« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Hayworth, Brewer running weak in the General?

McCain Hayworth

Daily Kos and Research 2000 looked back to Arizona. It’s a reasonably comprehensive poll, carpetbombing the general elections for Governor and Senate, as well as looking at the Republican primary for Senate.

Let’s unpack it.

In the Republican primary, JD Hayworth trails John McCain as we’ve seen in every other poll on that race so far. At 48-36 (MoE 4), there’s only a 6% chance according to this poll and my model that Hayworth leads. McCain can breathe perfectly easily at this point, though being below 50 of course is a traditional indicator that Hayworth does have his chances to come back.

In the general election, McCain also sits right there at the bridge between traditional safety and a close race. He leads Rodney Glassman in the general election matchup 48-35, just slightly better than he runs against Hayworth.

Hayworth, on the other hand, would seem to turn this reasonably safe Republican seat into a horserace, as he only leads Glassman 43-42 for the bare 54% lead probability. Either candidate could reasonably be ahead right now in that matchup. However that’s a poor showing for Hayworth when he has a sizable recognition gap over Glassman, with 58% having no opinion of Glassman vs 19% for Hayworth.

As for the Governor’s race. Democrat Terry Goddard leads all four Republicans: up 47-30 over John Munger, 48-34 over Buz Mills, 47-35 over Dean Martin, and 48-42 over Jan Brewer.

However on the flipside of the Glassman/Hayworth race, the Democrat Goddard so far has a name recognition advantage over most of the Republicans. Only 29% have no opinion of Goddard, but that number climbs to 53 for Mills, 55 for Martin, and 76 for Munger. Only Governor Brewer at 13 seems to have little room to grow with greater voter education.

The primary for Governor was not polled.

Crossposted from Unlikely Voter

COMMENTS

  • jsmiddleton4

    “Goddard so far has a name recognition advantage”

    And that is not a good thing I can assure you. Folks in AZ know who Goddard is. Yep. High name recognition for sure. Does not mean we are going to vote for him.

    Gotta wonder why Kos does this kind of thing if the democrat is winning.

  • Aaron Gardner

    Hopefully the more they get to know Glassman the less they like him. ;)

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    It is *possible*. Whether Independents go for or against him would be key though.

  • Mark D

    While Hayworth is favored among conservatives, he has a reputation, fair or not, of being bombastic and caustic. He’s not viewed favorably state wide.

  • mbecker908

    Hayworth is a total buffoon. There is a really good reason the good folk – mostly Republican folk – toss him out on his a$$ four years ago. Mitchell winning CD05 had nothing to do with displeasure with Bush or immigration, it had everything to do with JD being a total jerk. Please note that his talk radio show in Phoenix never really got more than mediocre ratings and he couldn’t manage to get anybody interested in syndicating it even though he’s got good national name recognition among people would would be listening to conservative talk radio.

    If either Shadegg or Flake had chosen to run for Senate the race would have been about McCain. With JD running, it’s about JD. And that’s not a good thing for JD.

    With respect to Brewer, she is Charlie Crist in drag. She’s to left of McCain and signed SB1070 only because she’d have dropped off the face of the earth if she hadn’t. She’s never met a tax hike she didn’t like and used TARP funds to bail out the budget this year. Next year will be a freaking disaster. She got to be Governor because she was SoS and we don’t have a LGov. Every SoS who’s moved up has been a disaster and she’s no different, although she may end up being the worst of the lot.

    We’ve got three people running against her and if two would drop out any one would beat her handily. I think Goddard has a really good shot at the General. He’s got statewide name rec and his rep is better than Brewer’s.

  • aesthete

    John Munger or Buz Mills are or where their support is coming from, but I hope that the anti-Brewer vote coalesces and unites around one candidate, preferably Dean Martin.

    As to Rod Glassman, I’m surprised that his name recognition is that high: I live in AZ, and I have no idea who he is. I’m pretty sure that the “recognition” is the partisan vote in favor or against Democrats at large, but even so, that number surprises me.

  • aesthete

    I live in Tucson, where Glassman was a city councilman.

  • kuksool

    Brewer endorsed McCain. I believe Dean Martin stayed neutral in the Senate primary. JD might have had a chance if Sheriff Joe ran for Governor. People would have been motivated to vote for Sheriff Joe and JD. Now JD has convince people to vote for him. So far all he’s got is “McCain is a dirty RINO.” While McCain hits back at JD for being an unacceptable replacement.

  • kuksool

    Brewer endorsed McCain. I believe Dean Martin stayed neutral in the Senate primary. JD might have had a chance if Sheriff Joe ran for Governor. People would have been motivated to vote for Sheriff Joe and JD. Now JD has convince people to vote for him. So far all he’s got is “McCain is a dirty RINO.” While McCain hits back at JD for being an unacceptable replacement.

  • SIConservative

    I don’t doubt that we’d be better off with someone else taking on McCain, but Hayworth’s problems don’t make McCain’s go away. Personally, I’d rather have someone who is reliable on the issues but may personally be a jerk than someone who will go out of his way to stab the movement in the back.

  • ktsub

    Hope Jan looses the primary, she is going to make it trouble to hold the Governors seat, in a year we should do well in AZ.

    Also, she should have laid some more ground work…take Rick Perry today, was endorsed by 30 elected officials from the Texas border (mostly hispanic). Each of these guys from the border are Democrats, and have said how much Rick cares about South Texas (you can’t buy that advertising).

    Brewer, really should have eased into this better, plus her upcoming push for a tax increase is just BAD. She is muddling the message.

  • aesthete

    but he’s not particularly conservative. He voted for Medicare Pt D, No Child Left Behind, and several other objectionable policies promoted by the Republican party. Tellingly, he voted against McCain-Feingold (which was opposed by the party), and for the 527 Reform Act (a “fix” of McCain-Feingold that expanded its provisions supported by the party). Really, the only issue where he has been independent in the past has been amnesty.

    Mind you, I would rather have a blowhard party hack than an independent politician without guiding principles, but neither choice is particularly appealing.

  • IJB

    Why even bother?! – Their polls haven’t been worth the toiletpaper they’re written on this cycle…

  • dio55

    ATTENTION ALL REDSTATERS. let us make it so

    http://www.thefoxnation.com/cinco-de-mayo/2010/05/06/watch-mexican-flag-students-assail-man-wheelchair

  • deano64

    or do we support the most conservative candidate? I would agree that Hayworth isn’t the perfect candidate but I believe he’ll be on the side of conservatisim much more than McCain. I pretty much have to question anything that comes from Daily Kos/Research 2000 too. There is still 3 months to go in this race. Joe Arpaio is now running radio adds endorsing Hayworth. This whole immigration debate hurts John McAmnesty not Hayworth. I think it’s going to continue to get a lot more interesting. As far as governor goes I really don’t know. I wish I knew more about these guys. I really have no idea who to vote for there other than anybody but Brewer.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • mbecker908

    And Arpaio wouldn’t help JD that much. He’s already endorsed JD and it’s worth about a zero bump because the people who are the strongest Arpaio groupies are also the residents of Sun Cities who consider McCain to be the Great American Hero.

    Frankly, McCain is a dirty RINO. And, JD is an unacceptabe replacement.

  • mbecker908

    The likelihood is that people who are on the far right would vote against McCain no matter who runs. The election will be decided by conservative leaning libertarians and the “moderates” in the AZ Republican Party. The latter two categories of people are generally willing to tolerate McCain and they hate the sight and sound of JD. That’s why he’s a former talk radio host running for Senate and not the Congressman from CD05 running for Senate.

  • mbecker908

    It won’t get him much of any “new” support in Maricopa County and outside of MC, Arpaio’s endorsement is tantamount to AIDS.

  • mbecker908

    it should be pretty instructive that there are three major Tea Party organizations in Arizona: Maricopa County (Phoenix), Pima County (Tucson) and Flagstaff (basically the northern tier of the State) and NONE of them will endorse Hayworth. They are all sitting out the primary.

    In addition, every one of the Republican members of the Arizona Congressional Delegation – arguably THE most conservative group in the US House – has endorsed McCain. That includes Shadegg who’s retiring and has nothing to lose or gain. Every one of these guys served with Hayworth and knows him very, very well.

  • mbecker908

    worth is directional until late July. Frankly nobody is paying a whole lot of attention to the races right now on anything like a consistent basis. Directionally, this poll is right on the money though.

  • houstoneagle

    I put more trust in Rasmussen than Kos, and Scott has Hayworth -5 with plenty of time to go before the primary.

    Hayworth represents a real threat to the Establishment types who frequent this site, so of course they are just going to trash him and imply that everyone else in Arizona thinks the same way they do, instead of just articulating their points and letting them stand on the merits.

    Electability? -5. Overcome-able.

  • houstoneagle

    (Just kidding) But that’s the message of this thread and some of the commenters.

    We will get the last laugh in August.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Calling John McCain a RiNO is not a substitute for arguing specifically why we should prefer JD Hayworth in the Senate.

  • aesthete

    fact-filled and informative post laying out the case for JD, I suppose.

  • IJB

    …in their polls, artificially inflating Dem numbers,

    Kos/Research 2000 is one of those wacky firms that filters numbers on the assumption that turnout will be even *more* Democrat/minority than 2008′s turnout!

    IOW, they’re toilet paper. (Which you can easily tell from Kos’ numbers for AZ Gov’s in the General – the idea that Goddard’s at almost 50% at this point in the race is laughably asinine…)

  • Scope

    you just did more damage to Rick Perry than you probably realize. Saying that 30 elected officials, who are Democrat, just endorsed Perry, because he cares so much about South Texas sounds like a death knell to me. That may well be why the most recent polls I read have Perry almost tied with White the Democrat. May also be why Texas has such illegal problems, particularly in south Texas. I’d like to hear from our own Texans here.

  • Scope

    have Obama in a much higher approval rating, of course combined with the ABC/NBC exagerated Obama approval ratings. To use a Kos poll to artifically inflate McCains ratings is not wise. We all know that the leftists want the weakest R candidate to run against. They did the same with McCain’s polls, popularity, and exposure to the MSM news in his 2008 pres. run. It’s the leftists habit to promote our weakest. Notice how often McCain has been on the news channels lately. No one has given Hayworth the same opportunity. MSM=free advertising/face time for the biggest RINO in the R party.

  • Scope

    You have said numerous times here that you would gladly trade McCain for the Maine Twins. I believe you said that, at least they haven’t done as much damage with their votes as McCain has.

    There have been some comments about some votes that Hayworth did while in DC, but, it seems they were not as mavericky, or destructive as McCain’s worse than bad votes, over a long period of time. Was Haywoth’s record in DC as bad/good as the Maine Twins? I know that you are not fooled about McCain’s very recent run to the right, and his election year conservatism.

    Your biggest problem with Hayworth seems to be his being a buffon, and not gaining a large market while on the radio. Yet, what we are reading from ColdWarrior is that McCain is not supported with the people CW is involved with.

    I understand that there is a big a rift between the McCain supporters, and the Hayworth supporters in AZ. That is to be expected in the races between primary candidates in many other states. The Fiorina/DeVore race comes to mind.

    Do you really support McCain over Hayworth becuse Hayworth is a buffon over someone you consider to have been more dangerous than the Maine twins?

  • Scope

    the usual suspects.

  • Scope

    can’t be beat in buffonery, yet he votes with his progressive party 100%. I really could care less if someone says strange or off-the-wall things as long as they vote conservatively.

  • deano64

    reasons for the Tea Partys not endorsing candidates. Here’s a little blurb from the Pinal county 912/Tea Party site:

    “ANY TEA PARTY THAT ENDORSES A CANDIDATE WILL END UP INVESTIGATED BY THE STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ELECTIONS AND THEIR FACES ON THE FRONT PAGES OF THE NEWSPAPER. The law says if an organization endorses a candidate, it must file accounting forms with the Dept of Elections on their website account. Please attend the Department of Elections Financial Workshop. Now, if the organization files with the Secretary of State that it is forming a 527 Political Action Committee (PAC), then it is OK to endorse a candidate, and MUST start periodically (perhaps even daily) reporting on the website account.” FYI seems like I heard around the first of the year on KFYI that Sherriff Arpaio was the most popular elected official in the state. Arpaio’s endorsement tantamount to AIDS outside of MC? Nah don’t think so.

    http://the912projectpinalcounty.ning.com/

  • mbecker908

    I specifically said the numbers were worthless but to look directionally. And, directionally, this poll is right on track with all the latest polling.

  • mbecker908

    BECAUSE if elected we’d have to put up with the da** fool for probably three or four terms. As it is, we can make this McCain’s last term and if we do it right, we can have a conservative groomed to run in six years. Think Shadegg, Flake, or one of the new candidates running for House who have a great chance to win. That way we get a real, thoughtful, intelligent, movement conservative for three or four terms instead of the buffoon.

    I doubt McCain will do much in the way of damage this time around because it appears that most of his effort goes toward squabbling with BO. And, FWIW, BO will be hell to beat in ’12 barring a MAJOR attack on US soil and a depression. In which case he’ll be busy anyway.

    The “rift” in Arizona is NOT McCain supporters v Hayworth supporters. For the most part you could hold a meeting of “Hayworth supporters” – those who support Hayworth in the abstract – in a small closet. The people who will be voting for JD are people who simply hate McCain more than JD and are willing to waste a vote to “make a statement”. In point of fact, JD is about as popular in Maricopa County (where over half the voters reside) as clap in a convent.

    I don’t know who CW “hangs out with”, but I would guess he’s reflecting the opinions he hears among very conservative PCs and people at tea parties. I don’t question him one bit, but that group is not reflective of Arizona voters, even AZ Republican primary voters. Remember, this is a statewide election. The people who live in MC don’t like JD personally, and once you leave the confines of MC, they hate him. Probably the only politician with statewide name recognition who is hated more than JD is Joe Arpaio and Joe endorsed JD. It won’t help JD in Pima County (Tucson) or in the north from Prescott to Flagstaff.

    I’ve never said McCain was “more dangerous” than the ME girls. I have repeatedly gone out of my way to say I really don’t have a problem with them. They are the perfect “moderate” Republicans. First, name a more conservative candidate who can win in ME. I’ve been trying to get that answered for a couple of years and all I get is blank stares. Second, neither of them is in anything even remotely representing a “leadership” position in the Senate or on any issue. While they may vote against “us” with some regularity, the only real vote of substance was TARP, and I’m convinced they only voted for that because Specter had already announced and was going to take pretty much all the heat. Keep in mind that both of them have voted “party line” against BO’s agenda. With respect to voting records, all I can tell you is that JD never met a spending bill he didn’t like and the amount of legislation he was active in writing/promoting that would downsize government is about the same as McCain’s – zero.

  • mbecker908
  • mbecker908

    And if Arpaio was so popular why oh who has he consistently refused to run for Governor? Because he’d get about the same 35% or so that JD’s gonna get. Ah, he might get 45 because he’d get a good chunk of the Sun City vote that he’s bought off for a decade with the Posse. But he’d get creamed.

  • discerningconservative

    Don’t know much about her, but I like this ad…

  • ktsub

    He is very strong on.the border, its his approach that he is protecting South Texas, maybe I should have been more precise. There is a big difference in the preception of the AZ law and what Perry is doing to secure the border.

    Perry is not in a close battle cause he is not conservative enough. He has an unknown quantity running as a technocrat, running around beating him up.

    Texas hispanic voters are part of the coalition here, Perry needs the support, so he will enforce the border, but by approaching it different than Brewer, he has not irritated a whole class of people.

  • IJB

    Because I sure don’t put it past a Kos outfit.

    And as for matching the recent AZ “trends”, I have no idea what you’re talking about, because I sure haven’t seen a bunch of polls showing a “surge” for Goddard.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    So you think JD could win all those terms over dems. Is that because AZ, like SC, likes seniority in the senators?

  • texasgalt

    Perry’s made efforts on the border and has some political friends there.

    http://www.rickperry.org/release/bipartisan-group-mayors-and-elected-officials-endorse-gov-perry-re-election

    Perry just called for National Guard troops to the border. He also called his recent meeting on border security with Napolitano “encouraging” saying she “gets it.” He might wish to have those words back.

    He continues to take heat over the Texas law that allows illegal immigrants who have graduated from Texas high schools to attend Texas universities at the “in state” rate.

    We’ve got an 800 mile border in Texas. There’s violence and grinding poverty. There are hundreds of “colonias” within 50 miles of the border where living conditions are 3rd world.

    I really think Perry is on to something with the Guard. I just don’t think enough HONEST border patrol agents can be hired to protect and inspect the God forsaken border territories.

  • SIConservative

    Ah, yes. Florida and Pennsylvania.

  • deano64

    you haven’t got the slightest clue if Arpaio would win or lose or what percentage of the vote he might get. Also I didn’t say anything about him getting elected governor I said his endorsement isn’t tantamount to AIDS. That’s a freakin ridiculous statement. He’s a hell of lot more popular than you make him out to be. Anyway now you know why AZ Tea Parties aren’t endorsing Hayworth or any other candidates for that matter so you can stop using that excuse.

  • discerningconservative

    and what on Earth is a bafoon?

  • Adjoran

    He only escaped an Ethics probe in the House by losing. He is one of the very few who refused to return Abramoff cash, but the biggest problem is the fund-raisers he held in Abramoff’s stadium sky box. Federal law requires such in-kind donations to be valued at market, and if they exceed limits, the campaign is required to reimburse the excessive contribution. Hayworth never did.

    So between the birther-nutcase issue he handed the Democrats with his repeated references on the radio, and the crook issue, and the “hey remember why you were embarrassed to be from Arizona while this jackasp was in the House” issue, and the stupid things he is bound to say during the campaign, Hayworth gives the Democrats a shot they don’t deserve at this seat.

  • houstoneagle

    you’re going to mouth off to someone with a blam stick and then I won’t have to read all your ad hominem attack headlines anymore.

  • houstoneagle

    If I were an ultraliberal I’d be throwing flowers at Franken’s feet everywhere he walked.

  • houstoneagle

    Why is John McCain afraid to debate Hayworth? 72 days and counting and still no “yes.” I guess he’s waiting til he is down in the polls or something. That’s like only one team showing up for a high school football game. Forfeit!

    Here is reason #2. Border Security = National Security

    For more reasons why you should specifically prefer Hayworth over McCain, go to http://www.jdforsenate.com/issues

  • houstoneagle

    If you actually think for a minute the state of Arizona is going to elect a Democrat Senator and change a red Senate seat to a blue Senate seat…if you REALLY think that is even remotely possible in this political environment and with all the gold tea party folks on top of the GOTV in Arizona…just because McCain doesn’t get to keep his Senate seat into his ripe old 80s, then you just scare really really really really really easily.

    Undecideds, take note of the desperate language indigenous to the rino supporters–a classic example in the post by “adjoran” here…note the feathered plumage…oh wait, wrong slide…achem….note the derogatory name-calling implying mental defectiveness (“nutcase”). Note the reduction of an honorable former Congressman to the ultimate emblem of derision in the animal kingdom, a donkey (only in his crazed desperation, the rino supporter is known to use the harsher synonym for “donkey,” as is indeed evidenced in the above post).

    As for ethical scandals, McCain has had more of an official rebuke from a congressional ethics committee than Hayworth ever has. Just google “worst mistake of my life” and “McCain.”

    This has been a joint presentation of the National Geographic and Politico. (Just Kidding).

  • mbecker908

    somebody is going to show up and post something about this subject that is based on fact or at least on a reasoned and detailed set of assumptions that have been clearly laid out.

    None of you whiners are capable of doing that. You first among them. I have laid out, in detail, why I think JD will get swamped in the primary. Included in the discussion has been all my assumptions about demographics and Arizona electoral history with my assumptions about the players. None of you pathetic, slobbering sycophants has yet to make an actual argument that posits why I could be wrong. My comments and conclusions have been supported by virtually all of the Arizona residents who post here.

    To his great credit, my friend Cold Warrior has, on several occasions, dropped off some anecdotal discussion with PCs and some tea party attendees. I have never questioned the information or it’s specific veracity, but it doesn’t – and CW never said it did – represent the demographic view of the state. Additionally, about the only real “argument” we’ve had is over McCain’s margin of victory.

    Now then, with respect to the specific comment about Arpaio that I called Dean on, yes he is routinely the “most popular” elected official in Arizona. Which translates in today’s environment into nothing. He gets high ratings in generic polling like that because of his name recognition. Put him into a situation where were dealing with specifics related to a broad range of issues and he’s not so popular. His popularity hasn’t changed much in the last ten years and he routinely refuses to run for Governor. Four years ago Janet would have massacred him. This year he would probably win the primary, simply because Brewer is a disaster – we’ll see how long she can ride the 1070 wave – and the guys running against her are more or less unknown. I doubt he could beat Goddard, who even though he’s a Dem has a reasonable record as a law and order guy as AG. The key to the Gov’s race is how 1070 is handled since it will barely be law by the primary.

    Right now, it’s McCain in a walk in the primary and the general. Three House seats are up for grabs and we’ve got a good shot at all of those. The Governor’s race is a toss up.

  • mbecker908

    that little snippet showed up anywhere. Talk to me in late August.

  • SteveLA

    mbecker

    But Simcox has a very interesting background if you read up on him. I’m also not sure the MM phenomenon has not come and gone now.

  • Richard Mullins

    In house elections over there. I guess it one of those times, where you need to have another choice because neither is likeable. Brewer seemed to have a lot of down side and it’s best that she loses the primary. Arizona has been a wild state so getting a Dem if the Republican is bad is far too common. It’s not the case here.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    He plays by the rules.

  • mbecker908

    Right along with most of the other AZ residents who post here. We can win three House seats if we have the resources.

    McCain’s seat stays in Republican hands come hell or high water.

    I think the best pick in the Governor’s race is Dean Martin. He’s got some name recognition, he’s a statewide elected official, Treasurer, and AZ’s budgetary problems are as bad – or arguably worse with smaller numbers – than CA. Brewer is simply in way over her head. I will say it’s not her fault, it’s the fault of the AZ succession rules. The SoS has no business being elevated to Governor – it’s been a disaster every time.

    Also, let me say again, Arizona is no bright red state. Janet Napolitano beat a solid conservative in 2002 – and she did it with an endorsement from Arpaio – by 1%. In 2006 a guy named Len Munsil ran against her and her record was no prize. Munsil had some name recognition and was a solid conservative. Janet won 65/35. Goddard is well known and not disliked at-large. Brewer is just a wimp.

    The general will be ugly. I could see a scenario where McCain wins a huge victory in the general, we pick up three House seats, hold our majorities in the AZ Legislature – maybe even increase them and Goddard wins the Gov’s race. Again, totally speculation on my part, and it’s way too soon call but if it happened I wouldn’t be surprised in the least.

  • mbecker908

    Simcox’ endorsement is worth zero net votes to JD. Once he dropped out none of his supporters were going to vote for McCain. They’d leave the US Senator box blank first. Or write in Satan.

    It’s early on Saturday and I’m not caffeinated so I have to admit that I have no clue what you’re talking about with the “MM phenomenon”. Elaborate please?

  • mbecker908

    1. SB 1070 wasn’t the brainchild of Jan Brewer. Pretty much all she did was sign it.
    2. She did sign it so – at least on a national basis – she’s going to get credit/discredit for that.
    3. In Arizona, I really don’t know how much credit she’ll get for this by the time the primary rolls around. The law will only have been in force three weeks on primary day.
    4. In every other issue she’s shown herself to be either an Arnie wannabe looking for new taxes to raise or has been pissing TARP money into a rat hole. Right now that stuff is just hovering in the background and nobody is even discussing it.
    5. The budgetary problems in Arizona look a lot like what Governor Christie faced in New Jersey. Jan Brewer is no Chris Christie.

    See my earlier comments below on this race. It’s going to be ugly.

  • mbecker908

    AZ is no different than the other 56 states. All of them like seniority in all their elected officials. And especially Senators.

    I think the thing that makes upending a sitting senator so difficult is finding someone who has name recognition AND who has a hint of credibility to run. “The Devil You Know” and all that. And on that note, I think I might like to discuss what Utah does with their nominations at the party level. They seem to be on the verge of taking out an icon, we should know more by the end of the day today. I haven’t put much thought into their system, but it would certainly be an interesting topic for discussion. After the UT race is settled, of course.

    Oh, and any chance you’ve got somebody to run against you-know-who?

  • mbecker908

    Could the poll be “edged”? Sure. Is it an outlier? No I don’t think so at all.

  • Richard Mullins

    if he comes out more on the left side of things(I’m only speculating on that). For a short while, my irrational anger got the better of me until I thought it all out. Having a guy that isn’t well liked is help get rid of someone you don’t like. It never does anything. I hope that the Arizona legislature comes up with a Lt. Governor’s office and make SoS an appointed position(I could be wrong on that). Not all that up on Arizona politics and the only person I know in Arizona is a Brother of a friend of mine(Business parter as well).

  • mbecker908

    If anything, it’s gone the other way. I’m pretty sure he was actually ahead of Brewer in Jan.

    The “problem” in the Governor’s race is that it hasn’t really even started. Brewer is getting a big bump for signing 1070, a law she had nothing to do with. The real issue in the Gov’s race should be the fiscal condition of the state. And it’s horrible, second only to CA in terms of budgetary problems and Brewer did absolutely nothing to address those last year. Well, she proposed and fought for tax increases and used TARP funds to bail out education. In other words, the problems are still there and one year bigger.

    Right now I doubt anybody has a decent handle on the Governor’s race – primary or general. Way too soon to prognosticate.

  • AceInTX

    this is the third or forth poll from KOS on several subjects I’ve seen given credibility when it’s run by the very definition of left wing propaganda site.

  • IJB

    This is exactly my point.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Daily Kos commissioned the poll. They didn’t conduct it.

    Feel free to analyze it and show me the problems with it if you saw something I missed.

  • SteveLA

    mbecker

    Yes…need caffeine…MM phenomenon…Minute Man phenomenon. The MM as you probably recall were all over the news for a while, call it the last two years. You don’t see a lot of news about them anymore, which means nothing really with the MSM, which is now focused on the Tea Party folks as the new group to demonize.

    Simcox got lots and lots of press coverage as the founder of the MM, but there was some sort of falling out between the factions, I don’t recall all the details.

    Simcox is JD’s border adviser it seems from something I read on line. That’s ether a good thing or a bad thing, depending on how you view the MM I suppose. The MM aren’t eveyone’s cup of tea for a variety of reasons.

  • SteveLA

    Neil

    A technical sort of question about polling that I’ve always wanted to know.

    Do the folks who do these polls release the questions that they asked to derive the results and the methodology they use to conduct the poll ? Seems to me that depending on how you phrase a question and who you ask it can lead to skew one way or the other.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Some make you pay.

    It takes real digging in to be sure about this stuff.

  • mbecker908

    JD Hayworth is no Rubio, he’s no Toomey and he’s no Scott Brown. Not even close.

    And McCain is no Specter, no Martha Coakley and no Charlie Crist.

    Not even a good try.

    Toomey was a credible candidate against Specter six years ago and would have taken him out in the primary if GWB and Specter’s Republican colleague hadn’t endorsed him and campaigned actively for him against Toomey. Toomey also was a conservative, incumbent Congressman from a slightly D district with a record of winning.

    Scott Brown was a well known, well liked, very likable candidate with a solid (not a solid conservative, just a solid) legislative record who had the good fortune to run against the worst candidate to ever run for US Senate any where at any time.

    Rubio is well known, well liked, and has a good conservative record in the state legislature. He had the luxury of being sort of a stealth candidate for a while and built up a head of steam against a guy who has been out front supporting BO’s agenda.

    JD is very well known in AZ. He’s not liked. He got tossed from a pretty safe R seat in CD05 because people were tired of seeing him, listening to him whine and he didn’t accomplish much of anything, unless you count air time on Fox News. He’s been running a fairly unsuccessful talk radio show in Phoenix since then. McCain isn’t taking any challenge lightly and has gobs of money and an easy target. The Arizona media hates JD with a passion. He has none of the other candidate’s good points nor any of their advantages.

  • Richard Mullins

    It’s the fact that it’s a poll commissioned by DailyKos. That must be part of the problem. The overall of the poll isn’t bad and the only part I don’t like that it isn’t in a .pdf format for me to look over at my leisure.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I prefer the HTML ones. That PPP always puts theirs in PDF gets in my way.

  • mbecker908

    that they would be an outlier.

    In fact, the biggest problem with ANY polling in AZ right now and for at least the next month will be that nobody is paying attention to anything but SB 1070 flap and the Suns run in the NBA playoffs. Nothing is going to begin to firm up in primary land until mid-late July and it’ll be October before we’ve even figured out what the “issues” are in the Governor’s race.

  • AceInTX

    which is consistent with several other polls…JD may be weaker against the Dem…but the fact that the nominee of the Republican Party in 2008 and a decades long incumbent can’t get over fifty in his own state is a death knell if you ask me….my guess is…if JD doesn’t take him out in the primary..he’s in real trouble in the general…

    He’s dropped his pants around his anlkes and proven himself to be a “say anything to get elected” opportunist, (“Ive never been a Maverick”)..he’s lying now to beat off JD painting a caricature of his former image to save his seat…now he can’t get over 50?…..and I don’t see how he comes back from that

  • mbecker908

    I’m guessing the MM phenom is long gone. Actually, I’m not sure it ever really even was, at least with respect to this election.

    With respect to MM on the border doing their watch thing, that’s been over – at least as far as I know – for a long time. I think it would be safe to say that it’s probably former MM groupies who account for maybe 30% of tinfoil sales in the state.

    As far as Simcox working for JD as an adviser, that should pretty well indicate why the entire R House delegation wouldn’t endorse JD. I would also guess that JD might even be smart enough to keep him in his aunt’s basement until after the primary.

    And with respect to MM and TPs, while I don’t know for a fact, I would guess those groups are fairly mutually exclusive.

  • AceInTX

    with conservatives that disturbs me…on of them had something to do with how Racist the tea party movement is.

  • SteveLA

    Ace

    Why are you surprised? There is a trend to be anti incumbent in the R party right now, Tea Parties etc. etc.. Throw in that the same sort of base energy that propelled the DONKS far Left to challenge Joe Lieberman is repeating itself with the far Right challenging Johnny Mac, history and these things seem to come in cycles.

    Besides, you Eeyore Republicans have to have something to be unhappy about to be happy, might as well be Johnny Mac as anyone else. Sadly, your standard bearer in your pursuit of unhappiness is JD Hayworth, who’s really not that good a politician.

  • mbecker908

    And unfortunately I don’t see us getting a LGov any time soon.

  • Richard Mullins

    I like seeing over an over again in .pdf although an Open office document. Whatever floats your boat is my motto. All I want is RedState’s Poll mathematician to look this and other polls while giving a straightforward approach. BTW, I might be needing to have some polls to be done in the future, are willing to conduct them?

  • AceInTX

    I neither like nor dislike the results of this poll because I can take as much negative from it for McCain as I can JD…in fact…I pointed out below that if McCain can’t pull 50% approvals I’d say it looks much worse for McCain if I were going to take this poll seriously.

    Neil makes a valid point that KOS didn’t conduct the poll…they only commissioned it…I’d like to know more about who conducted it…where they sampled…and what questions they asked….but having KOS as the banner of the poll is reason for suspicion is it not?

  • mbecker908

    But this one doesn’t appear to be out of the ballpark. Is it “right”? No. Neither is Rasmussen at this point in time.

  • SteveLA

    The MM out here in CA started pretty good but some of the folks associated with it went off the deep end.

    There was one local instance where one of the leaders went into a Home Depot and got in the manager on duty’s face about illegal day workers in the parking lot. That really was way over the top as the on duty manager was just some wage earning guy who really didn’t have the power to do a darn thing about the situation.

    As political theater and fuel for the nutters I guess it was OK, but I’m not a big fan of harassing somebody who is just a wage earner and not the corporate masters of a company like Home Depot. Heck even cities have problems restricting day labors congregating; Google Redondo Beach and Day Labors if you want to read about that.

  • SIConservative

    John McCain would leave the Party if he thought it would earn him more media attention. He’d rather be a thorn in our side, though, than a rank and file member on theirs. If the Senate hit 50/50 again, I, for one, would not feel at all at ease with McCain being the 50th (or 51st with Obama still in office). He has time and again fought the right on issues from immigration to judges to campaign finance. I’m not a particular fan of JD, but as aesthete said above, “I would rather have a blowhard party hack than an independent politician without guiding principles.”

  • AceInTX

    and I’ll also point out what I’ve said over and over…he’s exposed himself now…he can’t go back to his “man of principle” country first mantra with any credibility because he’s done a 180 degree turn on every issue that’s defined who he is over the last 40 years all in an effort to maintain his seat and his grip on power….in an anti incumbent year such as you point out…his naked opportunism and transparent pandering is like pouring Nitroglycerin on an already raging fire

  • AceInTX

    who conducted the poll…what was their sample and what questions did they ask?

  • SteveLA

    Ace

    You should challenge yourself and prove me wrong on something. I don’t think I’ve ever read anything but Eeyore comments about anyone or anything on this side of the ditch that you have written that takes a positive and approving stance. You are the undisputed king of the “Nattering nabobs of negativism” here on RS, quite an accomplishment.

    Find something, anything, even a small thing to say positive about something or someone you support. You can start with JD. Try to find something that you actually have researched that is positive about JD and not just negative about Johnny Mac.

    You can do it Ace, find something good to say about a Republican, or even JD, prove me wrong.

  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX

    That should be easy for you to answer since you won’t have to post links to any you might find

  • AceInTX
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • AceInTX
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Don’t know the sample but you can estimate it from the 4% MoE.

  • Richard Mullins
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Daily Kos hates John McCain as much as they hate any other leading Republican. They declared him McSame, if you recall.

    So a poll that reflected the Daily Kos *beliefs* wouldn’t be showing McCain cruising over Glassman.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I don’t know that. But the Kos-commissioned R2000 results I’ve seen to date look reasonable.

    They’ve shown Burns up, Toomey up, Ayotte up. These are all seats the Democrats want.

    I suspect their LV model is quite different from Rasmussen’s, but that’s because Rasmussen’s a maverick in that regard.

  • mbecker908

    That should give you an idea just how much people dislike Hayworth. The difference is that people tend to dislike McCain’s politics but tend to respect him personally. With Hayworth, people don’t respect him politically even if they might tend to like his current political incarnation and they viscerally dislike him personally.

    That’s what cost him his House seat.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I’ve never even researched it.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    It matters if they also dictated the questions and the methodology in a biased way.

    That Ron Paul poll by Rasmussen to me had the hallmarks of a poll commissioned and skewed by Ron Paul supporters.

    But these R2000 polls by DKos look reasonably fair and thorough.

    If they lean further left than you like, I suspect they’re using an LV secret sauce which takes 2008 more into account than you’d like.

    But we’ll get the answer to THAT in November.

  • SteveLA

    mbecker

    When the immigration debate was going hot and heavy I used to catch JD on Hannity. As hard as it is to imagine, JD was a bigger blowhard than the host. I started checking him out on line, reading what he and done and said. My visceral dislike of him grew and grew as I saw what a bully and a jerk he is.

    Your comment about Johnny Mac is about right in my limited experience. I few back from DC to LA through Phoenix a few months back, Johnny Mac was on the other side of the cabin from me. I got to watch how people reacted to him and you’re pretty much spot on. Ordinary people seem to relate to him well and he does tend to be very nice in person.

  • SteveLA
  • mbecker908

    Given, the Hanoi Hilton was a long, long time ago, but there are tons of retirees in Phoenix who consider him to be THE Great American Hero. They are the conservative base here. While they may not like his previous iterations on immigration or whatever they will give him a pass because of his long ago deeds. And they won’t tolerate a loud mouthed blowhard with no resume attacking his character, even if said blowhard happened to be right.

    Actually, I think the immigration flap right now has benefited JD. Just not for the reason that some would assume. He’s out of the spotlight, nobody’s heard squat from him for several weeks. For him that’s a plus. Come late July when people are buying air time in bundles and his face is back on TV folks will remember why he’s an EX Congresscritter.

  • AceInTX

    I’ve never disagreed with you on Hayworth mbecker…but what effect will 52% negatives have :

    1) on the primaries when people start paying attention in the summer….

    2) On the General election?

  • mbecker908

    either do or commission polling? Any chance of working off of that?

  • AceInTX
  • SteveLA

    mbecker

    I disagree with McCain on torture, but I understand where he’s coming from as having experienced it first hand.

    He’s dead wrong on McCain Finegold. It was and is too blunt an instrument, but there is something to be said for unlimited funds in elections, but to expect politicians to police themselves in nonsense.

    The list of things I don’t agree with Johnny Mac is probably pretty long, haven’t been looking for reasons to trash him though, I’ll leave that to the Eeyores.

  • AceInTX

    I trust your take on it…but I can’t help being suspicious when I see a Poll that has anything to do with KOS

  • AceInTX
  • SteveLA

    Maybe something new in polling.

    An email poll with everything expect who was polled out in the open, aka transparent. Maybe opt in or something with a real email address. Problem would be how to assure the sample was not skewed and how to keep the email addresses private and not fall into the hands of anyone for fund raising.

    Web polls are useless because of the ability for tech savvy folks and not so savvy to mess with them. Telephone polls are random, at least I think they are, but not quite sure.

    I wonder if any university teaches a course in polling and would take on the challenge of coming up with a methodology to implement a email poll.

  • AceInTX

    McCain also has stuff in his background that is above reproach.

    As I’ve mentioned above…he’s exposed himself as a leopard who will change his spots to maintain his grip on Power….he’s sold himself in the last 5 months or so as someone he’s not and history shows he never has been….he’s gone back on everything he’s ever said he was and/or believed in.

    You know AZ better than I do…I’ve acknowledged that…and I’ve never argued with you about JD’s warm and cuddly nature…he is a blow hard and has always irritated me. …

    no matter how this thing turns out…I’ll sleep well at night knowing a couple things.

    1) McCain has stayed on the reservation and not gotten mavericky because of this race

    2) McCain has had to turn off the funding spigots to his statist backing, progressive Republican supporting money machine in order to protect his right flank

    the one nagative I can see in this is the off chance he might lose the general to the Democrat…and I truely pray that doesn’t happen…if he does, it will be blamed on JD and people like me, Cold Warrior and the Tea Party movement…but the truth of the matter is…McCain has destroyed his so called “man of honor” persona….and if he loses this in the General to the Dem…it will be his fault for his arrogance and pompous attitude that he’s better than all the rest of us and thinking voters are dumb enough to by his act.

  • mbecker908

    The Democrats have two candidates (the second one entered the race today). Both make Che Gueverra look like a RS frontpager. I will be utterly shocked if either got 35% in the general and I wouldn’t be surprised if McCain got upwards of 90%.

    Some perspective on McCain in the Generals…

    1986 – First run for Senate, he was a Critter. Won by 20.

    1992 – Got 56% in a three way race that included former Gov Mecham who got 11. Count those 11 for McCain, none of those folk would have voted for any Dem.

    1998 – 69/28. I can’t remember if he even bothered to campaign.

    2004 – He got 77%. He was a much more vocal “maverick” then, he’d just gotten CFR slammed through.

    In November, a live boy AND a dead girl might get McCain below 60, but not by much.

  • SteveLA

    Ace

    You write these four or five posts all tiered under yourself, who the heck cares to figure out if you’re making sense or asking a question. You posted three in this case…YIKES. Try to figure out what you are going to say and say it without posting diarrhea.

    I actually did go through the links, they’re the usual I have come to expect of you. Ether a whining session about how social conservatives are being ignored or worse, or a warning to Republicans about something or the other or a link to a video without comment. By the way, if you want to quote something in your posts, try the US Constitution, that’s relevant to how our government actually works.

    So what has JD done to attract you to his cause, besides he’s not Johnny Mac?

    You can do it.

  • AceInTX

    But I’m sure McCain OWNS the RPAZ and no one with real stature would dare buck the establishment to challenge him….so we’re stuck with JD

  • mbecker908

    One is a Tucson City Councilman and I’m pretty sure he’s from the same district who gave us Raul G-whatever, THE most liberal guy in the House. He’s barely known in Tucson and will have trouble buying votes (literally) in Maricopa County or the north country.

    The other guy is a former investigative reporter for “The Real Paper” which is the alternative weekly here in Phoenix. To give them their due, while they are certainly a proud offshoot of Isventia, they actually have two or three good, high quality and very fair investigative pieces every year. I actually posted a diary on one about the greens that was HIGHLY critical. One of the better stories I’ve read anywhere on the subject.

    All that “fairness crap” aside, my dead white cat has better name recognition and less baggage than either of these fools. They will also have run their campaigns on something less than Mrs908′s food budget because the national Dems won’t be spending money here.

    So, to summarize:

    McCain – 52% think his politics are icky. Everybody respects him personally.

    Both Ds – no money, no name rec (I honestly don’t know either of them, I don’t think aesthete knows the Tucson guy and HE lives in Tucson), no prospect of either. They will also come out in support of policies that are an absolute anathema to both any Republican and the libertarian leaning folk here.

  • AceInTX

    JD has taken McCain from a 60% conservative to 99.999% this year….and he’s not been able to help Crist and his other favorite RINOs this year because he’s fighting for his life.

    not bad from my perspective…not bad at all

  • mbecker908

    And it’s just not my fault Shadegg or Flake didn’t run against him. Either could have had a real shot at beating him. This would be a totally different race.

  • Aaron Gardner

    You consistently trash conservatives.

    Just for the record.

  • mbecker908

    I’ve made them all in the past and been much nastier about than old sweet you. I have no use for McCain’s politics. I happen to have no use for him personally.

    I have no idea what McCain’s deal with the RPAZ or the Congressional Delegation is. All I know is that all the House guys are supporting McCain and none of ‘em really “need” to, they’re all in safe seats and are solid guys.

    And no, we’re not stuck with JD. We just have to put up with him for three months and then, hopefully, he’ll move to SC and be gamecock’s weatherman again. The one thing that won’t happen is him serving in a elective office in the state of Arizona again.

  • mbecker908

    elect a real quality candidate in six years. And frankly, I think McCain will probably do a much better job fighting BO in DC than JD ever could.

    He’s not fighting for his life either If there’s a “fight” it’s just to see how big the primary margin will be. I still think 20 is about right, but as I’ve said before that’s just my gut.

  • mbecker908

    THAT is exactly the only thing he’s got going for him.

  • SteveLA

    Our resident insulter of folks he disagrees with weighs in.

    Just for the record, I’m way conservative, just not in your single issue of abortion way or on other social conservative issues you and others focus on. I make no pretense of my beliefs on those issues, I am an out and out RINO libertarian on those issues. I’ve been a constitution loving conservative long before you were born and will be one for a long time in the future.

    So you have a lovey day, go find someone else to insult.

  • mbecker908
  • Aaron Gardner

    If you are insulted by me pointing out the parody of you calling someone else an eeyore, you have eve thinner skin than I thought.

    As far as your dig at me as a single issue conservative … well, let’s just say that anyone who has to fall back on an outright lie in order to attempt a defense has already lost.

    You have a lovely day as well.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I get the impression it’s a small firm that Kos found to work with.

    In fact it wouldn’t surprise me if a Kos reader founded the firm.

  • AceInTX

    about it’s legitimacy.

  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX
  • SteveLA

    Neil,

    Not sure if you found this video, but this is an interview video about the USC/LATimes CA Senate poll done a few months back. The speakers are one of the Times guys and one of the Professors from USC. The discussion does make a lot of sense about what the CA general election will probably come down to….Obama and how is he doing.

    src=”http://college.usc.edu/assets/swf/player.swf” bgcolor=”#262626″ quality=”high” scale=”noScale” salign=”lt” menu=”false” allowscriptaccess=”always” flashvars=”autoplay=false&config=http://college.usc.edu/videos/xml/146/0/senators-race/” width=”396″ height=”223″ />

  • AceInTX

    how about answering mine?

  • SteveLA

    Here’s a link to the web page. USC

  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX

    I couldn’t think of a reason otherwise

  • eburke

    anyone who disagree’s with him.

    He is so virulently anti-pro-life that anyone who ever trots out the ‘moderate’ or RINO card he immediately pulls the ‘you’re a one-issue, social conservative’ just so he doesn’t have to debate the issues with you. As you well know, it doesn’t matter what your *actual* posting history and positons are.

    It’s Steve’s equivalent to the libs using the ‘racist’ card everytime you disagree with them.

  • AceInTX
  • AceInTX

    He is so virulently anti-pro-life that anyone who ever trots out the ?moderate? or RINO card he immediately pulls the ?you?re a one-issue, social conservative? just so he doesn?t have to debate the issues with you.

    because I haven’t seen a soul raise social issues in this thread except Steve

  • AceInTX

    that would NOT have happened without JD

  • mbecker908

    I doubt JD has anything much at all to do with McCain’s current rantings.

  • AceInTX

    his absurd statement that he’s never considered himself a maverick is my proof of JD’s influence on him this year…

    One thing I will admit to being concerned about though.,..is his legendary vindictiveness and spite…if he beats JD…and if he wins the general…he’s going to be a huge pain in the rear for the next 6 years

  • AceInTX

    the people of Arizona potentially lose the ability to elect a real quality candidate in six years. And frankly, I think McCain will probably do a much better job fighting BO in DC than JD ever could.

    How does JD’s challenge affect what and who will fun in 6 years?

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    If McCain wins this and retires, it’ll be an open seat in 6 years and we can run safely the best Republican we can.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I’ll put in a question though.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    And you bet I scrutinized the first couple I worked with.

    But they all follow the same pattern. fav/unfav of all candidates, relevant races, and then some stuff on Obama and nat’l issues.

  • Doc Holliday

    I told the McCain haters some time ago they did not know their man. McCain can hold a grudge like no one, Obama pissed him off at that meeting. I also said it was a waste of time and money to go after McCain for several reasons I won’t repeat here. I understand why people want to do it, and they are welcome to try. We will see what happens, these types of things are hit or miss ie. Coats, Bennet.

  • mbecker908

    And I don’t think it matters whether McCain retires in six or not, he’s beatable. Just not by JD.

    There are currently two guys who would have had a real shot at beating McCain. Shadegg and Flake. In three or four years we could have as many as five credible candidates. The key will be to focus on beating McCain and groom somebody.

    After this election, I’ll be surprised if JD even stays in AZ.

  • SteveLA

    mbecker

    I was hoping Megan McCain would run for the seat in a few years, just so I could agree with the Eeyore’s for once.

    Shadegg and or Flake would be good however.

  • Doc Holliday

    many who can’t stand him. No he would not change parties like that crumb Specter.

  • mbecker908

    the Twitter pics…

  • SteveLA
  • mbecker908

    McCain’s no Specter.

  • mbecker908
  • beau

    No matter who runs against JD, I would vote for the opposer. JD has left a very sour taste in the mouths of those who live in Arizona. He ruined the reputation of Republicans, he left his seat wide open for a democrat, he added to the corruption in Washington, he is a blowhard, ignorant and has a severe lack of experience and intelligence. JD is not worth of any seat anywhere near Washington!

  • AceInTX

    the people of Arizona potentially lose the ability to elect a real quality candidate in six years. And frankly, I think McCain will probably do a much better job fighting BO in DC than JD ever could.

    I don’t follow how JD running against McCain this year will potentially lose Arizonans the opportunity to elect a quality candidate?

  • AceInTX

    I was hoping for Megan

    but it doesn’t have anything to do with us…she’s you’re political soul mate isn’t she…

    She’s “Like…a Progressive”

  • AceInTX

    I don?t follow how JD running against McCain this year will potentially lose Arizonans the opportunity to elect a quality candidate in 2016?

  • mbecker908

    He’s gonna get his head handed to him and he’ll be back to being a non-entity in AZ politics.

    What it does do it take resources and organization that could be much better spent on winning three House seats.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    I go to the Tea Parties. I recruit precinct committeemen there. Conservative precinct committeemen. Some of the Tea Party groups in the Phoenix area, and across the state, “get” that it takes more than holding a sign to change things. They have figured out the Neighborhood Precinct Committeemen Strategy. They are recruiting Republican precinct committeemen. At the North Phoenix Tea Party meeting this past Monday, 85 per cent of the attendees, by a show of hands, said they were already PCs and I tried to recruit all those there who didn’t raise their hands. On Tuesday night at the kick-off meeting of the Tempe Tea Party about half of the attendees already were PCs.

    McCain doesn’t attend Tea Party meetings. J.D. does. Guess for whom these NEW conservative PCs will be getting out the vote in the Republican primary election.

    What happened today in Utah should give McCain pause.

    We’ll see come August 24 in the primary McCain has to survive.

    Turn out in the primary is very low in Arizona. It’s been as low as 20 per cent of eligible voters.

    John Shadegg yesterday at an Arizona Republican Lawyers’ Assn. luncheon yesterday was asked whether he believe Obama and the Dems were misreading the power of the Tea Party movement. He said they were.

    I told him in a follow up question that I believed the Republican senators who did not fight harder to kill Obamacare were misreading the political power and and organizing skills of the Tea Party movement and predicted that Sen. Bob Bennett and the Republican Party would very likely receive the shocks of their lives today at the Utah nominating convention. Shadegg seemed clueless.

    Like I said, we’ll see come August 24. Meanwhile, I’ll be hitting another precinct later this evening to recruit a few more conservative precinct committeemen. Who will get out the vote for J.D. on August 24.

    That’s how it’s done. That’s how they did it in Utah.

    For Liberty,
    ColdWarrior, PC (that?s ?precinct committeeman,? not ?political child!?)
    Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW!

  • houstoneagle

    as long as you either agree with his overall message or as long as they aren’t directed against someone with a blamstick? What about the rule “be respectful, or be banned,” Neil?

  • houstoneagle

    Rinse. Repeat.

  • houstoneagle

    I lied…HERE is the template:

    ***insert offensive personal attack headline here***

    ***blah blah blah blah***

    ***allege EVERYONE in [insert state here, usually Arizona] believes blah blah blah blah***

    THEN, you have your rinse and repeat.

    :-)

  • houstoneagle

    Tell us how you REALLY feel! LOL

    Need more personal attacks ITT, IMHO.

  • Scope

    You haven’t been a registered poster on Redstate for a long time. This is kinda like a union, when you gain seniority/longevity status, you can say pretty much what you want, as long as it doesn’t involve bad language. The seniors have the right to use words such as “idiot” and the like. It’s great when they do that against those that really are not on “our” side. There are also factions that are what you might call “conservatives” though that term has never been fully defined by anyone here, or in many other places. There are also those that have a little or alot of Moderate beliefs. You should know by now that no mater how much Erick Erickson supports a particular candidate, there will be many who think he is an “idiot” for supporting that candidate. IRedstate is very diverse when it comes to candidates. There are also some candidates that get the detractors that come out in small numbers, but are very vocal in their detractions so to speak.

    You must learn the rules of the road at Redstate. If you do not agree with a senior or moderator, walk away. You will gain absolutely nothing in arguing with a senior union member that has no compunction other than to denigrate you, call you names, and belittle you. Let it alone. You will not change it. It is what it is. Go post some positive news or opinions on another diary.

  • mbecker908

    Then draw conclusions. That’s how it’s done. You can take any position you want to on any subject or candidate and have a great discussion.

    However, neither you nor houstoneagle or deano have come to terms with that. Until you do, you can expect to get smacked around for parading your stupidity and incompetence.

    Specifically, in your case, when you can manage to post on topics you actually know something about you do reasonably well. Your problem Scope is that you seem to think you know a whole lot about most things and that your opinion will pass for facts. You don’t and it won’t.

  • mbecker908

    We disagree, but you come to the table with actual facts and opinions and reach conclusions.

    We’ll see in August.

  • AceInTX

    AceInTX:

    If you’re right…and no Dem could beat McCain…then we’ve lost NOTHING from JD’s challenge of McCain

    mbecker:

    the people of Arizona potentially lose the ability to elect a real quality candidate in six years.

    I’m asking you to clarify that because I don’t see how what you said applied to what I said. How does JD running in 2010 effect who is running in 2016?

    I’m not trying to be a smart axx here I just don’t understand what you meant

  • Scope

    the best thing is to walk away. To say that when I post on something that I actually know something about I do “reasonably well” is to say that when you post on anything, you are the expert. Your critique of me becker means nothing, as for you, your opinion trumps all. I don’t rely on your opinion of me to define myself.

  • Scope

    If you are now looking for facts about Al Franken well that just speaks to ……

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    I think you’ve been an observer of Arizona politics a lot longer than me. I had one foot in California and one in Arizona for about six years and didn’t pay too much attention to Arizona politics until early 2007 when the illegal immigration issue popped up in a big way and I got really p.o.-ed when McCain, Kyl, Graham and other “conservatives’ tried to foist Shamnesty on an unsuspecting public.

    If McCain didn’t think J.D. had a shot, why would be be spending all that cash here in AZ and not in support of other RINO candidates all over the country in greater amounts? The only reason McCain spends here on himself in the huge amounts he’s been expending is because he knows he could go the way of Bennett in his primary.

    The Maricopa County GOP is a lot different in the PC ranks than it was after the 2008 election. The independents who go to the Tea Parties are not McCain people — they’re there, in part, because of McCain and his ilk. As I’ve noted here in another comment, I’ve literally met thousands of people at the grass roots Tea Parties and group meetings, and so far I’ve met only ONE person who liked McCain, and she was persuadable — after I told her a few things about McCain, she was ready to at least consider voting for J.D.

    It will all be about vote turnout in the primary. I asked a political consultant at the seminar I attended yesterday on election law whether he had a sense as to whether there’d be a big uptick in participation in the Republican primary on August 24. He said no. That does not bode will for McCain, as I believe the new PCs in the Party will be beating their precincts — and Tea Party/9.12/WeSurroundThem/SmartGirlPolitics/etc. groups — to get conservatives to the polls to vote for AnybodyButMcCain and that most of the independents who choose to select a Republican ballot will vote for AnybodyButMcCain.

    Whether it will be in sufficient numbers is the big question.

    I don’t think it will be 60-40 for McCain.

    Time will tell. Meanwhile, I’ll keep trying to get conservatives to become Republican precinct committeemen.

    For Liberty,
    ColdWarrior, PC (that?s ?precinct committeeman,? not ?political child!?)
    Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW!

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    this thread, I’d really like to know which are actually INSIDE the Arizona Republican Party as a precinct committeeman?

    I am.

    I go to my monthly Legislative District committee meeting. And the Maricopa County committee meeting. And I go to every tea party I can to recruit PCs. And every tea party/9.12/WeSurroundThem/etc. meeting I can to recruit PCs. In all those meetings and events, I’ve met ONE person who supported McCain. One. And she was willing to listen to my arguments as to why McCain needed to go.

    And keep in mind we’re talking about who’s going to win in the Republican Party primary election, not the general election. I agree McCain would coast to victory in a general election state-wide against J.D.

    But we’re talking about the traditionally-very-low-turn-out primary election with an energized group of new conservative precinct committeemen.

    So, what’s the count here on precinct committeemen?

    For reference: What’s the [precinct committeeman] count?

    Why do you think J.D. is recruiting conservatives to become PCs?

    I believe J.D. has a shot. We’ll see on August 24. Meanwhile, I’ll keep recruiting conservatives to become precinct committeemen — so they can help get out the vote in the primary for real conservatives. And to make sure we elect more conservative leadership INSIDE the Party.

    For Liberty,
    ColdWarrior, PC (that?s ?precinct committeeman,? not ?political child!?)
    Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW!

  • AceInTX

    but before McCain was forced to spend all that money attacking JD…he was handing it out to Carly and Meg and T-Paw, and Kirk, and the rest of his progressive buddies….it wasn’t ever going to go to those seats

  • aesthete

    In some of those cases, such as Kirk, it is a choice between him and a Democrat. In the case of others, at least some of that money will go towards defeating the Democrat in the general, one way or another. Money sent to JD and McCain will be exclusively dedicated to the result of the primary; no seats will be won on net, and there is no challenge from the Democrat that we need to worry about. That would be acceptable if JD were a conservative in the mold of, say, Jeff Flake or Tom Coburn. In truth, he is more like an obnoxious version of Dan Coats: a reliable party vote, but not an outstandingly conservative or independent one. Why do we want to spend our limited resources on getting the party hack in over McCain, when we could be putting it to good use by electing three conservatives (a net gain) and putting Dems on the defensive? Better, why not go for the best of both worlds and groom a candidate who can wear Goldwater’s mantle with pride in 6 years, instead of rushing it and supporting a vain one-hit wonder who will embarrass us and detract from message discipline?

    At any rate, a funding strategy predicated solely on how our moderate elements will spend their own money is one doomed to failure and to unnecessary fratricidal infighting.

  • http://www.theprecinctproject.wordpress.com ColdWarrior

    Chirp, chirp, chirp.

    Still waiting to hear which of those who have prognosticated in this thread about J.D. Hayworth’s chances of winning the primary election actually are elected or appointed Arizona Republican Party precinct committeemen.

    For Liberty,
    ColdWarrior, PC (that?s ?precinct committeeman,? not ?political child!?)
    Conservatives, UNITE! CHANGE the Republican Party and save the world by UNITING INSIDE the Party as precinct committeemen. NOW!

  • houstoneagle

    Bullies like mbecker908 only tear us folks down for “incompetence,” “stupidity,” etc. because he is desperate to empower himself by any means necessary. He deeply resents that we are more intelligent and more competent with our arguments.

    I guess I’ll be putting in earplugs from now on so when his one-record jukebox (“stupid!” “ignorant!” etc., ad nauseum) plays, I won’t be listening. Thanks again.

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    Some here, like Scope himself, will not use ad hominem language but will certainly try to bully you if you make an argument they have no real answer for.

    Here are some things to watch out for: (1) If you say that some Republicans are not doing right, or making valid arguments. You will be inundated with attacks saying that you are “hurting” the movement, or that you are falling for democrat attacks.

    (2) If you make a Libertarian based argument there will be those who attack you for that, but not as much anymore. It seems like the incredible growth of government has at least sacred some of the “social-only” conservatives into fiscal reality.

    (3) There are certain people who can, and will, hit you with the most incredible vituperative attacks, far worse than anything MBecker said. And for merely disagreeing with them. I will let you discover who those people are on your own.

  • Scope

    you make most of us proud. Keep reporting your experiences from the inside, they are very encouraging.

  • AceInTX

    this isn’t rocket science

  • aesthete

    We could, similarly, use the money that is going into the Inept Politician Bailout Fund that is the JD campaign to pull the party to the right. Again, if we spend all our money on making sure that the “RINOs” (whatever that term means) don’t reform the party in their own image, what will be left to support our own conservative candidates and candidates running in the general, and how will we be able to unite all of the factions of the Republican party to win?

  • AceInTX

    you apparently have no problem with McCain and his ilk raising money and spending funds recruiting liberal/progressive Republicans to run up and down the line…but have a problem when the tables are turned.

    again, I’ll point out…we took out Bennett and McGoo wasn’t able to help him…We still have a shot a Carley and what’s his face in CO…and McCain won’t be able to help them either because he’s so hell bent on destroying JD…

    I’ll say it again…JD has his uses…he’s been most useful in getting the maverick to disavow his maverickness…and he’s pinning the old fart down so he can’t keep spreading the progressive cancer in our ranks.

    I know JD is an SOB…by by golly…he’s a useful SOB and he’s done a darn good job IMHO

  • aesthete

    On McCain, the old devil’s always been about making politics personal: now that Bush isn’t his archenemy, Obama has no use for McCain or his brand of “bipartisanship”. I think that that has much more to to with McCain’s rightward lurch than what JD does or doesn’t do, especially when you consider that this rightward turn began before JD even had superficially decent polling.

    As for the rest, I’m not going to reiterate my point on the negative-sum nature of your argument for the third time, but I’ll note that it still stands, and not to offend, but you never really addressed it.

  • AceInTX

    maybe this?

    Why do we want to spend our limited resources on getting the party hack in over McCain, when we could be putting it to good use by electing three conservatives (a net gain) and putting Dems on the defensive? Better, why not go for the best of both worlds and groom a candidate who can wear Goldwater?s mantle with pride in 6 years, instead of rushing it and supporting a vain one-hit wonder who will embarrass us and detract from message discipline?

    If so, I can understand the validity of backing three Conservative candidates to move the party rightward and put the Dems on defense but there is one problem with that argument which I started with in the first place…for every conservative we back, McCain and his ilk are out recruiting and funding 1 or 2 more who are progressive/liberal Republicans. JD has brought that to a screeching halt,

    I also like what you have to say about grooming the next Goldwater…(I have my problems with Golwater by the way…namely his anti SoCon bent)…but again we face the problem of McLame and his big money donors grooming Megan to replace Daddy Warbucks

    in short…I don’t think your wrong….but I don’t totally agree either….for me it’s a win win…because If JD Takes him down it will go a long way toward wiping the bad taste out of my mouth from having to vote for the POS in 2008…

    If JD doesn’t take him out and only manages to take him down a few pegs…it’s worth it to see McLame humbled after his arrogant behavior of the last 8 years or more.

    Finally…let me address this:

    I think that that has much more to to with McCain?s rightward lurch than what JD does or doesn?t do, especially when you consider that this rightward turn began before JD even had superficially decent polling.

    McLame’s rightward lurch roughly coincided with his massive expenditures attacking JD before JD had even announced his intent to run the way I remember it…so I’m not sure I buy that.

  • aesthete

    Let’s say that we fund our candidates, McCain funds his, and we get on net 3 new conservatives, and 2 new moderates (as far as I know, there’s no conservative in serious danger of a challenge from a moderate) from that outcome. That means we have 5 candidates who are more conservative by any metric than the former occupants of their seats (liberal Dems). Even if McCain is funding primary candidates, some of that money will go towards making ads in the general, and if the moderate loses, there is a very strong chance that he or she will support the nominee, both monetarily and otherwise, because it is in his or her self-interest to do so.

    If we throw money into a primary, that money will go into the black hole of the McCain-JD race: one which, as I noted, isn’t so much about conservatism as it is about party loyalty. Significantly, it is a battle that the anti-McCain forces, more likely than not, will lose: polling, anecdotes from most of AZ’s residents (of at least its 3 major cities), and the level of support that JD has so far received bears that out. Any money that goes into this race will a) either go into McCain’s war chest (and therefore be used in the fashion that you have noted previously), or towards JD’s flailing and debt-ridden campaign: even if he wins and has money left over, that money will go towards paying off JD’s campaign debts, and not towards winning any other races (which is why I call it the Inept Politicians’ Bailout Fund). IOW, this race is a black hole of funding, with no effects on other races nationwide. Therefore, any money that goes into this race will be money that, at best, is going towards electing a party loyalist over an idiot, instead of electing many conservatives over their liberal counterparts.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine
  • AceInTX

    because in many of the races we’re talking about,…it is McCain’s money that is being used to push liberal candidates for seats where there is already a conservative running…in some case where the conservative runs better than the McCain candidate….(Crist)…costing us money and effort there…but of course we never hear complaints about that game being played…somehow it’s OK when the moderates play that game….but let us counter it…and engage in the fight that they pick…and WE are the trouble makers…we’re the purists…this isn’t a fight of our choosing…McCain chose it…the RMSP chose it….the NRSC and RNC chose it…and we need to figth to win it or we lose this country…Forever!!….but I digress…

    In this case…we have shut down the moderate money machine thanks to JD…at the same time, we are funding more conservative candidates and stiff arming the establishment by refusing to give to the national party…and giving money directly to our candidates…