« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Blood Meridian (Part 1 of 3): Michele Bachmann on Border Security and Immigration

The separate issues of border security and immigration have become entwined as the American economy continues to wane, an illicit drug trade continues to flourish and a vast number of Americans remain unemployed as illegal immigrants take jobs on American soil. This leads to the immigration and border security issues becoming increasingly important and controversial.

With President Barack Obama’s decision to take a vacation from deporting millions of people who broke our nation’s laws by entering our soil illegally, it is vital that we get to know which GOP candidate would do the best job of redressing the damage he has done. Thus, I will endeavor to examine the immigration stances of Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Mitt Romney. Today, I start with Michele Bachmann.

I begin with Congresswoman Michele Bachmann’s stated positions. On her Congressional Website, she points out that our current immigration laws have serious flaws and our obsolete. She states her views below.

The last time our immigration laws were overhauled was in 1986, when Congress granted amnesty to almost three million illegal immigrants in the U.S. and promised increased border security in the near future. Twenty years later, the number of illegal immigrants in our country has quadrupled, with no end in sight. Rather than repeating the mistakes of our past, I believe Congress must work to secure our nation’s borders and enforce the immigration laws already in place. Once this is achieved, improvements to the current system can be considered.

On the campaign trail, she has established a strong position in favor of enhancing the level of security present on the Mexican Border. The Patriot Action Network recently blogged a Bachmann campaign visit to Greenville, SC.

Bachmann said “The problem has been in our unwillingness to enforce the laws that are on the books.” and “How do you solve it? You build a barrier, a fence, a wall — whatever you want to call it. You build it…As president of the United States, every mile, every yard, every foot, every inch will be covered on that southern border.”

While she hasn’t been lead author on any legislation that reflects these stated priorities, she has been supportive of others. She is one of 64 co-sponsors for Congressman Rohrabacher on H.R.787: No Social Security for Illegal Aliens Act. She also co-sponsored Congressman Hunter’s H.R.1134: Enforce the Law for Sanctuary Cities Act. According to OnTheIssues.org, Congresswoman Bachmann has also stated support for making English the official language of The United States.

On the Issues goes on to describe four basic positions that they believe describe American attitudes towards open borders and unrestricted immigration. Strongly Support, Support, Oppose, Strongly Oppose. I personally Oppose Open Borders and Unlimited Immigration, Congresswoman Bachmann Strongly opposes these ideas. To the extent that I disagree with this candidate at all on immigration, I can offer up only two minor quibbles to balance out the remainder of this post.

I would like to see her think of something to address the economic impact of lost migrant labor on agriculture, and I would also like to see her encourage a larger number of decent and legal immigrants to join the American Family. That’s it. Otherwise, she basically has the issue nailed. As I said before, these are minor quibbles. Compared to Barack Obama’s “Call Me When I’m Back From Martha’s Vineyard” Policy on the issue, Michele Bachmann would truly be a godsend. (Coming soon: Mitt Romney on Immigration and Border Security).

COMMENTS

  • evilleramsfan

    but a meridian runs north and south…..might be appropriately named if a border war breaks out between Arizona and New Mexico….;)

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      But it’s a good point. At least I didn’t recently wish Elvis happy birthday.

      • redneck_hippie

        The title is what made me read the post. Of course, I “always” read your posts. ::smile::

  • acat

    They’re in, or on the cusp of, a civil war. I’d say overdue, the ruling party has long since become an oligarchy or its’ worse cousin, a kleptocracy. Yes, I know Fox wasn’t PRI, but .. just changing from one faction to another among the oligarchs does not mean it’s any less an oligarchy … “Meet the new boss, same as the old boss”, as The Who put it.

    As long as the U.S. has absorbed Mexico’s surplus of young men and provided a stream of jobs and cash to Mexican citizens, the situation hasn’t gotten *quite* bad enough for an actual war .. although that seems to be changing.

    Cutting off either form of support will cause lots of ripples…. I say this not to discourage taking action, but to encourage taking wise, prepared-for action.

    One preparatory step would be to troops in from the rest of the world, in addition to accelerating the standing up another division, adding a focus on border enforcement (any vets honorably discharged from any branch looking for work encouraged to re-enlist, form a specialist battalion) and then see what happens.

    Mew

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I don’t think people know how bad parts of Mexico have gotten. It’s point that could work for or against restrisctionist policies.

      For – “If they’re crazy (Beep)-holes, keep them in their country.”

      Against – “If they collapse, Houston, we have a problem.”

      • acat

        Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance.

        History may not repeat, but it certainly echoes .. and it’s entirely predictible that, if Mexico goes into a civil war, we’ll get pulled in. If for no other reason than every city, village, hamlet, and ranch house within walking distance (25-50 miles) of the border is going to be flooded with refugees.

        Given how bad the bureaucrat infestation (see also “tooth-to-tail ratio”) at the Red Cross and other large-scale aid outfits has gotten, I’m quite sure we can’t pick up the pieces on a volunteer basis… but from a humanitarian viewpoint, we can’t do nothing.

        Mew

  • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ Daniel Horowitz

    Regarding our legal immigration system, it needs to be smarter and more efficient. We need to stop favoring one area of the world or low-skilled workers.

    We also need to be more careful with immigration from the Middle East. Many of the thwarted terror attacks in the country since 9/11 have been from Arab immigrants who came here legally, many of whom are American citizens.

    In terms of numbers, it’s hard to imagine that we need more. Historically, we have let in between 300-500,000 annually. Over the past decade, we have let in over 1 million every single year. If you factor the sheer numbers into the welfare state, and take into account that most of the immigrants have been low-skilled…well, we have a policy disaster. Also, if we continue at this rate, the Dems will have a permanent majority. Whether we like it or not, they vote overwhelmingly Dem.

  • irishgirl

    I look forward to this breakdown.

  • Locked and Loaded

    to address the economic impact of lost migrant labor. Just because it will be painful to undo a long-bastardized system of sending fruits and vegetables to market is no reason to put it off with more government intrusion.

    Americans better dang well start seeing jobs they WILL do. Don’t want to pick? Try roofing or lawn maintenance. For encouragement, NO MORE extensions of unemployment benefits. The US public education system has given us plenty of candidates for the above-mentioned vocations.

  • runner12

    These should make for some very informative reads. I look forward to reading all of them.

  • hwgood

    The third required leg is policing the corporate sponsors. Go for the companies that have large numbers of illegal aliens. If the job market dries up, the folks won’t have that incentive.

  • RonLewenberg

    Congresswoman Bachmann has a good record on this issue http://www.numbersusa.com/content/action/michele-bachmann.html
    I wish she would devote more time to immigration. We have millions unemployed, millions more under-employed or ignored by the government statistics, and Obama is now implimenting a small scale amnesty.

    However, Bachmann does not have the best record on the issue amongst the GOP candidates. Congressman Thaddeus McCotter does. http://www.numbersusa.com/content/my/congress/1111/reportcard/RECENT/

  • drawer22

    As a legal immigrant who chose the United States of America as my country of citizenship and voluntarily fought as a Special Forces team leader for two combat tours before becoming a law enforcement officer in civilian life, my questions are these: Why do we not enforce the laws I chose to follow? Why does my government hand out amnesty to criminals? What incentive is there (other than patriotism) for me to obey our laws, when they are so easily circumvented? And, cynically, why did I choose to fight for a country which does not appreciate that I chose to obey the law but appreciates criminals so much that we virtually invite them here? (That last question is rhetorical.)

    ??i ?y Paul (Cogito, ergo armatus sum.)

  • drawer22

    As a legal immigrant who chose the United States of America as my country of citizenship and voluntarily fought as a Special Forces team leader for two combat tours before becoming a law enforcement officer in civilian life, my questions are these: Why do we not enforce the laws I chose to follow? Why does my government hand out amnesty to criminals? What incentive is there (other than patriotism) for me to obey our laws, when they are so easily circumvented? And, cynically, why did I choose to fight for a country which does not appreciate that I chose to obey the law but appreciates criminals so much that we virtually invite them here? (That last question is rhetorical.)

    ??i ?y Paul (Cogito, ergo armatus sum.)

    • gekster

      and I am native born.