Tech at Night: The home stretch for Net Neutrality


Tech at Night

Good evening. In case you missed it, I weighed in with great detail on the Level 3/Comcast/Netflix flap, getting down to the basics to unravel the issue technically.

But tonight we discuss Net Neutrality. House Republican Reps. Cliff Stearns and Joe Barton fired a warning shot, challenging the FCC to justify any action it takes this month, so now that’s an issue getting some attention. ISPs are already scoffing at one proposed legal avenue because it’s ridiculous. Net Neutrality has zero to do with deploying high speed Internet access, and in fact such regulations would likely hinder deployment. Even left-wing universal access folk have been saying that for ages.

I guess it’s a good thing various big names turned down stimulus bucks for deployment.

Of course, we’re all making our final pitches right now. Seton Motley points out the basic fact that legally, nothing has changed since the federal courts told the FCC it has no authority to enact Net Neutrality regulations. It’s not something it’s allowed to do. The Congress deregulated and that’s final unless a new law is passed.

Meanwhile some of the Net Neut supporters are engaging in doublethink: They simultaneously claim Net Neutrality is not a new regulation… while asking for new regulation. Yeah, that’s what they’re down to.

Of course, we’re lucky. The FCC could still be seriously discussing disastrously bad proposals, such as the Title II Reclassification scheme to declare that ISPs are now phone companies, and try to regulate the Internet with the same kinds of price and content controls that New Deal Democrats thought made sense for phone companies in the 1930s. That would have been terrible.

Instead it’s looking like the final Net Neut regulations will be mild. It’s not great, but it’s not horrible either. Free Press President Josh Silver calls it “fake Net Neutrality.” Tim Wu only scores it 2.5 out of 5. The left is not happy.

Meanwhile, since Google defeated Search Neutrality at the FTC, they’re busily going along making their search service even less neutral than before by rigging the algorithms to punish disfavored firms even more than before. The fact is, Google would never tolerate ISPs rigging their routing in secret, and Google search has higher nationwide market share than any ISP. It must be neat to have friends in the White House.


RSS feed

8 Comments Leave a comment

Looks like this is a good development

kyle8 (Diary) Friday, December 3rd at 11:36PM EDT (link)

and whatever minor damage is done can possibly be corrected after the Obamaniacs are gone.

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 

What does 'mild' net neutrality mean and is it legal?

scorpio0679 (Diary) Saturday, December 4th at 12:22AM EDT (link)

I’m not clear on what the ‘mild’ version does or doesn’t do. Seems to me that they want to prevent companies from discriminating against different usages of their bandwidth . . . how does one do that mildly versus harshly?

It's about the power grab

Neil Stevens (Diary) Saturday, December 4th at 9:27AM EDT (link)

This mild NN doesn’t involve the FCC claiming broad power over the Internet under Title II. That means no justification for price controls, content controls, or other ridiculous stuff.

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Oh, So The FCC

edintexas Saturday, December 4th at 9:56AM EDT (link)

Is only claiming narrow power over the internet, when the courts have apparently declared the FCC has no power over the Internet. And here I thought they were still doing something unconstitutional. Whew, what a relief!

That's about it, edintexas

Neil Stevens (Diary) Saturday, December 4th at 10:02AM EDT (link)

We take the victories we can when Obama is President. :)

Just imagine how angry the radicals are, and feel better.

RS contributing editor and “a hardy variety of crabgrass.”
Read the RedState Posting Rules

Unlikely Voter: Poll Analysis, Election Projection.

“I rejoice that America has resisted.” – William Pitt, the Elder

Thanks for keeping on top of this issue

scorpio0679 (Diary) Saturday, December 4th at 11:00AM EDT (link)

It isn’t a sexy ‘media-friendly’ issue as it is technical and complicated . . . but nonetheless, it is unbelievably important. The Internet is the crucible of freedom at this point in history and it is unleashing the power of conservative thought.

Thanks for being on top of it and getting the message out!

 

ditto thanks Neil

fpete13527 (Diary) Saturday, December 4th at 11:08AM EDT (link)
 
 
 
 

This list of people who dislike Michael [conservative censor] Copps is growing - and this is good

fpete13527 (Diary) Sunday, December 5th at 1:04PM EDT (link)

In the last few years, I have disagreed on some of Bill O’s stands. IMO he sometimes shifts too moderate.

However, on this one I can’t acknowledge Bill enough….and we can certainly use all the help we can get on this importatn issue. Bravo Bill.

http://fxn.ws/ejeMF2