« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Tech at Night: FCC, AT&T, T-Mobile, Facebook security warning

Tech at Night

For a while there, we seemed to have a bit of a break from the big news. We knew big fights like the AT&T/T-Mobile deal loomed, but it was all talk.

But that’s changing. As the coalition of self-seekers and socialists forms, the final scope of the debate is beginning to take shape. Listen to this: Some Democrats are criticizing AT&T for planning to use money from the FCC’s Universal Service Fund to provide high speed, wireless Internet to 97% of Americans. That is, as close to truly universal access as possible. Apparently universal access isn’t actually the goal of the USF? Remember that when they talk about applying USF taxes to Internet connections, folks.

Another criticism of AT&T is that it’s using acquisitions to expand instead of building, which is absurd. Check the numbers. They spend billions, however you can’t just build spectrum. You have to buy it, and AT&T needs spectrum or else Verizon will be alone at the top in the 4G market.

Of course, the Senate is looking into the deal. Mike Wendy has a statement on the matter, reminding the Senate that modern technology and competition render silly any talk that today’s AT&T has any chance of becoming an actual monopoly like the old AT&T.

Hopefully they listen. Because as the forces of larger government are the only winners if the deal is blocked. Because guess what? Without government, the Internet continues to evolve, getting better at getting more data to you, faster and cheaper. The market provides better pressure to succeed in innovative ways than government ever can.

Welcome to the next expansion of government. Government is now dictating more cellular phone features with a national emergency alert system deploying soon in New York and later everywhere. They promise they won’t use it much but… you know how these things work. Government programs start narrow, then get scope creep. Think of the children! This is a good cause! Programs expand, but never seem to contract. It’d be nice to kill this.

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: Welcome to Net Neutrality. If ISPs can’t discriminate between abusive traffic and the rest, then the only tool they have left to protect the network in the best interests of the ISP and of the Internet-using public is to cap traffic for everyone. One size fits all. Funny, they didn’t warn you about that, did they?

Still more FCC: The gears turn on Low Power FM radio. The FCC is mandated by law to perform a study of the economic impact of LPFM on the big commercial stations. Let’s hope this doesn’t become a tool for the big guys to try to muscle out the little guys.

Of course, the possibility of that, given the track record of the FCC, is just one reason to be glad that the House GOP is calling the FCC “broken” and in need of major reform. That’s why a hearing approaches that will see every single FCC Commissioner called in to testify.

How about some copyright? COICA is back, only the bill granting the government sweeping powers to control the Internet has been reborn under the new name PROTECT IP. It still must be defeated. Government must not have dictatorial control of content online, even to go as far as to create national blacklists of websites.

I’ll close tonight with a warning: There appears to be a mass attack on conservatives on Facebook going around tonight. People are being asked to “verify” their accounts. Don’t click on the links. It’s a trap!

COMMENTS

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    But using AT&T and innovation in the same sentence is nonsensical. AT&T has always stifled innovation on their handsets, and I’m skeptical that they will bring on any of that mentality from T-Mobile that always led the way in innovation.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    Everyone raise your hand that doesn’t think this will be used as a campaign tool by Obama. Oh sure, it’ll look like an emergency alert, but it’s just a little too convenient that alerts from the President can’t be disabled, and will be required on every new handset.

  • toddjones

    AT&T doesn’t have a spectrum problem . AT&T actually is sitting on more spectrum than any wireless carrier . They have more spectrum than Verizon . Verizon is rolling out its LTE network quite aggressively . AT&T has a capacity problem . They chose profits over investment the past few years . That is fine but no need for the dishonesty . The merger will pass . The Obama wants device tracking & net neutrality . The less wireless providers the easier it will be for deals to be put in place for these two things to happen . This is where less competition will hurt just as much as the price control aspects . This bothers me . Less competition will give big brother more power IMO .

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    You’re the liar spreading propaganda without proof.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Handsets aren’t even part of the picture here. I forget which one used this in their ads, but it’s all about the network. And while AT&T *is* sitting on some spectrum, bought up piecewise as opposed to Verizon’s big buy of one of the old VHF blocks, they need more to be fully 4G ready.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I care more about the handsets. AT&T has never been as innovative with their handsets, and the ones they have a severely locked down. With T-Moblie, they’ll unlock my phone so I can use it when I travel internationally with a local SIM. I can install non-Market applications with no problems. AT&T forces their way and none other. It stifles innovation, which is pretty much the whole point of the Android operating system (which I prefer).

    This doesn’t even go into the plans that are better and cheaper with T-Mobile. All of that could go away after the merger. I have yet to find someone that currently has T-Mobile that is in favor of the merger.

    3G is fine for my purposes. T-Mobile’s current 3G is almost as fast as the 4G of the others, so performance just really isn’t an issue. I realize this won’t be the case long term, but for now I’m fine with it.

  • http://seekingliberty.wordpress.com fmaidment

    Seriously? AT&T doesn’t build the handsets. Nokia, HTC, Apple, HP/Palm, Motorola, Blackberry/RIM and dozens of other companies build the handsets. AT&T may require that said handsets have certain restrictions, but they own the network and have the customers.

    If you don’t like it, try Sprint or Verizon. They both have Android, RIM, WebOS and Windows 7 phones, and Verizon has the iPhone. But if you want to stick with SIM cards, you’re stuck with AT&T.

    As for international travel: Personally, if I travel outside the US, I’ll just get a local pre-paid “burner” phone. That way I don’t run much risk if it’s stolen.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Everything I’m seeing shows VZ LTE several times faster already than T-Mobile’s HSPA+, and the theoretical max is through the roof.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Just buy your own handset on the open market that’s unlocked (this should be possible even for iPhones; just get one from a place like HK that only sells unlocked ones) and jam your SIM in?

  • http://seekingliberty.wordpress.com fmaidment

    …that AT&T hasn’t been investing as heavily as some other carriers, compared to their profits. WSJ did an article on this a few weeks back.

    The rest of his comment? Utter whale hork. AT&T has still been investing heavily in its infrastructure; billions of dollars each year, in fact, and more than they claimed they’d be spending in their previous merger filings.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Sprint, for example, has been spending far less than AT&T. But he didn’t bring numbers. He brought socialist talking points. Don’t even try to give him the benefit of the doubt.

    He’s a shill for state-run media, literally.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    This is why I like T-Mobile.

    Apparently you don’t know how this works. AT&T works with the vendors on the phones. The ones they sell are “locked down” so your options are limited. As a consumer, I want more options. That’s why I went with T-Mobile. They’ve always been at the leading edge of innovation (hence my original comment).

    That said, I don’t want the government involved here. I’m against the merger as a consumer, and a lot of others are there with me.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    I realize this will change quickly. As I said above, I don’t want the government involved here, but I’m personally against the merger, and I have yet to talk to a T-Mobile customer that favors it.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    It’s how they handle the OS. My choices are to go with their limited OS versions and I’ll get updates, or go with a rooted OS and have to handle it all myself. I do IT all day long, I don’t want to have to deal with it on my phone at night.

    Also, at the request of providers (Verizon, AT&T, Sprint), handset manufacturers are now starting to add ROM chips to their handsets that will only allow their OS version. If you try to install a different OS, it will fail. AT&T went even further with this on one of their early Droid versions, it and an EEPROM chip that shorted if you tried to install a different OS….bricking the phone in the process.

    There’s a reason I’ve never liked AT&T, and I’m just not thrilled with being forced onto them. Verizon is no better (and even more expensive), and Sprint ends up being the odd man out here.

    This merger may be good for AT&T, but it is not good for consumers that want innovation, choice, and the freedom to use their devices however they want.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Buy your own.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    There’s a chip. You’re still stuck with their OS. Same problem.