« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The Democrats’ Lost Wisconsin Lesson for Obama.

Lord, please continue to make my enemies' cheerleaders ridiculous. Amen.

From Hot Air Headlines comes this entertaining Wisconsin post-mortem, and the first paragraph will tell you why I used that adjective:

A controversial incumbent hangs on and retains his job despite fierce opposition in a bad economy. Sounds like a hopeful scenario for the Obama campaign, right? Instead it was Republican Scott Walker’s impressive victory in Wisconsin. If President Obama is smart—and he is nothing if not that—he will go to school on Walker. Here are some lessons he has probably already absorbed.

I’ll just list the ‘lessons’ - Money Matters Most, Ground War Can’t Counter Air Superiority, The Base Ain’t Enough, Go Ugly Early, and Class Warfare Has Already Begun – to reassure my readers that the Democrats (well, Paul Belgala) haven’t actually learned a darn thing from Wisconsin. No, that actually covers The Base Ain’t Enough: Paul Begala seems to think that the President doesn’t need to move any further to the right to keep independents, which is funny as all get-out. Just like the thought that the President learns lessons; but that’s not what I want to get into. What I want to get into is what’s missing from that list of lessons.

I could emulate Begala and try to come up with a cute, snappy bullet point for the aforementioned missing – Lost – Lesson of Wisconsin… and why not? I will. Be Right. And you can take it either way: the baffled fury of liberal pundits to the contrary, conservative fiscal arguments and policies are in fact resonating with the rest of the country. And the reason why such arguments and policies resonate is because they work. Even the recall movement admitted this when they quietly dropped the issue of collective bargaining reform as their reason for said recall; the reforms worked, teachers kept their jobs, the bleeding stopped in communities across Wisconsin, and the voters all thought that was just fine. Recall forces got forced to end up arguing that Scott Walker needed to be recalled because he didn’t take them seriously.

Can’t imagine why Governor Walker thought that, really.

Anyway, here’s the reason why Scott Walker won. It’s not because the Democrats were outspent (they weren’t), despite the Democrats’ superior ground game (it wasn’t), the electorate defines Walker and Obama as having the same ideological position (…REALLY, Paul Begala? Have you no shame?), the Republicans were uglier in the election than the Democrats were (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA), or because there’s a class war out there (which Paul Begala’s firm will be happy to help foment, at a quite reasonable price*). It’s because that when you have a strong, sincere belief in something, and you have enough backing from your party and your compatriots to make success possible, and you’re ready to go out and fight for your beliefs, and you go out and do all the unglamorous things needed to win that fight, AND YOU’RE RIGHT… you win. Because this is the country where the Good Guys get to win.

Here endeth the lesson.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

*No, seriously, Paul Begala embedded – in his opinion piece – an ad for the Super PAC that he works for. Il nous faut de l’audace, encore de l’audace, toujours de l’audace!

COMMENTS

  • renny

    with the Dems.’ voting 119% of their registrees. Even fraud and criminality couldn’t “win” for them a la Franken and other “recount” travesties where it turns out more than 17,000 votes were counted than were orig. cast.

  • streiff

    I read Begala’s assessment of the Wisconsin Recall and was reminded of the old joke with the punch line of “a frog with no legs can’t hear.” Either Begala is an imbecile (I’m at least willing to entertain the suggestion) or he’s trying to whistle past the graveyard… or give the Dem base a tune to whistle as they pass the graveyard,

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    He and the rest of the Clinton surrogates are looking to 2016. They see 2012 as a loss, already.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    then that’s good for everyone.

  • lineholder

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/155138/Majority-Union-Members-Favor-Obama-Third-Back-Romney.aspx

  • txdave

    ?So the fact that we were able to get prominent Republicans and businesspeople, some of whom were involved before but others who are new, helped in the effort both financially and politically.?

    This is on top of a network of wealthy gay men and women who have a history of giving money to philanthropic causes and in recent years have shifted much of their effort to same-sex marriage.

    Tim Gill, a billionaire software developer from Colorado, who is gay, has assembled a network that has been likened to a gay version of Emily?s List, which supports female candidates. Mr. Gill?s foundations have distributed over $235 million to gay-related causes, with much going to promote same-sex marriage, his advisers said.

    ?My husband and I are legally married in some states but obviously not married in others, so that?s a pretty big focus,? Mr. Gill said.

    David Bohnett, a co-founder of GeoCities and a gay philanthropist here, has donated more than $4 million over the past 10 years to candidates and organizations supporting same-sex marriage, his advisers said.

    And this week, Freedom to Marry, a group that advocates same-sex marriage, announced on Thursday a $3 million fund-raising campaign aimed at winning the five ballot initiatives and pushing the New Jersey Legislature to override the veto by Gov. Chris Christie of a same-sex bill, said Evan Wolfson, the founder of Freedom to Marry.

    The first $250,000 is coming from Chris Hughes, a founder of Facebook, and his fianc?, Sean Eldridge. ?Chris and I certainly prioritize in our contributing,? Mr. Eldridge said. ?Marriage is a top priority.?

    Mr. Brown said the same-sex-marriage cause had been greatly helped by people like Mr. Hughes. ?A couple of billionaires go a long way,? he said. But Mr. Wolfson said the ?vast majority? of donations came from small donors.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    or on an open threads, normally the threads respond to the topic of the post.

  • zachv

    Beluga claims that Scott Walker went ugly on Barrett and early? That’s a joke! Barrett and the Recallers have been going ugly against Walker for a year and a half.

    So much so that Wisconsinites simply started rejecting them because they were tired of the bitter malcontents.

  • Bill S

    Buh-bye.

  • renl57

    The Left in Wisconsin once again made the same basic mistake they’ve been making since the 1970s:

    You can’t get the voters to whip themselves, even in pursuit of some larger overarching goal.

    With forced busing, affirmative-action quotas, overly generous public-employee pension and health care plans, environmental hobbling of the fossil fuel industry, universal health care, etc., liberals have been trying to persuade the majority of voters that they have to sacrifice what they already have so that others will have some too.

    In Wisconsin, the Left tried to persuade private sector workers to support empowering public sector workers with benefits that they themselves did not enjoy. Why is the Left surprised that this fell like a lead balloon.

    Now the Left is surprised that working-class Democrats–particularly oil and coal workers–aren’t eager to sacrifice their livelihoods to Save The Planet ™ from global warming.

  • tthatapudi

    Moe…I see that you are asking The Lord to make the enemies more ridiculous…

    to me, the Walker’s election is a strong indication that the masses are vexed with the political muscle of the unions and do not want to pay for the benefits anymore… its as simple as that…the party which recognizes that will be on the right side of history…

    I am a Christian from a third world country settled in the US and for me, Christ stands by his believers when they are mortally threatened any their children burnt to death…The mighty Lord’s name should be invoked more in the context of his kingdom and its establishment. …I honestly doubt if Christ wants to see the unions lose or is actively planning for the same. Never use The Lord’s name in vain…

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    Begone, tthatapudi, before I sending a flood of burning frogs down upon your head!

    Wait a minute, I think I just mixed my plagues . . .

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    “I see that you are asking The Lord to make the enemies more ridiculous?”

    Indeed, no such prayer is needed.
    They do it on their own.

  • ceili_dancer

    If you want to parse words he said lord. I don’t know if he meant Lord, it was at the beginning of the sentence, but he definitely didn’t write Christ’s name there. Prayers are prayers, so get over it.

  • Dave_A

    At least he found the right side of our political system, now that he’s here…

  • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

    That didn’t last long.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    And he’s about as foreign as Gomer Pyle.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    He is Jewish.

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    …that as far as I know I have no ancestors from among that illustrious people. I am merely from NY/NJ, which means that by state statute I am permitted to use Yiddish epithets and complain if the hot dogs aren’t kosher. :)

  • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

    NT

  • westcoastpatriette

    we hear the word “Lord” and immediately think of Jesus. :)

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    oh well Mazel tov