« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

An open letter to conservatives

I had a very exciting time at the Republican National Convention.  My conservative allies and I all worked very hard in the presidential election.

When I woke up the day after the election, everything I had worked for appeared to be in ruins.  An extreme leftist had been reelected president of the United States.

Some liberal Republicans immediately began to blame newly activated conservatives for the presidential defeat.  I knew they were wrong.  It was clear to me that these newly active conservatives would be the key to major future victories for conservative principles.

The day was Wednesday, November 4, 1964.

The Republican nominee, Barry Goldwater, had suffered a crushing defeat.  He won just six states and 52 votes in the Electoral College.  But from the ashes of that loss sprang a vigorous conservative movement.

The conservative movement grew from modest beginnings to become a major force capable of nominating and electing candidates at the local, state, and national level, including Ronald Reagan.

Waves of newly activated conservatives elected Ronald Reagan, broke the Democratic monopoly in the Congress, and were decisive in the thrilling 2010 elections.  The influx of new conservatives greatly benefited the Republican Party then, as it has again in recent years.

It would be foolish for conservatives, defeated for now, to form a circular firing squad and start shooting at each other.  Each element of our coalition — limited government, free enterprise, strong national defense, and traditional values — has a long and strong background of working together.  These principles will lead to victories in the future as they have in the past, as recently as two years ago.

For those disappointed by the results of this year’s presidential election, remember that it is a long ball game.  Politics has a natural ebb and flow.

Now is the time to study the lessons of this election and to chart a course for conservatives to win in the future.  The stakes could not be higher.  The margins of victory in the public policy process may be smaller now than at any other time in American history.

Conservatives must reach out and identify philosophically compatible individuals among the types of people with whom leftist organizers have had the most success.

Seek out the reasonably conservative people, the younger the better, who happen to be in categories long-targeted for organization by the left, people who share our American view of individual rights rather than group rights.  Help them deepen their understanding of public policy issues.  Many have strong opinions they already share with us.  Then undertake systematic, persistent actions to recruit them into the public policy process, teach them political skills, and place them where they can be effective.

Work hard and wisely to increase the number and effectiveness of conservative activists in all categories of people.  Do all you can to advance and to protect them.  Their success will break the leftist organizers’ near monopolies among people like them.

In closing, let me share with you the most important lesson you will learn at any time in your life about success in the public policy process.

Being right in the sense of being correct is not sufficient to win.  The winner in a political contest over time is determined by the number and the effectiveness of the activists and leaders on the respective sides.

You owe it to your philosophy to study how to win.  You have a moral obligation to learn how to win.

That was the clinching argument Goldwater conservatives used to revive the power of conservative principles in America in 1964.  I know you will find it helpful today.

Conservatives can and will win big again in presidential elections.  But first we must learn from our experience, do what must be done, and study diligently to become ever more effective.

You have fought for good causes before.  I pray you’ll continue your fight for good causes now.  Victories may be just around the corner.

On Twitter: @MortonBlackwellThis piece ran in the Washington Times on November 15, 2012.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • clowngirl

    Excellent! Thank you for putting things in perspective!

  • eltuba

    Cool, Calm, and Collected. Love it.

  • perdido

    Look not for another Reagan. Seek first to find the next William F Buckley.

    • hobokenred

      Well said.

    • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

      I think, to a great degree, we had our next Bill Buckley in Andrew Breitbart. His untimely demise was a great loss to the Conservative Movement. But there will be others.

      • libertarianlawyer

        Andrew Brietbart couldn’t hold a candle to one of Bill Buckley’s farts. The Republican party needs a TRUE intellectual who can define a platform that people can get behind. The 2012 Republican Party Platform was embarrassing. Pandering to the religious right of the South is SUICIDE going forward as the electorate will resemble that wing of the party less and less. The next platform MUST encompass things that can draw in independents and conservative democrats. The Republican party MUST abandon social issues. You cannot be for small government AND a nanny-state that tells people what they can do with their bodies. We must elect leaders who promise to cut spending and do not treat the military like a sacred calf.

        • davesinsanantonio

          No, we do NOT have to abandon social issues! What we have to believe, and articulate for others who believe the same way, is that it is not government’s business to regulate what people do with their bodies, nor to pay for it! And, the military is NOT a sacred calf, it is the organization which protects us and our interests abroad. What conservatives need to do is first KNOW what our national interests are, and then articulate them to others. Just cutting the military is NOT in our national interest. But, cutting some things may be. Lastly, your crudity does you no credit.

          It is not enough to be intellectual, you must also be able to communicate effectively. Communication means you get your message across. Breitbart did that effectively. Buckley didn’t always do it because sometimes he talked over people’s heads. That is NOT being an effective communicator. So, put away your biases and try to help, not just condemn.

          • libertarianlawyer

            The constitution proscribes that congress may fund armies which exist for 2 years. Standing armies are unconstitutional.

            Furthermore, it was NEVER the intention of the founders that we have a standing army that acts as world policeman.

            In which way is a strong military in our national interest, OTHER than a source of right wing corporate welfare which we excoriate the left for when they want to give away free phones, etc.?

          • Bill S

            Ron Paul called. He’s pissed because you stole his ideas.

        • streiff

          spoken like a typical self proclaimed libertarian that is unable to understand that liberty is not license and who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.

          This, Scooter, is not a libertarian site. Keep that in mind when you post your next diatribe.

          • libertarianlawyer

            First off, is there another kind of Libertarian other than a self-proclaimed one? Are there political parties that are just snatching members without their voluntary joining?

            The site bills itself as a conservative site, does that mean that anyone who strays from the Republican Party platform is squelched? Keeping thoughts confined to the echo chamber had HORRIBLE results in 2012 for Republicans. You think you would WANT people who will posit ideas that can snatch away independent voters from Republicans in states like OH, PA, VA, FL, CO, NV, NM, etc.

          • streiff

            libertarians are not conservatives, if they were conservatives they wouldn’t call themselves libertarians. If libertarians knew diddly squat about winning elections they would be winning them and not trolling conservative sites telling them how to win.

        • richtfan

          with no deference to social conservatism, the gop will never win another national election. book it. that IS the base. The irreligious and ungodly portion of the GOP is what is holding it back. They claim that we God fearing people are causing the party’s demise. Well, I say that the yankee, northeastern academic rino types are the ones destroying the party. this spineless gutless rino types elected the last three losers (dole, mccain and romney) and they just don’t get it. we don’t like moderates. they stand for nothing. they masquerade as Obama lite. we don’t need that. it does not help us. and if the south and our ways are so bad, then why are all of you moving down here? please stay in your yankee liberal northeastern states and tolerate the rot gut that you have voted for. don’t bring it down here. we don’t want it.

          • libertarianlawyer

            I am not moving to the South, nor do I have any desire to. I like flouride in my water, and teeth in the mouth of my women, thanks.

            Furthermore, I agree that the R candidates have been awful, though I’m confused why you would not call Bush Obama-lite, as he was nothing more than a no tax, then spend, moderate Republican who started two wars that he was unable to finance, and created the greatest depression SINCE the great depression.

            The Republican party can win national elections without the Southern Base who will become smaller and more marginalized as the years go on. This was the least white election in history. Guess what? It’s going to be significantly less white in 2016, and even smaller in 2020. The Republican party is going to starve if it remains beholden to Southern, low-information, values-voters. We must develop a platform that is appealing to hispanics, blacks, gays, and MOST important youths – especially as most boomers will be dead by 2024.

            The Republican party CANNOT win the youth vote if they remain anti gay-marriage, anti-birth control, anti-abortion, and anti-drug. We COULD regain the youth vote with a strong pro-freedom message wherein we stop acting like the nanny-statists that we constantly accuse the democrats of being.

            For the democrats being nanny-statists, they don’t appear to care what goes on in our bedrooms, bathrooms, or doctors offices. They did not pass the patriot act, we did. They did not hand out copious amounts of pork to banks, we did. They did not maintain farm subsidies (Which is corporate welfare in a populist costume), we did.

            Refuse to change at your peril. There is a very real possibility if the Republicans do not start developing candidates who can win in purple states, and keep nominating people like Todd Akin and Sarah Palin, that we could lose the House in 2016, and then lose everything forever as the electorate becomes majority non-white, majority young.

        • baldbarian

          Brietbart was the perfect mind for the times. He won most every battle he chose to enter. That is nothing to denigrate Buckley but AB’s method of communication for this period would win while Buckley’s would fail.

          • libertarianlawyer

            Breitbart had no ability to communicate a message beyond those willing to lap up his message. Furthermore, he had a very small audience compared to Hannity, Rush, Levin, and Beck that those four horsemen have not helped our cause whatsoever.

  • rustyoldgarand

    “You owe it to your philosophy to study how to win. You have a moral obligation to learn how to win.”

    This is exactly right. It is our duty to rebuild the republican party into a platform which can effectively communicate conservative values. Failing to tell our side of the story means we have failed our country. But we won’t fail.

  • littlehouse18

    Good advice. I am not old enough to remember LBJ. But one concern I have is that I don’t think they had the demonization and near-persecution of conservatives, Christians, business, etc. that we see today.

  • http://www.bohnetlaw.com rightappeal

    With all due respect to Mr. Blackwell, we need to do a great deal better than the conservative movement that emerged from the ashes of the Goldwater campaign. That movement did succeed in restoring the Republican Party, but on policy that reinvigorated Party basically spent 40+ years fighting a rear guard action against the big government juggernaut that Johnson was able to create due to Goldwater’s defeat. Goldwater presented a case against big government that had been lacking, but the government he railed against was far smaller than anything that has been seen since. The 1964 defeat directly resulted in an explosion of big government in Johnson’s “Great Society” that bled over with more major expansions during the Nixon administration. Reagan and Gingrich slowed the expansion somewhat while they were in power, but did little to roll it back. And the growth returned with a vengeance during Bush, Bush, and Obama administrations.

    Winning the White House in 2016 and winning future victories for the GOP over the coming decades will be pyrrhic if we don’t find a way to stop Obamacare from destroying our private healthcare system and start rolling back the government’s many spending and regulatory excesses. I suggest that our priority these next few years should be on slowing the implementation of Obamacare and holding the line on deficits and spending. The electoral prospects of the GOP should be of secondary concern.

    • lrrp

      You’re exactly right. It’s a poor showing, that in the 48 years since Goldwater there was just one real conservative. And that includes all Republican candidates as well.

      ‘The problem’ is not political. The American people have drifted (or trashed) the foundational principles which made this country strong and prosperous. It is a moral (not ethical) issue. That’s why Obama was elected, then re-elected. Same with Clinton, Marion Barry, et al. Wisdom is gone, replaced with short-sighted selfishness and greed.

      The politics is the symptom…

    • edintexas

      So you think Nelson Rockefeller would have been far better for the Republic and Republicans? There is a reason many of us old enough to remember Nelson and the “Country Club Northeastern Liberal Republicans” call today’s slightly left of center and/or big government enabler Republicans “Rockefeller Republicans”.

      • http://www.bohnetlaw.com rightappeal

        I don’t know whether Rockefeller would have done any better than Goldwater in 1964, though he could not have done worse than Goldwater as a candidate or than Johnson as President. My point was that the conservative movement birthed by that defeat never came close to undoing the resulting policies. If Republicans win five of the next six Presidential elections (as they did after 1964) but leave Obama’s policies in place, this election will still go down as a disaster for the nation.

        Better model is the aftermath of 1916 when Woodrow Wilson was narrowly re-elected. Four years later Warren Harding swept the GOP back into the White House with over 60% of the vote and managed to repeal most of Wilson’s agenda, including cutting the budget nearly in half while the top tax rate dropped from 73% to 25%.

  • notpropagandized

    Your sentiments appreciated, but Goldwater aftermath was when we were “We The People”. Now we are “We The Hordes”.
    The Corrupt Media has demonstrated that that it has enough power and monopoly now to determine the outcome of elections and will do so in the future. You are invited to find someone a lot smarter than most of us out here to figure out that problem. Whatever does not focus like a laser on defeating Corrupt Media is a complete waste of time.

  • theatlmac

    Yes, conservatives can win big again, but the deck is stacked against us. In 1964, our education system taught American values. Today, kids are indcotrinated into liberal/socialist ideology from grade school through college. Bill Ayers is a leading thinker in the realm of public education. Need I say more?

    In 1964, there were only three networks, they were liberal, but they valued truth. Today, the mainstream media is not only slanted left, they are completely corrupt. They serve as a propaganda outlet for the Democrat party. They have completely abdicated their role as the honest broker for objective information. They smear honest, decent Republicans and cover for liberal failures. Bold conservative thinkers are crushed and their brands ruined. People like Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin are turned into dirty jokes while Barack Obama, Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi are treated with kit gloves by the media. Aiken says something stupid about abortion and it’s echoed for six weeks as Republican policy. President Obama, as a state senator, votes to allow doctors to kill babies after botched abortions and not a word of it makes it into the public domain. The Democrats declare a war on women. Their cornerstone speaker at the convention is Bill Clinton, a misogynist who lost office through his disrespect and mistreatment of women. No one in the press bats an eye at the hypocrisy. The morning after Paul Ryan’s visionary speech at the convention, the buzz in the press was that he was “lying.” No such buzz after Obama’s, Biden’s or Clinton’s speeches at their convention. Even when it’s clearly evident the administration is involved in a blatant foreign policy cover up the press ignores it. Today’s press has devolved into a propaganda machine that would make Goebbels blush. We have outlets like Red State, Fox News and talk radio, but the vast majority of good American’s who are too busy to dive deep into current affairs still get their news from ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN. Those outlets still follow the lead of WaPo and The New York Times. They all lie, cover for Democrats and smear Republicans. That’s the media environment we are up against and it’s the environment we will face until those corrupt outlets eventually go broke.

    Worst of all, our political strategists and consultants don’t understand, embrace or believe in conservative values. They are convinced that tying conservative policies to conservative values is the death of any modern campaign. Worse, they are terrible at what they do! There is no Lee Atwater of Karl Rove on the horizon. The clowns running today’s campaigns don’t understand how to craft a message that explains to conservative Hispanics the danger of voting for a radical liberal. They can’t even figure out how to counter bribery. Obama sold free contraception, gay marriage, low cost student loans and amnesty. No one on our side was able to effectively counter with why hard work, morality, thrift, and fiscal responsibility lead to a more prosperous, stronger America and a better life for our citizens. They allowed the Democrats to destroy Mitt Romney’s credibility and integrity without firing a shot in return. They allowed one of the most dirty and negative campaigns of modern times to run unchalleneged while the Democrat candidate maintained the facade or a “likeable” candidate. No one touched Obama’s mask of likeability because no one challeneged it! We didn’t need to go negative to destroy the myth of Obama’s likeability. All we needed to do was point out the gap between what he was saying and what he was doing. No one on our side could even figure that one out. Until we find strategists and consultants who can win in hardball, tough campaigns, we’re not going to win those campaigns.

    I agree, we can and will win again but we need to look hard at the infrastructure. We need candidates, campaigns and consultants who understand conservatism and are strong enough, quick enough and open enough not just to explain it but to defend it against the onslaught of lies and misinformation we will constantly face in future elections. In the words of one former Alaska governor. It’s not time to retreat. It’s time to reload and load for bear this time.

    • zollistar

      It wasn’t just the strategists who don’t understand, embrace or believe in conservative ideas, neither did the Republican candidate.

      Try this thought experiment: What if Mr. Romney had delivered a full-throated deunuciation of RomneyCare, complete with details about its damaging effects on Massachusett’s health care system? And went further: apologized for creating the mini-monster along with explicating what he had learned from his terrible mistake?

      While just a thought experiment, what do you think something like that might have meant about Romney’s true thinking and beliefs?

      He never said anything like that — and couldn’t. Indeed, Mr. Romney said that first thing he would do is repeal ObamaCare — but retain its “best” features.

      Bottom line: Republicans fielded another Big Government RINO. The Stupid Party continues to act…stupid.

      • kenroar

        Add this – What if Romney had embraced those who supported Ron Paul at the RNC? We knew he would still win anyway, but instead of respecting us and at least considering some of our ideas for small government, balanced budgets, and liberty, he voided all our delegates and shut us out. The GOP made it clear they didn’t want us in their party and we obliged. On election day, we either stayed at home, wrote in Ron Paul’s name or like me, voted for Gary Johnson. If you look at the numbers of those who supported Ron Paul in the primaries and then compared them with the numbers that Romney lost by, you will find that had Romney welcomed us in the fold, he would have won the election. Instead, he showed us he was just another corrupt politician and not any better than Obama.

    • whitetop

      Karl Rove may have been the architect of the Bush administration but he clearly is the man with his hand on the plunger for the demolition team when it comes to conservative values. Men like Allen West have been targeted for defeat, by liberals and republicans alike, and it appears they have won in the case of Allen West. Conservatives need people like him to defeat the Washington establishment.

      Individuals need to become more involved in the political process by letting their elected servants know what they desire from their government. This includes everyone from those in national offices down to the county commissioners and city councilmen. E-mail has made it even easier to maintain a line of communication.

      We got rid of a republican state senator in Texas this election. He had been in office 25 years and it was apparent at the primary elections that he did not have a record to run on. He ran a negative campaign much like Obama but he got whipped like a rented mule. We need to clear the deadwood from our government offices. Now is the time to start by preparing good people to run.

    • richtfan

      You are very right about many things. But please don’t dump on Lee Atwater by comparing him to Karl Rove. Rove was both wrong and stupid in his pre and post election assessment. The idea that you have to track to the right in the primaries and to the center in the general election is just ridiculous. Rove and the rest of his idiot followers are enamored by the “independents” in the so called middle. Well what did we learn about those people in this election? Independents aren’t really independent. They’re really just liberals who don’t wanna be chastised for being liberal. Same thing with “moderates”. If you continue pandering to those people and in turn alienate your own base by trying to appear to be a centrist, you’re not going to win anything anytime soon. Rove was proven dead wrong, and we need fewer people like him and more like Atwater.

    • cwfoster

      I came across an interesteing article yesterday. If this is true, then The GOp will forever and always have one hand tied behind their backs. It has a great deal of credence, given the reluctance of the GOP to even throw the BS flag on half the electoral corruption that occurred this cycle, because to throw it, they would be expected to DO something about it, which based on this 30 year old court ruling, they CAN’T.

      http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/11/15/why-the-gop-will-not-do-anything-about-vote-fraud/

    • denverkitty

      mac, well said!! This next 4 years will prove Obama to be the nation-wrecker he is. Then, it will be up to us to re-build America. But we will still be up against the “takers” — Proverbs 6:16-19: “These 6 things doth the Lord hate: yea, 7 are an abomination unto Him: A proud look, a lying tongue, and hands that shed innocent blood. An heart that deviseth wicked imaginations, feet that be swift in running to mischief. A false witness that speaketh lies, and he that soweth discord among brethren.” Sounds like Obama to me.

    • geonerd

      Where are the good conservatives? You mention Gingrich – who suggested we construct a moon base and who is a serial philanderer, and Palin, who quit her job as Governor of Alaska. There are no real conservatives anymore, The movement has been co-opted by the Tea Party and those that want the US to become a theocracy.

    • xerock

      If you’re not born into a religious household, then it’s not going to be easy getting the conservative message. They’re not going to show it to you in High School or down, not in college. Where then? That’s what were up against.

      If people think that the GOP can keep going while working hard to keep people out that disagree with social conservatism, they’re dead wrong. The social conservatives must evolve. Or run against the mainstream culture itself. Best of luck witht that. Watch NBC, ABC,CBS and tell me how many shows feature gay characters. Things aren’t going to go backwards on this issue. Abortion will always be murder, and the first word in illegal immigrant will always be illegal, but gay’s aren’t going back in the closet anytime soon folks.

    • philorida

      Karl Rove is called, “The Architect”…yea, of a house of cards. He was the brains behind W. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism”, pushing Medicare plan B (massive expansion of govt. spending), amnesty, and convinced W that he just had to fly over New Orleans after Katrina (massive PR blunder).
      You are right about the demographics changing against us. I don’t know how it can be reversed, when you have the masses buying into the secular socialism promoted by the Leftist monopolies in Media, Hollywood, Internet, and Education.
      Someone please tell me how we can overcome the 4-headed monster that influences the vast majority of the populace? Our 2 key havens for the culture war–Churches and the family structure, are disintegrating.

  • honor8versus8expedience

    I know people are upset at Christie for Obama/Sandy but its going to be Christie 2016. No one can shoot back like he does. He’s the type of mean we need. He would slaughter anyone in a debate. He’ll call out the real bs artists.

    • BlackRedneck1

      People are upset about his embrace of the Global Warming Hoax and his disdain of the 2nd amendment. I love his videos attacking the teachers unions. Don’t like his videos attacking gop / conservatives. His tone deaf remark about Romney doing Sandy didn’t help his cause. He also has McCain like tendencies in which he embraces democrats and trashes conservatives. How about we just agree to have no more moderate blue state republicans for the foreseeable future.

      • edintexas

        Let’s compromise. No more moderate Republicans in my lifetime, my children’s lifetimes, my Grandsons’ lifetimes and my Great-Grandchildren’s lifetimes. That is as far as my progeny go at this time.

        • mikwcas

          here here

    • edintexas

      It will be a cold day…

    • kycon

      Let’s see…Romney got less votes than McCain, so let’s run another middle of the road ‘moderate’ just because he can get in a zinger or two? Doesn’t that fulfill the very definition of insanity that Mr. Einstein spoke of? “Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

      Let’s put Christie where he belongs: stumping at the convention for a conservative candidate.

    • timcooper62

      Sorry, Christie ain’t the guy.

    • tngal

      Well, darn it I can be mean too, but we don’t me as prez any more than Christie. I admit he’s fast on his feet when it comes to arguing his principles, plans and strategies..the problem is many of his don’t align with the conservative/ right- of-center population.

      • tngal

        kowalski: Also I’m not sure he’s “mean”. That’s just the way they talk in New Jersey. Kind of a loud grrrrr.

    • Dave_A

      No, it’s not.

      The Northeast is dead to us now…

      Christie did what he did with Obama, because he knew that his own seat was at risk if he didn’t.

      Given the choice to boost Romney or boost his own election chances, he chose to save his own skin…

      NOT a team player. DEAD to us.

  • Pingback: An open letter to conservatives | If Bush Had Done That

  • jpolk84

    we need to wrestle control of one of the big three networks away from liberals. Fox isn’t enough. We need an ABC, NBC, or CBS.

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      I think a better strategy is to let ABC/CBS/NBC/CNN/MSNBC become leftist echo chambers. Republicans should stop going on these obvious camps of enemies of America and, instead, use Fox, conservative talk radio, press conferences, YouTube, internet broadcasts, etc. to get their messages out to the American people.

      Let Chrissie Tingley Leg and that guy Maddow and Wolfie Blitzer and Gloria Borger and Norah O’Donnell and all the rest experience a complete boycott by Republicans. They need Republicans far, far more than Republicans need them. And Republicans should explicitly state why they are boycotting them. “We’re boycotting you because your are not fair and balanced objective reporters. We’re boycotting you because you are, essentially, the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party. We’re boycotting you because you hate American and want to destroy her from within. We’re boycotting you because you are unpatriotic. We are boycotting you because we consider you to be enemies of America. We’re boycotting you because you need us more than we need you — we no longer need you to get our message. We’ll do that on our own from now on.”

      Let them prove those accusations are wrong.

      They can’t.

      Remember Air America? When leftists are left to talk to themselves, no one listens and they go belly up.

      Thank you,
      CW

      • mikwcas

        and no more of the crazy debate platforms we’ve been forced to watch. that f’n stephenpoupalas is a hack asking Mitt about controception the way he did, he was a plant of the O campaign sitting up there asking our guys, and gal, questions. it must be stopped. Imagine a panel of Medved, Levin and Bennett posing as the moderators in any debate/ Q&A period…ahhhhh wonderful. :)

    • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

      We don’t need to own or control any of them. We need to discredit them the same way the left discredits Fox News by referring to them as “faux news” on all the blogs. We don’t need to bother with BSNBC, because they have already discredited themselves to the point that only marxists watch their programming. We need to take on the three monoliths that the American people trust and pull back the curtain to reveal the humbugs that operate the controls of the Great and Powerful Oz. We need to do what the guy with the camera phone did to the edited clip that BSNBC showed to try to paint Romney as out of touch. And we can do it as subtly as they slant the news . . .

    • Dave_A

      The media is a business…

      Start winning, and they will switch sides, to keep making money…

      • davesinsanantonio

        You are right, they are a business. If we boycott their shows, and they lose revenue, they will come begging, and then we can dictate terms. But, if we keep doing what we’ve been doing we’ll keep getting what we’ve been getting. Which is disrespect, lies, and hypocritical unfairness. So, quit doing what we’ve been doing and maybe get something else.

    • vermontpatriot

      I have seen everything under the sun blamed for the republican loss…strategy, voter fraud, the media, unethical democrat tactics, etc. Folks, the problem was Romney. The electorate was prepared to vote the economy as they always do in bad economic times. However, they were not prepared to vote for Romney because they were not even sure who Romney was. I’m still not sure what positions Romney truly holds on a variety of issues. Is the man really a conservative or simply an opportunist? The opportunist is what came across to me, which is why for the first time in my life, I did not pull the lever for any presidential candidate…

      • denverkitty

        That’s sad…because you did pull the lever…for Obama. As one of America’s non-voters, you joined the Democrats who were out there just hoping for your lack of action. An opportunist is also known as a business person, an entrepreneur…which is just what our country so desperately needs right now. You failed us, the Republican Party, and the conservative movement. But, most of all, you failed yourself. If you could not see voting for Romney, you could have voted against Obama. You really should consider removing “patriot” from your name and replacing it with “non-voter”.

        • cactusbob

          Well said, Denver, that message goes to thousands who knew that Obama was the worst of the 2 choices but didn’t want to vote for Romney to avoid the worst. We now have the Worst for another term, unless the GOP pushes for a national recount. I”m convinced by the news coming from FL and other states that Obama was elected due to fraud, massive fraud, and extreme fraud. If it’s impossible to recount machine votes, have the elections all over again – after prosecuting the many individuals who instituted or tolerated the fraud.

  • timcooper62

    I agree that there is an ebb and flow to politics, but the plot line on the political graph is still trending socialistic. There may be sinusoidal movements on the plot line where conservatives rule the day; however, we still find ourselves becoming a socialistic country. As others have posted, liberals have been very successful in controlling education and media, and have thus shaped culture. Demographics are not in our favor as the people immigrating to the US are coming from socialistic backgrounds. Lets face it, American values have changed.

    • davesinsanantonio

      If American values have changed it is because we have allowed the liberals to dictate the dialogue. We have to get the conservative message out, and not just sit on our thumbs and let the liberal wing of our party speak for us. We have to have a local level up control of the party and Cold Warrior has the formula for doing that. When that happens, we can bypass the liberal wing and set the platform as conservative and then put candidates on that platform who are truly conservative, not just posers!

  • Pingback: » An open letter to conservatives

  • malvernpa

    The election was a mathematical flesh wound. The number of voters who chose the Democrat ( liberal, progressive,socialist,communist,Marxist, Maoist they are all the same in the current democrat party) declined dramatically more than 10%. Only a democrat using democrat math can find a mandate in that. Someone stayed home on our side and did not vote. The last guy to run the table was a conservative (Regan) yet the GOP cannot bring themselves to support such a candidate. Romney would have been better than what we got but what we got will over see a terrible economic decline and reap the fruit of the misguided foreign policy.

    • davesinsanantonio

      The problem is that the number of voters who chose the Republican Party declined dramatically as well. We cannot win by being Democrat Lite!!!

  • Blue_State_Refugee

    I think our harder task is not necessarily finding people to promote conservatism as a populist agenda, but in overcoming the resistance from the Republican establishment. Speaker Boehner’s words regarding the tea party and recent leadership elections indicates to me they are hell bent in keeping conservatives “under control”. Our job will be made even more difficult with the party rule changes regarding delegates they rammed through during the convention, which may stifle grass roots candidates.

    • Dave_A

      You have it somewhat backwards…

      Establishment hostility is due to the spectacular screw-ups of ‘outsider’ candidates…

      The party-rules were long-needed, because of a certain so-called ‘grass roots’ candidate who is a drag on the party brand (ok, he makes us all look like lunatics, because he’s got an R after his name, promoting an insane ideology) & a constant menace (Ron Paul)….

      If you want to fix the ‘problem’ with the Establishment, you have to show them that conservative candidates are not a bunch of wild-cat anti-authority screwups, who will damage the party brand….

      Right now, the Establishment favors more moderate candidates, because these moderates will follow their leaders…. Insubordinate idiots like Akin, Mourdock, ODonell, Akin, and Bachmann are costing us elections nationwide – it should be no wonder that the Party wants them gone & wants to stop more from replacing them….

      If we can elect conservative candidates who can stick to the party talking points, play-nice with others, obey the leadership rather than reflexively fight any authority-figure they encounter, and accept the decisions of the primary voters rather than acting like Jihadist insurgents conducting a hijacking….

      Then the Establishment will back them….

      • davesinsanantonio

        No, YOU have it backwards. The so-called party leadership does not own the party. It is not for the candidates to “obey” the leadership. It is for the leadership to represent the bulk of the party, which is conservative. If the leadership had backed, rhetorically and financially, the candidates you call insubordinate idiots, instead of throwing them under the bus, those candidates and other who the leadership didn’t actually attack, but didn’t back either, we would control Congress, and probably the White House today. I would say that there were no “spectacular screw-ups”. Rather there were a few misspoken moments that the establishment elevated to “spectacular” by publicly demanding those candidates quit the race and then they refused to back them in any way. If they had just ignored the misstatements and allowed the candidate time to work it out, they would have won. Instead the so-called leadership didn’t lead, they pushed the candidates out of the winner’s circle from behind.

        • whitetop

          The so called leadership of the Republican party is the problem, not the solution. John Boehner is no better than Nancy Piglosi was as speaker of the house. He runs the house like a union shop steward. Play by my rules and you will get your committee assignment. If not you get the lowest position possible and you will be assigned the broom closest as an office. It is all about power and has nothing to do with representing the people. Boehner worries more about what the Washington Post will say about him than doing whats right. He is no leader and his record shows it.

  • mccoy

    I joined the Republican party earlier this week after a lifetime of feeling that Republicans were the enemy, having come from a very liberal upbringing. As a entreprenuer and family man I kept asking myself why I could not come to support the party that espoused family values, lower taxes and individual freedom. What became clear is that the Republican party has become attached to a message of privilge and antiquated social policy that simply does not resonate with the changing demographics America. Republicans have lost sight of the core values of Republicanism in favor of special interest agendas and have lost the ability to communicate a message and vision that has durable appeal.
    The Republican party mucst change and needs new leaders and new vision to communicate that Republican values that suppor business growth, innovation, individual freedom, local and state government are in fact a better alternative than an overbloated central governement.

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      mccoy,
      You wrote that you “joined the Republican party.” Welcome. Does that mean you registered Republican? Or did you take the next step and resolve to fill up a vacant precinct committeeman slot where you live? I hope so. That’s what conservative Republicans really need to do if at all possible. The precinct committeeman ARE the Party and to change it, as you recommend, we’ve got to get more conservative Republicans INSIDE the Party as PCs, so we can elect greater numbers of conservative to the officer ranks of the Party apparatus at the local district, county, state and national committees. We can write better Party platforms (state and national) if we get greater numbers of conservatives into the PC ranks. We can have a greater chance of getting conservatives into the winner’s circle in the all-important, traditionally-very-low-turnout primary elections. We can have more effective precinct-level, boots-on-the-ground GOTV efforts if we conservatives unite and organize where we live at our monthly local district Republican committee meetings.

      Go here to learn more: http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com

      I hope that helps.

      CW

  • 1stRichard

    Goldwater called it “me-to-ism” and today we call it RINO, but this is the new cover of the book called conservatism. This “me-to-ism” or what ever you want to call it was a simple mandate to offer a choice written in the book of conservatism. Unfortunately, there has been a lot of graffiti over the years dumped on this book cover and too many judge a book by its cover. Worse is the fact that one side pounds their bible and the other side counts numbers as they ignore the propaganda all around them, arrogantly ignoring the graffiti. It is time to read the writing on the wall and do something about it

  • Pingback: Perspective. | pawatercooler.com

  • iowaguy

    I do believe it’s the candidate that wins and not the party. I think a big problem with the perception of conservatives right now, in relation to the perception of liberals, (whether unfair or not) is that conservatives are perceived as the party that is “against” (abortion, big government, welfare, gay marriage), and the democrats are perceived as the party that is “for” (etc..). The party that takes the “positive” position (rhetorically) tends to win. In 2004, it was the optimist (Bush) vs. the pessimist (Kerry), and in in 2008/2012 it was the optimist (Obama) vs. the pessimist (McCain/Romney). Hope and Change may be hokey but people want to be inspired and feel confident. I realize this is over simplified, but it’s the presentation of the message that often out-weighs the message itself.

  • sparks69

    The Republicans lost because they are hypocrites. They cite loss of freedom with the same vehemence (in virtually the same breath) that they castigate women in for
    managing their reproductive physiology.
    They champion a Judea Christian heritage yet charity is not the
    “freedom of” envisioned by our forefathers– it is the intolerant doctrine of
    adherence administered by theology based legislation that has caused many to
    seek the secular “freedom from” that plays well into the hands of the
    progressives. These perpetual litigants practice infidelity at the rate of 50% yet presume to choose the lifestyle and life partners of honest citizens who have no issue or offer no interference with your own social or cultural incompetence.
    The youth of today, many of those Obama voters, come from broken homes -
    your lofty proclamations about “matrimony” to them must be laughable.

    In short, “Do unto others as you wish done unto yourself” is being politically enforced. Do not look at defective candidates, do not look at the hostile media, and certainly do not look under the bed for some boogie man, look in the mirror. Staring back at you is the reason for our demise, a delusional, insufferable, alienating social issue totalitarian.

    The tragedy here is not your complete humiliation, it is the
    usurpation of the simple “less taxes, smaller government, and more personal
    freedom” by the fringe. The demise of freedom, and the inevitable “dark ages” that will result due to your squabbling,intolerance and incompetence will be monumental and it will be measured in a time frame of just days – no one alive today will see the recovery.

    • Bill S

      Blah blah bla blah libertarians is kewl blah blah blah

      • davesinsanantonio

        I don’t think it is even that good! He seems to be enough of a hater to be a liberal.

        • rajjon

          What was hateful? You guys are a joke. One minute liberals are naive peaceniks, haters the other. The GOP is 95% White, Christian straight, but the Dems are intolerant racists. You guys suffer from the effects of delusion brought on by intellectual inbreeding. You just gather around and reinforce your skewed views which all make sense to each other because that’s all ever hear. Then when reality (2012) smacks you in the face you go into denial and make even more delusional excuses.

          PLEASE keep up this strategy…….

          • Bill S

            Bye.

    • rufuschoate

      I have trouble imagining the Party of Lincoln signing on to the slaughter of innocents without due process by morally debased slatterns as a right. That is the rule of the Slave master and the slave and is abhorrent to the very concept of Western Civilization.

  • leaddog

    yes, there are many areas that need work within the Republican party. But in order for us to succeed, we MUST find a way to fix, ONCE AND FOR ALL, the problem of VOTER FRAUD. Voter I.D. must be made mandatory nationwide. Voting machines must be redesigned, standardized, and violation-proof. These are just a few of the steps my amateur mind can produce. Experts need to get to work on this. I would be glad to help if asked. tom.wing@yahoo.com

  • coemgenus

    Have you wondered why, in such a crucial election, the turnout was considerably lower than in 2008? I think that Michael Medved has the answer. The Obama campaign knew that it was hopeless to campaign on his record, so they decided to dispirit and discourage people who were sick of Obama not to vote and they were successful in doing so. Read:
    http://townhall.com/columnists/michaelmedved/2012/11/14/the_dirty_little_secret_of_2012/page/full/

    • rajjon

      Or maybe, despite a tepid economy, Romney was a poor candidate with no new ideas. All the more reason for the GOP to blame ITSELF and stop looking for excuses. Romney had all the money in the world and still failed.

    • Ari

      You are absolutely CORRECT!
      I experienced it from some of the Libertarian Extreme and also faux Conservatives
      Who, since the election have become more transparent in their true support for Obamanation. Some were black, some rock star hedonist with an air of intellectual superiority who feined “spiritual and religious interest” to gain acceptance and access to plant all sorts of “there is no difference between O and Romney,”
      and “They are equally pawns of the elite!”
      Some were actually idealists too young to see reality and bitter, especially after the Republican Natl Convention treatment of Paul and delegates.
      These are even this week still sending “voter fraud” Utube vids about Republican removal of Ron Paul Delegates and Delegations.
      Many are extremely vulgar and Occupy types.
      Must be a huge unseen (rather unidentified) army on BHOs Alinskey payroll.
      The more cleaver ones were assigned to sites like RedState. Trolls all!

  • paco12348

    I’m just a little peon in a mass of Conservative big headed thinkers. Let me tell you what a peon thinks. I think Conservatives are sick and tired of the GOP Establishment selecting the candidate THEY SELECT and then Carl Rove going out on TV blatting about “the only one electable”. I’m sick of the GOP’S treating their base like idiots. WE are not Democrats. WE think for selves and don’t need their pap crammed down our throats.
    NOW, since we lost (thanks to them) they want us to open our arms to illegals, LIKE THE DEMOCRATS. To Hell with America and the border. To Hell with America’s principles and values. Well, this peon says to HELL with the GOP.

    • rajjon

      Half of “illegals” fly in legally and over stay their visas. This border crap is a red herring for “not too bright” republicans.

  • rufuschoate

    Sadly I concluded long ago that It was a gift that Goldwater went down to defeat. He wasn’t the right man for the time or the culture.

    I fear Conservatives being the true Americans are overly optimistic. This is a crisis of cultural morality with a growing segment of the population intellectually and morally debased. You’re not going to change that level of immorality with any candidates or platfrom. Blacks and Hispanics except for Cubans and some multi-generational Hispanic citizens are lost when they support a party so anti-thetical to thier Culture and best interest.

  • barron44

    This is not 1964.

    Obama has perfected the Democrats’ art of buying votes with other people’s money. Obama is the greatest political Santa Claus in the history of our country—surpassing the era of the New Deal and the Great Society.

    We lost the election to the Obama Phone and the Zombies. (The free Obama Phone is symbolic of all the government gifts Obama and the Democrats hand out, to say nothing of the gigantic increases in spending for Food Stamps, for Social Security Disability, for Earned Income Tax Credits.) It was the comic actor, Bob Hope, who described Democrats as “Zombies” in one of his films. Please look it up in YouTube.)

    Just as important as the vote buying was, we have to admit, that Mr. Obama was, and remains, the greatest “celebrity” we have had in the White House. Of course that persona was created, and continues to be created, by the media.

    No Republican can ever win an election against the buying of votes and the “celebrity status” that the media can crown a candidate with.

  • Ari

    I agree with so much of your rallying cry, and do not wish to have a circular firing squad.

    Nor do I wish to see the current RHINO leadership of the Republican Elite,
    continue to ride on the backs of our hard work and hijack all our dreams behind
    closed doors.

    A specific and Historic proof, of how long this has continued, was REAGAN’s election.
    Yes! We conservatives under Grass Roots Family Values banner, did that almost
    entirely on Social and Founding Fathers’ Freedom and Constitutional issues.

    But what few seem to remember, if they ever knew, is that immediately after the
    election was tallied, GEORGE BUSH SR and JIM BAKER’s elite, commandeered the Administration Transition Desk, keeping all of the true victors’ best nominees from almost every important appointment into the new administration. Rhino and non-conservative bureaucrat types were selected by 100 to 1 over the conservatives who labored so hard.
    Even Adolf Coors, who was Reagan’s buddy and chief financial/political
    supporter, could not get his recommendations through. Extremely talented
    brilliant conservative men were appointed to ambassador posts of no import,
    such as one sent to the Gold Coast of Africa.

    They were screened out all because they had Conservative Social Ideals such as pro life, God and the Constitution.

    So, while I do not wish to start a 3rd Party, we must realize our greatest
    threat to any permanent and practical return to TRUE CONSERVATIVE SOCIAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, & FISCAL Principles must eliminate the dominance of the RHINO Liberal leadership in the gilded (and padded) rooms of the |Party Elite

    This REQUIRES an internal take over of the leadership positions… Starting immediately, not just with Boehner, McConnel, and the other unprincipled or cowardly wimps, but pursuing a purposeful PATH to win the Delegate Process and REPLACE the RHINOs in local, state and national leadership.

    The best opportunity to pursue what Tea Party, and even Ron Paul supporters
    have begun, is in the 2014 elections through precinct to delegate process.

    It matches simultaneously with precinct organization needed to select full spectrum Conservatives, and nominate Articulate, Viable candidates.

    The fertile ground in this will require education through churches,
    neighborhoods, and local government forums in every community in this whole
    country.

    The biggest job is in the Major Metropolitan areas.

    That’s where Obama’s ground game motivated Ignorance and Racial division into
    landslide voting by the naieve, and Mass Media influenced youth, as yet too young
    for the wisdom to recognize lies.

    Instead we must get an arsenal of educational DVD’s, pamphlets and speakers to
    each men’s and women’s group, to our neighbors, to our school board meetings,
    and to special event presentations in community centers, Town Halls and other
    group settings as allowable.

    This MUST be begun now! While we still have some
    momentum and voice like Rubio, Cruz, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul and others.

    It is our FUTURE AT STAKE, our children’s, grand children’s and our COUNTRY
    itself which will be forever lost if we do not.

    Another serious front line in this battle is in the local school boards, county
    and state educational boards

    If all this seems too, hard, then stay depressed, but pleez, get out ot the way!
    I too wonder if, in the last 4 years, we passed the tipping point.
    But I also know that to quit, or give up is allowing certain mortal failure.

    It begins with one or two in every place (home or gathering) in America that
    still loves God, Country, the Constitution, Children, and grandchildren

    And we must stop shooting (and burying) some of the best
    voices, like Herman Cain.
    Stop allowing, and passively accepting the media ridicule of the best articulators like West, Palin, Rick Perry, Rick Santorium and the others Liberals see as threatening.

    A Liar-in-Chief with evil surrogates from media to Cabinet, these are the real threat, along with “get along” Rhinos.

    Start educating yourself to be able to educate those around you.q
    Read the true news, behind the news and share it in person and emails.

    Begin now to vote daily with your feet and heart and truth.

    As you do, realize that “being INCLUSIVE,” means that we do not denigrate
    a person for some wrong ideas. If they have any agreement with Godly, Constitutional, Conservative values, welcome the PERSON and the good ideas, and only contend with the bad ideas as opportunity presents. Defer that until you have a larger common bond of friendship.

    Speak to your friends and neighbors as a FRIEND not an enemy.

    If they are only 10% off level, accept them and educate later.

    Get over that need to make them 100 % right before you accept them.

  • rightlane1111

    It has taken me a while to put this into words. I think most of you would agree. http://justaquarrel.com

  • Pingback: | A Land Called America

  • kenroar

    Romney lost the first day of the RNC when he and the GOP voided all the Ron Paul delegates. Entire states walked out of the RNC at that point. About 15% of Republicans then left the party and never came back. On election day they either stayed home, wrote in Ron Paul’s name, or voted for Gary Johnson. These 15% were the most enthusiastic and motivated part of the party. They were also the party’s future because most were in their 20′s and 30′s. Until the GOP begins to respect those who believe in liberty and limited government, they will keep losing elections. One can only hope that they’ve learned their lessons from John McCain and Mitt Romney. However, when I keep reading articles like this, I have my doubts. If conservatives don’t even know why they lost, how can they learn any lessons?

  • Pingback: bgdfgdfgdfgdf

  • Pingback: noclegi roztocze

  • Pingback: Remote Control

  • Pingback: lecteur datamatrix

  • Pingback: abc blinds

  • Pingback: mold

  • Pingback: "???"

  • Pingback: Cucciolo Rottweiler

  • Pingback: buy real instagram followers

  • Pingback: Dumpster Rentals

  • Pingback: weight loss diet

  • Pingback: free sex hookups

  • Pingback: land of nod deals

  • Pingback: babies r us baby registry

  • Pingback: free annual credit report gov

  • Pingback: logo quiz game answers

  • Pingback: Edmond Beran

  • Pingback: Solavei

  • Pingback: bear grylls messer

  • Pingback: work from home

  • Pingback: cheap car insurance

  • Pingback: Organo Gold Scam

  • Pingback: Jc Rutledge

  • Pingback: Logan Poynton

  • Pingback: jobs

  • Pingback: Gladys Salmans

  • Pingback: Zoila Houck

  • Pingback: Jeremy Goettel

  • Pingback: harleydyse

  • Pingback: http://ldlhdlcholesterollevels.org

  • Pingback: Medical Marketing

  • Pingback: zynga poker chips for sale

  • Pingback: lida satis

  • Pingback: arts and crafts

  • Pingback: http://victoriousafter63.sosblogs.com/The-Item-Library-b1/License-Restoration-PA-Laws-b1-p11.htm

  • Pingback: Felicitas Scheve

  • Pingback: Lane Tartaglino

  • Pingback: Minnie Schoeder

  • Pingback: wellnesshotel

  • Pingback: At The VA GOP Advance : The Other McCain

  • Pingback: http://forums.adobe.com/people/DanSmtih

  • Pingback: Morton Blackwell encourages young conservatives buckle down to win White House