« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Tech at Night: The New Year Begins

Tech at Night

The New Year has started, and the Republicans are soon to start acting. Conservatives were mixed in reacting to Fred Upton’s words over the weekend. Some think he’s not tough enough when it comes to rolling back big government when it comes to the FCC, the EPA, and of course Obamacare. But I’m hopeful about him because he’s struck me as coming into his Chairmanship with aggression. He’s been vocal about coming into this year with an agenda to reverse what Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi have been doing. I like that and it makes it easy for me to be patient and see what he does.

Some have also been questioning Darrell Issa’s commitment to making life miserable for people in the Obama administration, which I think is a bit silly. Issa’s been building up to this moment for months and I think he’ll do just fine with his subpoena pad.

The FCC may have already voted on Net Neutrality, but the job of picking apart the “case” for it goes on. George Ou dissects cable Internet advertised speeds and what they actually mean under real-world use. Spoiler: if you’re on cable Internet you’d better hope nobody in your neighborhood likes Netflix. So it’s just silly to be using the theoretical maximum speeds to judge whether or not there’s an effective monopoly on high-speed Internet. Cable isn’t really better, and (limited, thanks to intentional state and local monopoly status) competition still rules.

And don’t forget: in case Darrell Issa didn’t make the point well enough above, regulation threatens innovation which means regulation threatens the American way of life – the highest standard of living on the planet for decades running – as we know it today.

COMMENTS

  • Adjoran

    But there is no case. The only evidence is Sestak’s own somewhat contradictory and equivocal statements.

    Do people expect Issa to call a former President to testify? Of course Obama will assert privilege to refuse questioning of his aides.

    There’s no hearing to be had there, until and unless someone else comes forward or new evidence is found.

    I’ll be happy if he gets moving on the stuff with lots to investigate, and I think he will.

  • slp0

    Unfortunately Upton is partly responsible for outlawing light bulbs so I do not have a lot of hope. If he would put some effort into repealing that monstrosity it would help a lot.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Let’s worry about LIGHT BULBS!!!!!!!!!!!!one

  • JSobieski

    I read that someplace in well established book :)

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Victimhood takes less effort and all.

  • Raven

    for being reasonably cynical and jaded with our political “representatives.”

    We don’t want Upton to fail. We just have no faith that he will even try.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    If people want to whine all day about light bulbs in my threads then I can respond.

  • JSobieski

    A few exceptions serve to illustrate the rule, and Upton is NOT one of the exceptions.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    If you all are so sure he’s going to be a lousy Chairman, there’s no harm in waiting for him to actually prove it before dogpiling him.

    This pre-emption achieves nothing but a total Obama-friendly distraction from the good work he’s doing right now.

  • Raven

    Past performance may be no guarantee of future results, but it’s the best gauge we have.
    Upton was instrumental in the light-bulb issue.

    What has he done that we should give him the benefit of the doubt on Net Neutrality?