« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Election 2012: The long, slow retreat of Obama for America.

It’s funny, really. Somebody like Mark Halperin sees this:

Barack Obama’s decision to base his re-election campaign outside of Washington seems to be working pretty darn well. The campaign’s massive, high-rise headquarters in Chicago’s Loop achieves a fine balance between 2008’s hip-casual dorm room (there’s a Ping-Pong table and cheeky homemade signage) and 2012’s systematized Death Star (there are more employees than I have ever seen in a political campaign, with work stations subdivided as ever more employees are added). The place hums from early morning until late at night, designed for maximum efficiency and manifest focus.

and thinks “Success!” I see it and think “High burn rate.” Also: “Hubris.” Let’s talk about why.

Visualization of the Electoral College totals will be helpful, so I’m going to show a series of maps (via 270toWin) and give my explanation of what I think each one represents. A lot of this is subjective, so if you think that I’m generally full of it anyway you have my permission to keep thinking that. Anyway, let’s start with the baseline:

These are the 2008 results, adjusted for Electoral College changes (which cost the Democrats 6 Electoral Votes (EVs) right there). This is the ceiling for Barack Obama. I know that they claim that Arizona is in play for them, but I suspect that even Team Obama’s leadership sees that as a morale-keeping exercise. So… 359 EVs. Good number, right? 89 EV margin. And yes, it was… and then the administration started to, well, govern.

This is Fallback Map #1:

It shows Indiana switching sides – which pretty much everybody in the business has already conceded – Nebraska going fully Republican, and both North Carolina and Florida becoming toss-ups. This is a map that obviously Team Obama would like to see being the reality on the ground in September of 2012… and, indeed, it was probably the reality on the ground in September… of 2010. I’m showing this map partially because I do think that it was expected by the Democrats that this would effectively be their 2012 map, and partially because it bears noting just how volatile a lead of 89 EVs can be.

This is the Fallback #2 map:

And this is the map that should be front and center at the Democratic party’s HQ right now, because it should alarm the heck out of them. With NC flipped (and the NC Democratic party is in freefall right now), and IA, NH, & OH added to FL as the states in play the Democratic margin is down to 6 EVs. Which is to say, the 89 EV lead that formerly existed has been reduced by over 90% at this point. This should not fill the Democrats with confidence, given that there’s this map:

This is a representation of the last Cook Political Report snapshot (May 10, 2012) of the race. Toss-up states are CO, IA, NV, OH, PA, & VA (note that NC & NH are conceded to the GOP). Now, obviously some of those states will go to the Democrats… but not all of them. And there aren’t that many combinations to make the numbers come out right. Here’s the best firewall that I could come up with on the Democrats’ behalf:

…and even then it requires a Hail Mary play: write off OH, FL, & VA (all three of which have gone strongly for the GOP on the state level since 2008); retain CO, NV, & PA (that last one will be a bear, but they could do it). Also retain IA… and somehow suck two EVs out of NE. That keeps the EV at 270. A bare win. That is the Democratic firewall. That, to use a pop culture phrase, should be the Democratic party’s zombie plan.

And here’s the thing: I don’t think that the kids overpopulating Central Obama Hive #1 in Chicago really understand this. I think that they’re still operating under the assumptions of the Baseline map, with the avant-garde feeling all transgressive by embracing the Fallback #1 map and the IT guys in the basement morbidly looking at a variant of Fallback #2. It has perhaps not occurred to them yet that there are implications to the way that Florida, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia all went severely Republican in 2009 and 2010; or that the Virginia and North Carolina state Democratic parties both decided to shoot themselves in the head, just in time for the 2012 elections*. If it had sunk in, then their unofficial motto wouldn’t be “Be confident, but take nothing for granted.” It’d be “Hold the line! Make the [expletive deleted] fight for every inch.”

Mind you, the fact that they haven’t a clue? Great news.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

PS: Some of you will probably now want to argue that Mitt Romney does not have a notably rosier electoral strategy at the current time. So noted, and I agree with you: both candidates have a hard row to hoe this election cycle. Fortunately: from what I’ve seen of and heard from the Romney campaign, they grimly understand this. Even more fortunately: from what I’ve seen from the Obama campaign, they do not.

*Admittedly, Virginia’s Democratic party did this in 2009, which hides the symptoms a bit – but they haven’t exactly recovered from their statewide losses in 2009 and 2011, either. And that will make a difference when Obama tries to campaign there this year.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • macwell

    if America is to remain a free nation. In fact, we the people must rid America of all of those who believe that America NEEDS to be “fundamentally transformed”.
    It would do us good to retake our Congress. The good old boy’s club has been having fun at our expense for too long.
    Congress was NEVER intended, by the framers, to be anyone’s career. Also it was NEVER intended to be overrun with lawyers. The House was meant to be filled with Americans from all walks of life, not all lawyers.
    They lie to us, steal from us, and make fools of us and now, they don’t even try to hide it anymore. They treat us like we’re their children, eat this, don’t eat this. You can’t go there, you can’t build here.
    This is not the America I grew up in, and I’m only 65.

    We the people MUST come out in droves in November, the silent majority cannot remain silent any longer.

    America… is at stake!

  • wintermute

    Just not in the direction theyre talking about. We’re practically already there. How many of us are reliant on government assistance at this point? I think we have lost a lot of major battles but we wont stop fighting the war.

  • wimom

    http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/05/11/sex-and-murder-in-the-land-of-obama-2/

  • acat

    Our enemy’s inexperienced, college-age minions and drones are making a colossal blunder.

    Not *quite* to land-war-in-Asia scale, but close….

    Please PLEASE don’t interrupt them!

    Mew

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    They’re going in against a Sicilian when death is on the line?

  • lineholder

    will kick over into PA and OH. Big time. In a major sort of way.

  • acat

    Death panels… so yeah, death is on the line.

    Mew

  • acat

    Death panels, eh?

    Sicilian? Not sure…

    Mew

  • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

    All their echelons have been weaned on a perversion of the Franklin aphorism, believing none of what they hear from the opposition; this has put them at a decided disadvantage for gathering what we would call intelligence.

  • acat

    (Cheshire grin)

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    test

  • jakeofalltrades
  • retrocon87

    a few solid Crossroads ads in October about Obama’s plan to kill the OH and PA coal industries should probably do the job pretty well I’d think…

  • retrocon87

    A few solid Crossroads ads in October about Obama’s plan to kill the OH and PA coal industries should do the job pretty well I’d think…

  • Warrior

    and I’m “only” in my mid fifties..

  • Warrior

    and I’m “only” in my fifties…

  • http://MichaelHarrington.org Michael Harrington

    All indications are that we are not so easy a sell anymore to Liberal causes.

    Heck if I can walk into an average fast food place in Portland and the whole staff is neutral to upset against Obama… it tells you he has issues.

    Unemployment, unemployment, no jobs, no jobs, panic, panic. It all bears repeating. It all bears repeating.

  • The_Gadfly

    if we just had a wheel barrow and a fire cloak.

  • renny

    I think the Reps. get PA. Harrisburg is bankrupt and the entire city very demoralized, the o got heavy suburban votes in 2008, but they have also gone GOP since 2009, and PA has a Rep. gov. now, as OH, FL, WI, IN, AZ, MI, and NC is in a Dem. funk.

  • renl57

    In off-year elections, minority and youth turnout is often lower. And these groups skew Democrat. That’s one reason why the GOP did so well in 2010.

    Obama won’t have that problem in 2012. He can count on heavy black turnout for sure. More than some white senator or congressman running in 2010 could.

    Right now, Romney is actually doing worse among Hispanics than McCain did. (That’s the only demographic where Obama has gained support compared to 2008.) Romney gets only around 20% of the Hispanic vote. In Western states, that could be critical.

    And many young people like Obama personally, and they usually vote heavily only in Presidential elections. In 2012, they’ll turn out to vote for him, in larger numbers than they turned out to vote for some nondescript Congressman in 2010.

    Obama knows these facts, which is why his re-election campaign is evidently focusing on turning out his base more than on reaching out to moderate and Independent voters in the white working class.

    There are plenty of other reasons to suspect that Obama’s EV total in 2012 will fall far short of his EV total in 2008. But 2010′s off-year election results aren’t a valid reason.

  • renl57

    n off-year elections, minority and youth turnout is often lower. And these groups skew Democrat. That’s one reason why the GOP did so well in 2010.

    Obama won’t have that problem in 2012. He can count on heavy black turnout for sure. More than some white senator or congressman running in 2010 could.

    Right now, Romney is actually doing worse among Hispanics than McCain did. (That’s the only demographic where Obama has gained support compared to 2008.) Romney gets only around 20% of the Hispanic vote. In Western states, that could be critical.

    And many young people like Obama personally, and they usually vote heavily only in Presidential elections. In 2012, they’ll turn out to vote for him, in larger numbers than they turned out to vote for some nondescript Congressman in 2010.

    Obama knows these facts, which is why his re-election campaign is evidently focusing on turning out his base more than on reaching out to moderate and Independent voters in the white working class.

    There are plenty of other reasons to suspect that Obama’s EV total in 2012 will fall far short of his EV total in 2008. But 2010′s off-year election results aren’t a valid reason.

  • http://MichaelHarrington.org Michael Harrington

    Our polling says Oregon be red, rephrase…. RED!!!

    So don’t put us down just yet, this State is changing back! You won’t be able to say Left Coast after the November elections!

  • earlgrey

    showing a trend back to sanity in Oregon. I could use an upbeat post.

  • ctredstater

    Great work, Moe – fascinating read. The multiple maps really show the tactical shifts.

    the other way to look at it is more strategic – that it will be an election based not on demographics, percentages and turnouts, but a national referendum on the current occupant of the white house and the failed economic policies of his party.

    look at 1980 and 1992 – the last two times an incumbent was voted out of office. Races which turned on the economy – and the voting public’s crystallized rejection of the incumbent’s ability to deal with it.

    In 1992 it was “the economy, stupid”. In 1980, it was “recession is when your neighbor loses his job, depression is when you lose yours, recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his.”

    Both elections represented massive electoral map inversions – driven more by a national referendum on the incumbent combined with hope that the alternative could do better. That is what Romney is trying to do – and I have been pleased with what I see the past few weeks.

    A die-hard Perry supporter, I am now fully behind our expected nominee. Hoping he makes a great choice for VP – my current preference is Jindal. And presses the “fixit/turnaround” aspect of his career, along with some more fleshed out and solidly conservative economic proposals.

    I am glad for the tacticians looking at the state by state stuff. But hoping that this is a truly national election – bringing in Romney to 1600 Pennsylvania and the next conservative iteration of the 2010 tidal wave at the Congressional level.

  • acat

    Becker might be…

    Mew

  • SoFiMil

    .

  • acat

    where the new influx of Red is coming from?

    (Portland has the same problem most “purple” States have – a vast lightly populated area that’s very, very Red, and a tight urban core that’s very, very Blue … )

    At a guess, the Portland suburbs will tend to be more fiscal-conservative, regardless of their stands on social issues, so .. in bad times, they’ll vote GOP. Since most of the job growth has been in the suburbs (Beaverton etc.) …

    Mew

  • lineholder

    Strong Constitutional law scholar. Past experience with governmental health policy. Experience within his state with energy in the form of oil. Making strong headway where education in the form of charter schools are concerned.

    Jindal’s got experience that would that allow Romney would set a platform in stark contrast to Obama’s. What’s more, when it comes to the Dem’s new slogan of “Forward”, it provides a prime opportunity to point out “Forward…toward what outcome?”

    Green energy sources versus traditional energy sources? Poor quality of education in our schools or higher quality of education in our schools? Obamacare or other options that won’t cost us as much in the long run (plus protect and preserve freedoms and liberties as well, which you could count on it with Jindal’s experience in the law, this would definitely be part of the mix).

  • romeg

    which he clearly has chosen to ignore. Instead of a contrite admission that maybe he had tried to overreach he chose, instead, to double down on his divisive rhetoric and destructive central planning strategies.

    The EPA’s planned destruction of the coal industry will result in much greater damage than the mere loss of a few thousand coal miner’s jobs. The resultant increase in energy costs (NatGas costs 5 times what coal does at current prices and will only go up as demand for it increases) will make the Arab oil embargo of 1974 look like a tiny blip on the economic radar screen.

  • http://MichaelHarrington.org Michael Harrington

    He said I was the brute squad. What did he mean by that?

  • http://MichaelHarrington.org Michael Harrington

    Portland and Salem are not ‘growing’ as quick as other counties are on a per capita basis.

    That and students are becoming more Conservative out here by a wide margin. I was actually astonished with our inroads there.

    Tie in with our retiree’s and small businesses getting pounded…

    I think the shift is from being damaged by liberal policies and growth patterns in the population… but I could be incorrect.

    But the Oregon GOP is very expectant to win the House, and feels comfortable we can win the Senate as well.

  • recentlyenlightened

    nt

  • acat

    is repeating – the generation of students whose future got flushed by Carter became much more conservative than their parents…

    Hopefully, with the existing Tea Party network and the growing number of conservative blogs and communities, they won’t have as hard a time breaking through the establishment logjams.

    Mew

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Just around when we were posting.

  • califgal

    True when O’Neil said it: true now.

  • acat

    (null)

  • Gengisdon

    And while I agree with you that there is a certain…hubris, I think, is the right word, to the Obama staff plans, I think it comes down to this: If I give you NH, NC, IN, and CO from the Obama 2008 campaign, Obama has to 1) win Florida and to hell with the rest or 2) win Ohio and one of NV or IA, or 3) win VA and both IA and NV.

    Alternatively, lose FL, OH, VA and carry NH, IA, CO, NV.

    So really, the firewall is win one of the three, not some two vote EV pick-up in Nebraska that ain’t gonna happen. My bet is another Ohio deathmatch ala 2004.

    We’re far enough out all are plausible. Romney has some Veep choices that might take one of OH/VA/FL off the table.

    Bottom line is that from a purely tactical standpoint I’d rather be one of the IT guys in the bottom of the basement in Chicago trying to figure out a way to win one than face the Romney Triple Crown challenge of win all.

    And if Obama 2012 is really threatened with losing PA, then he’s toast anyway.

    Always nice to read your stuff Moe – you still have better health insurance on the other side? ;-) .

  • paladin1

    I agree with you and think that overall, we will have to work hard but a win is very plausible for us, even given our Romney choice.

  • The_Gadfly

    .

  • The_Gadfly

    The real problems are Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, and to some extent, Erie.

    Harrisburg is to PA, as DC is to the country – low population and only important because it is the capital. Even the leftists in the areas I listed above regard it as the armpit of the state.

    I do hope you are right about PA going Republican this year, its the best shot at restoring some sanity there. Unfortunately I know too many people in my home state who I don’t think have wise up yet. Plus others like my Dad who are of the “shoot the crooks and they are all crooks” mindset.

  • The_Gadfly

    Fortunately for us, his Progressive learning erroneously taught him the way to put out a fire is to pump gasoline into it.

    It’s the rest of the Dems who are only now waking up to the new reality.