« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Jason Altmire (D, PA-04): pro-life? Pro-choice? Try ‘pro-keeping his seat.’

Won't work, but he'll try.

You have to wonder whether the Online Left finds equivocators like Rep. Jason Altmire (D, PA-04) as insulting as we do (not that progressives have the courage to call their own hypocrites out, of course). Let me set the background: in 2010 Altmire did his level best to look like a mighty pro-life champion, largely because he was running for re-election in a R+6 district (which he ended up winning with only 51% of the vote). Back then it was all about how Altmire absolutely hated taxpayer funding of abortion, and how he’d never support such a thing, and the rest of the spiel that then-Speaker Pelosi graciously allowed him to repeat in order to keep his seat.

But that was 2010. Since then the seats have been redrawn, and now Altmire is facing Murtha crony/replacement Mark Critz in a race for the redrawn PA-12 district that has been called ‘spirited‘ (read: ‘vicious’). So, now that the pandering has to be to Democratic primary voters, how is Altmire pandering?

Did you really need me to tell you? Altmire’s all about keeping Planned Parenthood nice and funded, now. Of course, as CatholicVote.org helpfully notes, Altmire has always supported PP; but now he’s ratcheted up the rhetoric. Apparently you’re an ‘extremist’ now (according to Altmire) if you support defunding it – and whether or not you believe that is immaterial; the real question is whether Republican voters (who, if these numbers* are right, went 54/45 McCain/Obama in 2008) agree with Altmire. Spoiler warning: they don’t.

The moral of this story is, of course, that there’s really no such thing as a conservative Democrat: Jason Altmire was supposedly a reliable pro-life vote, but the very second that his principles clashed with the primary he changed his tune with nary a lost note. Not that Mark Critz is any better, of course – but Critz has union support, so Altmire has to make up the lost ground somehow. In a lot of ways, of course, this is academic, given that PA-12 was redrawn extensively to look a lot less like a mutant amoeba and a whole more like a normal Congressional District; the eventual Republican candidate is in a good place to beat whichever crab crawls to the top of the Democratic barrel after the primary this month. But it never hurts to remind people that supposedly conservative Democratic politicians lie when it suits them…

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*I know, I know. Give me a better source.

COMMENTS

  • renl57

    In fact, that was one of the larger differences between Critz and Altmire in their debate.

    Both men are to the right of their party’s center of gravity. Certainly they’re closer to the political center than either Obama or Pelosi.

  • ihateliberals

    The reall Problem is the left-wing Republicans that do the same. They tell us of how conservative they are but once elected go lock step with that Left-wing Republican John Boehner. Shuster is my Representative and unfortunately he was unopposed in this primary because of a technical glitch. Shuster claims to be conservative but if you examine his voting record he only votes conservative 40% of the time. I have asked him abut this and all I get form him is the run around. I don’t even need to vote in the primary now because he is the only one on the ballot. what kind of choice is that? His oppent ws getting too close to him so the local GOP through their support behind Shuster and challenged the names on his petition. The Judge throughout 96 names which put him 5 names under the required number to be on the ballot with no time left for him to challenge or make up the deficit names.

  • http://www.redstate.com/wp-admin/user/profile.php docfreeman

    Sounds like another Arlen Spector.

  • Pingback: URL

  • Pingback: let me watch this

  • Pingback: Party Packages Corona CA