« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Opposite of Pro-Life Is What Just Happened In Norway

The great plague of our times is repudiation of life. Not since late antiquity, when Hellenes and then the Romans exposed their children rather than bothering to raise them, have so many nations eschewed the task of raising a new generation.

– David Goldman, Asia Times.

The world now sadly knows far more about an evil man from Norway named Anders Behring Breivik than we ever needed or wanted to. We know he held the lives of others in disdain. He demonstrated that moral failure by traveling to the island of Utoya and executing eighty-four of his fellow human beings. A society that cheapens the value of life can reasonably expect to produce Nietzschean Supermen like Breivik with increasing frequency as that culture’s fundamental apostasy rages unchecked.

Thus, I am Pro-Life. This extends far beyond my desire to eliminate both abortion and state-encouraged euthanasia as much as possible. Cheapening the fundamental value of life cheapens all of us. It makes our children’s futures less hopeful. Human life, even the lives of other human beings that I forget to love as brothers, is a lot more important than I, or anyone else will ever be as solipsistic individuals. When a society forgets this, many lives will soon become forfeit.

Our current non-culture denies the failure of our Modern Age to properly respect life. It devalues everything that surrounds us. It allows people to withdraw within their own philosophical smug clouds. Within the mental smog, they then rationalize moral barbarism and the accompanying complete and utter lack of concern for others. Eyewitness accounts of what took place on Utoya Island bear this out.

He (a survivor named Dana Berzingi) said the fake police officer ordered people to come closer, then pulled weapons and ammunition from a bag and started shooting. Several victims “had pretended as if they were dead to survive,” Berzingi said. But after shooting the victims with one gun, the gunman shot them again in the head with a shotgun, he said.

– UK Telegraph.

Anders Behring Breivik carefully planned and selected his tactics. This was not an emotional reaction on his part, it was a trained one. This was an action that he ran through his twisted mind. It was something he morally weighed and found personally commendable. He had convinced himself what he was doing was noble and decent. It wasn’t like he was killing anything that had value.

And then there were those who tried to “take credit.” People who were not involved, but claimed they were because they actually believe that this would enhance their reputations. The braggarts included two Islamic Terror Organizations who are as morally worthless as Anders Behring Breivik but who blessedly lack the courage of their sick convictions to this point.

Many intelligence analysts said they had never heard of Helpers of Global Jihad, which took initial credit. The Kurdish group Ansar al-Islam also took credit on some jihadist websites.

It’s a sick world where a man feels perfectly justified in dressing himself up like a cop and shooting eighty-four people at a youth camp. It’s an even grosser world where people other than the man who shot the children and young adults lie and actually brag that they did it.

We live in a world where we are perfectly happy to abort millions of children and then DEMAND to know WHY Anders Behring Breivik became the human sarcoma that he truly is. We live in a world where people praise Jack Kevorkian as some sort of efficiency expert, but we have outraged news stories when someone in Seattle shoots his fellow man for insulting the paint job on his car. I mean it’s rough sanding down the frame and applying a new coat of primer. Give the guy an efficiency ribbon. Al Gore decries our global overpopulation anyway.

But if we think that way and let the Modern view win, we have gone down that road before and saw where it ended. German physicians, during the Weimar Republic, invented a booth-like contraption analogous to Jack Kevorkian’s van. They put a senile or crazy person inside and turned on the gas. It was viewed as humane, sanitary, and dignified. Then some government bureaucrat named Reinhard Heydrich just sat down and figured out the economies of scale…

So I have to explain to otherwise decent and intelligent people that Anders Behring Breivik is not a surprise, not an anomaly and not a socio-political phenomenon that our society will easily rid itself of. He is the kid who sat in class and actually believed it when he was told that Earth’s problem was that it had too many people. He actually believed that life was no more valuable than Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris say it is.

He is the living, breathing embodiment of what our modern culture teaches us that we are. He did exactly what are euthanasianists, our abortionists, our health care rationers and our zero-population growth fanatics preach is the light, the gospel and the enlightened, Modern way. The only difference between he and they was that he was a loud, ignorant klutz who forgot to go ask the government “Mother, may I?”

Jesus of Nazareth explains better than I ever why we must rise up against the cheapening of life in our darkling modern world. I close with his words as he approached Jerusalem, knowing he would soon die.

And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out..

-Luke 19:40, King James Bible.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • sjwrick

    N/T

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I was stunned to return to the Modern world and read about this.

  • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

    My first thought was to jump to Anders Behring Brievik’s manifesto (found here: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=89a_1311444384 ). Simply, I’d like more proof that he sat in such “indoctrination” classes growing up in Norway. I’m not saying his society, and the West at large, have not changed a pro-life culture into one of pro-death. His manifesto speaks out against Marxism, political correctness, etc.

    What is even another tragedy is that the maximum penalty this evil incarnate person will get is twenty-one, 21!, years behind bars. What does Norway value more here, a mass-murderer or the 84+ lives he took?

    • http://www.AmericanThinker.com Hammer2008

      when he writes, “Contrary to first reports, we know that Breivik is not a fundamentalist Christian, nor a Christian of any sort, but rather a hater of his own countrymen, whom he murdered in place of the Muslims he reportedly feared.”

      Note that Christian-peoples are rejecting this mass-murderer and his actions in a loud voice, whereas, if this were to happen from an Islamist, there would be utter silence by Muslims, no?

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        For the reasons I’ve cited in my post. Outside of the Dar-Al-Islam, the unbelievers don’t have legitimate standing as human beings.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      was Norwegian philosopher Arne N?ss. You can see from its principles the devaluation of the human being. Like all environmental ideologies studied, it calls for limiting of human populations. It just leaves the listener to fill in the blanks of how.

  • mattyp

    Is there any actual evidence (statistical studies, psychological studies, etc.) to support that support of abortion rights is an indicator of a higher propensity for violent crime? You have your argument sure, but without any evidence, they’re just words with nothing to back them up.

    In regards to the nut-job in Norway: After a quick perusing of part of his “manifesto”, it would seem that Anders Breivik was actually anti-abortion, as evidenced by the following passages:

    As Ellen Willis, self-proclaimed democratic socialist and founder of Redstockings, a radical feminist group from 1969, stated[9] to left-wing The Nation in 1981: ?Feminism is not just an issue or a group of issues, it is the cutting edge of a revolution in cultural and moral values. [...] The objective of every feminist reform, from legal abortion [...] to child-care programs, is to undermine traditional family values.? Feminist icon Simone de Beauvoir stated[10] that ?no woman should be authorised to stay at home to raise her children [?] because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.

    These policies of extinction is nothing less than the deliberate plan to cause the indirect demographical genocide on a mass scale by implementing and maintaining Marxist social structures. This huge deficit is then used as the primary argument to allow mass Muslim immigration. The utter unwillingness to change these social structures (reverse from matriarchal oriented structures to patriarchal structures) leading to this gradual extinction is considered no less than high treason. These Marxist social structures causes an annual Western European birth deficit of at least 2 million. The political doctrines which create the fundament for these Marxist social structures are included in another chapter. A few examples include collaboration by allowing the marketing and propagating the excessive distribution of contraceptive pills to European women, by allowing 500 000 annual abortions, by stripping aways mens rights and prerogative (as patriarch/head of the family) in relation to custody care, by criminalising physical disciplinary methods etc.

    The Protestant liberal Church defends and encourages the ordination of women, divorce, abortion, the mass scale distribution of contraceptive pills and contributes to glorify homosexuality (including the ordination of homosexuals). When the Church resembles a minimalistic shopping mall, the female priest wears jeans, defends abortion and the mass scale distribution of contraceptive pills, defends the Jihad against the Israelis and lives a sexually active life; then what is the point? We must go back to our Catholic roots. We, the protestant nations of Europe should not forget that we were all Catholics once.

    Not that I want to paint all terrorists with the same brush,but this particular terrorist seems to be a right-wing, xenophobic Christian Nationalist, strictly opposed to multiculturalism and liberalism (particularly Marxism), so blaming his actions on a left-wing “culture of death,” unless you want to justify them, is just erroneous and silly.

    At a cursory glance, you just seem to want to deflect attention from Breivik’s right-wing views by making a (being extremely generous) tenuous link between him and the lefty, pro-abortion “culture of death.” It’s quite sad, really.

    • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

      To prove your point that Breivik is a Christian or a Christian fundamentalist as some claim, you will have to demonstrate how his actions fall in line with the standard of Christianity – the Bible and the teachings of Christ contained therein.

      Two other fallacies in your argument include:

      1. Being anti-abortion does not make Breivik pro-life.

      2. Nor does Breivik claim to oppose abortion because it is murder. He decries the aborting of European children because it paves the way for Muslim immigration. One comes away with the impression that he would willingly abort Muslim children.

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        If he enjoys the thought of killing Muslims, he probably isn’t particular as to how.

        • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

          My point is that one cannot say Breivik is pro-life simply because his rhetoric opposed the aborting of European children. Nor can one argue that opposition to aborting European children means that he is anti-abortion in general.

          I was simply point out how mattyp is making assumptions without evidence and ignoring evidence to the contrary.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            Far more confident and less ackward than Richard Dawkins in the elevator at 4am…

  • http://jhpruitt.blogtownhall.com/ kipling

    Your analysis is spot-on, RMJ.

    Leftists want a world in which life is cheap and the individual is subservient to the collective. Breivik is that world.

    Unless we turn back to the traditional values of Western Civilization and Christianity, then we will see more of this type of behavior.

  • timchgo9

    parts of this so called “manifesto”.. He is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a “Fundamentalist Christian”. His writings, though more organized, and slightly more coherent, still have the rambling disconnect of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf”

    It is an arduous 1,500 page rant, and while organized, and on the surface, seems to make a coherent argument, he loses me in the rambling nature of his work.

    I cannot believe how anyone can connect this man’s ramblings to “Christian views”.. his actions were so “un Christian” that they expose the man’s evil intent. His document, while Anti-Marxist, is NOT anti-totalitarian.

    He decries Hitler as “traitor” but he seems to indicate that Hitler had the right idea but went about it the wrong way. He seems to envision a Europe under a central authority he prefers, before the Marxists, or Muslims take over. He wishes a strong Europe… but again, one under a central authority, that answers to no one. He seems think Hitler’s biggest mistake was starting a war against his European neighbors. It appears he feels that if Hitler wanted to be aggressive, he should have aggressively united Europe on a peaceful manner, stomped out Marxism in Europe, and then turned the force of a united, authoritarian Europe against the Arabs and the Soviets.

    He cries out against multi-culturalism,and liberalism, but he doesn’t necessarily speak in favor of freedom, or individual liberty. at least in the parts I read. He seems to advocate for a united Europe against the Marxist/Islamic threat, but, in the sense of a centralized, authoritarian, Europe, united by fear and coercion.

    His writings, once read, are going to inspire more of this. Be forewarned, it’s a long read, a very difficult read, and I did skip many parts, because of the rambling nature of his writing style. I will probably go back and read more in depth. I am not printing this out, because frankly, I am not wasting the paper.

    He is not a Christian. He is an evil, soul-less man, who wishes to destroy those who disagree with him.

    He is no better than the Islamists.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Was my own reading of the Unabomber Manifesto. The guy would make 10 or 15 good, cogent points in a row. Then he’d slip in the industrial-strength crazy. What Goebbles(sp?) would have called The Big Lie. If what you say is true, Anders Behring Breivik was as intelligent as he was iniquitous. That is a scary thought.

      • timchgo9

        But, you have to be careful calling them “good points” I think they are merely a setup to get agreement from a reader, and get them to read further, where he then twists that point into something else, and heads in a different direction with it. Unfortunately, he is good with the direction change, that his conclusion almost seems logical, until you analyze where he is really coming from.

        I learned a long time ago. Don’t fear those to speak like they are crazy, Fear the one that speaks articulately and clearly, who hides his darkness and madness behind fluid prose.