« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The DNC seems to be sitting out the Wisconsin recall.

Alternate title: Eau de Flopsweat from #wirecall Democrats.

Alernate-alternate title: DOOM.

You know, when I saw this secondhand whine from Wisconsin Democrats upset that the DNC apparently wasn’t prepared to throw half a million dollars at the general recall election, I assumed that this would be resolved. I mean, really: the Left has already thrown away tens of millions of dollars; what’s a bit more? Admittedly, not throwing utterly horrible money after bad (we’ve passed the ‘throwing good money after bad’ stage already) would be the right answer, in a strictly utilitarian sense; but the state party is in a bad way right now. They sort of need an indication that the President cares for more than his own election, right?

Well… that’s apparently not going to happen. MSNBC’s Chuck Todd asked Obama’s deputy* campaign manager Stephanie Cutter whether the DNC would be sending money earmarked for the recall, and Ms. Cutter said… nothing in particular. And definitely nothing that would commit the DNC to giving out money.

TODD: The last time you were on the show we talked about the Wisconsin recall. I’d asked whether the president would be supportive, if the party was going to be supportive. You said that it’s possible. Obviously there’s a stake, that you “have stake in the election; we believe that the governor has penalized working families across the state, so it’s possible. We certainly want to see a good outcome there.” This is the idea of the DNC helping out. Wisconsin state party says the DNC has not ponied up any money. You guys control the DNC. The Obama campaign and DNC are one in the same. Are you going to pony up money to the recall election in Wisconsin?

CUTTER: I don’t know the answer to that question, on the money.

I’m still looking for the video of this… but as Jim Geraghty notes: “If the answer is not ‘yes,’ it is ‘no.’” And the answer is almost certainly ‘no,’ given that not even PPP/dKos/SEIU can really find good news for the Democrats with regard to recalling Scott Walker. 50/45 Walker/Barrett (safe link), no change in a month, and everybody they talked to was EAGER to go out and vote in June. The DNC will have enough trouble as it is with trying to get the Anti-Elvis elected; they don’t need this complication.

I’d say ‘Sorry about that,’ except that it’d be a lie of such magnitude that I might actually fear for my soul.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*Take a good look at Ms. Cutter, by the way: because that’s as about as high a position in the Obama campaign team as a woman is likely to reach.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • wimom

    What the democrat luving Chisholm office has coordinated with the Dems/White House/unions. I’m suspicious of many of the Dem blogs all of a sudden saying there will be no money coming in and acting like the election is a lost cause for them. Remember, Obama always brings a gun to the fight.

  • chbroussard

    nt

  • PowerToThePeople

    after this scummy ploy by the union and democrats will be a nice knife in the chest of every democrat from sea to shining sea. The DNC not giving money to the lost cause is about the most sensible thing they have done in many, many years.

    And the whole recall thing in WI needs to be ended or every citizen in WI needs to be shamed until they do the right thing. The time for “recalls” is an election year. If you do not handle your business, it is your problem. Seems pretty stupid that the ticked off side simply has to get signature that equal only a small portion of the populace then screw the tax payer with another election when they already spoke before.

  • garfieldjl

    Considering how things have started turning around and doing a 180 in Wisconsin, people realize that Gov. Walker made the correct call, thus they probably more apt to support him in keeping the Governorship.

    The fact the Dems aren’t even putting a token effort in this fight however will hopefully come back to bite them in the fall.

  • checkmate2012

    the unions/O will be emboldened. If Walker is recalled, I’d move ASAP as it will go into the abyss like Detroit. Let them dwell in their pig sty.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Small failure can beget larger failure. In this case it looks like it is shaping up to be a failure souffle’ that the dems don’t want to taste… conceding the loss by not backing their own with cash is both and attempt at damage containment and an illustration for everyone else that the dems are about power and unwilling to try to fight for their own where they see a loss… sort of a win-win for the rest of the US considering the only thing that could be better would be if more dem money went down this sinkhole sideshow they’ve created.

  • lineholder

    on their “Battle For White House” electoral map.

    It’s national level rather than state level, and there may be no direct correlation at all. Merely coincidence.

    Strange coincidence if that is true, though, eh?

  • checkmate2012

    greedy IMO but happy the DNC won’t ante up against Walker. I don’t recall O going to WI to support the unions, did he? One for all and one for #1. He didn’t learn how to share in kindergarten.

  • texasref

    for president.

    The last time it did, the Republican took 49 out of the 50 states.

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    …maybe that’s just me, though.

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    nt

  • renl57

    The moment the TV networks announce that Walker has won, look for riots and vandalism to sweep across Wisconsin.

    That’s usually how the militant Left reacts to failures like this.

  • circlegranch

    Breitbart.com is reporting on a cozy meeting in Miami between Soros, Media Matters and a host of others entangled with Team Obama where strategy to win was plotted. Everybody needs to spread the word about the upcoming movie “2016″ and make sure as many people see it as possible. Go to www.2016themovie.com to see a short trailer. Also, purchase copies of the movie, “Agenda” and give as Father’s Day gifts, show it at a house party for your neighbors over Memorial Day and July 4th.

  • barleycorn

    To depress Republicans? To pour cold water on conservative enthusiasm?

    Viewed from a practical standpoint yours is a baseless comment given that according to you Wisconsin last went Republican in 1984 which by my calculator was just 28 years ago which in turn is a much shorter time than “a trillion years”. Its hard to believe that Ronald Reagan’s victory in ’84 really presaged “a trillion years” in the wilderness for Republicans.

    Virginia hadn’t voted for a Democrat since 1964 yet there she was in Obama’s column in 2008.

    This is not my site but if it was I’d tell you to stop running down Republican chances unless you have well documented facts to back up said assertions.

  • CFPeterson

    Wisconsin, perennially a blue state, strong progressive roots, may be starting to change. In the big conservative mid-term elections you saw the Gov and both houses of the legislature flip from Dem to Repub, as well as Feingold losing to Ron Johnson, and now you see Tommy Thompson more than likely taking Kohl’s seat. And we have Congressman Paul Ryan taking on more of a leadership role in Washington. Alot of it can be seen as backlash against the failed socialism of Obama’s first few years, but I think maybe the political landscape is slowly changing towards conservatism. *crosses fingers*

  • funwithknives

    black-shirts will be on hand? Milwaukee should be-a hoppin’….

    Oh, to have a Video Camera and a large memory chip on that night….

  • johnt

    Soros and Co are really going to have to dig deep this time.
    Did anybody tell Chuck Todd that not every living soul in Wisconsin is a union member or democrat, that working families helped elect Walker. The psychosis is tiring.

  • Duke

    what do you think will happen on November 7th when it becomes clear that the Black Messiah has just lost all hope and change?

    If you live in a big city – Chicago, Detroit, NY, LA – buy some extra ammo and plenty of pepper spray.

  • Finrod

    W might well have won Wisconsin in 2004 had it not been for the serious voter fraud in Milwaukee (more votes cast than eligible voters). IIRC the statewide vote margin was in 4 digits.

  • Duke

    “Regional Commissioner Charlene Peiffer noted that union members accounted for 13.3 percent of wage and salary workers in Wisconsin in 2011 compared with 14.2 percent reported a year earlier. At its peak in 1989, the first year state data were available, the union membership rate for the state was 20.9 percent.”

    And then there’s this:

    “Union members also tended to be older than nonunion members, according to the BLS data. Union membership was 15.7 percent among workers 55 to 64, but 4.4 percent for those 16 to 24.”

    We have, in WI, something less than 15% of the working public trying to recall our Governor with the help of the lib-Dems. All the money in China (much of which is ours) won’t create more union members, and won’t have that much impact on the recall elections. If that money comes from the Obama campaign, however, it could cause him a problem come next November.

  • sarg01

    PPP is out with a Wisconsin registered voter poll showing Romney -1.

    Ras had a Wisconsin poll from last week that was Romney -4.

    If I’m not mistaken, RCP classifies everything between -5 and +5 as Toss-up.

  • fishgod3

    The didn`t share the dog at lunch?

  • fishgod3

    Greed is good ,Obama will need all he can get come Nov.

  • Bill S

    The Chinese have a lot of money and even I have my price. If they’d pay enough, I’d move to Wisconsin and join a union… ;-)

  • texasref

    You’d be confusing neutral political prognostication with preference.

    I hope Romney wins all 50 states.

    Just understand, there is a substantial cohort of folks in Wisconsin who don’t give a rat’s patootie about the governor’s race but will crawl over a field of razor wire with a friend strapped to each of their backs to go vote for Obama, with or without proper identification.

    Also, you should look up the word, “hyperbole.”

    Now as soon as the vein stops popping out your forehead, you may reply.

    Have a nice day.

  • texasref

    But the governor, Johnson, Thompson, Ryan, the members of the Assembly, the members of the Senate–NONE of them had to do what Romney has to do in Wisconsin. One simple difference.

    He’s running against the guy Oprah annointed “The One.”

    Check my comment above to the other poster, read between my lines, check video of enthusiastic inner-city voting back in 2008, and you will understand.

    Obama carries Wisconsin hands down. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try. It’s just since resources are limited, we should pour them into a state that we have a chance at and one we truly need like Ohio or Florida, or maybe even Pennsylvania. If we win Wisconsin, it’s a 42+ state landslide for Romney. Not likely.

  • texasref

    threw out the charges against the guy the morning after Obama loses. Then liberal folks can get all their rage out in one day.

    :-)

  • texasref

    and will it be enforced? There’s always some left-wing judge that grants injunctions to common-sense legislation like abortion waiting periods or voter ID laws.

  • texasref

    so why throw away the money they’re going to need in October?

    They know their chances are excellent in November.

    This poll showing Romney within 1 is a temporary blip with folks mad about gay marriage stuff. Check back in June when gas is below $3.50.

  • Duke

    “SHAME – SHAME – SHAME” in Chinese?

  • Duke

    Remember how Obama always won elections in IL – all the way up to the U.S. Senate? He always aced-out his opponent(s) with a crap storm just before the election: In ’96 he took four primary opponents off the ballot by challenging their nomination petitions; in ’04 he won when Jack Ryan’s sealed divorce records were unsealed and Ryan dropped out of the race five months before the election,

    At the present time the partisan Democrat DA, John Chisholm is conducting a secret John Doe investigation of Gov. Walker’s staff from back when he was the Milwaukee County Executive. The John Doe has been leaking like a State Street drunk on Saturday night. What’s the chance that a week before the recall election, say around May 29th or 30th, Chisholm releases his “finding” that County Executive Walker was complicit in covering up the political campaign activites of his office staff?

    This is the second time Obama has pushed Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett into running against Walker for Governor. Barrett is a colorless mouthpiece looking for a big salary and some way to get his President reelected. I don’t believe the Dems would just give up and let Walker win. They’d maybe pull their funding if they thought they could conserve the bucks for Obama’s campaign once Walker was out of the way. Believe me, they can’t afford to lose this election – it would spell the beginning of the end of the labor-Democrat funding machine.

  • texasref

    So I agree with your fear and that it is legitimate. Be sure to post a link to your comment when your prognostication comes true.

  • celador2

    When Barak Obama was in Wisconsin and apppeapred on a local Milauke radio show he made news. He butted into a local issue that did not concern him or the fedral government. Obama attacked the new Governor Scott Walker for this budget reform that had to be balanced in midst of a long simmering financial crisis.

    Obama fired the first shot at Gov Walker that sent a signal Wisconsin was high powered fodder at the national level. Obama criticized Walker for removing some limited entitlements to collective bargain for pension and health care for public government workers excluding police and fire.

    Walker would answer reporters with a comparison. He Walker was trying to balance his budget and spendning crisis maybe the pres should do the same.

    As of today Gov Walker has balanced the books! He saved thousands of jobs by avoiding layoffs and never raised taxes
    .
    Can head of DNC, Barak Obama incumbent pres, claim the same?

    For now Obama plays it safe. .
    Obama may have started the recall ball rolling but he does not want to be blamed for a recall defeat.

    These recallers were whupped soo bad and kicked out of office 2010!