« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz stupidly forgets comparing Voter ID to Jim Crow.

Let me rephrase that: she abjectly, amazingly, incredibly stupidly forgets comparing Voter ID to Jim Crow laws, to the point of huffily walking off when reminded about that particular bit of hyper-partisan stupidity. Watch.

Watch.

For those without video, that shows a clip of… Debbie Wasserman Schultz claiming that she ever made the above comparison, followed by a clip of… Debbie Wasserman Schultz explicitly making the above comparison, followed by a clip of… the meat of the first clip again, largely because mrctv apparently could not believe that the chair of the Democratic National Committee was this incapable of even remembering what specific fumble-fingered attempts to [incite] racial hatred were shambling about under her name. So they themselves had to go back and make sure that yes, she said this; and they must have decided that since they had to do a double-take, then so would their viewers, so they might as well make it easy for them.

Look, it’s no secret that Barack Obama put Wasserman Schultz in the position of DNC chair not because of her inherent abilities – the woman doesn’t actually have any useful life skills, past snarling – but because she wouldn’t say anything as Team Obama raided the Democratic general election coffers to get the President (and only the President) re-elected. That’s life. But this is an embarrassment- to Democrats. Particularly to those fools out there who actually do think that having to have a picture ID in order to vote is functionally equivalent to segregated water fountains, bathrooms, and lunch counters; they just had it ground in their faces that any kind of supposed support among the Democratic establishment for such inane pap was “just pillow talk, baby.”

Shorter Moe Lane: Debbie Wasserman Schultz is rapidly approaching Tim Kaine-status when it comes to being The Ideal DNC Chair.

(Via The Sundries Shack)

Moe Lane (crosspost)

COMMENTS

  • PGDeFreese

    lying.

  • naysayer

    Rather than “insight”. Feel free to delete this comment after correction.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    Although ‘insight’ ALMOST worked well enough for me to pretend that I meant to do that all along.

    Thanks for catching that.

  • johnt

    It’s always best to stick close to home.

  • anjinconsulting

    could make a short video showing some historical footage of the news reporting the success of the majority party that actually created and passed the Jim Crow laws juxtaposed with some video of Ms. Schulz’ bloviating race baiting behavior.

    No juevos, no blue chips.

  • rogershru2

    Since she is controlled via a remote desktop app found on the Daily Kos website – it must have been a different blogger typing that day.

  • acat

    What are the media going to do, call them on it?

    Mew

  • JimmyGee

    As Stupidly does, and dog face seems to be a genius at it! I bet she went to…wait for it…Harvard!

  • macbookben

    …my keyboard with coffee reading that! Good one.

  • naysayer

    … if that was intentional, but decided it probably wasn’t.

    Good article on an infuriating woman.

  • mustango

    Why oh why are Democrats like DWS taken even remotely seriously when it comes to racial issues, when incidents like this couldn’t make it clearer that they don’t take it seriously themselves?

    Someday someone’s going to point out the naked emperor here, that “Democrat accuses Republican of racism” has become as meaningful as “dog bites man”. And when that day happens, oh brother…

  • ss396

    Well, that’s a mouthful of coffee that I had other plans for.

  • Common_Cents

    Why the stupid party doesn’t have a strategy for this is beyond me. when a gingrich comes out after the media, he gets left hanging out to dry by his colleagues.

  • westcoastpatriette

    but that voice is obnoxiously grating…can hardly stand to listen to her.

  • acat

    of Conservatism and the GOP that we need to end.

    The better question is “What can conservatives do to ensure that Breitbart’s legacy grows?”

    Mew

  • Common_Cents

    Gingrich could do well at starting up some conservative media preparedness organization.

    Every elected Republican should go through media bootcamp on how to do interviews, how to call out the media bias of the interviewer etc…learn Alinsky tactics and defenses.

    Gingrich, Giuliani, Christie, Trump, West etc seem to all have the right stuff when it comes to being firm with the media trolls. 99% of Republicans get sucked into the media romance and get brutalized.

    There are literally only a handful of Republicans who do pretty well. Every single R should be trained here on out. The media is no longer cloaked, they openly mock, and defend obama in his lies. The media has gone rogue, derelict in their duty as a check/balance on power. They are propagandists for the Democratic party.
    International media reporting on the US is more objective than domestic media.

    When Obama can openly and brazenly go to some oil facilities and look at the camera w/ a straight face and say he is for oil production and the media promotes his propaganda, you know there is something drastically wrong.

  • acat

    Gingrich is certainly smart enough, and I think he could make a very good elder-statesman … but Breitbart was much more in-your-face .. in a ‘happy warrior’ kind of way.. that I don’t think Gingrich can match.

    Mew

  • azaeroprof

    I think they only picked her for DNC chair to make Michael Steele look good by comparison.

  • romeg

    The Lizzie Borden of Modern Politics.

    She makes Bob Dole look like Johnny Appleseed.