Whether standing or sitting down it was meal time for Newt.

I remember the issue being covered some but don’t remember seeing Obama ever directly confronted about it. Certainly not in a debate.

Could be wrong – but the one article I read claimed Newt was lying because a couple commentators discussed it once.

Newt didn’t claim nobody discussed. He said the elite media didn’t ask Obama questions about it in 2008. That is different. And I haven’t seen that proven untrue.

,,,,or just look at the abortion issue for what it is instead of viewing it as a political issue, it’s shocking what is going on in this country, and has for decades.

Our country needs far more than political solutions to its woes.

He voted to protect doctors who killed babies who survived the abortion because as you well know, those terms: “babies” and “doctors” are very loosely-defined. Legally, we’re talking about the definition of “previable fetuses” here, and of course, that changes everything completely. Because we put a different name on it!

Our home growns follow their old hero, mentor, and mass murderer quite well.

Since birth control is the latest hot topic, which candidate believes in birth control, and if not, why?

See how King did that?

Sure, Newt’s point was good red meat. But it was partially factual and missed the point. That is, the question from King is a non sequitur.

The question at hand is really not about birth control. It is a question of the government trampling on the free exercise clause of the Constitution.

IMHO, Newt missed the opportunity to make a larger, more relevant point (which, he frankly does extraordinarily well). That would be how the Obama Administration has as nauseum trampled individual rights and the Constitution. There are a bounty of examples Newt could have articulated with his encyclopedic mind to really make a much more relevant point. Instead he went for the feel-good demagoguery.

who noticed that Burns had no clue what Gingrich was actually talking about. I think there’s less of a media conspiracy than continual groupthink that prevents reporters from analyzing issues from outside the box.

McCain did very little about attacking or even publicizing MAObama’s radical pro-infanticide beliefs.

BIG BRObama had little fear about being proud of his position:

From October 6, 2008

“By Chad MacINNES

Senator Obama came out swinging at John McCain a couple of weeks ago on his abortion positions, taking swipes at his “extreme” position against abortion,… Just to be clear, Obama is the Prophet of Hope and Change only if you are not a child in the womb or newborn, for in these cases he is the prophet of doom. The AP printed an article entitled, “Obama calls out McCain on abortion.” …

In fact, Obama is so confident that he is in the right, he rails that McCain holds an “extreme position on choice” and “will make abortion illegal.”

It is difficult to wrap one’s mind around the fact that Obama does not see his position on abortion as extreme. As has been reported since he announced his candidacy, Obama favors unrestricted abortion to include lifting all bans on partial-birth abortion. Obama also fought hard to kill a bill in the Illinois State Senate that would have protected a newborn baby that survived a late-term induced-labor abortion. In fact, he is on the record on the floor of the State Senate as not merely speaking out against the bill, but in doing so making a convoluted argument as to why a baby born alive should not be afforded “human personhood” because it would “unduly encroach upon Roe.” Translated, that means, “I can’t afford to let these children live because I must retain my 100% rating from NARAL in order to received money from Planned Parenthood.”

See:

http://www.americanconservativedaily.com/2008/10/obama%E2%80%99s-pro-infanticide-position-isn%E2%80%99t-extreme/

Why is it I knew back when Catholics, Jews and Christians were tripping over themselves to get to the polls to vote for Obama. Seems most wanted to believe what the MSM told them instead of taking the time to do just a little research before Obama had his minions spend millions hiding his background and scrubbing everything they could off the Internet. Well, after 3.5 years, one would think you might have a clearer picture. There should be no questions this man should be voted out of office even if Bugs Bunny turned out to be our candidate. One thing, hopefully some will vet their choice this time of the man with the “R” beside his name because we have one who is very much like Obama. He’s programmed, doesn’t use the prompter to speak but has robot like memorized all his convenient talking points. If you don’t know who that is and you vote for him, we might have Obama for another 4 years to finish off what he’s started.

Newt is the only one that will shake the tree BOTH Parties live in and rule from. He sees the larger picture from the SC to the President and Congress plus Federal Judges. He sees the corruptness and the disdain for the Constitution and the Rule of Law. He see the assault on Religion and the Socialist Indoctrination in our school system. Why do you think the GOP leaders came out against him? It’s not his warts. They FEAR Newt. They know he will change their strangle hold on American Politics.
BTW, what nitwit allowed the lame stream media to manage the Republican Debates? That was idiotic. It’s no wonder we hear nothing of substance.
Romney is a good man and good for the economy. BUT, he does not see the larger picture and under his leadership it will be the same status quo in Government. WE, the PEOPLE, want our Government back and Newt will clean up and give it back.

An acquaintance (obviously a liberal Democrat) posted a link to this article on Facebook last night. I don’t usually read much of anything this person posts but for some reason I looked at this. Title is “The 7 Biggest Lies Uttered At The CNN Arizona Republican Debate”. This one that Gingrich brought up about Obama supporting infanticide is #4 on the list. The rest of the seven are pretty stupid too and the comments following the article are incredible – hard to believe people are still believing this stuff about Obama.

http://www.politicususa.com/en/republican-debate-fact-check

Obama, Senate floor, 2002: [A]dding a – an additional doctor who then has to be called in an emergency situation to come in and make these assessments is really designed simply to burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion. … I think it’s important to understand that this issue ultimately is about abortion and not live births.

Obama, Senate floor, 2001: Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we’re really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a – a child, a nine-month-old – child that was delivered to term. That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it – it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute.

My baby boy was born six weeks early. He is a health man now. He did not need any special treatment..and Obama is saying that he is not a person. Better tell Obama to look at all the babies that have grown up to be healthy living human beings a/k/a persons.

Please cut and paste into your browser.

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1526

It is rare to see so many facts spun to benefit the left all in one place. Factcheck.org will make you walk leaning to the left. Just one more point it charges Newt of being wrong about the media coverage of the Obama infanticide vote. There was one point brought up on CNN tht quietly got buried in the newspapers and TV stories. The Elite media did conspire to cover it up. So with that they can say it was covered but no one cared. To me the fact that anyone could consider allowing a newborn to be murdered is so reprehensible to me and makes me sick to the stomach. My first reaction is that abortions shouldn’t even be allowed in the time period that a baby would be viable if born naturally. Abortions shouldn’t be allowed after the first 10 weeks. If most women culd see what they are doing I would hope that they wouldn’t be so heartless as to murder their baby. I agree with the laws that require the woman to view a non-invasive sonogram before the abortion takes place. No other nation kills babies on the scale that the USA does. Why is that?

Obama .. He wants you to kill your babies and if that doesn’t work his other pptions are Contraceptives to control the birth rate .. this self important biggot that is “killing ” our Country isn’t satisfied with just that .. he wants to kill all of unborn babies and if that doesn’t work he wants to have “WeThe People” give contraceptives away to insure that no babies are born at all .Whats next aone babie limit like China or worse yet forced sterilzation, Hia czars would do that in an instant… We really have to end the reign of this wannabe dictator .. after November it may be too late .. Get out and VOTE Folks it’s our last chance to save this Nation..

It is unbelievable to me that child murder is the educated, cosmopolitan, freedom-enhancing, and enlightened view in the States.