« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Reagan’s place… at Brandenburg Gate then, and in the party now.

There has been a certain amount of …well, the usual invocation of Ronald Reagan’s memory in order to justify other people’s positions on issues, particularly the ones where they’re not majority positions in the Republican party. Latest offender – and it’s a shame that I have to use the word, in this case: I like the guy – is former Florida governor Jeb Bush, who wondered yesterday whether Reagan would be able to get Tea Party/conservative support these days. Well, it’s interesting that today is the 25th Anniversary of Reagan’s Brandenburg Gate speech*.

So let’s check:

 

Would you throw this guy out of the party? Even if you didn’t agree with him on, say, immigration issues? – No, I didn’t think that you would, either. Better a man that you disagree with in part, yet trust, than a man who you do agree with, but do not. And that was the thing with Reagan; you always knew what you were getting with the man. That’s why most of us had issues with Mitt Romney: we weren’t sure that he meant it when Romney said that he was going to fight for the nomination. And that’s also why those issues have been getting less and less publicly aired; it’s become increasingly clear that indeed – and on this, at least – Romney meant it.

I don’t want to dwell on the topic: after all, better that dirty laundry get aired occasionally, and honestly it’s not as if either side of this particular debate is 100% simon-pure and squeaky-clean, either. I just wish that folks like Jeb Bush were a little more trusting of the GOP base. Or at least a little more conscious of why the Left is so desperate to promote dissension in our ranks.

Moe “Social Moderate Squish” Lane (crosspost)

PS: Exhibit B.

*You know. The one that Barack Obama tried – and abjectly failed – to surpass in 2008. Personally, on reflection I kind of wish that the Germans had let Obama speak at the Brandenburg Gate. It would have ended up being even more humiliating for the man.

COMMENTS

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    statue, actually a group of statues, in some eastern European capitol.

    And I would call it the Liberators. It would feature a smiling Ronald Reagan pointing to something in the distance, with a Margaret Thatcher standing next to him and a Pope JP 2 whispering in his ear.
    Next to them in the for-ground would be Lech Walesa, Vaclav Havel, and Andre Sakarhov.

  • gekster

    I miss you Uncle Ronnie.
    I sure miss you.

    I can almost bet you are giving God a few tips
    on conservative principles.

  • Tbone

    rather then employing him as a compass.

  • romeg

    when Ronald Reagan was the extreme right-wing lunatic that “mainstream” Republicans didn’t want anywhere near “The Football”.

    John Anderson was the darling of the “moderates”. Even Jeb’s dad held RR in rather low esteem for his “extremist views” on everything from foreign relations to economics.

    Reagan was regarded as the second coming of Barry Goldwater whom the Nelson Rockefeller wing of the party held in very low regard. The left referred to him as Ronald Ray Gun and the squishy “mainstream” seemed to agree.

    But since Regan was the most successful president and, easily, the most popular of the last half of the 20th, he is suddenly embraced by everyone to the right of Hubert Humphrey. Remember his funeral where one Democrat after another clamored to link himself to the Reagan Legacy?

    The Tea Party Movement is built on that legacy. The time has long past for the current Republican leadership to recognize and embrace that reality.

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    !

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    to “please, please, please, nominate Ronald Reagan!” in 1980. Uncle Ronnie was viewed as a radical right-winger, who had no chance of winning the presidency (at least by the left).