« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Tech at Night: Henry Waxman, Net Neutrality, California, New York, 4chan, Privacy

Tech at Night

Apologies for missing the last two Tech at Nights. But unlike the paid staff of the well-funded Free Press, every word I’ve ever written here on technical issues has been on my own time, for free, because I care about the issues. And when work overwhelms me, as it did last week as a huge deadline approached, something had to give. And what gave was what I had to do at night when I just wanted to sleep.

So we start tonight with an update on the Waxman Net Neutrality bill. I wrote of it before in support of it, and proved prophetic as Henry Waxman used Republican opposition to justify radical, illegal FCC action on the issue.

It’s not too late, though. We can still build momentum to stop the FCC’s end run around the Congress, the Courts, and the Constitution. We need to talk up the Waxman bill because it is more limited than any other major proposal we’ve dealt with during this debate, because it would strictly, expressly forbid the FCC from doing the disastrous Title II reclassification which would give the FCC broad powers, and it’s just possible that the Congress taking the baton on this would encourage the FCC to back down until the process runs its course.

Politics matters, and there’s going to be a lame duck session. We can judo the Democrats on this, and use their bill in a bipartisan way to get the Congress behind a clear majority of the nation against massive Internet regulation. But we have to step up to the plate, ignore the Waxman name, and use the decent language of his proposal to make it happen. It’s time to put country first.

Especially when it gives even Barack Obama an out from a divisive issue, even as it gives America an out from regulation potentially more devastating to our economy than Obamacare, if it chokes off the Internet, one of our high growth, high potential areas.

And remember, the FCC is under pressure. It has all the power, but it is also under enormous political pressure. If the United States Congress makes bipartisan efforts against it, that will matter. Constitutional power still matters in this country, and no amount of political or rhetorical nudging will matter against it.

Moving on, The Obama administration is increasing regulation of electronic money transfers, rather than decreasing it as the libertarians who supported him expected. Huh. The statist is making government bigger. Whodathunkit? Oh wait. We did. We even said so. But people had to “make history” because Bush. And because racism. And now we all pay the price.

Be careful of what you do online with your name attached to it. People without their name attached to their works may expose you if you’re buying things online that you don’t want people to know about. It’s a crime, and anonymous vandals like the ones who have invaded 4chan infuriate me. But know they are out there. Walk in well-lit places. Use disposable credit cards. Be careful.

Carol Berkman, a judge in New York City, has presided over a case that convicted a man of “Identity Fraud” because he sock puppeted their names online. Saturday Night Live had better watch out, and put up disclaimers that THIS IS NOT JOE BIDEN, because mocking well known academics in their field is not allowed in Berkman’s court.

And to finish up tonight, California is also dumb unfortunately, not just New York. Our economy is in the toilet, we’re bleeding jobs to Texas and to plain old closings of businesses, but the state legislature is looking to increase tax collection. Unbelievable. Just unbelievable.

COMMENTS

  • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica
  • jeanms

    Just like to warn you guys to tread lightly around 4chan. Very lightly, Do not insult them, do not belittle them, do not call them names, do not talk down about them. Actually, if anything, avoid it all together, you don’t want to be on the receiving end of their wrath

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    I could lead a movement tomorrow to get America rallying against that den of filth.

    5 well-chosen pictures from that site would be enough. Do you want your kids seeing that? I would ask. Then get your ISP to filter it, I would suggest.

    I have a little megaphone here at RS and I’m not afraid to use it.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Which is one reason why I dislike so much that the cyberterrorists have hijacked the site as a home.

    But at the same time they don’t do anything to drive those guys off, so I’ll do my best to shut them down if I have to.

  • powertothepeople

    we must all hide in the dark shaking in fear because of the 4chan group.

    Are you for real?

  • http://realchangeandsense.blogspot.com jamesrileyjr

    4chan’s inhabitants have actually helped a number of our causes on many occasions, including the anti-Scientology movement, helping the FBI track terrorists and wannabe terrorists, and, oh yes, helping track down relatively quickly the idiot behind the Sarah Palin email hack. They spotted the password, they went in and changed it, and changed it again to prevent it from being re-hacked.

    Yes, they’re kids and yes, they’ve done their fair share of damage and done wildly stupid things but give them a little credit and stop whining about them.

  • Doc Holliday

    which libertarians? Certainly not many of them, he stands for everything libertarians disdain.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Uh *huh*.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    And again, all I have to do is put up five pictures from that site.

    You know it, too.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    You know, like those folk tend to because his spending was “out of control,” etc.

  • Doc Holliday

    I think they just figured out is was the norm in their world to hate Bush, certainly the MSM and NEA kept telling them to hate Bush. Most independents are clueless, when in doubt they usually go left because they are “caring”.

  • cactusjack

    what has happened to create the fiscal problems in CA today? Specifically has it been drain of business/drain of revenue, or, set up of too many state pensions ciphoning revenue out of the system? or = ? I agree with Chuck Devore from the RS Gathering, California is worth fighting for, it has produced great conservatives like RWR and Duncan Hunter, and has tremendous economic potential because of its size and varied geography/geology/terrain. Side note the drain of certain hi tech to Texas was inevitable, the hi tech was already there from WW2 defense boom and parts north o Austin are so similar in appearance, culture, etc., to tech CA, it/s a natural move to” CA East”

  • jeanms

    This isn’t some group whose members would be ashamed to be seen in public, this is the new media, new rules. You get the public involved, they can destroy your life, get your darkest secrets, destroy your credit rating, etc
    They can do enormous good, but they ruin people, they already have

  • jeanms

    Anonymous and 4chan are two separate entities, and the “terrorists” haven’t hijacked it, it’s way more complicated than that, read encyclopedia dramatica before you start making wild claims

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    It’s done. I’ve done it, and I’ve done it before. I’ll do it again to those cowardly cyberterrorists, too. Scum of the Internet.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    First off, a big chunk of the state just went squishy on abortion, and that shifted the partisan balance of power in the state.

    Second, the initiative process created a number of hard requirements on the budget, as well as a lot of bond debt.

    Third, greenie stuff and just plain old taxation really hurt job creation in the state.

    Also, it’d probably be a lot worse had the state not had a supermajority requirement for passing budgets, which has given Republicans veto power over tax and spend politics should the caucus hold together, as well as Prop. 13.

  • rasvar

    Your strategy on the Waxman legislation is absolutely correct. It would be easier to fight the situation with the Waxman bill in place than if the FCC goes off on its own.

    I am wondering what your issue with the tax collection issue though. These companies collected the money under the guise that it was sales tax. It was not the retailers money. To collect and then not send the money is theft/fraud. Now, I don’t know if California allows an offset for a processing fee. They probably should since the actual managing of sales tax is a pain in the butt. But, from a law an order side of things, I have problems with arguing that it is wrong for the state to make sure it receives what it should in regards to sales tax collected when the money was collected under the guise of a government imposed tax.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • rasvar

    I’m sorry but I don’t get this. Are you saying that these collected taxes should be able to be used by the businesses as government loans until they can afford to pay them back? This is just like running a business and accounts receivable. The argument on priorities just seems illogical and irrational. Argue to get rid of the sales tax. Argue to change the collection system in total. But you are implying that these companies should be able to hold onto collected tax money that they did not earn until they are making profits again. If we found a Democratic political candidate who did what you seem to be advocating, we would be running them into the ground with it.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • rasvar

    Mind explaining further. What are these priorities you speak about that take precedence to enforcing laws? You don’t strike me as the scofflaw that you seem to be advocating? Have you even taken the time to think about this or is it just a macro button you press to respond to anything that has to do with taxes? I would really like to see the logic in the argument. However, I don’t think there is any based one your response.

    I have no problem with advocating to get rid of the sales tax. But that is not the issue. You seem to think that the government should selectively enforce the law and look away because companies are in bad shape. That is foolish. Taxes have been collected. To not remit them is theft. You are advocating theft and fraud!

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    When you even begin to explain to me why this should be a high priority in a critical economic situation, rather than rattling off theoretical boilerplate.

    Maybe when you enter the real world you’ll understand. Real life means tradeoffs.

  • rasvar

    I understand the real world more than you will ever know. What is theoretical about collecting a sales tax and not remitting it? I guess you have never owned a business. You probably just work as some programmer for some company or do back door programming where you don’t report the income since you don’t think the government deserves any of the money. Guess what, I have been in the field for decades. I run my own business. I know what will happen if I collect sales tax and don’t send it in. I will go to jail! If jail is some theoretical nonsense, then I suggest you try out your “theory” kiddo.

    Simple fact, sales tax collected is not income for business. It never has been and it never will be. Therefore, to collect sales tax and not submit is not some theoretical crime as you seem to believe. It is theft. How can I take you seriously if you can not understand that simple economic concept? You are marginal on your actual understand of technology as it is. Now you are just coming off as some young punk. Not sure who ever thought you deserved front page status. I guess you must have been cheap under the table labor for the website and they rewarded you.

    Seriously, run a business and see what happens if you collect sales tax and don’t send it. Tell me how it goes.

    Theoretical boilerplate. What a bunch of bull.

  • http://realchangeandsense.blogspot.com jamesrileyjr

    Only someone who was stuck in Old Media understandings of the Internet would use the prefix “cyber” to start with.

    Moving on from that quibble, terrorists have set demands and rarely, if ever, deviate from those demands. See al-Qaeda, Hamas, and so on. The only force that you could point to that they’ve consistently been 100% against is Scientology, and even that isn’t 4chan-specific – that’s Anonymous and Project Chanology, not 4chan itself.

    If anything, they’re kids. Kids with a damned big soapbox and a microphone blasting their concept of humor, filthy and disgusting though it may be.

  • http://realchangeandsense.blogspot.com jamesrileyjr

    Doesn’t change the fact that you’re picking a fight you don’t want with people who don’t have the maturity to resist such things.

    They’re kids. Do you have kids, Neil? Do you have teenage boys or have you ever been around teenage boys? I’m the oldest of ten kids, seven of whom are teenage boys. The sorts of things that get posted, anonymously or otherwise, on 4chan are exactly the sorts of things teenage boys say and do. I’ve heard 4chan referred to as the boys’ bathroom of the Internet, and nothing I’ve seen has or ever will change that perception.

    So as I said before, grow up and grow a pair. Give the 4chan kids what they deserve – no publicity and no forum here at Redstate.

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil_truth

    It just may be injurious to your health to bring nothing more than a knife.

  • rasvar

    They are your typical group of boys in their teens and twenties who get their kicks by making others miserable. Sometimes their targets are good. Sometimes they are bad. They are nerds on steroids who just have a large critical mass. The “vandals” have not invaded 4chan, they started it. They have always been there.

    The only thing that really gets them going is when someone fights them. I treat them as nothing unless they attack one of my clients. Then I just workaround them. I have never seen them attack a location that I treated that way twice. I know a couple of security guys who tried to dig deeper and attack them on their level. It backfired badly. 4chan went after their clients system without relenting until they shut their business down.

    I don’t like 4chan. I know they don’t like me. But I have learned that sometimes it is not worth poking the hornets nest when it is not on my property. Discretion is the better part of valor sometimes.

  • rasvar

    So am I going to get kicked off of RedState for being a conservative who believes in following the law even if I disagree with it while I want to change it?

    I don’t understand the attitude and brazen disrespect of the law. That is really my point. Should we just say, “Oh no! the economy is bad. We better not collect [insert whatever] taxes here”? I don’t understand when conservatives began to accept selective enforcement of the law. Just because the liberals do it, it does not make it right. This is my point.

    I don’t like the way the Copyright and Patent laws have evolved in the software business. The economy is bad and I need a new product. Should I just borrow some copyrighted software or use a legally patented process so that I can grow my business just because the economy is bad and I might go out of business if I don’t? I really don’t see any difference with breaking the law in this manner than collecting sales tax and then not sending it in. That is my point. Both are theft even if I don’t like the law. The state of California is enforcing the law. If you don’t like the law, change the bloody law but don’t complain when it gets enforced.

    It frustrates me to no end when logic is completely dismissed. Especially from a programmer who should understand concepts of logical thought.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Are you just incapable of explaining to me why we should renew our emphasis on tax collection in a period of 12%+ unemployment?

    This is a specific choice someone is making, to take resources from A and apply them to B.

    Justify that.

  • Doc Holliday

    they already exist, it is just that most people don’t know it. If they read their tax forms carefully they will know it. Almost every state has a “consumers use tax” which is meant to capture out of state purchases from catalogs and mainly from the internet. I read less than 4 percent of people pay these taxes, but they do exist. I do pay them because I know about them. I don’t want to give the government an excuse to hose me. I actually become livid when I write the check, I call it the Consumer ABUSE tax.

    Now, if a company has collected state taxes, ( believe they must do so if they buyer is from the same state), they better damn well give the money to the state or they are perpetuating fraud. They are stealing money from the consumer, I care more about that than the state.

    I am not for any new spying on people at all, I am not here to argue that. I would prefer that the internet be tax free. It is de facto tax free but not de jure.

    I think people got confused from the beginning because the feds at one time wanted to tax internet use, that has been kept at bay to date. But most people think it was about taxing purchases on the net, unfortunately no. I only mention this because it is the real law, whether enforced or not.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • Doc Holliday

    anyone who finds the information relevant to them. I disputed no one, I just gave some info that can be used or discarded at the reader’s whim.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens
  • cactusjack

    your point #2 on ballot initiatives was it.

  • rasvar

    I agree with what was posted in that article that the state does not need more new taxes and just needs to go after what is owed. That is what I am arguing for. I don’t see where I am reallocating anything from A to B. I see an argument in that article in favor of making sure the state gets the money that was already legally collected.

    I am certainly not talking about pushing internet or any other kind of collections. I am only talking about making sure that what a retailer has collected is sent in. Maybe we have been thinking the same way. But thought the other was arguing for something else. When you were talking about collection, I was thinking in terms of remitting what was already collected. Not about going after consumers and such. If this is the case, I apologize for the misunderstand. I thought you were advocating that it is not the responsibility of a retailer to send in collected sales tax if they were in financial trouble. You did not specify this in your one line response so I thought you were supporting an argument against collecting already collected but unremitting sales tax. I really could not tell if you were supporting the article you posted or were against it.