Who has best shot at beating Reid? Who do all pundits think Angle is easiest for Reid to beat?

Please please please hightlight and support NJ District 7 where 3 candidates are trying to oust rino Leonard Lance on June 8th. The Tea Party candidate is Lon Hosford, a true blue American conservative…

www.lonhosfordforcongress.org

… None of them can be called “moderates.” So the next thing to consider is who will be *better* able to pound Reid into the ground without making us chew on our nails on Election Night?

To be honest, that’ll be Lowden. I just believe Tark would be a more consistent conservative (96% to Lowden’s 93%) and that his path to victory would be only slightly more steep than Lowden’s which is why I put him first.

Angle on the other hand may be the most consistent conservative, but quite frankly, she would have the toughest time beating Harry Reid. The “Scientologist Massages for Prisoners” ads basically write themselves and Reid has a $30 million warchest.

Notwithstanding all that, I simply see no reason why we need to damage perfectly good people to see our guy/gal win. Lowden is not an enemy – she’s actually someone we should be happy to have on our side.

Or is it one and done for the primary?

I definitely like Angle the most, but I think defeating Reid is the most important thing, and she is definitely the least likely to win. Therefore I support Tarkanian, who is 2nd best, and probably about the same as Lowden in terms of general election electability.

Is the only real Conservative in the race and the only one who can beat Reid. Angle cant win and Tarkanian is questionable on the issue of the 2nd Amendment. When voters go to the polls, Tarkanian will play spoiler on Angle’s chances and Lowden will win. End of story!

The three top reasons!!!!
ELECTABILITY ELECTABILITY ELECTABILITY

Mark Levin recently endorsed Sharron Angle, because he sees her as the most consistently conservative. Lowden seen as a moderate. Rhino?
Nonetheless, unless citizens of that state have lost the last remnants of their brains, ANY ONE opposition candidate could and should easily beat the obnoxious Reid.

I’ve sent him some dough. Both Lowden & Angle are gaff machines. Bartergate, prohibition, etc. Lowden strikes me as a candidate who would probably do okay as long as there’s a blue team member in the White House but when the next red team president says, “Hey I need $700 billion to give to my Treasury Secretary’s friends on Wall Street,” she’ll say okay. An earlier comment suggested Reid is toast unless the GOP candidate implodes, which Angle (Lowden too) would probably do. We have to look beyond this year and this president, this country is going to go through some very hard times and we are going to need strong conservatives in office. Spineless marshmellows like Reid or Lowden need not apply.

That’s the answer to the question of who should we support in Nevada Senate race?

That also happens to be the answer to all of the primaries. We must as conservatives unite against socialists and progressives on the left. Those who are looking for the “perfect” candidate can always find fault with anyone. In Nevada, there are three good candidates. The people of that state will tell us who we will back.

Just one thought, Isn’t Harry Reid the one who thinks the aliens are coming to get us. Who’s the Scientologist now? He’s a wack job, political bully, who has made unethical real estate deals for his own benefit, and the leader of the most liberal Senate in history. Other than that he’s a great guy.