« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

ObamaCare With Jets, Stupid Human Tricks in Libya With Live Ammo.

“You permitted Libya to sell oil. For what purpose? Just keep the price of oil down?” he said. “This is also a war against the Libyan people. If the west wants to protect Libyans they should protect them through every arena, economic, political and military,” he added.

Ahmed el-Sharif, Libyan Rebel Finance Minister. (HT: Financial Times)

Former Red Army Generals all across Russia must be shaking their heads in disgust. “This NATO force we lost The Cold War Too!” They perhaps yell in pained exasperation. Had the Red Army attempted to blast through the Fulda Gap, and then met the NATO Alliance that has intervened in Libya’s Civil War, the Red Star would have risen over the French Riviera after two weeks of futile and one-sided combat.

NATO’s operations to date in Libya have been a joke – David Letterman’s Stupid Human Tricks with live ammunition. Libyan Rebel Leader Abdel Fattah Younes has asked NATO to please quit the field. He wants them out of the way as he explains below.

He said: “Nato is moving very slowly, allowing Gaddafi forces to advance. Nato has become our problem.”

(HT: Sky News)

Mr. Younes describes how battlefield bureaucracy works. He discusses the resulting ObamaCare with jets below.

“One official calls another and then from the official to the head of Nato and from the head of Nato to the field commander. This takes eight hours.”

(Sky News ObCit.)

A part of NATO’s reticence comes from the fact that Libyan Strongman Muammar Khadafy has started taking prisoners and using them as human shields. This has slowed the NATO sortie rate and thereby allowed Khadafy’s mercenary army to regroup. The Libyan rebels are now locked in an attrition contest with one of the most ruthless dictators the world has seen come to power.

Khadafy has also invested his ill-gotten spoils quite wisely. Hedgetracker.com speculates that his reserves total $6Bn worth of the so-called “one true currency” known as gold. He can’t eat it, but he sure can continue to buy the mercs.

Plus, electronic bank embargoes do not impact physical specie held in Tripoli. They do impact all electronic balances. Anything not held in scrip or in full-bodied money is now out of circulation in Libya. Thus, according to the Libyan Rebel central bank, the freezing of Libyan assets has had the unintended consequence of harming them as well. Rebel Finance Minister, Ahmed el-Sharif explains below.

“When you get to the point of rationing liquidity, whether local or foreign currency, we are on the edge of a crisis,” he said. “We are in a cash economy; all the cash is with the public,” Mr Sharif said. “The banks will be empty in maybe two weeks.”

(Financial Times ObCit)

Meanwhile an oil tanker has docked near the contested port of Marsa el Hariga to take on cargo. It sits empty, for now. If the Libyans could sell oil, they could probably solve the liquidity squeeze that their allies stuck them with as collateral damage.

Heck, it might even motivate alliance countries such as France and Italy that used to buy 85% of Libya’s oil output before things got out of whack in the Grand Duchy of Khadafy. There’s nothing quite like cold, hard, iniquitous wealth to inspire “humanitarian” warriors. Meanwhile, the Libyan Rebels discover a truth already known to the Yugoslavians and the Iraqi Kurds. With friends like NATO, who needs an enema?

COMMENTS

  • Tbone

    ?One official calls another and then from the official to the head of Nato and from the head of Nato to the field commander. This takes eight hours.?

    I think I’ll bet with KaDaffy. It looks like Busted Flush Barry went all in to the tune of $200 million on a pair of deuces, Cameron and the Froggy midget.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack
  • Old_Crow

    or
    Not After Two O’clock.
    At least that’s what we used to say when I was active duty. Although it looks like it still applies today.

    NATO was the most successful use of OPDEC (Operational Deception) since WWII. The old soviet generals are probably doing face palms now and hitting the vodka extra hard.

  • redwood

    If it were fall they would really be in bad shape. Oh, the can always buy more from Russia, brrr. They do have light sweet don’t they?

    And if the Russians had come through the Fulda Gap in the ’50s they would have encountered an American front line lead by Truman or Eisenhower. NATO was US guarding Europe and there was no peace and love facing the east.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      With Jimmy Carter at the helm, it would have been the Terminator attacking Daffy Duck.

  • methodius

    of WWII being the UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER of our enemies we fought with purpose and fierce determnination. With modern PC based rules of engagement, politicians running the battlefield rather than the generals, etc. replacing or supplanting defined war aims we end up with strategic losses despite tactical wins. Our soldiers win and then our “leaders” snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

    Notice the results of WWII: Do we have any more problems with an aggressive Germany or an imperialistic Japan? Germany had been a thorn in Europe’s collective side since the rise of Prussia as a major power. We enter the picture and now no more problem. This also had an effect on the other European powers who had been waring nonstop for centuries with one another. The message was that the world led by the US was not going to put up with this “stuff” any longer.

    Contrast that with the results of our “police actions” and such since: Korea is still divided and the North is a sponsor of terrorism and nuclear/ballistic missle proliferation. Had MacArthur’s advice been heeded China would not be communist today. Vietnam, where we won every major battle and most of the minor ones, would be free with a profound effect on the rest of SE Asia. Sadam could have been dealt with decisively in the first go around instead of halting after a symbolic 100 hours. Flat out leveling Iraq or Afghanistan versus nation building would have said to any other like country “you’re next if you mess with us” and would serve as a far more effective deterent than our current mamby-pamby liberal run foriegn policy.

    We spend so much time trying to make war “civilized” when it can never be so. War is hell and the nastier you make it for your enemy the more likely tin pot dicatators in third world cespools will avoid messing with us. Speak softly and carry a big stick. The United States is and has been one of the only nations in history to use its military strength and superiority for making the world safer and not for selfish, imperialistic gains as has been the history of the other world powers of days gone by.

    Have we been perfect or completely altruistic in this endeavor? No, but show me, for example, where one drop of the oil we supposedly fought for in Iraq is. What country are we occupying and raping for its natural resources as old imperialistic Europe had? What country in the history of the world defeats its enemies, helps them rebuild, and sets them free to be productive citizens of the world community? What country has shown so much charity and benevolance when other countries are in need or have face disaster than the US – even to our enemies? American exceptionalism ain’t just a catch phrase.

    There is certainly more to be said on the subject, but this post is already too long.

    • randy_burgess

      It’s easy to say American exceptionalism, very few lay it out so clearly and cogently.

  • edintexas

    IS the following a press release by the PR flacks of the UN’s mercenary army (AKA NATO), the White House flacks or Hillary’s flacks? Surely you didn’t write this propaganda paragraph.

    “A part of NATO?s reticence comes from the fact that Libyan Strongman Muammar Khadafy has started taking prisoners and using them as human shields. This has slowed the NATO sortie rate and thereby allowed Khadafy?s mercenary army to regroup. The Libyan rebels are now locked in an attrition contest with one of the most ruthless dictators the world has seen come to power.”

    What a load of … never mind.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      NATO now lacks the guts to do its job because Khadafy now has people strapped to vehicles interspersed in his military convoys. Khadafy is that big of prick, NATO is that genuinely afflicted by cowardice. K. will win this war by forcing NATO to have to violate their own ROE in order to proceed.

      • edintexas

        I’m not casting aspersions on your veracity, but since I’m not there – and I guess neither are you, just how do you know this is true? Because the British Foreign Office issued the statement? Because Reuters distributed the statement in an article?

        I’ll admit I could have missed live video with the people strapped to the vehicles screaming to be allowed to flee (but then how would I know what they were saying anyway?).

        Not that I don’t think Daffy is capable of it, I’m sure he is. And I’m equally sure the “rebels” are too. For that matter any of these ME types are capable of it – other than the Israelis, though I’m sure they’d be blamed for it anyway.