« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Obama’s Election 2012 dilemma: the DOOM that came from suburbia?

Right now, somebody in the DNC’s HQ is likely sitting in a room somewhere getting morosely drunk, and it’s because of articles like Michael Barone‘s.  You see, Michael sat down and looked at the various reactions to Barack Obama’s possibly ill-advised (and certainly ill-executed) Bain Capital-themed line of attack on Mitt Romney, and concluded: it’s likely to provoke a backlash among affluent voters (particularly those in suburbia).  And the reason why people should care about that is because 2008 exit polling showed that voters from households making more than $100 grand a year made up a quarter of the electorate, and that they split their vote down the middle between Obama and McCain.

And how are they voting now? Michael sees some interesting trends:

The popular vote in House elections is a good proxy for presidential and party support, and voters with incomes over $100,000, evenly split in 2008, voted 58 to 40 percent for Republicans in 2010.

Northern Virginia, which Obama carried 59 to 40 percent and which provided 95 percent of his statewide popular vote margin, went 52 to 47 percent for House Republicans in 2010. Nine suburban Denver counties voted 53 to 46 percent for Obama but switched in 2010 to 54 to 42 percent Republican.

There’s more data – Michael Barone mentions similar shifts in Pennsylvanian and Michigan suburbs – but the concept that Virginia and Colorado are slipping out of the Democrats’ fingers would be sufficiently unnerving to operatives of that political party as it is.  I truly believe that Team Obama expected to be fighting out 2012 in North Carolina and Florida, and possibly Iowa, with all the implications about the larger electoral picture that one might expect from that (i.e., a narrower but decent win for the Democrats).  Fighting in Virginia, Colorado, and possibly Michigan instead implies something else.  Something wonderful.

Unless you’re a Democratic operative.  Hence, the entire ‘getting morosely drunk’ thing.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

PS: This, of course, does not mean that Mitt Romney has a lock on the election.  And the Republican party needs to keep the electoral pressure on until the moment that Barack Obama gets on television and congratulates Romney for his victory (no doubt through gritted teeth).  But we do seem to have caught a break, for once; as Michael Barone notes. Romney did very well in precisely the suburban areas that Obama seems so determined to alienate.  Provided that Republican activists can continue to keep fostering in the candidate a laudable wariness – not to mention healthy fear – of provoking us, we stand an excellent chance of shifting this election from a 50/50 squeaker to a full-throated repudiation of Obama’s Chicago Way…

COMMENTS

  • http://MichaelHarrington.org Michael Harrington

    With the world in near economic turmoil they stand the most to lose, not quite perfectly buffered from a collapse and enjoying their hard earned cash as well.

    But that said, I love good news!

  • tankertodd

    I’m thinking Obama loses a lot of blue states this time around, and the election – CAN’T WAIT!

  • APA Guy

    IMO, it will be the bellwether for a landslide victory. Romney can win a closer election without it, but it is crucial for establishing the sort of election mandate that precipitates sweeping changes to reverse what Obama has done and FAST.

    Not that Romney shouldn’t do this anyway for the good of the country, but it sure would be nice to have a fat electoral margin to cement the end of socialist federal policies as we know them in America :)

  • Bill S

    .

  • jakee308

    I’m willing to bet that he won’t congratulate Romney without some backhanded reference to himself, his color or Romney’s money.

    Any takers? Anyone? C’mon. Baby needs a new computer.

  • JimmyGee

    If I had a son, he would look like Romney. He then would say, my campaign team acted, “stupidly.”

  • lloydrmc

    No way I’m taking that bet. I would bet that he will do all three, though!

  • jomo2009

    Michelle Obama will say in subsequent interviews following a Romney victory. My ears are already beginning to bleed!

  • http://www.twitter.com/AWG9_yoyo yoyo

    “And let me be clear

    that America has spoken.

    But with that voice

    I believe that they have reacted in a manner that is both hurtful and stupid

    and I suspect that this rash decision

    is nothing more than a lashing out; a temper tantrum that will reinstate those failed policies

    that lead to the economic catastrophe my administration inherited

    from white, fat-cat Wall Street executives, Texas Republicans, and venture capitalists

    not unlike my opponent

    President Romney. Congratulations

    to him and may your

    communities be organized against you.”

  • BA Cyclone

    …a full-throated repudiation of Obama?s Chicago Way?

    You definitely left the dessert until the very end.

    But as they say, there is “a lot of green” between here and there…