« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

It’s Oligarchical Collectivism or Shutdown

DISCLOSURE: Repair_Man_Jack is a psuedonym for a person who works as a Civil Servant for the United States Federal Government.

“A lot of people with budgetary responsibility are planning for a shutdown instead of for next year’s budget,” said Diane Breckenridge, who works in the office of the secretary of Health and Human Services. “It doesn’t add to the productivity of the government.”

(HT: Washington Post)

I partially agree with Diane Breckenridge. This totally doesn’t add to the productivity of the government. The US Government is running a deficit equal to 11% of the GDP. Congress currently wrangles over whether to cut $33Bn or 61Bn off of a budget projected to run almost $1.5Tr in deficits. Former Budget Director David Walker describes this as “Like Arguing About the Bar Tab on the Titanic.”

Where Diane Breckenridge falls short is that she gives way too much credit to the current executive branch of the US Government. Nothing in the current Administration’s plans involves productive government. They want larger government; more powerful government. If the government actually does anything for the people, that’s a swell positive externality. The current administration welcomes the chance to stage this government shutdown to protect what it believes to be a positive status quo.

This proposed government shutdown is not about the productivity of government, which does not matter much to the CEO that runs it. The proposed government shutdown is about intimidation, power and the threatening legislators in the other political party. It’s about making a lot of marginal workers and benefit recipients become too frightened for their own welfare to think about the long term commonweal of the American nation.

This proposed government shutdown is a form of political terrorism. It’s like The Candyman telling junkies he can starve them any time he feels pissed off. If this can be blamed on the Tea Party, they are done. A solipsistic nation will turn on them in anger. Deficits are bad, but nobody cuts off My Government Check!

This proposed government shutdown is a preemptive strike against Congressman Paul Ryan. He has proposed a budget that will cut Trillions of dollars in Federal spending over the next decade. It will involve reform and reduction in every one of the major entitlement programs. It will cut defense. It will eviscerate much of the spoils system involved in discretionary spending and tax loopholes. In other words, Paul Ryan puts up, so Obama wants him forced to shut up.

The current system of government entitlements was primarily designed by powerful Democratic Presidents who favored a large, activist government. Reforming these shibboleths goes against Democratic Party Catechism as well as policy. No Democratic President would ever let this become law. No incumbent president with a legacy deficit of $5 trillion in four years wants to veto a significant budget reduction act without putting forth an alternative.

This proposed government shutdown will prevent entitlement reform from ever being a serious piece of conversation. People will be too worried about the lack of government money to support any serious systemic reform. President Obama will violently stomp out any serious overtures towards spending restraint or reduced governmental power and influence. Let people who fear Big Brother last a month in the asphalt jungle without him there to protect them.

So this government shutdown is a pernicious and venomous display of power to protect a threatened and unworkable system of government spoilsmanship. It’s the best method of preserving the Oligarchical Collectivism that Barack Obama feeds off of as a base of power. George Orwell describes President Obama’s governing theory below.

“In each variant of Socialism that appeared from about 1900 onwards the aim of establishing liberty and equality was more and more openly abandoned. The new movements which appeared in the middle years of the century . . . had the conscious aim of perpetuating unfreedom and inequality”; because the true goal was to end history upon becoming the perpetual High ruling class — composed not of aristocrats or plutocrats, but of “bureaucrats, scientists, technicians, trade-union organisers, publicity experts, sociologists, teachers, journalists and professional politicians” originally from “the salaried middle class and the upper grades of the working class”.

(HT:Wikipedia)

The people who are engineering this proposed government shutdown have garnered more power and influence than they have had at almost any point in American History. They are not willing to give it up. This proposed government shutdown is no different than the belligerent and threatening behavior from the public sector unions in Wisconsin. No Oligarchical Collectivist will tolerate the reestablishment of an empowered electorate. They would rather the entire government get shut down.

COMMENTS

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    The proposed cuts from this year’s budget are essentially 0 (whether 0, 30, or 60 billion doesn’t really have any impact) and thus the only reason we are playing this game is to appease a portion of our base. You are absolutely right that we should be concentrating on meaningful reform and the 2012 budget process and nothing stops us from doing that other than some (un)necessary political appeasement. Ryan put forth a decent starting point (although I would quibble with much of it, especially the ridiculous unemployment rate assumptions in it), but it is going to get lost in the shuffle if we insist on fighting over a measly 60 billion when Ryan’s plan gets almost 100x that (and should be more as he didn’t cut defense spending by nearly enough).

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      If they can’t cut anything off of this year, why would anyone in their right mind believe they intend to fight for a major overhaul in 2012, or even 2112? Appearances matter and lines have to be drawn.

      The longer DC goes on the way it is, the more inertia it builds up. The brakes had to be applied back in about 2005. It may not be too late now, but entire mentality of how the Senate operates w/ respect to budgetting and deficits has to be altered. The longer our legislature actually gets away with just not bothering with the entire politically unpleasant budgeting process, (A la Reid and Pelosi in 2010), the less likely it is that a serious budgetting process will take place again.

      • clowngirl

        If people aren’t getting their paycheck — can’t use government services they’ve become accustomed to, if their lives are generally disrupted – how are they supposed to soberly consider the issue of spending cuts.

        And I think it’s important to respect the fact this is supposed to be a Democratic Republic — it’s not clear that an overwhelming majority of Americans support allowing a shut down in order to get slightly larger spending cuts. The leverage needs to come from public opinion — if 70% of the country is demanding more cuts – the Democrats aren’t going to be able to refuse — that isn’t the case right now — but it’s something to be acheived.

        When Republicans win back the White House and the Senate — then they will be able to really reform.

        But as a side note. I don’t understand is why a dispute about discretionary spending can lead to a shut down of most of the government. Perhaps there could be a reform to pass the budget in parts? So Democrats can’t shut down most of the government because they aren’t getting funding for their favorite radio station.

        • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

          The USG is suppossed to pass an annual budget consisting of 12 seperate discrete appropriations acts. This was not undertaken in 2010 because the congressional leadership at that time felt it was too politically contentious.

          Also, the Dems got everything they could possibly have gotten in 2009. Any other year’s budget is a decline for them. They will only consider passing something other than 2009 when they A) deperately need something not in 2009′s blue print, or B) get forced to by a determined adversary. They will attempt to cruise along at the 2009 spending levels because they’ve at least got optimized at a local maxima with that year’s budget.

          • YnotNOW

            The public will only understand the need for budget cuts in 2012 & onward budgets, if they understand the problem with the baseline. 2010 baseline does not exist – no budge passed. 2009 was totally distored by TARP and other kneejerk responses to the recession. 2008 provides the most recent baseline from which to start, and even that baseline causes deficits and should only be a measure from which to cut.

  • clowngirl

    it’s worth pointing out the blatancy of Democrats current doublethink. They go into hysterics about any Republican sponsored cuts – and yet they are willing to irresponsibly cut off funding to the whole government – causing massive problems and inconvenience- rather than allow the defunding of institutions they like but whose defunding will cause no inconvenience for the average person.

    There’s a stunning contrast between Paul Ryan’s plan to responsibly and sensibly cut spending – and the apparent willingness of Democrats to disrupt millions of Americans lives if they don’t get their way.

    You’re analysis is excellent and spot on.

    • Wayne

      And, as the plutocrats in government are increasingly faced with the realty that the Tea Party actually represents the foundation of our Democratic Republic, and the will of a they will pump more propaganda money at it.

      What’s a word that rolls Plutocrat, Bureaucrat, Autocrat in to one? Democrat?

  • msctex

    The Dems believe that what once worked in Clinton’s favor can be twisted to work in Obama’s, despite drastically different circumstances.

    They ignore their current President is a failure of unprecedented, almost unimaginable proportion, and are currently functioning in a state of almost complete denial.

    If the reality of the “shutdown” can be explained in a straightforward manner, this could easily be made to work in our favor. Something as simple as, “If the Government were a company, it would have gone out of business a long time ago” could do the trick.

  • The_Gadfly

    isn’t also adversely affecting what little efficiency exists in government.

    I’m currently a government contractor, working in IT support. Theoretically our contract expired sometime in 2010. It is supposed to be replaced by a new task in an umbrella vehicle that is supposed to give the government more flexibility in spinning up new services or shutting down unnecessary ones. Except that since they haven’t had a budget, they haven’t been able to award the new contract. Instead they’ve extended them a couple months or even weeks at a time. It makes a complete hash out of trying to do any long term planning. One complicating factor for me is I as part of our heightened security posture, I’m required to use a smart card for administrative access to the systems I support. Well, the contract runs out the week after the current CR does. When they rush the process it takes about a week to get a new card. I can’t get a new card until there’s either an extension on the current contract or a new contract award. So when the government shuts down on Friday, the impact will extend well into the following week.

    On the personal side, I’m supposed to go to the Penn State Blue and White game with friends in a couple of weeks. I haven’t been willing to fully commit to it because I don’t know what my leave situation will look like. Same thing applies for DragonCon in September, the next RedState convention, or making a trip to visit my brother and his family sometime in the summer.

    In short, Harry and The Big 0 are really putting the screws to the economy with their “Over my dead body” shenanigans. My concern is that Republicans haven’t held them accountable for it in the public square. They keep trying to appear “reasonable” in the MSM, which has no interest whatsoever in helping them. Well, unless the help they are looking for is serving their own heads up on silver platters.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      Over three more stanzas of Cowboy Poetry. It almost sounds like campaign theme.

      • kestrel

        Cowboys + nationalized healthcare colonoscopies (snip, snip, oops) = cowboy poets

        • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

          Harry Reid has a John Wayne fixation.

  • Tbone

    ain’t voting for Republicans anyway.

    The Republicans should run ads on all the networks during American Idol, DWTS and fronts of lottery tickets saying If you are missing your government check, call this number:

    202-456-1414

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      Although the actual recipients of the checks aren’t the only Dem targets. They could also deliberately take down businesses that get 2nd order benefits from it like grocery stores that get paid in food statmps for example.

  • http://www.FranBaker.com frankieb

    Make everyone receiving a government benefit reapply … with birth certificate in one hand and an empty bottle to fill with fresh urine on the spot in the other.

    • Tbone

      if that were the requirements.

  • toothpick

    Barack Obama, Community-Organizer-In-Chief, is about to lead the Federal Government on a general strike against the taxpayers, represented in negotiations by the Tea Party and to a lesser extent by the Republicans in Congress. Obama’s intention is that the strike will end only when his demands are met.

  • johnt

    I better lay off the booze. I’ll try that one again later.