ObamaCare — One Year Later


by Congresswoman Renee Ellmers (R-NC)

As a nurse of twenty years, wife of a surgeon and owner of a wound clinic, I am not only aware of the problems that currently exist in the American health care system — I have seen them up close — as a caregiver, a patient and a small business owner in the health care industry.

This week marks the one-year anniversary of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act — ObamaCare.  Unlike the remedy we were promised, Obamacare has done nothing to improve the quality of health care in our country, and has already done significant damage to the economy.

Last year, in a time of rising unemployment and out-of-control federal deficits, the President and Congress chose to put forward an unpopular government takeover of healthcare.  The bill was poorly written and passed in such a rush that many of those voting on it admitted they had not even read it.

Those trying to sell the bill claimed it would reduce the deficit.  Some even continue to claim that today (with many of those claims being debunked in the Washington Post this week).  But the facts show the opposite is true.  ObamaCare is negatively effecting our economy.

The more than $500 billion in tax increases, IRS 1099 reporting requirements and other employer mandates associated with the bill threatened an already struggling economy, creating uncertainty with its job-crushing provisions.

On this one-year anniversary of ObamaCare, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has handed out over 1,000 waivers of some provisions of the law to selected companies, unions and states.  Unfortunately, if you are not selected by the Obama Administration, you and your business are not exempt from the mandates of this law.

While the negative effect of ObamaCare on small businesses and the economy is significant, the effect of the law on the health care system is no better.  Rather than protect and strengthen the Medicare program, the law takes more than one-half trillion dollars in Medicare cuts and uses the funds to create a new entitlement program that our country can’t afford. The Obama Administration’s own actuaries at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) warn that the Medicare cuts contained in the law are so drastic that “providers might end their participation in the program (possibly jeopardizing access to care for beneficiaries).”

When I ran for office I vowed to repeal ObamaCare, and that was one of my first votes in the 112th Congress.  I co-sponsored and voted for a bill to end the job-killing 1099 reporting requirements that were part of the health care legislation. I also voted for funding restrictions to limit the President’s implementation of ObamaCare.

In the weeks to come, I will be working on legislation to eliminate ObamaCare “mandatory” slush funds and will pursue other de-funding and repeal bills to dismantle this ill-conceived law that increases the size and control of government, raises taxes and results in devastating regulations on small business owners.

As ObamaCare is being repealed (and/or dismantled piece by piece), I will continue working with my colleagues in the House on common sense, patient-centered solutions to improve our healthcare system.


Category: ,

RSS feed

14 Comments Leave a comment

Funding PPACA via Continuing Resolution??

zaxour Wednesday, March 23rd at 9:51AM EDT (link)

Congresswoman Ellmers,

I do not doubt your opposition to Obamacare and do believe that you will vote to repeal and defund it. However, how do you explain your vote for the 3 week continuing resolution that continues to fund Obamacare via illegitimate appropriations to the tune of $105 billion? Congressmen Bachmann and King were sounding the alarm on this for at least a week and a half. I hope that you and your colleagues in Congress will not continue this farce of CR’s that continue to allow the government to implement Obamacare.

Agreed. Until you and your fellow Congressfolk

avgjo (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 11:10AM EDT (link)

cut ALL funding a la King amendment, all this is empty rhetoric.

With all due respect, Congresswoman.

Ceterum autem censeo, Obamaecuram esse delendam.

It’s the morality, stupid.

5555 nt

ColdWarrior (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 11:13AM EDT (link)

CW

In 2012, will YOU become a “voting member” of the Republican Party in your precinct?

Where it all started. Twitter @kaltkrieger
Learn how to GOTV at The Concord Project and at Procinct and Unified Patriots.

 
 

Agreed

earlgrey (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 11:24AM EDT (link)

Not a constituient, but did contribute. The great wave of conservatism has turned into a ripple.

 
 

5555555! nt

yoyo (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 10:33AM EDT (link)

Nemo me impune lacesset
“No one will provoke me with impunity!”
=============================
Pukin’ Dogs – The Fighting 143
Sans Reproache
=============================
The ‘yoyo’ replaced my cigarettes January 22, 2006….

 

CR?

VizBiz (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 11:54AM EDT (link)

Congresswoman, your piece sounds genuine enough but would you please explain your recent yes on the CR. I belong to a group that did a LOT of groundwork for you. We’d like an answer.

Runs with scissors, walks with Wacom.

 

I'm with VizBiz AND what about your Congressional health benefits?

taylerdog23 Wednesday, March 23rd at 12:16PM EDT (link)

With all due respect, and kudos to VizBiz for asking first, but I’d like you please explain to us here @ RS how you justified your vote on the CR. Makes little sense to me.

And I know I may get piled on for asking this because it’s also a question that Libs have been asking for silly political gain, but I’m genuinely interested in how you can justify accepting taxpayer-funded healthcare while being (correctly) against government-funded healthcare.

Even assuming that accepting a Congressional health care plan has no relation to being against Obamacare, don’t you think that accepting taxpayer-funded benefits while calling for Federal fiscal responsibility at the very least compromises your message? Seems to me that rejecting these benefits and getting your own private plan would at least send a strong message that you understand shared sacrifice.

As you know there are a number (admittedly a small handful) of your brave congressional colleagues that have rejected the taxpayer-funded healthcare and have purchased their own private plans.

Do you have plans to do the same? And if not, why?

She gets her benefits like most of us -- through our employers

HerbC (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 2:00PM EDT (link)

She works for us. Thus, she is entitled to whatever benefits the job
provides.
To refresh your memory, the R’s sponsored amendments to ObamaCare which would have required that Congress change their plans to the ones specified in their legislation. The D’s removed
such amendments.

But I don't get to vote myself a pay raise or cushy pension or cadillac health care plan. nt

Melody Warbington (rwm52) (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 2:07PM EDT (link)

The woman saith unto him, I know that Messiah cometh (he that is called Christ): when he is come, he will declare unto us all things. (John 4:25)

you choose where you work; you choose your representative. n/t.

HerbC (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 2:12PM EDT (link)

n/t.

HerbC, this isn't about what she's "entitled" to...

taylerdog23 Wednesday, March 23rd at 2:23PM EDT (link)

rather, my point was that rejecting this taxpayer-funded benefit would make her fiscal responsibility mantra ring all the more clear.

And do you not see any irony whatsoever in being against government-funded healthcare and at the same time accepting a Cadillac taxpayer-funded plan?

taxpayer-funded benefit? like her salary?

HerbC (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 2:36PM EDT (link)

she works. her employer provides a healthcare plan. most employers, for now, currently provide one.
lets see here. “entitled” — only dems believe they are “entitled”. she WORKS. “cadillac” — another dem buzz word.
she is earning her health care; she is utilizing her employer and the
benefits. Those benefits were decided by other representatives before she arrived. she would be foolish to turn down a BENEFIT provided for her WORK.
obamacare is a mandate for workers to pay for entitlements for non-workers.

you used the word "entitled," not me...

taylerdog23 Thursday, March 24th at 9:50AM EDT (link)

and I could care less whether “cadillac” is a dem buzz word.

As for whether she’d be foolish to turn down a benefit provided for her work, does that mean she’d be foolish to turn down pay raises and Congressional pension benefits as rightwingmom52 noted above? Perhaps that would be foolish, but I’m just looking for a Congressperson to finally walk the walk and show that they get it.

If she had been half as articulate as you, HerbC, in justifying why she was taking the taxpayer-funded plan, then I’d give her a pass. Instead, Rep. Ellmers complains that Washington is very expensive for her and her $174,000 salary and that’s how she justifies taking the Congressional plan.

At the end of the day I guess we can just agree to disagree on this one.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Eternally gratefull that you represent the

dsmurf (Diary) Wednesday, March 23rd at 12:23PM EDT (link)

Ft Bragg area over that pathetic Etheridge dude.

Is Obamacare worth shutting the government down and then funding the government piecemeal?

I would say that it is, as theoretical possibility so far, the sooner the better Obamacare is repealed, the country would benefit now. As it is the CR is a check on the people that got the GOP their majority.