« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Debbie Wasserman Schultz for House Minority Leader?

Debbie Wasserman Schultz for House Minority Leader!

I wasn’t going to say anything about this rumor from the Shark Tank that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was scheduled to get the boot in November for failing to lead the DNC to anything except humiliation, largely because Debbie Wasserman Schultz is a GREAT DNC chair… for us. I wanted to keep her at that job for just a bit longer; there are entire states that DWS could end up opening up for the GOP. But then I saw this passage from the National Journal (via Hot Air):

Talk is that Wasserman Schultz will not be asked to serve another term at the DNC, regardless of whether she helps President Obama win a second term. Yet the native New Yorker could use that to her advantage, as she reportedly now has her eye on a House leadership post—perhaps even the highest.

If Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California decides to relinquish House Democrats’ top spot after November—a possibility oft-discussed in the cloakroom, hallways, and Capitol subway—the similarly polarizing Wasserman Schultz may make a play for her post.

…Wow. That would do it, huh? That would be worth getting Wasserman Schultz out of the DNC for. DWS as House Minority Leader would be… quite close to unique. The closest event that I can come up with to compare this to is… well, it’s like Jeff Davis had decided to replace Braxton Bragg as head of the Army of Tennessee with John Bell Hood without first giving Joseph Johnson a shot at saving the army first.

(pause)

OK, let me translate: this would be an unmitigated disaster for the Democratic party. Debbie Wasserman Schultz has only one mode: attack. Much worse for her: everybody else knows it. Having her run a party whose major need right now is to get less confrontational and a whole lot more ‘just-plain-folks’ish would be contraindicated. Which is why I want her to go for it, of course.

Moe Lane (crosspost)

COMMENTS

  • gflyer3364qt

    HAHAHAHA LMAO!!!!!!

  • Tbone

    I like it!

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    Seriously. Most Dems are so narcissistic, they’d never even notice if a bit of sarcasm crept into our voices as we tell her how good she’d be at it.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    She is every bit as nasty and foolish and ideological as Pelosi, but she lacks even a hint of the animal cunning that Nancy has.

  • evilbloggerlady
  • bspritzer

    Joe Biden as VP…. Oh, that’s right…. :o p

  • Stinger808

    …the more Debbie Whinerman-Schnozz is the public face of the Dems, the better.

    I just don’t think they’ll take Pelosi’s leadership spot without prying it from her cold, botoxed hands.

    One of the dirty little secrets of the ConDems is that those who don’t just LOVE Nancy, absolutely FEAR her.

  • Mr. Sandman

    We wish us a Merry Christmas,
    We wish us a Merry Christmas…

    And a Grand Old New Year!

  • greatp

    Wasserman Schultz repeats over and over and over and over and over forever the same Democratic parties lying propaganda,misinformation and is unable to answer any questions put to her.Schultz head is so full of cement that she is a perfect choice to head the Democratic party.What a disgrace.

  • tngal

    Really??!! Is the right to vote and Pelosi/Schultz the only thing we get to show for it. I believe some women squandered their right to vote by electing these two. Geez..what a waste of a good movement. At least when the prohibition movement was over, we got something aromatic, tasteful, and relaxing after dinner .

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    is that they are as stupid as they are arrogant.

  • joecollins

    If the Dems take the shellacking we predict in November, and if Pelosi does retire, the rest of the Dems will be licking their wounds and trying to salvage what might be left of their party.

    But then, I figured they wouldn’t be so stupid as to elect Pelosi as Minority Leader in 2010. So, what do I know?

  • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

    unfortunately for her (and fortunately for us), she doesn’t have the brain cells it takes to back it up. Anyone except a zombie liberal who listens to her speak for more than 15 seconds realizes that her IQ would give a Frigidaire a run for its money.

  • daylight58

    …be the head tool of a box-full of hammers might be worth the price of admission.

  • checkmate2012

    on a chalkboard! Please say it ain’t so.

  • thurman

    Debbie Downer as DNC head has been the gift that keeps giving for the past year

    I can think of no finer successor to that idiot Pelosi

    Good thing the Dims have a deep bench to replace her huge shoes at the DNC– anyone up for Alan Grayson for DNC chair next? I can think of no finer example of liberal eloquence

  • zachv

    Dear Lord, no.

    That’d be awful.

  • gawken

    After the Dems lose the Senate, Reid will be gone. He will not serve as minority leader. Indeed, I fully expect that he will retire, citing the need to care for his ailing wife ( and she does have major health issues). This lets him bow out gracefully, before he’s pushed out.

    There will then be a steel cage match in the Dem caucus between Schumer and Durbin for minority leader. My money’s on Chuckie..

    And there is no way that the Dems will have as the two top spokesmen for the party ( since Mitt is gonna win) a pair of loud, obnoxious New York Jews.

    Or could that possibly be THAT stupid???

    Chuckie and Debbie??? Could it be?

    Some here may be of an age to recall the GOP’s Ev and Charlie show, when Dirksen and Halleck were minority leaders in both houses. That was fun…Dirksen’s pressers were a hoot.

    But Debbie and Chuckie….the ultimate turn off!!

    So, dare we hope?

  • Common_Cents

    DWS is one of the worst mindless talking points robots ever. How could anyone vote for her? She is repulsive in every way.