« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Law and Order and the 2012 Election

It was the day after Memorial Day Weekend. The weekend had been violent, and Matt Drudge knew just how to bring the story to the attention of his Internet audience. The entire top quadrant of his website consisted of stories about rioting youths and ensuing chaos. The reaction to this mayhem unfortunately involved race-baiting and political gamesmanship. Those who opined failed to recognize that America now has a law and order problem that the GOP nominee for President needs to have a solution for.

The splashed headlines provoked a visceral and often times wrongheaded reaction for several reasons. The offenders portrayed were primarily young, black males. Those who listen intently for dog whistles heard them. Kevin L. Martin describes one such example of journalistic malpractice below.

“…since the president of the United States is a black man, and since black voters tend to align with his party, it is to the advantage of the Republican Party and its allies to inculcate fear and apprehension about people who look like him. Hence the top stories on the Drudge Report today.”

This mindset has pervaded every media story that could somehow become detrimental to Barack Obama’s reelection campaign in 2012. People got robbed, beaten and killed this year on Memorial Day, but it’s blatantly racist to bring that to the attention of anybody old enough to vote by 2012.

This is a kick-the-can-down-the-road mindset that calls for us to make problems go away rather than address or solve them. This mindset will not help a poor elderly man in Saint Louis. For Hoang Nguyen, it is now too late to kick anything on down the road.

Poor Hoang Nguyen lacked the sense of drama to get himself attacked and die on Memorial Day. He won’t be making the Drudge Report. He’s just an elderly, decent, honorable, law-abiding citizen who fell victim to a new teenage pastime known around St. Louis as Knockout King. The game has a brutal simplicity to it that is outlined below.

The rules of Knockout King are straightforward, according to Jason and other former players interviewed for this article. A lead attacker is chosen from among a group of boys, usually young adolescents. Next a target is picked out. Then the attacker either charges the unsuspecting victim or motions for his attention. When the target turns or lifts his head, the attacker strikes. If the victim is felled by the punch, the group usually scatters. But if the target withstands the blow, other members of the group may follow up with their fists to finish the job.

When the attackers had finished the job on Hoang Nguyen, there simply wasn’t much of him left. A repeat juvenile offender named Elex Murphy “won” by scoring a perma-TKO on the septuagenarian retired school teacher.

While Dr. McCoy from Star Trek would have been saddened, the Saint Louis PD seems to view Hoang Nguyen as just another Redshirt. The Saint Louis PD tells people not to worry. It’s just some screwy kids.

“The ‘knockout game’ is played by a group of kids who, as outrageous as it sounds, go around with the goal of knocking people out, for apparently no reason,” says Chief Daniel Isom. “Based on our intelligence, we believe it’s an isolated group of maybe five to nine kids,” he says.

Patrick Wallace, a spokesman for St. Louis Public Schools, gives us the predictable bureaucratic response to any problem the bureaucracy is too feeble to effectively solve.

The social workers, Wallace reports, “are not interested in talking about it.”

This reminds me of a particularly vicious gang rape in Houston, Texas that I blogged about several months back. The Houston Chronicle gave a blunt description of what took place.

Seventeen men and boys, including a middle school student and adults in their 20s, have been charged with sexually assaulting Maria’s daughter, a sixth-grader, in a dingy trailer. That number could grow to 28.

The New York Times then informed us as to how “The Thinking People” were expected to view this issue.

Residents in the neighborhood where the abandoned trailer stands — known as the Quarters — said the victim had been visiting various friends there for months. They said she dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said.

Whether our best and brightest want to admit to it or not, law and order disintegrates daily in America. Crimes rates have been both higher and lower, but the things that took place in Houston, TX, in St. Louis, MO, and all over America on Memorial Day would never happen in a society endeared to the rule of law. We are not supposed to care whether it helps the GOP or Democrats when we discuss crime or enforce laws. We are supposed to be a nation of laws and not men.

Thus, I believe that the eventual GOP candidate for President has to ignore the accusations of racism and make this an issue. This is bigger than just a shot at political advantage. The blood of innocent people cries out from the stained and filthy alleys of our lawless urban streets. As Mitt Romney pointed out about the victims of feckless and stupid economic policy yesterday, these are human beings, not speed-bumps. The GOP nominee in 2012 must demand that the law protect people like Hoang Nguyen once again.

COMMENTS

  • acat

    The issue isn’t laws – what every one of the folks splashed all over Drudge on Memorial Day did was already illegal – the issue is enforcement.

    There aren’t enough cops. There simply can’t be enough cops… unless we want a 1984 scenario .. or. The alternative our Founders intended. We are all “cops”.

    That doesn’t mean we all have badges or carry firearms .. it does mean *some* of us carry .. and nobody knows just who.

    The one commonality I noted on the Drudge splash was the location of the attacks. Every single one was in an urban area, with tight gun control laws.

    None were in Texas, for instance, where walking up and punching someone would likely get more than a harsh look…

    No, the root problem isn’t “law and order”, that’s a symptom. The root cause is a lack of responsibility taken on by the citizenry to enforce the rules upon ourselves. “It’s not my problem” or “there’s nothing I can do” or “never a cop around when you need one” …

    Yes, the next GOP presidential candidate needs to address this .. but I’m not quite sure what you want him or her to say. This is a societal problem, not a government one.

    I’m reminded of something I saw in someone’s sig here on Red State. “I carry a gun because when seconds count, a cop is minutes away”.

    More of that, with the necessary lawsuits to rout the Lib anti-2nd-amendment anti-concealed-carry would turn the tide. For a while, anyway.

    Mew

    • Bill S

      We have a concealed carry law in MO.

      • acat

        Gun control in Chicago works differently than in the rest of Illinois – concealed carry is possible outside the city, but very difficult inside.

        Is St. Louis different?

        Mew

        • Bill S

          I used to work down there, and I don’t recall ever hearing such a thing. I suppose it could have changed – it’s been a few years…

        • ja_ak

          http://stlouis-mo.gov/government/departments/sheriff/permits-to-carry-a-concealed-firearm.cfm

          • acat

            That doesn’t mean the sheriff in a big city isn’t bending the rules to block concealed carry. It happens.

            I’m not saying concealed carry is a cure-all, but .. bullies pick on the weak, when there’s little or no expected fight.

            If they can’t tell whether someone’s going to react to the punch with lethal force, then .. the game becomes suicide-by-random-citizen… and I’ve never been in an urban area (other than in Texas) where concealed carry was easy to get.

            Mew

          • ja_ak

            I live outside of Atlanta, and here permits are issued by county. My county makes it as difficult as they can for you to get your permit, which basically just wastes your time. Once you get through the process, though, the carry laws are fairly liberal.

            Many people in Georgia carry, and I credit that as to why you haven’t seen wildings here – yet.

            I believe that an armed society is a polite society.

          • acat

            Robert A. Heinlein, isn’t it? He had it right, too.

            One reason why the 1950s are thought of as so polite was the 1940s.. the “big war” and the sheer number of guns in private hands who knew (thanks to the army) how to use ‘em. Something like 15% of the population went through basic training for WWII, on top of the hunters and farmers. (statistic from memory, corrections welcome)

            Mew

    • dbkohl

      … one way could be “ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.” Then tie in several of the other societal problems that can be traced back to reliance on the different levels of government rather than having independence and self-reliance.

      I agree with everything that you said in your post though… very well presented.

  • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

    These are the fruits of a half century of insidious urban dependency polices that have been propagated by Dems for political gain. We all know that they have no regard for the well being of urban America. Otherwise, they wouldn’t perpetuate and exacerbate the same failed policies. They want votes; everything else be damned.

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister
    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      I wish there were some way of statistically quantifying what percent of these mobsters were longterm unemployed.

      • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

        Very high employment among the younger ages, and lots of problems. Worst thing you can give a young person is too much free time. They will find trouble, or trouble will find them.

        • acat
  • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

    I remember seeing the headlines but did not read the stories.

    The headline – “Teen Gangs Unleashed on Boston Beach” – begs a couple of questions.

    1 – Who unleashed the teen gangs? The verb tense seems to imply that someone, something, or some circumstance – other than the gangs – allowed their violent crime wave.

    2. Were the teen gangs leashed at some point? And if so, how and why?

    The headline struck me as odd at the time but I passed it by without much thought. The wording seems to point to an outside force being involved and to the attacks serving a purpose other than just being random acts of violence.

    • http://theminorityreportblog.com Repair_Man_Jack

      Or maybe this is how pervasively bad our education system really is. Just leash them to a desk for 18 years and hope they don’t get loose on Boston’s Beaches.