« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Occupiers lose Battle of Wardman Park

The basic premise of the Occupations, including Occupy DC, is that they, the “99%”, are not being heard in elections, so they must impose themselves on spaces where they are not welcome in order to force their message out. It’s a strategy reminiscent of George Lincoln Rockwell’s Phase One for the American Nazi Party, and I expect it to be just as ineffective at achieving meaningful policy change.

What’s worse than that though is when the occupiers can’t even manage to occupy anything. They can’t even execute their strategy, let alone see it through to policy results. That’s what happened tonight when they tried to Occupy CPAC. They failed, badly.

The back entrance of the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel was the Occupiers’ target. I had a great view, being on the second floor, just above that back entrance. They caught my attention because they were in fact there, briefly.

Then the police came in strength, including some officers from the Truancy Division. Yes, these kiddies got pushed back, and then a wall of looked to be about 10 cops, backed by about what looked like a dozen cars and vans, blocked the driveway, keeping the occupiers out.

All is now quiet in my room, because the Occupiers failed. There were few of them, and they are far from the hotel. I grabbed a couple of pictures. Forgive any poor quality; I just used an iPhone and am composing this post with my iPhone and iPad. These are not my best tools, so what I can do with this situation is limited.

Here is the bottom of the back driveway of the Marriott Wardman Park Hotel. As you can see, there are more conservatives watching the occupiers than there are occupiers. And they’re not really near the hotel anymore.

20120210-154553.jpg

The cops clearly did a good job here. There aren’t a lot of them, but they’re keeping the protest out. 20120210-154622.jpg

P.S. “Hey, hey, ho, ho, CPAC has got to go?” Seriously? That’s the best you can do on Friday night, after the headline speakers all already spoke? As they said in the comic Wondermark, “It’s a good life, having idiots hate you.”

COMMENTS

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Are they just building up for the Spring, trying to fool everyone into a false sense of security by losing over and over again?
    /

  • altexas

    I feel so apathetic to the whole thing. I think it will be a forgotten movement before the next President is sworn in.

    They have me right were the want me. What a fool I am.

  • phelbin

    The term 1%-er is firmly part of our national lexicon now. Obviously there has always been a top 1% of wage earners, but the occupy movement has served to define the “them” in the us vs. them fight, which we all know will be aimed squarely at Mittens if, God help us, he does manage to win the nomination.

  • Uma Richie

    just by making supper.

  • macbookben

    …was your typical Sonny Barger Hell’s Angel kind-of-a-guy, back in the day. M/C’s even incorporated the phrase into their club colors So it’s ironic that the lexicon now expropriates the term once used to described freedom-loving, socially outcast bad-asses to fit the image of Warren Buffett and his band of merry accountants going to a poker run at Shoney’s on a Saturday morning.

  • tngal

    Daily caller has up a story about how the “Occupiers” were paid $60 to spend the day protesting CPAC. Never mind that they didn’t know what CPAC stood for or who was inside. So the way I see it…several people got work today….thanks to the Conservatives who attended.

    One of the protesters said his sheet metal union encouraged him:

    ?I have nothing nice to say about Local 100. ? They just told me ?you wanna make sixty bucks? So c?mon,?? the protester said.

    (what really bites is they’ll probably take the money and donate to one of the many Democrat candidates running this year.)

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/10/occupy-cpac-protesters-paid-60-for-the-day/

  • The_Gadfly

    quite the way they wanted. In these parts it always ends with a /sarc tag, and when I speak it the same thing applies. Ditto for “the 1%”.

  • renny

    because their agendas no longer arouse excitement in the protester imagination.

    Another reason I think the left was so hyperbolic over the tea parties is they spontaneously took to the streets the left thought it owned, even if it had to pay to occupy them. Bork them all.

  • digitalyoyo

    this made me LOL.

  • duncer

    I wonder if a union thug gave them 3×5 cards with numbered chants on them and a community organizer calls out a number to keep them in unison.

  • brojohn2

    They started their chant and were chanted down by the CPAC folks, with USA, USA as the “Occupiers” were escorted out the door, never to return. Sarah never missed a beat, “yeah, USA USA” it was my favorite part of the show.

    I agree with her speech, it was awesome, it had the CPAC folks doing the standup and cheer thing. I think if she were running for office, she would win, I know she would have destroyed Mittens as well as the rest of the pack of wannabes. I cannot understand how Romney won the Straw Poll at CPAC, if he is a conservative, I must be a libertarian, and I am definitely not a Ron Paul fan.

    Sarah for VEEP! Newt for President!

  • soljerblue

    “(what really bites is they?ll probably take the money and donate to one of the many Democrat candidates running this year.)”

    I donate part of my SocialSecurity check every month to conservative candidates and the SCF.

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    Small donations times many people equals large money.

  • lbyron

    Nigella Lawson
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigella_Lawson