« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Ten Good Reasons to Oppose the Omnibus Spending Bill

The ink is barely dry on the almost $1 trillion stimulus package passed by the Democratic-controlled Congress and signed by President Obama. Unfortunately, this fact hasn’t stopped Democrats in Congress from attempting to push through an additional almost half a trillion dollar omnibus spending bill this week.

President Obama should be applauded for bringing attention to the need to reign in our spiraling federal budget deficit and the accompanying crippling national debt. Unfortunately, while President Obama talks the talk on deficit reduction, Democrats in Congress seem unable to walk the walk. Indeed, they aren’t even trying.

The omnibus spending bill being considered by the House and Senate is a shameful continuation of politics as usual in Washington. Campaign season is over, it’s time for results. Instead of simply talking about the need to balance the federal budget and eliminate wasteful and unnecessary spending, it’s time to actually deliver.

Families all across the country are being forced to tighten their belts and make the tough decisions and its time Washington followed the lead of the American people. With 9,000 earmarks included in the omnibus spending bill, there are at least 9,000 reasons to vote against it.

While no one will mistake me for David Letterman, I have compiled a best of the worst – the top 10 reasons for members of both political parties to vote against the bill.

  1. Welcome Back Carter. Total spending in Omnibus $410 billion an increase of 8% ($32 billion) over FY 2008 levels. Largest increase in annual discretionary spending since the Carter administration
  2. Can you say Double-dip? Omnibus contains spending for many of the same agencies and programs that received funds in the stimulus bill. Double-dipped programs are now receiving an 80% increase in spending over FY 2008.
  3. Is this Change we can Believe in? A total of almost 9,000 earmarks in the Omnibus.
  4. I thought Pelosi Said She Was ‘Draining the Swamp’?!?! Millions of dollars for the clients of the disgraced PMA lobbying firm that was just raided by the FBI.
  5. A Legend in their Own Minds. Money to memorialize politicians currently serving. $5.4 million for the Iowa Department of Education Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) grant program and $5.8 million for the Senator Edward M. Kennedy Institute for the Senate in Boston, MA
  6. Go Fish! $65 million for salmon. $59 million for Pacific salmon and $6 million for Atlantic salmon.
  7. How do you say pork in Spanish? $476,000 for the National Council of La Raza in Washington, DC.
  8. To the Moon Alice! $7 million for NASA for science museums and another $7 million for a NASA visitors center.
  9. Does as I Say Don’t Do as I Do. Millions of dollars for increased staffing in the House and Senate while businesses all across the country are forced to lay off workers.
  10. When Losing isn’t losing at all! Millions of dollars in earmarks for former members of Congress. Lose Your Election – But Keep Your Earmarks.

President Obama and Congressional Democrats came to power promising to change the way Washington does business. This omnibus spending bill will be a good test of how interested they are in turning campaign rhetoric into fiscal reality.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • red4ever

    Yep, get a tat that you wish you hadn’t the government will help pay for it. Never mind you paid for the original tat yourself. Never mind there is no health reason (usually) for having one removed. Make a stupid mistake, the government will pay you to correct it.

    That should be the slogan of the entire Obama administration.

  • Samsara

    Republicans campaigned saying they had learned their lesson, and that they were going to once again become the party of fiscal responsibility. From what I have read so far, the Democrats aren

  • Praying

    Can’t find the details – but the GOP in the House were not as fiscally principled this time as they were on the stimulus. There were some Democrats that voted no (I understand more Dems voted no than GOP voted yes, but of course it still passed). I want names. I’ll find the phone numbers. And post them.

    • zsmvf6

      Link Here

      GOP Members in italics.

      • Samsara

        Voting against this thing is meaningless if Republicans are still putting their names on earmarks in it. Hypocrisy is not going to work.

        • zsmvf6
          • Samsara

            http://www.taxpayer.net/resources.php?category=&type=Project&proj_id=1961&action=Headlines%20By%20TCS

            Earmark Disclosure List downloads at bottom of the page.

          • Praying

            Pretty much looks like the entire thing is “earmarks”. This is what the federal gov’t spends my tax dollars on? Isn’t this like… unconstitutional?

          • http://www.thepoliticalclass.com The Political Class

            And please explain your standing to criticize fiscal irresponsibility – I seem to recall you as a bit of a porker, not to mention living off of the public teat since 1974 (I mean being devoted to public service).

            Oh, and also hanging out a bit too much with Christine Todd Whitman and the enviro-weenies…

            Oh, and also pushing the pro-abortion agenda…

            It’s people like this guy that helped make Republicans = Democrat-lite.

            The only reason he is posting here is that he lost in ’06 but wants to run again in ’10.

            Charlie – go deliver newspapers, cut lawns, flip burgers; anything, so that once in your life you actually contribute to the private sector as opposed to subtracting from it!

          • AceInTX

            Collins Snow and Specter are all part of your little plaything used to undermine the Republican Party for the last 16 years, maybe you could tell them what you’ve just told us at the next RMSP board meeting!

          • AceInTX
        • dbecraft

          anymore… There are no Democrats or Republicans, just politicians looking for money and re-election. It just seems so futile!

          • Samsara

            At some point, people serious about ending our addiction to debt need to stop voting… and start running. Voting is not inconsequential if it is consistent with action. People need to strive to live up to the ideals they vote for. Democracy has always been an uncertain enterprise, but it also gives us the ability to re-create ourselves. Principled voters make that happen. :)

          • dbecraft

            and the voters that are bribed by government outweigh the voters with principles…

      • Praying

        for the link on earmarks.

        I find this so disheartening. I thought that we had made some headway here. But they are back to the same old-same old, being stupid politicians. That thing should have been STRIPPED before it ever went to vote. What are these people THINKING? And it’s worse than wishful thinking to expect the Senate to make this a more reasonable bill – it will come out twice as bloated as it went in.

        The problem is, even with the internet, the American public never gets a chance to view the actual bill. There is no accountability – no one even hears about these things until WAY after they are passed, and then it is too late. What about that transparency and “change” in the government? yeah, I thought so.

  • sdan

    to these bills being posted 5 days before they would be voted on? I read about this bill on the blogs yesterday and tried to find it and couldn’t. I mean in a lot of ways I expect politicians to lie but at least they used to be creative in getting around it. Does anyone have a count on how many promises Obama has broken so far because I can’t think of one right now. It might be easier to count the ones he hasn’t so we know what to be looking for.