”

DNC Chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz: “That is simply not true. In fact, unemployment has now dropped below 9%. It’s continuing to drop. He’s been focused on – ”

Carlson: “Yes, but it’s higher than when they promised that the stimulus would lower it to 8%.”

Wasserman Schultz: “That narrative doesn’t work for you anymore.”

Carlson: “It’s not my narrative. I’m just talking about facts of where the unemployment numbers are.”

Wasserman Schultz: “You just said that the unemployment rate is going up since he took office, and it hasn’t.”

Carlson: “Is unemployment higher now than when President Obama took office?”

Wasserman Schultz: “What’s happened since President Obama took office – “

Carlson: “Is unemployment higher than when he took office?”

Wasserman Schultz: “Unemployment is nearing right around where it was when President Obama took office and it’s dropping. You just said that it’s been increasing and that’s not true.” (Fox News’ “Fox and Friends,” 12/12/11)

No, the DNC Chair really and truly did deny on national television that unemployment has gone up precipitously since Barack Obama took office in January of 2009. Possibly it’s the word ‘precipitously’ itself? That’s a pretty hard word: it has five syllables, and Wasserman Schultz is fairly notorious for her inability to reliably grasp any word that has more than four. For that matter, the definition has polysyllabic words in it, too – no more than three for any given word, but sometimes even three’s too much for a Democratic duckspeaker. So let’s just go with ‘precipitously’ meaning ‘a lot.’ As in:

  • The number of members of the Democratic House Caucus declined precipitously after the 2010 Congressional elections.
  • Barack Obama’s job-performance numbers have fallen precipitously since the start of his Presidential term.
  • The DCCC’s reputation for fundraising has deflated precipitously since January of 2011.

See how that works, Rep. Wasserman Schultz? Under the circumstances – given the way that unemployment took off like a rocket from a baseline of 7.8% in January 2009, hit 10% within months, then trundled along at 9% for most of 2011 – we can in fact fairly say that unemployment has risen precipitously since your boss took office. And, yes, it’s currently ‘down’ to 8.6%. For the moment; people may have noticed that most of the usual suspects haven’t been beating the drum on that drop in the unemployment rate too loudly. There’s a reason for that, and it’s called “Recovery Summer.” Remember that one? That was when the White House promised hardcore job creation… which didn’t happen, and the unemployment rate continued to stagnate until after the November midterms (and its wholesale spanking of the Democratic party). After that, the usual suspects got a little gun-shy about over-confident predictions… except for Debbie Wasserman Schultz, apparently (and bless her heart).

Of course, speaking as an American, I hope that unemployment goes down… and speaking as a Republican, I’m expecting that it won’t. And I suspect that so does Debbie Wasserman Schultz. I mean, she’s as dumb as a sackful of hammers – but surely she can’t be that out and out stupid, right?

Moe Lane (crosspost)

PS: If you’d like Debbie to have more free time to devote to her DNC gig, then Karen Harrington would probably love to hear from you. Because while it’s a recession when somebody else loses a job, a depression when you lose a job, and a recovery when Barack Obama loses his, if Debbie Wasserman Schultz loses her job it’ll just be funny.

COMMENTS

  • irishgirl

    vids of her spouting off her nonsense never fail to entertain.

  • vandalii

    Just have to believe hard enough, and not be distarcted by niggling things like facts and such…

  • garythompson

    This is nothing new for the blamestorming blabbermouth Schultz. Just wait until she really kicks in to the next gear in 2012. It’s tough work being the chief defender of the worst president in history but she signed up for it!

  • indieinvirginnie

    You guys are oh, so wrong!

    Debbie is the master of a rhetorical device that is second only to the straw man (who is indisposed, due to engagements elsewhere, if you know what I mean). The “big lie.” If you repeat it often enough with a straight enough face, some people buy it. And if you have nothing else to work with, why not go for it? It worked for Baghdad Bob.

  • veritaseequitas

    reprogramming. It never ceases to amuse and amaze at some of the total dumbbells that have been elected to public office and the utter garbage they spew at the American people in the hopes they will be believed.
    As soon as the “Christmas Help” is let go after the holidays, the phony 8.6 unemployment rate will once again go up. I wonder what kind of spin these liberal mongrels will put on it then?

  • rbdwiggins

    to seek full-time employment at the DNC once the American people realize that the Obama Administration manipulated the unemployment numbers and find the courage to admit, “They’ve been had.”

    It will be especially entertaining to hear Debbie Wasserman Schultz defend the Obama Administration and the justification used to make approximately 4.2% of the US labor force simply disappear.

  • audax

    The total number of the unemployed is larger than when Obama took office. The “Unemployment Rate” as reported by the government is dropping because so many of the “Unempoyed” have just stopped looking for work….but they are still unemployed

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    While male democrats often say stupid things, there are a large number of Democrat talking heads who can at least sound intelligent, or sound like they understand the basic premise being discussed.

    But not so with Democrat women. Unlike republican women who tend to be really smart, There seems to be no end to the number of really really stupid, I mean mind numbingly ignorant, silly trash like Debbie here.

    When they were young, were these the girls you could have your way with for a pizza and a promise? Where these the ones doing their nails during math class? Somehow that makes sense.

  • macbookben

    …she looks like Chelsea Clinton.

  • Deskpilot

    So full of ($#it) themselves, that they know not what they are culpable for.

    Were the truth ever to be truly revealed to them, surely they would burst into flames diagnosed as Spontaneous Human Combustion. Of to be vanquished of them so easily. But NO, we much get them out of office the old fashioned AMERICAN way, vote ‘em all out!

  • radix

    Debbiewasser Manschultz is one of the most abrasive people in Congress. Anytime she is pressed with facts she quickly spins it as some kind of narrative. She does it on a regular basis with Fox News interviews. Gretchen seemed a little caught off guard, but recovered quickly.

    Then Manschultz put words in Gretchen’s mouth, and said they weren’t true. The #1 trick of a liberal debating against unfavorable facts.

  • evilleramsfan

    n/t

  • TopGun

    Game Show Participant: I?ll take Airheads for $100

    Alex: She?s clueless, hasn?t a lick of common sense, and is Chairman of a major political party.

    Game Show Participant: Who is Debbie Wasserman.