« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Boehner Should Resign

There comes a certain point when enough is enough: American Majority Action (AMA) believes it is time for Speaker John Boehner to resign after his embarrassing failure to pass his “Plan B” fiscal cliff bill.

Speaker Boehner killed the planned 7:30 p.m. vote last night when he realized that AMA and other groups had succeeded in holding enough conservative members to defeat the measure. AMA has been leading the charge against Boehner–kicking off the #FireBoehner movement–since he removed four conservatives from their committee placements and started pushing tax increases as a solution to the fiscal cliff.

The reason is that AMA, and the conservative House members who dissented last night, believed Plan B would have let taxes increase on job creators, while doing statistically nothing to fix America’s debt problem. Our real problem in all of this is a spending problem, yet neither side is offering a serious proposal about how to rein in government spending. Speaker Boehner embarrassed himself yesterday by pushing a plan which AMA told him he didn’t have the votes to pass. After the 2012 election, conservatives must take this opportunity to define the direction of our movement–and proposing a plan Nancy Pelosi wanted just months ago isn’t the solution.

Remember, Speaker Boehner lost more than 35 votes last night, and the #FireBoehner movement needs only half that number to force him out of office January 3. He should save the Republican Party the embarrassment of a public leadership battle and resign. The world might not have ended today, but Speaker Boehner’s power is at an end. It’s time to make room for fresh leadership and a new approach to governing. Without Boehner’s resignation, no fiscal cliff deal will be agreed to until after the January 3 election for Speaker.

But let’s be honest about the Speaker options outside of Boehner: Eric Cantor is not an option. Kevin McCarthy is not an option. Jim Jordan, Jeb Hensarling, even Dr. Tom Price, are acceptable options, with Jim Jordan being my first choice.

Speaker Boehner’s leadership has been discredited, and now he’ll procrastinate on preventing the fiscal cliff until he can re-secure power. Our country’s economy and the Conservative Movement deserve better than to be held hostage by Speaker Boehner’s last cling to power. Time for a change, and time for a change right now. 

COMMENTS

  • rabun1016

    And who is the replacement? No one could be worse. I like Price a lot.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    It is obvious that Boehner should resign, and equally obvious that he will not.

    • conservativecurmudgeon

      A better epitaph for our times could not be written…

  • DerKrieger

    One point that the GOP MUST communicate to the public is the fact that the $800 BILLION stimulus was NOT a one time spending measure but is now in the budget every single year. If more people understood this important fact I think far more Americans would support significant spending cuts AND start to ask where all the money is going.
    It’s outrageous that the Dems position on spending cuts in light of this fact is that there are to be none.

    • rabun1016

      That requires communication skills which Republican leaders sorely lack.

      • bk

        And it requires brains that the American public in general seems to lack.

    • commonsenseobserver

      Yes, Americans already get that. And they already support spending cuts and smaller government.

      Except for, um:
      Entitlements
      Education
      Health
      Defense
      Security
      Agriculture
      Diplomacy
      Infrastructure
      Commerce
      Environment

      Anything else?

      • lawstudent

        The problem is that the middle class is not feeling the cost of these programs. When the tax cuts expire and their rates skyrocket, ask them how much they really like the pork barrel spending.

  • WY_Cowboy

    YES! Speaker Paul Ryan . . .

    • commonsenseobserver

      Who wants such a job…
      It’s difficult to face five different enemies. The White House, Senate Democrats, House Democrats, the liberal media, and the enemy within.

  • clyde30475

    While I agree with you,I’m sure the gutless wonder thinks he’s done nothing wrong. Hell will freeze over before Boehner resigns.

  • joshinca

    Yes it’s time to replace Boehner.

    He’s not only horrible at framing issues in the media and the worst negotiator since Chamberlain. But, he’s come to see himself as the boss of the republican house delegation, instead of their servant. The members of the house owe their jobs to their voters, not Boehner, and he owes his job as speaker to them, not the media or Obama.

    • Guest

      Well said.

    • RottDawg

      A point that needs to be made… while the voters do indeed elect them, the NRCC funds the hell out of their campaigns, and campaigns ain’t cheap…

      From the NRCC’s about page: Republican Leader John Boehner and the seven other elected leaders of the Republican Conference of the House of Representatives serve as ex-officio members of the NRCC’s executive committee.

      http://www.nrcc.org/about/

      • littlehouse18

        Well, then… perhaps some conservatives with means need to look into getting significantly involved with this organization.

      • bk

        Cantor’s PAC worked against conservatives in 2012, so it seems perfectly logical that the GOP (so-called) leadership would take it a step further. If they could just get back to the pre-Tea Party days, things would be great right? Except Pelosi would still be Speaker, but at least they wouldn’t have those damn Tea Party pests holding them hostage.

  • NightTwister

    Much more likely is he’ll start working with moderate Democrats and just be done with conservatives altogether. I can’t see any way that this goes well.

    • bk

      There are hardly any moderate Democrats left. Most of them got the boot in 2010.

      • NightTwister

        Hence, the italics.

    • commonsenseobserver

      Well, can’t blame a politician for playing politics.

  • http://www.bohnetlaw.com rightappeal

    I agree Boehner needs to step aside. I actually like him and up until now have thought he was doing a reasonably good job in a very difficult situation. But this cliff episode has become a fiasco, and last night makes it clear that he lacks the broad support of his caucus that he needs to be effective.

    But I think the obvious choice for a replacement is Paul Ryan. Cantor or McCarthy would have the same problems as Boehner, Jordan, Hensarling or Price would probably have the same sort of problem keeping moderates on board. We need someone who can count on support from all wings, and who has the ability to communicate clearly on fiscal issues.

    • littlehouse18

      Quite true, Ryan seems to have the ability to garner support from all sides, a good quality in a leader.

      • commonsenseobserver

        Not really, he’ll get hell over his voting record (90% lifetime rating from ACU is pretty poor, no?), and his backing of Boehner and Plan B instead of choosing disloyalty and the automatic tax hikes(because sticking to your convictions entails undermining your party and choosing starvation over 3/4 of a loaf, like Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan demonstrated so well).

  • rightlane1111

    WY Cowboy…you have a point…it should be Ryan….and after that…Price.

  • wbcoleman

    Obama’s strategy has been to divide-and-conquer the Republicans and, judging both from events and from reading Redstate, he is succeeding brilliantly. Great.

    • littlehouse18

      Boehner has had his own part to play in that.

  • Papabile

    Do you seriously think Jim Jordan or Price is an actual option after what that cabal did to the Speaker? I can guarantee you that we have done more to damage ourselves inside the Conference because of last night than anythings else

    Members are furious about what happened. Do you actually speak with any of them outside of the 45 die-hards in the RSC? Heck, half the RSC wouldn’t support them for Speaker.

    • littlehouse18

      Boehner brought this on himself by pushing a plan that raises taxes and trying to force members to go back on their pledges to constituents. He could have given them something to proudly vote for, but chose not to. Then he publicized it without knowing if he had the votes, which he didn’t. It was foolish of him.

      • bk

        BINGO!!!

      • Papabile

        I’m not arguing with you on regarding whose fault it was.

        I am saying people are literally living in fairyland if they believe that Jim Jordan or Tom Price could possibly capture the Speakership if Boehner resigned it. The majority of the Republican Conference would absolutely oppose someone like them.

        BTW…. we are going to end up swallowing something much worse, or go over the cliff. That’s it.

        • kycon

          The only way we could have come out of this positively would have been for the House to pass a bill making permanent all the cuts, including the AMT rates, the payroll tax cuts, and EVERY SINGLE ONE of the Bush tax cuts. Once we passed the status quo, the ball would be firmly in the Reid/Obama court. If they passed it (unlikely), we’d be able to say that we originated the bill that averted the cliff. If they stonewalled it (likely), we could bemoan that they let one little cut for the rich undermine all the issues they’ve claimed to support.

          Plan B was simply Republican cover for Obama’s plan to ratchet up taxes on anyone he can find. Step 1 in a much larger plan that Boehner was woefully ill-equipped to combat.

          • Bill S

            That’s not “the status quo”. Those things expire for a reason.?.to force this idiocy every year. The “status quo” would be yet another temporary extension.

            And allow me to remind you that that “one little cut for the rich” is precisely the problem. The majority of Americans support jacking up the top rate. It’s ludicrous to think the response of the electorate will be anything other than “There goes the GOP, protecting the rich guys again”

          • bk

            Boehner was doomed no matter what. If he packaged it with a bunch of REAL cuts, then he gets accused of protecting the rich AND hurting the poor. If he and the GOP are not willing to do whatever it takes to force the Dems up front to agree to some real cuts, we are screwed.

            As long as the Democrats know they can operate with no budget, endless CRs, unlimited debt ceiling, etc. because the GOP is absolutely terrified of shutting down the government, then they are going to come out ahead. Unless we are willing to shut everything down and not vote on any spending bills without a budget, then it’s over.

            The Democrats operate just like the corporate bigwigs they hate – get me what I want now and someone else can worry about next year later.

          • commonsenseobserver

            Ridiculous.
            Okay, now we have Republican cover for Obama’s plan (he has indicated this before) to ratchet up taxes on more people than he can find.

          • imstillbreathing

            It’s too late for that. The voters have already bought into a tax increase for the rich.

        • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

          “I am saying people are literally living in fairyland if they believe
          that Jim Jordan or Tom Price could possibly capture the Speakership if
          Boehner resigned it.”

          Both men would have managed this situation better than Boehner. It’s not whether they voted no on something that might have been a ‘voter for a tax increase and get nothing out of it’ proposition, its whether they have a better strategy. Boehner’s negotiate-against-yourself and let the Dems get away with taking things off the table is NOT working.

          “BTW…. we are going to end up swallowing something much worse, or go over the cliff. That’s it.”

          I agree, so I was disappointed in in the outcome on Plan B. But again, the very fact that we end up swallowing something worse UNDER BEOHNER’S LEADERSHIP tells us that maybe we need a Jordan or Tom Price at the helm.

        • commonsenseobserver

          I don’t know. It’s not clear that Tom Price was a rebel?

      • bdirks

        Come January 2nd, I think you will realize that the biggest possible abdication of the ATR pledge to a congressman’s constituents was by not supporting Plan B. By not voting on Plan B and giving Boehner something to work with, we have now enabled the largest possible tax increase, and the extent to which we can be bailed out of that tax increase will be determined by Obama and a 113th Congress with even more democrats.

        I don’t know about you, but I care more about the size of my paycheck then the satisfaction of a bill that would never ever become law but would give my Congressman a feeling of “pride” in voting for.

      • Bill S

        So instead, virtually all of their constituents get a tax increase, thanks to the guys who allegedly don’t want tax increases. And after Jan 1, Obama and the Dems get credit for cutting taxes for everyone except the top tier. Marvelous. Aren’t we just brilliant?

        • imstillbreathing

          “Heads you win, tails I lose.” What a wonderful position to be in.

      • commonsenseobserver

        I suppose you think that the ATR pledge meant that they are supposed to prefer the larger automatic tax hikes over keeping the tax rates as low for as many people as possible.

        The tax issue has nothing to do with the spending issue because, yes, the problem is overspending, so our priority here is keeping tax rates as low for as many people as possible, and you cannot fault House Republicans for sticking to that before some strange logic that it is better to have larger tax hikes which you don’t sign on to than getting most of the tax cuts you want.

  • gunnyg2002

    Ryan is the man to lead. He speaks Conservatism from the HEART and unlike Bonehead, he KNOWS his facts and will stand up to the Liar-Whiner-Blamer-in-Chief.

  • viperscale

    John Boehner MUST go.

    He cannot articulate the conservative solutions to our problems and the only thing he is good at is compromising… usually ending up in favoring the Democrats side.

  • rosenstern

    Speaker Boehner must be removed. Last night’s vote was a stand on principles, a clear message to the party and the country that we are prepared to take difficult, even unpopular steps to realize our vision for America. The matter with Speaker Boehner is difficult and not personal, but now that we have begun, it must be finished.

    • Dave_A

      So instead we get a tax increase on EVERYONE and still don’t ‘realize our vision for America’ because the Democrats control 2 of the 3 seats of power…

      • lawstudent

        No – what we get is a commitment to avoid the redistribution of wealth to the dilatory in society through high tax rates on the successful and low tax rates on the moochers.

        If we are going to have high taxes they should be on the entire county, so that people feel the cost of a socialist welfare state.

        What we should do now is stand proudly for the principle that the only acceptable continuation of the Bush Tax Cuts is their extension for all Americans. As long as we are united in standing for that, Obama can’t win. It’s very simple – the house should not pass a bill that redistributes wealth and turns America into Greece. If we stand together on this we can win, if we let the moderates sell out to Obama – we will surely lose.

        • Dave_A

          ‘Gingrich Poker’ (playing chicken with the President on fiscal issues/shutting down the govt) did not work out for Gingrich…

          It won’t work for this Congress on taxes – let alone the debt ceiling – either…

          We are unfortunately stuck with this situation, due to Obama’s re-election. It’s make-a-deal-or-lose-it-all…

          • lawstudent

            Not true at all. We have a bill – extend the job saving tax cuts for ALL Americans. They have a bill – only extend the tax cuts for the least productive, and redistribute the wealth Karl Marx style from the rest of us. There is no reason why their bill should be more compelling than ours. As long as we stand strong, we will not lose.

          • Dave_A

            How well did that work for us last year, and in 1995?

          • lawstudent

            Last year we folded. 1995 was a full government shutdown led by a bombastic newt. We did quite well in 2011 forcing the sequester and making obama look weak. As long as we stand together and push our extend tax cuts for all bill, we will be fine. More importantly, the longer we force obama to fight on the fiscal cliff, the left time has has for amnesty, gun banning, homosexual “marriage,” a carbon tax, and the spread socialism. Better to fight here – it is good ground.

          • checkmate2012

            The sequestor was Team O’s idea and the GOP should not have gone along with it as in, here we are getting closer to its reality. It’s insane to think that the same politicians (all of them) that put us in this nutcracker will be the same fools that can solve the problem. Now they all want to walk away from the deal they made….so much for rule of law.
            About Newt, his two forced gov’t shutdowns forced real reforms. He stood strong on principles knowing he’d lose his Speakership; at least he had convictions and guts which are sorely lacking today in D.C. across the board.

          • commonsenseobserver

            The process of sequestration for automatically enforcing budgetary targets has existed since Gramm-Rudman-Hollings was passed…

          • checkmate2012

            Agreed, I was refering to the current situation. Thanks.

          • imstillbreathing

            This is fantasy. Look at what happened in 1996, the next election after Newt’s shutdown. Look at what happened in 2012, the next election after “We … [made] Obama look weak.”

          • commonsenseobserver

            I assure you, 98% of Americans, while not including many of the most productive, is certainly not equivalent to the least productive.

        • imstillbreathing

          You’ll never be successful by dividing society into the the successful and the moochers. About 16% of Romney’s votes came from people earning less than $40,000 per year.

          It’s too late to win by arguing for low rates on the wealthy. That argument has been lost (at least for now).

  • mustango

    “Without Boehner’s resignation, no fiscal cliff deal will be agreed to until after the January 3 election for Speaker.”

    Shorter version that is no less accurate: “No fiscal cliff deal will be agreed to.”

    Oust Boehner if you must. No skin off my nose. But please stop insulting our intelligence by pretending that anything Jim Jordan would offer up will be taken seriously by the Senate, President, or media.

    • bk

      You seem to believe that something Boehner offered might be taken seriously by Reid, Obama, or the media.

  • Rich

    The danger as I see it is that whilst the Tea Party tail is currently wagging the GOP dog – at which point does the GOP leadership make a decision that the political embarassment and potential blow-back is enough to put a fence around ‘the 45′ and just work with the Democrats for the next 2 years.

    Whilst there is always the fear of being primaried, if it’s the fear of a more-conservative primary vs. losing to a Democrat due to public opinion shifting in the more moderate states then many GOP representatives may decide the former is the lesser evil.

    • bk

      You mean kind of like they did the last two years?

      • Rich

        You mean watching the GOP brand get more and more poisoned as they are riddled with in-fighting, whether it’s McConnell being forced to filibuster his own Bill or Boehner promoting then pulling bills at the last second, the GOP is looking like they can barely govern themselves let alone the country.?

        What I see happening is what happened with the debt ceiling and the ‘McConnell work-around’ – the Tea Partiers got to keep their promise not to raise the debt ceiling but it got raised anyway.

        Likewise if this carries on all that will happen is the Tea Party caucus will get to keep their ‘pledges’ while the rest of the House of Representatives votes around them thus removing any and all influence they might have on the process.

  • bk

    “Remember, Speaker Boehner lost more than 35 votes last night, and the #FireBoehner movement needs only half that number to force him out of office January 3.”

    Don’t Democrats see him as the perfect Speaker for the GOP?

    • missingrreagan

      Yep. I’m sure they’d be thrilled to step in and cement the fractions by providing the missing votes.

      And let’s not forget that even if Boehner had 35 defections… it means that he had around 200 on his side. 35 votes can keep Boehner from making a majority, but it’s a heck of a long way from BEING a majority.

      • Dave_A

        The House Speaker is not elected by ‘a majority of all members’.

        35 defections makes Pelosi speaker.

        • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

          Wrong… “35 defections makes Pelosi speaker.” … the speaker needs 218 votes. If nobody has 218 votes then they keep voting until someone does. Pelosi can never become speaker unless some Republicans vote for her. will never happen.
          What could happen is defectors vote for Paul Ryan and Boehner realizes he lacks the confidence of the caucus and stands aside. Kind of how the Tories took out Maggie Thatcher.

          We need a Newt-level Speaker, and we have a bob michel-level one. You may argue “But bob michel was never speaker” Yeah, that’s the point.

          • commonsenseobserver

            Mrs. Thatcher had more than half of the votes in the parliamentary party, she was only done in by the rubbish she was fed by other frontbenchers.

            Of course, she did make some mistakes, and her successor is underrated.

          • Dave_A

            Actually, 218 votes are NOT needed.

            A majority of the votes cast are needed, so voting ‘present’ or not showing up = Pelosi wins….

          • imstillbreathing

            Dave_A is right. See: https://opencrs.com/document/RL30857/ .

          • commonsenseobserver

            Simple. Just show up and vote, but for neither of the two freaks.

      • commonsenseobserver

        It opens up the way for a compromise candidate.
        The question is, will that be compromise within the caucus, meaning someone like Paul Ryan, or a compromise with Democrats, meaning John Boehner and Nancy Pelosi as co-rulers?

  • tngal

    I’m sure Obama will be sad to see one of his key staff members depart.

    • checkmate2012

      tngal, you are so mean…in a most hilarious way!
      Boehner should take the high road, admit the job is too big for him and after 20+ years in Congress, take an extended vacation, i.e. retirement in a nice sunny spot. What’s up with all the 65+ crowd not knowing when to quit and give newcomers a turn, after the turn of the century? Let’s face it, most if not all, don’t the $170K to eek out a living. I know they’re power mongers but they need to get thinking they aren’t replaceable; everyone is replaceable!

  • warrior300

    Both Boehner and Cantor need to be removed from their leadership positions. However, that is either not going to happen for reasons already stated in other comments in this post, or either or both men will be replaced with more of the same or worse, which has also been stated by comments in this post. How do I see the outcome? Either the GOP is dead and will wither away, no matter how bad things get; or the leadership and its country club disciples will be contented to be permanently a minority party, as it always had been the case from the Great Depression until Ronald Reagan. Either way conservatives lose.

    It’s time to leave the party and begin a third party. Lay the groundwork now by fielding every office for the 2014 Congressional and state elections; vet these candidates so we don’t keep running a–holes who are an embarrassment to the party like Murdock and the fellow in Missouri (Their remarks were not just slips, they were reflections of their twisted mindsets); begin now to define exactly what we stand for and be prepared to either begin to build a new majority, or go down in flames if the nation is too far gone down the Marxist road to hell; instead of denigrating Obama and his community organizers acumen, learn how to duplicate those organizing strategies NOW and do what needs to be done to get out the vote in 2014 and 2016. It was karma that so many of the Romney and GOP facilitators had no ideological conviction, and were willing to take the money and run without performing their jobs. Exactly the model of modern day corporate conservatism, where there is no ethics and no loyalty. Corporatism is not free enterprise. Currently, Americans have a choice between corporate enslavement or big, increasingly international government enslavement beyond national sovereign lines, which can also be and is increasingly a combination of both corporatism and world and regional government organizations dictating more and more what national sovereign states may or may not do.

    A real conservative movement must be able to formulate an authentic policy that recognizes the role of both corporatism and big government, but cuts both down to size. The vast majority of people who identify themselves as conservatives are not libertarians, for they see the danger in that road which plays into the hands of the corporations and furthers growth in world-wide monopolies, as we now see when they can own the political and financial mechanisms that prevent the government from cutting these behemoths down to size. On the other hand, conservatives also see the danger of a government bureaucracy that has become entrenched and unyielding, which makes for genuine reform impossible. Conservatives want to see a pared down government, but one that has power beyond just coinage, foreign policy, and war making. Of course, this is difficult terrine to navigate, as the voters would ultimately determine at various times how much is too much federal power and too much interference in the lives of the American people.

    Many social conservatives have been so turned off by politics and the lying, self-serving politicians; I don’t think you will get a couple of million of them to ever return to the polls again. Until an independent party can prove itself to be the party of small businesses, are willing to break up the large financial institutions, and the power of the major conglomerates, and take major steps to limit the way campaigns are financed; the conservatives will continue to be viewed by a majority of Americans as the party of the affluent and super rich. The world is ruled by gangsters who control are politicians, no way will their heads roll within the Republican or the Democrat Party. While I’m at it, how about one of many constitutional amendments that can be offered by a new party and passed quickly, as for example, all members of Congress and the Executive branch must live by the same rules and benefits that they pass and execute into laws as the American people affected by said laws. Of course little if any of the above will happen, because the very nature of politics is to support candidates who serve narrow self-interests of the voters, and the well-being of the country be damned.

    Times a wasting. Anything short of a complete break with the Republican party, and getting to work on a new party will only further crystallize Democrat hegemony over the nation and its deliverance to international organizations and laws, which will make it extremely easy to dictate a Marxist agenda upon the world. WHY ARE CONSERVATIVES NOT ORGANIZED TO LEAD A MAJOR BRUTAL FIGHT AGAINST JOHN KERRY TO BE SECRETARY OF STATE? Oh yes, he’s a U.S. senator and a sufficient number of GOP senators will support one of their own for the position. Can you see why the Republican party is useless? Let these Republicrats enshrine this traitor as Secretary of State. You might as well just put Hanoi Jane in the position.

    • Dave_A

      A 3rd party is a path to defeat.

      There is simply no way it will do anything but increase Democrat power.

      • texashistorian

        Only for a time, and if we are going to lose anyway, it might as well be to a good end, no?

        • commonsenseobserver

          Well, sure, if we are to embrace the party of Sarah Palin rather than the party of Abraham Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan.

        • Dave_A

          Not ‘only for a time’…. Permanently.

          There simply are not enough votes ‘to the right of the GOP’, to form a winning coalition.

          Your 3rd party would get only a fraction of the current Republican vote, and would not be able to draw enough ‘new’ votes to close the gap & start winning elections.

          It would, however, siphon off enough GOP votes to ensure that the Dems win everything.

          • texashistorian

            The same was said about the first Republican party. It siphoned off votes from the Whigs, and the naysayers said not enough Americans would ever care about the slavery issue to make the party viable. I know, it’s a different time and different circumstances, but I am not convinced a new party with a clearer mission would do so badly.

          • Dave_A

            The problem is, where is the new party going to get it’s voters from?

            What coalition is it going to build, that the GOP cannot?

            There are only so-many right-of-center voters, and the overwhelming majority of them vote for the Republicans today.

            We are not suffering from a mission-clarity problem….

            We are suffering from a messaging and organization problem – largely fueled by a base that does NOT get the necessity of a unified and regimented political organization, along with brand-marketing & nuance – or worse (As often demonstrated here on RedState) believes that those things are ‘bad form’ and ‘Democrat tactics’….

          • warrior300

            Well, I agree with you that there is a major messaging problem, but nothing of substance was offered to the voters from the Romney camp in the last election either. Terrible messaging, billions wasted on terrible advertising, and no policy statements of substance for fear anything of substance would be used against the party and candidate. Reagan did not think that way. He was not a milquetoast.

            I mean, what is this nonsense now that Romney’s son says his father never wanted to run for President, if only there had been another choice. Another choice for what? We had all kinds of choices from liberal GOP’ers to an array of conservatives. What in God’s name was this all about? If you read my later blog further down below, I believe an independent party that generally follows the path I laid out can put together within the context of the negative way I believe world events will play out over the next four years to allow for a majority of the conservatives to join the new party, which will be a majority of the current GOP. A sizable plurality of independents, and 15 to 20% of Democrats. If it doesn’t give a new party a majority of the votes, it can by 2016 receive a plurality of the popular votes and hopefully with it the majority of electoral votes needed to capture the White House in a three man race not to mention many Congressional seats. I believe such a step will also strengthen conservatism further at the state levels where the GOP has been doing well.

            The only thing to stop us is a lack of will to think outside the box, and break the chains to the past and to a Republican Party that has outlived its usefulness except for the fat cats. Messaging, it is time to start hammering home how much the Democrats are own by the privileged set. The only problem is the welfare dependents don’t care as long as they keep getting their share. We are in a middle of a revolution, and we need a whole new party, strategy, and philosophy of policies that shows Americans the hope for a way out of our current road to perdition.

          • commonsenseobserver

            NOTHING of substance? NO policy? Really?

            I can see Tagg’s (?) point, but perhaps it would have been better if Romney had stepped aside for someone like Pawlenty or Perry.

          • imstillbreathing

            This is a bit too simple. True, the Republicans had an opening because the Whigs self-destructed. However, Lincoln won in 1860 partly because the opposition was badly split and partly because his support was concentrated in the Electoral College-rich North. He received less than 40% of the vote. These circumstances won’t happen again in the near future, at least not, as Dave_A says, for a party that is to the right of the GOP.

            Interestingly, Douglas, who placed second in the popular vote, only carried one state (Missouri).

    • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

      warrior300,
      What’s the name and number of your precinct and are you “in” the Republican Party?
      Thank you.
      CW

  • Wubbies

    I have not taken the time to read all the commenting below but here is my two cents…..

    He should but he won’t!

    However, now in light of the Brietbart story about the formal plan to oust him, including an actual document of the plan, I am sure he is rethinking things in a dramatic way.

    I bet the purging of conservatives doesn’t look like such a great idea anymore in hindsight.

    • jimmyg

      If I was to guess, the Brietbart story was fed to them by AMA. The drum beat to fire Boehner has started and finished with AMA. I asked last week, and I will ask now, who is going to run against Boehner, crickets.

      • checkmate2012

        No guessing required if you just ask the writer of this Diary, Ned Ryan, who is the president of the AMA…I think. Full disclosure would be nice or maybe I’m the only one in the dark.
        http://americanmajorityaction.org/who-we-are/

  • septembergurl

    Boehner’s big mistake was to set up himself as the sole negotiater with Obama. I get why he did it — to put himself on the same level as Obama rather than as one of a delegation. But it would only work if Boehner were an excellent communicator, a great negotiater, and could guarantee the support of his conference. As we’ve seen he does not have the first and third of these, today we learn from details of the negotiations that he is not much at the eyeball-to-eyeball either. Behind the WSJ paywall but this quote is out:

    Boehner: I put $800 billion (in revenue) on the table. What do I get for that?

    Obama: You get nothing. I already get that for free.

    boehner: (weeps).

    • checkmate2012

      Just read the WSJ article and happen to feel a bit sorry for Boehner in a way since he is dealing with a ruling dictator that doesn’t negotiate in good faith and keeps moving the goal posts. (I’ve been saying Obama is Lucy with the football!)

      A couple more examples of his King O’s unbending attitude from
      http://online.wsj.com “How ‘Cliff’ Talks Hit the Wall”

      “Mr. Obama repeatedly lost patience with the speaker as negotiations faltered.
      In an Oval Office meeting last week, he told Mr. Boehner that if the sides
      didn’t reach agreement, he would use his inaugural address and his State of the
      Union speech to tell the country the Republicans were at fault.”

      “The president told him he could choose one of two doors. The first represented a big deal. If Mr. Boehner chose it, the president said, the country and financial
      markets would cheer. Door No. 2 represented a spike in interest rates and a
      global recession.”

      “Mr. Boehner said he wanted a deal along the lines of what the two men had
      negotiated in the summer of 2011 in a fight over raising the debt ceiling. “You
      missed your opportunity on that,” the president told him.”

      “The speaker called the president with news the House would move ahead with the backup bill, which would preserve Bush-era rates for all income below $1
      million. The president was incensed.”

      Seems Plan B circumvented the rulers demands and it got under his skin. But really for O to say pick a door as if this was a game show is obscene for the President. Either do as I want with tax increases on $250K+, or I’ll blame Reps. for a global recession. We are watching tyranny in action.

  • lawstudent

    I think there is too much negativity here – the endgame can actually be very positive for our side. To the extent that we hold the line and don’t approve any tax cut extension that does not include all Americans, we should come out of this in decent shape.

    The key focus should be on a unified message. To wit, the GOP is committed to low tax rates for all Americans and opposes the socialist redistributionist policies of Obama and the Democrat party. I expect us to go over the cliff, and for tax rates to rise for all. The left will then push for an extension below $250k, unemployment benefits, AMT, doc fix, pork, etc… We must resolutely refuse to play ball, and push our bill to extend the Bush Tax Cuts for the entire country, including the people who generate the jobs that keep it successful. As an added benefit, the middle class tax increase will force people to confront the true cost of our bloated welfare state and entitelment programs, and may in fact bolster our reform efforts. The key to strategic success is remaining unifiied in the face of public pressure, and ensuring the Boehner does not cave by uniting moderate republicans with the liberal left, and selling out America in the process. With elections 2 years away, we have a lot of room to stymie Obama and stop his schemes dead in their tracks.

    If we fold here, the consequences could be catastrophic. Every day Obama is not struggling with the fiscal cliff is another day he has to plot mass amnesty, a carbon tax, homosexual “marriage,” and the rest of his leftist laundry list of fantasies. I’m reminded of a compelling story from World War II. In 1939, as the Nazis were demanding territorial concessions from Poland, including the city of Danzig, a polish minister rose up and spoke. He said “If I could give them Danzis to ensure peace, I would do so. Unfortunately, that cannot be. We know if we give them Danzig it will merely embolden them, and tomorrow they will want Warsaw. We will end up at war anyhow – and thus there is benefit to giving up Danzig. We may as well confront them here, with Danzig on our side.” This is our struggle as well – if we let Obama use public pressure to roll us – we will end up, deservedly, as another Greece. This is our hour to stand strong, and ensure that America remains a force for good in the world.

  • commonsenseobserver

    Aye, aye, he did his best to take the tax issue off the table and keep the tax rates as low for as many people as possible, and if this is the **** he, as well as Cantor and Ryan, gets, well, it’s the straw that broke the camel’s back. He can no longer speak for the Conference, even if he was already unsuitable before that. Continuing would only harm the unity of the party even more, and continue the destructive work of the rebels and the liberal media in weakening the Republican position.

  • django

    Those of you calling for Speaker Ryan should be careful what you wish for. Ryan is a politician before he is a conservative. He has been in lock step with Boehner on the fiscal cliff negotiations.

    • commonsenseobserver

      Good.
      I would have thought sticking to his principles entailed doing his job well, and his job as Budget committee chairman, at this point, is to support and strengthen the entire party’s position in fiscal negotiations. There comes a point on every issue where Boehner goes too far, but if we do get rid of him, it will assuredly not be because he has done so on this particular issue. House Republicans, including and perhaps especially Paul Ryan, were making tough choices to try and avoid tax hikes for most people, whatever we say about the spending issue (which really shouldn’t be connected in the first place because the bulk of the deficit comes from structural overspending rather than taxation, and the latter issue ought to be taken off the table first)- and most did vote for the sequester replacement bill which included deeper spending cuts, in addition to pushing for entitlement reforms, even if timidly.

      The Conservative movement would not have been helped if Paul Ryan, or anyone else, had openly weakened Boehner at that stage.

      The difference between Boehner and, not even Ryan, but people like DeMint? It’s not just how Conservative they are. The former also happens to be a horrid politician, and the party can’t afford that at this stage, even if we could tolerate his views, or lack thereof.

  • warrior300

    “A third party is a path to defeat.” That was the bull we were told
    four years ago, and where did loyalty to the GOP get us? The whole
    country has gone to hell, and the GOP didn’t win the Presidency, lost
    seats in the Senate, which should have been an easy majority win for
    them, and even managed to lose seats in the House. On the federal
    level, the election for the GOP was a massive disaster.

    This
    country is going to go through a nightmare during this second
    administration of Obama. A third party with real conviction and
    specific policies can give Americans a real choice in 2014. First, win a
    majority in the House. Second, take 3/4ths of the Senate seats that
    are up for 2014. No way will a new party control the Senate in one
    election cycle, but it sure will put the fear of God in both traditional
    parties. Add members to both houses of Congress in 2016, plus win the
    Presidency. No, not with lame-brains like Sara Palin, who has proven
    herself to be first and foremost out for her own self-aggrandizement.
    There are many intelligent conservatives out there. If they offer the
    American people the restructuring of a party that works at the grass
    roots level, provides the bureaucratic restructuring of the government,
    offers integrity (to whatever degree any politician can have integrity),
    and genuinely proposes and sincerely and consistently supports policies
    that should be formulated in a National Convention that would take
    place no later than next year, where the American people have input by
    their representatives to the convention as they participate in the
    birthing of this new party. However, if the party just becomes a cover
    for corporatism, whereby any law or regulation that isn’t fancied by Big
    Business, then a new party will just be a clone of the current GOP.

    A
    new party must deal with authenticity in seriously working to change
    the casino gambling, pyramid scheming, and short-term psychology and
    financial strategies that reward instant profits and quick turnovers,
    but fail to engender genuine investments. Raise the income taxes on the
    millionaires. I would love to see a 75% rate on all these limousine
    liberals. All the Hollywood crowd, many of these professional athletes,
    pop musicians, and the purveyors of porn. Let the George Soros, Ted
    Turners, etc. pay through the nose, or be made to invest in real capital
    investments and job creations, instead of betting against corporations,
    currencies, financial institutions, or buying up land under the
    pretense of supporting wind energy, while actually going after water
    rights on these lands. If these folks want to hang on to their money,
    then investments would be the way to avoid high tax compensation.
    However, raise the capital gains tax to 50% on gains the first year,
    1/3rd the second year, 1/4th the third year, 10% the fourth year, and
    all capital gains if sold off the fifth years would be completely free
    of taxation. Long term investment. Lower the corporate tax structure,
    propose a specifically designed flat tax, get the for profit insurance
    companies out of the health insurance business. My understanding is
    that the health insurance industry began with non-profit insurance
    companies.

    These are reasons why few people believe in the
    system anymore. They know even in their frequently unsophisticated ways
    that the system is fixed and it’s rigged against them. There are many
    former Tea Party people, who initially were excited about curtailing the
    power of the government, until they began to realize what they had to
    lose, while being used simply as pawns to expand the power of corporate
    and financial institutions at their expense.

    So far all I hear
    from the GOP is what the so-called leeches receive in government
    handouts, while the “productive” members of society are being made to
    carry more of the tax burden. Number one, such an argument is not a
    winning formula with a majority of the American people. Number two,
    many of so called “productive” have not earned their wealth by producing
    anything. Instead there is quick turn-over of earnings in financial
    paper schemes, sticking the taxpayers with the bill; flipping houses on
    speculative ventures; run a stock up for a few days, entice others to
    buy the stock, and then sell for a quick short-term profit, which leaves
    the late entry bozos holding the bag and the losses; ponzi schemes
    galore, etc, etc, etc. As long as these issues are not addressed in an
    authentic manner that shows a majority of Americans that everyone is
    going to have to share in the pain, then there is nothing to do but
    embrace the inevitable demise of the republic and American sovereignty.

    Once the Wall Street shenanigans have been addressed; middle and working class Americans may be willing to listen and support
    programs that stop putting people on increased disability, shorten the
    amount of time the unemployed can collect unemployment insurance,
    restrict the growth of social programs, deal with the humongous
    corruption in Medicare and almost every other federal program, cut back
    on the size of the federal bureaucracy, restrict the power of the labor
    unions particularly government unions, consider viable alternatives to
    the whole Obamacare fiasco, and find a viable way of dealing with
    illegal immigration, which first and foremost will require no amnesty
    without e-verify and stringent penalties for businesses who dare to
    flaunt
    the law. Put an across the board freeze on the federal budget, no part
    of the budget can show an increase without it coming out of or through
    the elimination of another federal program.

    It is going to require leadership like the United
    States has not seen since 1776 and thereafter in the creation of the
    new nation. Can the likes of Jim DeMint, Marco Rubio, John Thume, Paul
    Ryan, and a slew of others some of whom may not currently be holding
    public office; and yes, Newt Gingrich, the elder statesman, who has the
    moxie and the overriding understanding of history that is needed among
    all these lawyers and business people to play the role of a Benjamin
    Franklin in such a movement happen? It better, and immediately.
    Pasting, gluing, and rearranging bits and pieces of the current GOP is
    definitely
    the answer to permanent defeat. If 2012 proved anything, the days of
    rearranging the seats on the Titanic are over. Conservatives might as
    well
    find some other hobby than wasting time being news and political
    junkies, who continue to support an already lost cause.

    • PowerToThePeople

      Do you feel better?

      • warrior300

        I would, if people like you were not reading with your eyes wide shut. I must have stepped on at least one of your entrenched self-interests that rationalizes your support for the current mess called the Republican party.

        • PowerToThePeople

          Ahhhh, still on the lecture circuit huh. I know you think yourself to have politically evolved, but while you are up on that pedestal, tell me how the other third parties have done. America First Party, American Conservative Party, American Third Position Party, Christian Liberty Party, Citizens Party of the United States, Jefferson Republican Party, Modern Whig Party, Reform Party of the United States of America. This list does not even come close to listing all the third parties.

          Not to mention the Libertarian party.

          How has the third party done? How much sway does any other party have? Clue………..First answer…lousy second answer …….very little to none.

          Now go be a moron somewhere else. The level of stupidity you are bringing to the site is embarrassing.

          • warrior300

            Ad hominem attacks, “power to the people”, are just what one can expect with people who have no idea what they are talking about and have no logical response to their prejudices or self-interests when they feel under attack. “Power to the People”, times change. You seem to forget that the GOP was a very successful third party. The crisis of today is every much as great as that of the Civil War, which birthed the Republican Party. Most third parties get nowhere, because they appeal to a very minute extremist position that attracts a modicum of voters.

            No, I have not been warned that I can not talk about the need to create a third party. I’ve been kicked off of liberal blogs for not parroting the party line, and I guess I should expect the same from right wing ideologues, who sit on their own supposedly self-righteous pillars and judge negatively anyone who not only can think outside a set paradigm, but also dares to deviate from right-wing talking points. There may be enough yahoos out there who are willing to continue to make multi-millionaires out of the likes of Limbaugh and Hannity, while they play stooges for the money class. I don’t give a damn about the GOP. I care first as a conservative (not a libertarian) about the country. The party whatever it is, is only a useful vehicle to accomplish conservative goals, and when it fails to do that as miserably as the current Republican Party, then it is time to screw them, instead of constantly being screwed by them.

            I promised myself with this new year, I have had enough with politics and its continued b.s., as many other Americans have come to the same conclusion, which should bring joy to your ears “Bill W”. This will be my last post, since the purpose of this blog is obviously just another venture in set propaganda.

            We believed in Reagan, because he stood for something, and wasn’t afraid to step on egg shells for the politically correct crowd. We supported G. W. Bush and the GOP control of the Congress, and we were sold down the drain by them. No more. You all talk to one another, with your same old close-minded, self-serving interest, and then in 2014 and 2016, you can sit with your mouths agape again with wonderment at why you lost control of the House, and why the Marxists are in firm control of the country. If you’re too closed-minded to even define the problem correctly; or not dare to do so, because your precious self-interests are at stake and require that you continue your duplicitous ways with misleading the American people, then who needs to waste more precious time in our lives on mere propaganda.

            Continue to follow your current path, and you truly will reap what you continue to sow. Believe me, with what the Republican Party is up against, it is going to take a great deal more than just removing Boehner and Cantor. Such a move if successful, would only be a first baby step to the substantive changes that need to take place to even begin to make the party at the Federal level viable. Oh, but how many millionaires and billionaires would support a party that doesn’t serve their interest, and doesn’t continue to hoodwink the average American. It’s the working and middle class who oppose most of the welfare schemes. The wealthy don’t care. Buying off the welfare class with government debt is a small price to pay as far as they are concerned. They don’t want to hire these people, which is why we can’t resolve the illegal immigrant problem. Besides, the corporations will get what they want from the Democrats as well as the GOP.

            Farewell, adios, and God help us all. This country is really going to need it.

          • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

            warrior300,

            Sorry to see you leave. I hope you will come back.

            You said:

            The party whatever it is, is only a useful vehicle to accomplish
            conservative goals, and when it fails to do that as miserably as the
            current Republican Party, then it is time to screw them, instead of
            constantly being screwed by them.

            I promised myself with this new year, I have had enough with politics
            and its continued b.s., as many other Americans have come to the same conclusion, which should bring joy to your ears “Bill W”. This will be my last post, since the purpose of this blog is obviously just another venture in set propaganda.

            <<<<<<<<<<<

            I asked elsewhere (and I realize you may not have seen it) what precinct you lived in and whether you were actually "in" the Republican Party. You might want to give it a try. Find your local Republican Party committee. Go to its monthly meetings. That's where real "politics" is played. You'll probably be surprised by what you find.

            I hope you'll consider it. We need people with your passion "in" the Party.

            Thank you.
            CW
            http://theprecinctproject.wordpress.com
            http://precinctproject.us

          • PowerToThePeople

            Bye… I see it is easier for you to lecture with silliness than to follow rules or answer questions.

            Maybe when you step out of your preacher attire, you should answer Cold Warrior and after that, simply answer my question which was how have all the other third parties worked out. By answering those simple questions it will show A) that your just a talker not a doer as if you were a doer, you would know the answer to CW’s questions and you would be a part of the change, and B) You would know that this is not the civil war times, all the third parties I listed are current parties, and you would know they have no power, no ability to win, no ability to bring about change, and are useless groups of people too intent on stupidity and ideals to ever do anything that benefits anyone.

            So in closing, bye………….

        • Bill S

          The next 3rd party comment out of you will be your last on this site.

          http://www.redstate.com/posting-rules

          I’m pretty sure you’ve received this warning before. Heed it.

  • WmCraig

    Yes, the Speaker has failed us. He squandered the 2010 mandate and enthusiasm, we lost the election while he was speaker and he has not adapted to the changed reality, and he is a patsy for the Obama Administration. If his local constituency wants him to represent them, perhaps he understands that. But he clearly doesn’t understand Alinsky based power politics. The Democrat’s ARE the establishment, and fighting against the establishment is what would fire up this country, the base and the independents. He continues to allow Obama to paint him as representing the establishment.

    The speaker accomplished nothing in two years that passes the smell test outside the beltway. But as a loyal conservative congressman supporting a new speaker he could serve as conduit of communication with his Buddy Barrack, without giving away the store.