« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Law and Order: Google’s Intent

It’s been a while since we peeked in at Google’s doings. The proud champion of unprecedented FCC power grabs toward Net Neutrality regulation of the Internet (for which opposition is growing in the Senate) is still under fire for two broad breaches of the public’s trust: The Andrew McLaughlin lobbying from the White House, and the massive privacy breaches in the Street View program.

Google’s long been the pet company of digital libertarian types, but now they’re starting to wake up to the truth. Privacy International has come out strongly against Google for its invasive electronic spying on people’s homes, and the recording of large amounts of personal data corresponding with people’s home street addresses. PI has read Google’s internal audit of the breaches of the public trust, and has said the audit proves “criminal intent” to spy on people.

Google is likely to face prosecution in Germany, Australia, and possibly Britain for this criminal activity. Don’t be evil? More like, don’t get caught.

Of course their eyes and ears in the White House, Andrew McLaughlin, are already in hot water here in the USA as well for his illicit lobbying for his former employer from his job in the White House as Deputy CTO. He’s been officially reprimanded for wrongdoing, with reports coming out that he was even lobbying shamelessly for Google ally Clearwire while working on Haiti earthquake relief.

Darrell Issa isn’t letting it go at that, though. He thinks the White House was too quick to give a slap on the wrist to one of its own, and that the Obama administration is too quick to allow a corporate shill to continue to use the White House for those private aims. Quoth The Hill:

McLaughlin was reprimanded in May by Office of Science and Technology Policy Director John Holdren for using his personal e-mail address to discuss policy issues with his former colleagues, including Alan Davidson, Google’s director of U.S. Public Policy. The White House has claimed the breach was inadvertant and had “no influence on policy decisions within the federal government.”

Issa rejected that claim in his letter, highlighting what he terms “questionable” e-mail exchanges obtained by the nonprofit Consumer Watchdog where McLaughlin appears to discuss policy and press strategies with Davidson and other Google employees. In another exchange, McLaughlin assures Google’s Chief Internet Evangelist Vint Cerf that the White House is not shying away from its commitment to net neutrality.

We’ve got to stop the Obama White House and FCC in its Net Neutrality push. The thing stinks from the head down.

COMMENTS

  • techsan

    (via Slashdot)

    An Australian site points out ISP requirements for data retention. This includes virtually all forms of communication.

    The European Directive on Data Retention (2006) requires communications providers to retain a number of categories of data relating to their users.

    Broadly speaking, they must retain data necessary to trace and identify the source, destination, date, type, time and duration of communications ? and even what communication equipment is being used by customers and the location of mobile transmissions.

    According to the directive, where internet access is concerned, this means the ISPs must retain the user ID of users, email addresses of senders and recipients of email, the date and time that users logged on and off from a service, and their IP address ? whether dynamic or static applied to their user ID.

    For telephone conversations, this means the number from which calls were placed and the number that received the call, the owner of the telephone service and similar data such as the time and date of the call?s commencement and completion. For mobile phone numbers, geographic location data would also be included.

    As alarming as this is, I think it’s what Google already does for any other their services. Google is watching…when you choose them.

    At the end of the story, there is an attempt to say “trust us, we’re on your side”…

    The EU directive requires that no data regarding the content of communications be included, however, and it has directives regarding privacy, including the fact that data would be retained for periods of not less than six months and not more than two years from the date of the communication.

    Any data collected is to be destroyed at the end of that period.

    Yeah…right…destroyed…..in two years…that’s certain to happen…completely…no backups anywhere. Right.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • fashionbrandwholesale

    google is very strong ,but it have out of china,i think this is very bad for it .