« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The 2012 Standard: Holding President Obama Accountable

President Obama did voters a favor. During the 2008 campaign and early in his administration, he laid out the standards by which he should be judged. He made it perfectly clear under what conditions he would deserve re-election.

And by his own standard he doesn’t deserve a second term.

In February 2009, when employment was at 8.2 percent, he declared, “If I don’t get this done in three years, then this is going to be a one term proposition.”

Unemployment has yet to return to February 2009 levels, much less fall lower. Based on that standard alone, this should indeed be a “one term proposition.”

But consider the President’s other promises and self-imposed standards.

On the stimulus: He predicted unemployment below 8 percent. Today: We’re not even close.

On Obamacare: He promised accessibility and affordability. Today: Prices continue to skyrocket and many Americans have discovered they cannot keep their current plan.

On the deficit: He promised to cut it in half by the end of his first term. Today: He produced three years of record budget deficits, exceeding $1 trillion each.

On the debt: He promised to slow its growth. Today: He accelerated it and it has now surpassed $15 trillion.

On ethics: He promised the most transparent administration in history. Today: The administration has been caught gambling taxpayer money on failed investments like Solyndra for political purposes.

On lobbyists: He promised there would be no lobbyists in his administration and no lobbyist money in his campaign coffers. Today: He has gladly welcomed both.

He promised a thriving economy. It’s stalled.

He promised change. We have gotten more of the same.

He promised to unite us. We’re divided.

He has so little to run on, Democrats have resorted to pathetically arguing that “it could’ve been worse.”

In 2012, Republicans will hold the president accountable. He laid out the terms on which he wanted to be judged.  And we’re happy to accept those terms.

It’s not our standard. It’s not a partisan standard. It’s the President’s standard. Let’s hold him to it.

There are no words more damaging to Obama’s re-election prospects than his own. That makes our messaging strategy quite straightforward: Repeat those words—his broken promises—as often as possible.

COMMENTS

  • renl57

    “On the stimulus: He predicted unemployment below 8 percent. Today: We

  • johnt

    as we move closer to the election. You may also see starry eyed projections on the economy, all sorts of wondrous and unexpected, really unexpected, things. And all, we will be assured, due to the stewardship of Obama and the benign hand of government.
    With a nod to Congress, saved from disgrace by it’s Democrat members.

  • Marcus_Traianus

    But this has been going on since 2008 and our messaging in the press still sucks. We have different members of Congress saying different things and a Speaker more interested in his next golf game and a “good deal” than anything else.

    Right now, we have Democrats all singing the same refrain, albeit fallaciously, that the Super-Committee will fail because of Republicans. With the exception of Mr. Toomey, who has been brilliant on the issue, we hear either defensive befuddlement or crickets. How hard is it to explain we made a reasonable offer and the Democrats made none at all, then outright rejected our advance because they are set on raising taxes? Again, by the way? Wow, I think I just did it in two sentences.

    Is the aforementioned to hard for our beloved Representatives to remember…or do they just not believe in it, are scared and on the cusp of cutting another bargain because they fear the blame?

    Fear is a terrible motivator. It causes one to abandon sensible principles and yield to the worse instincts. It’s about time the Party got everybody singing from the same sheet of music. It’s also time to ditch the faint-hearted, no matter which seat they occupy. Otherwise you can look forward to 4 more years of the destructive rubbish we are currently experiencing.

    • Wayne

      Well chosen words Marcus. Because there are nothing but tough decisions ahead and not a one that will be popular if we are going to unshackle ourselves from the chains of government’s overreaching addictions. Common sense (though uncommon these days) must step front and center, returning control back to the States so that the Federal Government can resume it’s Constitutionally mandated responsibilities. Protecting our Constitutional rights and National Defense. Let the States decide what social and economic policies best suite them. And let the individuals migrate to the states that suite their particular paradigm of the world. It will be much easier to control when decisions about representation are made close to home. And, those states that prefer socialism, get what they deserve.

  • jiminga

    is criticizing Obama. He says Obama is campaigning against a “do nothing Congress” and has not spelled out anything he will do in his second term. Not only do Republicans need to highlight Obama’s failures but also his absent (or secret) vision for a second term.

  • Pingback: click here

  • Wayne

    was generations in the making and it will be generations before damages have been repaired if it is going to be repaired at all.

    Not to take away from the point of this diary, surely had McCain been elected things would not have been much different. We wouldn’t have Obamacare perhaps, but likely some kind of McCaincare and/or the size of the bailouts to wall street and the banks received might have been different. But the house and senate would still have driven us down this path. By electing Obama we merely accelerated the timetable and magnified the problem. And, this may not have been a bad thing.

    While it may be convenient to hand off the blame to Obama, let’s not forgot that this curse burdening the average American was brought upon by both houses and both parties.

    Electing a true Constitutional conservative is the only hope we have of returning to prosperity and even then it will take every bit of two terms to get us pointed in the right direction.

    I am not an Obama fan, but I am also not going to be spoon fed the idea that things would have turned out different had he not been elected. In fact, one could argue that he was the right man at the right time to wake up the sleeping conservatives across this country.

    In the Republican party’s zeal to seize the moment, they would be wise to recognize who handed them the victory in 2010 and setting the standard for which their representatives are expected to meet in the future. Many of us are disappointed at the Republican performance and recognize who needs to go in 2012.

    The economy is far from recovered and with a middle of the road, appeasing conservative President, things will not improve to the point that the problem of crony capitalist standing at the intersection of big business and big government for profit will go away. We will need a fire breathing Constitutional conservative to repair the American dream and from where I’m sitting, truly there are none in the offering. However, only one that if elected would illuminate a path that all predecessors would be wise to follow. Otherwise, the confused and less knowledgeable electorate will again go looking for another pied piper!

  • nathanalbright

    …and you may have been one of them, who preferred to see Obama win so that we could see how bad things could get with a real socialist rather than someone who was going to ameliorate things. Well, you got your wish. I’m not happy about it, but the ugly mood right now on this website and which I share is not far off from going on the warpath against socialism. Let’s give it the best we can this term, we may not have time to avoid the fate of Greece and Italy and Ireland and so on.

  • Wayne

    I pinched my nose and voted for McCain!

  • nathanalbright

    …I’m not going to burn it :B.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …is this delicious-clip from Chris Matthews!

    http://hotair.com/archives/2011/11/21/why-should-we-vote-for-an-obama-second-term-asks-chris-matthews/

  • wennejunk

    We just need him to hold on until the election.

    None of this ‘hand the reins’ to Hillary stuff. Just keep working on your golf score. Please.

  • romeg

    Would we be better off or worse off? Easily, we would be better off. We would not have Obamacare hanging over the economy and we would not have Dodd-Frank suffocating the financial industry.

    Without those two train wrecks, more time would have likely have been spent on the actual problems facing the country: Unemployment and mounting debt. On the other side of the ledger is the likelihood that the Republican sweep of the 2010 elections and the resulting majority in the House would not exist and that the RINO leadership, so eager for compromise and comity, would be even more entrenched.

    But I’m of the opinion that the net result would have been far better for the country. As bad as McCain would have been, I can’t imagine how he could have been the disaster for the country that BHO has been and continues to be.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    But then the left is all about double standards and corruption as an acceptable way of life for their side…

  • Ausonius

    Let’s assume that Constituional Conservative X is elected president.

    That will not be good enough without a Congress to support him. The wailing and gnashing of teeth that will occur among the leftist 45-50% of our population will be immense, as denial of the reality of national bankruptcy leads to more class warfare among the entitled elite.

    The Dems can still sell the BIG LIE with little problem: they sold it here in Ohio in our last election by overturning a bill designed to limit the powers of public unions.

    Nationally they will not go away quietly, and any attempts at limiting government will be met with cries of “Republicans only care about BIG BUSINESS, instead of the poor and the middle-class.”

    Courageous Conservatives must counter any and all such propaganda.

    Cowardly RINOS can go back to Oz: we do not want them.

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    will run ads with Obama speaking his very own words. He should indeed be held accountable.

    However, there are plenty of Republicans who should be held accountable as well. Many conservatives are not happy with those who hide behind the “R” next to their name and think they remain safe from accountability. It’s time to demand that an “R” stand not only for Republican but the conservative principles as noted on the GOP platform as well.

  • texasref

    P.S. Still not able to write a diary entry

  • Wayne

    It’s hard for me to get my head around 45-50% entitled minded Americans. I live in California and hardly ever run across them, though I know they are here. It may be the circles I run in, but it’s discouraging to here such statistics. Or, were you just expressing frustration and the numbers aren’t based on anything substantial.

    Many of the Union folks I know, openly admit that they have a conflict of interest but do want what’s best for the country. The government motors bailout shocked many on the west coast, though if it were their job on the line, they would have not batted an eye I’m sure.

    I have more faith in Americans than that and hope it’s not misplaced. However, I do agree that more people have to understand the Constitution and these times have brought a new stimulus to the subject of our Constitution in the minds of the young. And, particularly in the X-Generation, (at least those that I’ve spoke with).

    RINOS will be returning to Oz, voluntarily or not!

  • cwfoster

    n/t

  • scullymj

    I hope your faith in the 45-50% of entitle minded Americans is well placed. For myself, I have no faith in them. There are American citizens inculcated in Americanism and then there are americans who, although they are “citizens”, are simply residents of this country. We’ve had two generations dumbed down by a leftist controlled public school system and nutty as a fruitcake political correctness. Returning from my second Vietnam tour in ’68, I hardly recognized my country. Forty years on, politically and culturally, we are as divided as the little country of Vietnam I fought in. Though I will continue to stay engaged, we have reached the point where our country found itself in 1861, two very different and possibly irreconcilable visions. I fear it will take much more than just an election to resolve this issue.

  • Ausonius

    That is where I derived the percentage of the entitled electorate, along with the general attitude of too many people from all four generations currently alive.

    Limbaugh believes that there is a percentage of the non-income-tax paying electorate who are patriotic enough, and not quite so self-centered, that they will vote against the continuation of the entitlement society, to boot out the Dem Socialists.

    Certainly the Spaniards have shown themselves capable of rejecting socialism: recall that they were spooked into throwing out their somewhat conservative government, which had joined America against Arab terrorism, because of an Islamic terrorist attack three days before the March 2004 elections.

    Will Americans who pay no income taxes still help to boot out Socialist Dems?

  • Wayne

    While you were returning in 1968, I was going. That experience ripped away my self image, paradigm of the world and my place in it as an American. Without it, I doubt I would have the convictions I do today. I’ve posted on more than on occasion here that this will be a generational war. Receiving many responses similar to yours. My faith in the American people remains firm, but I’m a pragmatist if nothing else, and do not sit around hoping for the best while ignoring reality.

    My time is dominated with survival and it leaves very little to acquire more knowledge and understanding of the events unfolding. Our individual efforts to enlighten those around us of what’s at stake may be the only option to make a contribution and difference. Having faith doesn’t mean sitting on one’s hands.