« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Even Democrats are against FCC Deem and Pass [Updated]

When the FCC announced plans to declare that ISPs are no longer information services, but are instead phone companies, the FCC claimed the authority to regulate content and prices on Internet service nationwide. And no matter how many times the neo-Marxists at Free Press (and their front group Save the Internet) claim that Net Neutrality is all about “preserving an open Internet,” the FCC’s actions are all about command and control.

Even Democrats see the problem, as 72 House members of the Democratic persuasion signed a letter to FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski urging him to slow down and let the Congress do its job, instead of taking matters into his own hands and defying the law and the courts to do so.

Update: It’d help if I link the right letter.

Quoth their letter (via The Hill), which is just crushing of Free Press, Google, and other Net Neutrality propagandists:

Like you, we believe in a transparent, data-driven process and stand ready to work with you on measures that will spur adoption and expand the use of broadband networks. But we remain suspicious of conclusions based on slogans rather than substance and of policies that restrict and inhibit the very innovation and growth that we all seek to achieve.

I could hardly say it better myself, seriously. Far be it from me to praise Democrats but on this issue, they’re right. It is up to the Congress to keep the Internet open and innovating, as was done back in the Clinton-Gingrich days when they joined up to pass the Telecommunications Act of 1996, a much-needed update to the Communications act that told the FCC to keep their hands off to begin with.

The FCC is trying to take it upon itself to roll back the 1996 law passed by Republicans and signed by a Democrat, and instead regulate the ISPs the way FDR wanted phone companies regulated back in 1934, all because it gives them more power than the Congress and the President gave them. We’ve got to stop them.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

    And if so, any chance the FCC will overreach, and a subsequent court challenge will lead to SCOTUS overturning Mass v. EPA?

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The FCC is extending its authority far beyond statutory limits, much like the EPA did with CO2.

  • http://nationalchat.wordpress.com southeasttexas

    We already know President Obama would like nothing better than to abolish all sorts of Internet media such as public and private blogs, and a wide variety of social networks. And, (just ask FOX news) he apparently thinks he has some given obligation to control who in the news media receives news releases and has the right to report anything he doesn’t like. So, really, when it comes right down to it, can we not view this latest action by the FCC as little more than a continuing effort to destroy our freedom of speech, and place control over what people say, who they say it to and why they say it?

    What’s next? Are we Americans to stand up and say, “hail the Republic of Socialized American States”?

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The DC Circuit already slapped them in Comcast v FCC, which is why they’re trying Deem and Pass. Declare ISPs to be phone companies and try again.

  • http://erickbrockway.wordpress.com/ Erick Brockway

    And the rules are a changing. We’re putting people into office with cajones (hopefully).

  • Adjoran

    Of course, he insists the initial “fairness” requirements will be “voluntary” and we’ll just “see how it goes,” which means if you please the Commissar in charge of blogs, you’ll be okay, but if you offend his sense of “fair play” you will be subject to enforced opposition sharing your bandwidth, and repeat violators get an all-expenses-paid vacation at a re-education camp near you!

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2010/05/20/dont-let-them-tell-you-they-dont-want-to-censor-the-internet/

    And he’s the chief Regulator in the white house… wheee.

  • trutexan

    Someone should tell them…I mean, they are all about freedom of anyone looking at anything up to and including kiddy porn. They’ve even been arrested for not turning over web traffic logs to authoritites to prosecute sex offenders. Why are they silent on this? Will someone wake up the ALA please? The end result is no different than book burning.

  • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

    have NEVER been about open ideas or free expression. Those are just code words for being able to spread their own propaganda.

    Every Time the left gains power the FIRST impulse is to shut up their opponents.

  • cwilson

    the court actually ORDERED the EPA to go and regulate CO2 as a pollutant. In effect, Mass v. EPA said that the EPA refusing to regulate CO2 was a violation of its congressional mandate. That’s not “extending its authority beyond statutory limits”, that’s “refusing to perform its statutorily-mandated duties”.

    If you accept Steven’s asinine ruling.

  • indyjohn

    who secretly love getting whipped by their dominatrix, Nancy Pelosi, The Progressive Caucus and its supporters in the Democrat leadership are no doubt backstage, cheerng Genachowski on. Pelosi will allow this public display of concern and independence by an ostensibly disgruntled minortiy, but she will not permit anyone in the party stand in the way of her ultimate goal, which is control of all forms of media. When Nancy gets through flogging them, enough of these 72 Democrats will get their minds right that they won’t cause Nancy any trouble.

  • zuckey6

    everyone should call them Socialists or stateists; there is nothing progressive about Obamacare or Cap and Trade.