. . .but the toll this will take on the Democratic Party will be tremendous. The gears in the Party machinery are about to have a giant wooden shoe tossed inside. They have been legally (in the loosest sense) laundering money for generations, and an enormous amount of money they have come to count upon in any number of ways is about to suddenly dry up.

It is incredible how historically the worst things that happen to Progressives from a political standpoint occur immediately after they assume real power. They can subsist indefinitely below the surface, but their head tends to be chopped off whenever it is above the water long enough to be recognized.

is the sudden realization of their members how much has bee confiscated out of their paychecks. With the government (at whatever level) no longer serving as the collection agent, members whill have to stoke a check to pay thier dues. But with thier paycheck increasing by the amount that is no longer confiscated, they will see the painand the union will become the lowest priority in the bill pile.
A the family of a public union employee might decide to go out to dinner supporting a small business rather than pay that pay periods’ dues.
ALL GOOD IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

If you can read this, thank a teacher. If you can still read it in English, You’re Welcome
Deskpilot, AM(H)1 (AW), USN (Ret)

Join the RedState Strike Force

With half of all union members this ought to be big but I’m wondering just how big. First, I expect that the unions will go on a spending binge this cycle, available funds or not. The impact then could be felt more after the 2012 elections instead of the lead up to it with the unions in serious hock.

But:

What percent of unions/public unions membership is affected?

Is there data on non-membership rates that can predict membership impact?

When do the de-certification provisions start kicking in, and is there data to guess at those outcomes?

What sort of costs are the unions likely to incur for the collection of dues and other administrative functions such as regular elections?

I appreciate the viewpoint you have presented in this. Maybe, just maybe, it will curtail some of the dishonesty, bribery, extortion, and lawlessness that has been going on.

We need a return to higher accountability.

Why don’t Republican’s retroactively nullify any Statewide union-negotiated contracts that occurred between the period that the union-crushing legislation was introduced and the Secretary of State actually recognized the final law?

Simple.

“wildfire” that I would never attempt to extinguish. Let the flames roar as they may. A nation saving conflagration. Gov. Walker you are my HERO and you could very well be our nations hero. Thank you!

Now that has a nice ring to it doesn’t it?

results of the Tea Party revolution was in the state legislatures, Secretaries of State and Governor’s mansions. It’s showing. Hopefully, the House is awaken.

Every state should have a ‘RIGHT to WORK’ law that prevents unions from forcing employers and employees to join unions!

The union bosses do not give a rats biblical donkey about the union members or their families! The forced union dues are supposed to support the union members during strikes! However, the union bosses give this money to progressive socialists for election and reelection.

The union bosses do NOT lose a penny during strikes while the union members lose their homes, family and their vehicles and the perks continue for the bosses.

Wise up union members, the ONLY PEOPLE who remain wealthy during socialism or communism are the kingpins at the top of the unions and the progressive socialists, professional, political parasites…ALL OTHERS SUFFER!