« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Party of Jefferson and Jackson without Mr. Jackson

Jacksonians Bid The New Left Farewell! (HT: American Heritage)

“I am a Democrat but largely because I was born a Democrat. It was passed down by my father.”

– East Liverpool, OH Mayor James Swoger. (HT: Selena Zito)

The Democratic Party has been in business for nearly as long as The United States has been in business independently, rather than as a subsidiary of Great Britain, Inc. It has succeeded to continue on, despite its recent Post WW II, Leftist deracination. It has done so as an alliance between intellectual (Jeffersonian) thinkers and proletariat, salt-of-the-Earth working people. These working Americans are the Jacksonians.

This alliance gave the Democrats a powerful combination of weapons with which they could bludgeon foes. The Jeffersonian Wing gave the party a sense of intellectual engagement and ideological “fashion.” It kept them on the cutting edge of modernity.

The Jacksonians gave them things more visceral, real, and emotional. The Jacksonians came to be legion. They gave the Democrats a quantity that is a quality all its own. They gave the party grounding in reality. They gave it something else, more important. They gave the Democratic Party a culture and a soul. Norman Rockwell painted Jacksonian Democrats.

Now the Jeffersonians have deliberately attenuated that connection between the two. They now seem embarrassed to have Jacksonians around the table at The Annual Jefferson-Jackson Day Dinner. People with a culture and a soul cling to things. They are the Grass Roots to whom intelligent leaders of political movements needed to carry their message. But as Walter Russell Mead points out in his famous essay “The Jacksonian Tradition,” they do certain things that quite frankly scare the modern incarnation of the Jeffersonian Democrat.

It is often remarked that the American people are more religious than their allies in Western Europe. But it is equally true that they are more military-minded. Currently, the American people support without complaint what is easily the highest military budget in the world.

The Jacksonians are not Globalists or in any way Multi-culti. They are saddened and disaappointed with The New Left precisely because they are an accumulation point and a storehouse of American Folk Tradition and Culture. From George Wallace to H. Ross Perot to the Tea Party Movement of today, they are exasperating to the fashionable and chic intelligentsia of the coastal citadels of elitism.

They trust Wall Street as much as they trust Congress about as much as they Trust the Politburo of The Chinese Communist Party. They trust them all exactly zero and for the same reason in each case. To hard-working Jacksonians with sore backs and greasy hands; none of these people have any legitimate belief, soul or skin in the game of life. They don’t inhabit what many Jacksonians describe parochially as the “real” America.

Thus the Jacksonians can only maximize the benefit and minimize the harm of being forced to share a planet with all of these iniquitous jerks. This leads them to an agenda that confounds the non-Jacksonian. Walter Russell Mead describes some aspects of it below.

Suspicious of untrammeled federal power (Waco), skeptical about the prospects for domestic and foreign do-gooding (welfare at home, foreign aid abroad), opposed to federal taxes but obstinately fond of federal programs seen as primarily helping the middle class (Social Security and Medicare, mortgage interest subsidies), Jacksonians constitute a large political interest.

Some of this is Democrat, some Republican, and a lot of it will no longer work in the post-2008 Recession World. There are the Democrats who consider the Jacksonians whining brats and “bitter clingers who hang on to their Bibles and guns.” The contempt that the Liberal Democrats feel for these people is something you could cut and spread with the wrong edge of a knife.

This gives the GOP a major opportunity in 2012. We see this as a Republican Candidate comes closer to winning a Governor’s Race in West Virginia than any Republican has come since Lyndon Johnson was King. We see it when Mo Brooks wins the 5th Alabama Congressional District for the GOP. He is the first Republican to win a seat from Northern Alabama since Reconstruction. We see this when Rick Boucher loses his quasi-feudal sinecure in the Virginia Appalachians.

What we see here is the changing landscape of things when the Party of Jefferson and Jackson no longer has Mr. Jackson watching their backs. The last bastions of so-called “Yellow Dog Democrats” will fall hard. Yet they will fall. The intensity of resentment kindled by the off-handed contempt which the New Left shows for American tradition and folk wisdom will kill them off.

The Republicans must be ready to offer an alternative to these people and show them more respect than they see from the likes of David Brooks and John Derbyshire. This may become a moral challenge that accompanies a new generation of the GOP into power.

COMMENTS

  • dajeeps

    The centralized administrative state is unsustainable. Everyone is feeling the pinch from it, especially young people getting out of college with tons of debt and very little prospect for meaningful employment. Their lives are starting out ruined, and at least when I was young, I had quite a sense of invincibility and did things I certainly would not have had the courage to venture these last few years.

    I don’t agree with the general principles behind the Occupy the Fed protesters, but I do agree with what they are doing on it’s face. If I could join them I would because that has become most corrupt institution to wrangle the country since the Second Bank of the United States. Should they ever be successful at anything, they must be preempted or we will all lose. So I have no problem with picking a subject matter where I can agree: the Fed.

    I don’t blame the banks for people contracting debt, but I do blame the regulatory structure (the Fed) for pumping the housing bubble and allowing NGDI to plunge 15% when it all came crashing down (the last time that happened was in 1936). I blame the Fed for gearing monetary policy with a eye toward what is good for the banks, and not necessarily in the general public interest, on old contracts while unemployment is extraordinarily high. If there is anyone who should be sacrificed in this tragedy, it should be the banks, and not average Joe.

    In addition, it is paying interest on reserves (was forbidden by law until 10/2008 because of the harm it does to the economy), paying banks to hang onto money given to them by the Fed so they won’t go under. There can be no real recovery until the after tax yield on treasuries is higher than the interest being paid on reserves, or IOR goes away. What did the Fed just do to the yield on Treasuries and when will it raise interest rates so that treasury yields will increase?

    Nominal domestic income is directly controlled by the Fed, and an upper ceiling is hit when it is targeting inflation at a rate that is 11% below historical trend. It does not matter, in that regard, what you have to make money with, if there is no more nominal income to be had, you don’t get any. Many factors affect this, like shifts in demographics, trillions of dollars in wealth disappearing over night, etc.. and the Fed was established with the purpose of smoothing out the ups and downs, but it has just sat and watched as our economy flies over a cliff. Save the banks, while hard working folks who play by the rules are turned into paupers and unwilling deadbeats, is its only motto.

    The point of this rant is that people are getting to the point where they’ve had enough of this monster recession, a sentiment which I share. Judging by the direction of the GOP, the new front runner in the race for POTUS (a Fed guy), and those in congress wanting to strip the Fed of the full employment mandate rather than enforce it, and its customary coziness with high finance, it is at odds with what is needed to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, and completely deaf to what this populist movement against the banking monopoly will likely become.

    If there is any stripping of the Fed to be done, rather than getting rid of it, it needs to be stripped of its banking regulatory authority to remove the conflict of interest. It needs to be at least one step removed from the commercial banks, and it needs to have a mandate of stable NGDI targeting – nothing else, leaving interest rates and the value of the dollar to float with the markets and real economic conditions.

    If this isn’t something the GOP can or will do, they will lose. Nominate Herman Cain and we will lose.

  • renl57

    In the fall of 2001, the U.S. was facing two powerful recessionary forces: The bursting of the “dot.com” bubble which sent the U.S. stock market into a bear market; and 9-11. Economists were predicting a major recession.

    The Fed started drastically lowering interest rates to try to head off that recession. But in doing so, they created a real estate bubble, fueled by low interest rate mortgages. And now their efforts to reinflate that bubble are causing a gold bubble.

    Each time the Fed has faced the bursting of a bubble with reflationary policies that have led to another bubble. Then they reinflate that bubble and cause another bubble.

    The alternative is to bite the bullet and work through the pain of a recession. But it takes real leadership and real willingness of Americans to do that.

    In 1981, we had both.

    Today, we have neither.

    • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

      Yes, the int rates coupled with flat stock market and fannie policies sent investors into real estate

  • Spartan4Life

    He was big on State’s rights and hated the fed. He was a populist. He came from the people. He was a military man. He would have despised the elitist left.

    The guy running this year that most resembles Jackson is clearly Perry.

    And isn’t surprising that the msm spends so much time talking about the rightward shift of the GOP but fails to notice that the current Democrat party is a combination of left wing whacko interest groups? Not.

    • Raven

      It was Jefferson who continuously warned against a powerful central government in the formative years of this nation.
      It was Jefferson who could not countenance paying protection money to a foreign power, nor would he tolerate a declaration of war against this nation, let alone a direct attack.
      Jefferson who argued best for the rights of the individual and the Bill of Rights.

      Modern Democrats have no understanding for the philosophical roots of their party.

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        They were actually the good guys on some things over 50 years ago.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Tea Partiers are Jacksonians, not traditional GOP constituents. This is why they increased the GOP vote last election. The GOP has gotten it’s fans to the polls every time since 2002.

      • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

        Your comment here seems to echo my thoughts that there were no factions in the 18th and early-mid 19th centuries that modern day dems can point to as their ideological forerunners. Unless one points to a small part of Jefferson’s pre- and early admiration for the French revolution that his actions as President seem to repudiate as well as most of his actions all his life.

        The forebearers for the modern day left seem to be Rousseau, Robespierre, Marx etc. Agree?

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          Jefferson is used as a such a symbol by the Dems that I almost didn’t think I could write the post and have it work w/o him. But truly, Jefferson, was too libertarian in the classic sense to buy modern statism…