« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Fomer Obama staffer arrested in Iowa Secretary of State identity theft investigation.

Reports are coming in (via @CFHeather) that a former Obama ’08 staffer – one Zach Edwards, formerly with the 2008 Obama campaign in Iowa and currently up until the arrest working for Link Strategies*, a company affiliated with Sen. Tom Harken (D, IA) – has been arrested for identity theft. The Iowa Department of Public Safety puts it fairly succinctly: “According to the Criminal Complaint, on June 24, 2011, Edwards fraudulently used, or attempted to use, the identity of Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz and/or Secretary Schultz’s brother, Thomas Schultz, with the intent to obtain a benefit, in an alleged scheme to falsely implicate Secretary Schultz in perceived illegal or unethical behavior while in office.” In other words: Edwards is accused of trying to pretend to be Schultz in order to get Schultz in trouble. The crime is listed as an ‘Aggravated Misdemeanor,’ but if convicted Edwards could face jail time.

 

Matt Schultz is a Republican, in case anybody needed to have that spelled out; he was one of the many, many people who helped kick George Soros’ Secretary of State Project in the teeth in 2010. The SoS Project is, of course, an ongoing campaign by Democrats to control the election process in individual states by controlling the Secretary of State position, which is usually the office that oversees elections: and Iowa was definitely on its radar in 2010. Losing that state hurt, particularly since Schultz both opposes Election Day voter registration and supports photo IDs for voting**: two policies that seem to infuriate Democrats all out of proportion to the importance that those people publicly ascribe to either. So it’s not surprising that some poor, misguided individual might have decided to target the Secretary of State in this fashion.

But what is surprising is this passage from the Iowa Republican (the first link above):

Interestingly, on June 24, the same day as Zach Edwards alleged crime, Under the Golden Dome, a blog connected to Iowa Democrats, launched a three-part series of articles critical of Matt Schultz. They were based on documents obtained through an open records request from “a tipster.” The blog alleged that a batch of emails from Schultz’s office “raise some serious questions about his ability to remain independent and ensure election integrity”.

If that checks out, too… well. You don’t often see the Democrats being that sloppy. Man, standards under President Obama are slipping all over.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*Oddly enough, Link Strategies seems to have scrubbed Edwards from its site.

**This is usually the time when the Left starts whining about how the GOP didn’t require ID in its Presidential caucus. Oddly enough, I agree (without the whining): we should have been checking IDs. We might have had less non-Republicans sneaking in and skewing the results. One in four? – and if you’re waiting to see any of them vote Republican in the general, well, pack a lunch.

COMMENTS

  • johnt

    What’s happened to the good old days when you could destroy a Normal Person with style, a little mud here, a little slime there, gone?
    You still have the innuendo technique down pretty good, plant a hint, treat it as hard fact. The idiots who are the base of your party don’t need much to stoke their hate, after all it’s what they live for.

  • jimbomcw
    meh, then scott walker a pedophile?

    there are always bad apples working for all campaigns

    Walker’s pedophile worker is a lot closer to home to Walker than this to Obama

    The point is that this is nothing that can affect Obama. There are larger/ more important issues to hit Obama on

  • f224

    Moe: Reference your comments ** above, Iowa’s GOP does and did require photo ID’s and proof of residence for the Iowa Caucuses, and have for several cycles. The Democrats do not.

    Dave Funk
    Co-Chairman, Polk County, Iowa GOP.

  • ashland_avenue

    My late father used to say that some people are so arrogant they think their stuff don’t stink but it’s their gas which gives them away. That wasn’t exactly how he said it, but the idea was the same.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …that there was an issue about that. Something about people being able to vouch for you, or some such thing?

  • icesweeper

    Thanks Dave, you are correct. But what is the deal with same day voter registration. What difference does it make if you ask for a person’s ID, when you let non-Republicans have input into selecting the candidate.

    It would be like playing a Super Bowl, where at each possession, the teams were rescrambled and then sent on the field. Imagine the chaos, yet that’s how we allow our selection process to run. If a person wants to select a party candidate, they can join the team ahead of time. Otherwise they get to stay home and vote in Nov.

  • icesweeper

    Sioux County committee member….

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Same day partisan affiliation.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …but you’re not actually smart enough to get away with faking being a conservative. It took roughly five minutes, once I noticed.

    But, hey: thanks for confirming that this is a real story! I wasn’t entirely certain, but if it was worth burning an account over…

  • David123

    if someone told him to do this. Like you said, Moe, that open records request is an interesting coincidence.

  • acat

    would end up cleaning up after that piece of trash.

    Thank you.

    Mew

  • freemanja1991

    there is no dirt on SOS Schultz. He won the race unexpectedly due to campaigning on the Voter ID issue, with less than 50% of the vote

  • freemanja1991

    They still can vouch with out an ID.

  • ihccwmpenn

    Not one of my home state’s smarter citizens..

    But when it comes to Mr. Shultz, I honestly didn’t see Voter ID as a big problem in Iowa because last time I checked, there hasn’t been any real record of voting irregularities (except of course the recent error in reporting votes in nearby Appanoose county that started the process of declaring Santorum the real winner here in Iowa), so I didn’t quite understand why he was making it such a big issue when he ran. However I didn’t see the issue as being any reason NOT to vote for him. I’ve never read anything bad about the guy..Probably why this Edwards idiot had to invent dirt.

    On the issue of same-day registration, I will freely admit I have done so twice, in 2008 and 2012. However the main reason I did so was: Forgot to change my party registration before hand like I planned. For a lot of people here in Iowa, having to go to the court house and change your voter registration weeks/months before is just too much of a bother when you can do it right there at the poll. Further, for someone like myself who has over the last few years changed my political views fairly dramatically (seems to happen after you graduate college), I wasn’t sure I was going to vote in the caucus or not until that day. Still, I could have changed my registration weeks earlier just in case but I didn’t.

    So if Mr. Shultz decided to recommend to the Iowa Legislature to 1.) Demand photo ID when voting (as GOP in Iowa already does) and 2.) get rid of same-day registration, I would have little problem. The only real problem I would see is I suspect it make for lower turnout overall.

  • johnt

    but using a different handle. I have had one response that smacks of a modest intelligence, the rest is all bile, like your post above. Of course you hate, what else do you have but hate? What makes you any different from the rest? And why would you link to your utterly mindless slop? No pride, no shame?
    As I said, I use a different handle but maybe I’ll look you up.
    Love and kisses.