« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Why Al Gore Isn’t Safe For Work Or Intelligent Debate


I typically like to begin my blog entries with some quote from a powerful individual that addresses my topic. Today, however, I have to alter this procedure. My topic is Anthropogenic Global Warming and the speaker is none other than Al Gore. Therefore, we had to institute a 10 second delay in order to properly work-safe the commentary below.

‘This climate thing, it’s nonsense. Man-made CO2 doesn’t trap heat. It may be volcanoes.’ Bull(beep)! ‘It may be sun spots.’ Bull(beep)! ‘It’s not getting warmer.’ Bull(beep)!” Gore exclaimed.

(HT: Colorado Independent)

Al Gore swears for good reason. The scientific theory that he has devoted the last decade and one half of his life to advocating on behalf of is being shot more full of holes than a spaghetti strainer. His cash-cow is on the way to the slaughter house, his golden goose is being fricasseed.

Joe Bastardi responds to Al Gore’s temper-tantrum with a forceful and less profane opposing view. He asks “where is the heat?” below.

The PDO changes, sunspot activity is down from the max around 2000. The Earths temps level out and co2 continues to rise. To the folks at climate progress.. if co2 is causing the temperature rise, why is it the temperatures have leveled off while co2 continues to rise, and the other 2 forcing mechanisms have changed. Where are the trapping hot spots at 400mb? Where is the positive feedback? Why is the temperature not in any of the IPCC ranges issued 20 years ago? Even Phil Jones admitted there has been no warming, so how can co2 be the cause? Where is the heat.. The ocean bottom, a cave somewhere? And how is it the satellites say it fine after the PDO switched to warm, but cant find it now?

(HT: Icecap)

Rather than simply storming off the stage like the infantile and frustrated Al Gore, Bastardi lays out a case that is linked to by The Powerline Blog. It begins with a discussion of the highly significant correlation between temperature changes and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation(PDO).

The PDO Correlates w/ Temperature Change. R^2=0.85

The PDO is a change in the direction of the strongest current in the Pacific Ocean that occurs approximately every 20 to 30 years. This influences climate by forcing very cold water from the ocean depths to the sea surface and then burying this frigid water during the opposite phase of the cycle. The 85% correlation between the PDO and the temperature changes suggests a strong interrelation, not necessarily a causation, between the two.

Bastardi then discusses the correlation between CO2 concentration and temperature fluctuations. This relationship has only a 44% percent correlation. This statistic strongly suggests that the relationship between CO2 concentrations and temperature change is tenuous at best. Thus, absent any significant correlation, it is dubious to continue arguing such a Bull(beep)! proposition.

CO2 Correlates Poorly With Temperature Change. R^2 = 0.44.

Perhaps this is what has Al Gore reverting to potty-mouthed feces-chucking. His theory is demonstrably wrong. The models that support said theory are pulled out of some mathematically-talented acolyte’s rectum and have a cursory, at best, relationship with objective reality. People increasingly know and understand the extent to which AGW has become a brain-washed cult of Marxians who don’t dare speak their own ideology’s true name. The scam is over and Al Gore does not want to give up the fame and adulation that it has brought him. Thus Al Gore is not safe for either work or for intelligent discussion of scientific problems relating to the Earth’s climate.

COMMENTS

  • Liquid khaos

    He makes me laugh … Thank God that scientists got on the case. Uh oh, is that ok to say? Oh yeah its redstate! GOD!

  • snowshooze

    Yikes.

    • wennejunk

      n/t

  • Next93

    I’m pretty sure Al is invested heavily in propositions that are presently worthless and will remain so unless he can get a government decree to make them otherwise (like, say, cap-and-trade carbon tax law).

    Not only that, but I’d be willing to bet that he’s conned a lot of very wealthy and powerful individuals to go in with him on these scams investments. The kind of people who get upset when their promised 5000% return fails to materialize.

    My prediction is that when AGW is finally and unequivocally exposed for the fraud that it is, Al Gore is going to find himself spending some quality time with either Bernie Madoff or Jimmy Hoffa.

  • Tbone

    every time he says “bull s***.”

  • choey

    If the next ice age is starting, Algore will be screeching “Mann-made global warming” as the glacier pushes his mansion into the Gulf of Mexico. He’s incurable.

  • jtlfromfredmd

    forecasting for Accuweather. He departed from there this past spring. He would oftentimes have discussions with graphs and charts which argued quite well for the case against AGW. I never believed it (AGW) even before I heard of Joe B. Al Gore is an overweight blowhard who is gasping the last bit of air from the global warming balloon. Take him away and let him live on an iceberg with the polar bears.

  • jaykali

    Al Gore is supposed to be some expert somehow but his business makes money on green technology. He’s not some scientist with no (discernable) agenda.

    It would be like conservatives touting some big Coal producer person as an expert on the opposition side.

    Even if Gore didn’t have a stake monetarily, he would politically as all politicians do. That is why this thing can’t be settled by politicians. Big govt types want to be able to control every company in the world. If they can persuade the populace that the world is going to end unless the regulate the hell out of businesses, then they can achieve their ultimate ends of so-called ‘social justice.’ Conservatives naturally want the exact opposite.

    Unfortunately the scientific community isn’t exactly completely independent either. They are swayed by politicians pumping cash into their research. It’s a real mess. Hopefully over time the facts will speak for themselves.

  • http://www.gmsplace.com/ civil truth

    We’re past the point of scientific discourse; it’s strictly an ideological political battle, with AGW as the bow shock for government control over the country. Scientific truth no longer matters for the left – rather what matters is if they can outshout the AGW skeptics – or as the evidence mounts, silence them. The totalitarians are massing in the shadow of the AGW jihad.

    • http://www.veronicaestrada.com Veronica

      One of my fav’s by Coolidge:

      “Wherever despotism abounds, the sources of public information are the first to be brought under its control.”

  • donnybrooke

    Scientists at the Center for EBS have announced that they have positively identified the true cause of Climate Change…

    Money.

    Only more money can keep them studying ways to stop this money problem.

  • flannery

    The only restriction on finding an expert or multiple experts for any position you want to use at trial is the ability to pay for experts.

  • thx1138v2

    Since the global climate whatever-it-is-this-week proponents want to modify the entire world I feel like they should have some certainty about their own information. I want them to all take a simple test.

    It’s been said that the current global climate computer models are around 30% accurate. Let’s give then the benefit of the doubt and call it 50%.

    Here’s the test: load three bullets (50%) into a six cartridge revolver and play Russian roulette with it.

    The get to back to me.