« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Fallen Men of A Failing Nation

The Youth of America Will Support the Candidate That Gives Them a Chance to Work Again

“The young bloods of the South; sons of planters, lawyers about towns, good billiard players and sportsmen, men who never did any work and never will. War suits them. They are splendid riders, first rate shots and utterly reckless. These men must all be killed or employed by us before we can hope for peace.”

– General Sherman (HT:Rootsweb.com)

The GOP not only has an opportunity to pull more of the youth vote in coming elections; we have a patriotic duty to do so. The Wall Street Journal tells us something we would probably rather not know about the future of the American workforce. It’s hard to continue calling it a workforce, if its younger cohorts are unable to find themselves gainful employment. Details follow below.

The unemployment rate for males between 25 and 34 years old with high-school diplomas is 14.4%—up from 6.1% before the downturn four years ago and far above today’s 9% national rate. The picture is even more bleak for slightly younger men: 22.4% for high-school graduates 20 to 24 years old. That’s up from 10.4% four years ago.

This crisis is severely exacerbated by the fact that these unemployed people have been out of work for so long, that they no longer qualify for unemployment benefits. Less than 50% of the currently unemployed receive checks and nearly 5 million of the 14 million unemployed Americans have been jobless one year or longer.

Contrast this to the older generation of unionized workers. They are people who have engineered generous pensions at the expense of the public treasury. They are people who will never lose their current jobs unless they die or commit a felony. They bankrupt their states and localities, but could truly care less.

When anyone rises to face the challenges posed by overgenerous pensions, these grandfathered workers conspire in armor. Labor Unions all over Rhode Island are rallying against the proposed Raimondo-Chafee pension overhaul plan. This plan would reduce the pension benefits that currently are underfunded. Rhode Island’s liabilities double every twelve years. In response to these unflinching realities, the unions offer up blustering ad hominem.

Paul Valletta, president of the Cranston firefighters union, said Treasurer Gina Raimondo “cooked the books,” while Paul Reed, the statewide fire union’s president, declared it “an attack on collective bargaining.”

On the national level, things get no better. In FY 2010, the US spent $1.4 Trillion on Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. In stark contrast, the US spent $553 Billion on benefits aimed at struggling workers such as unemployment insurance and food stamps. Thus, the younger workers bear the brunt of the current dysfunctional economy, yet our nation spent three times the money on people who are older, wealthier and more secure.

All of this is badly misdirected. Much of the economic burden and insecurity afflicting the elderly comes from not having emerging family members who are successful enough to support and help them out in the twilight years of their lives. Imagine how many welfare checks it would be worth to the families with twenty-four year-old “house guests” if these children were earning even $12/ hour? This becomes a challenge, an opportunity and a moral imperative all in one to whomever opposes the failed Obama Agenda in 2012.

America has a generation of younger people who are so disconnected from work and responsibility that they are forgetting what it is like to get up in the morning with a purpose in life. The GOP candidate that can connect with these younger people and convince them that the ladder of opportunity can once again begin at their level, will change what young people want out of the world. Give people an opportunity, and they will explore that in preference to existing on handouts in some relative’s basement.

If reference to the General Sherman quote atop the post, we won’t be killing these young people and hopefully would never want to. Our choice is to create the sort of economy that will employ them before they seek to destroy us. The GOP candidate that can create the jobs and make young people believe those jobs will exist will eat Barack Obama’s lunch after all the failed promises he made to this voting demographic.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • kowalski

    There is another story making the rounds today about how something like three quarters of small to midsize business don’t plan to do any hiring in the next year.

    I run one of them and I don’t, either, unless there’s a dramatic turnaround in business optimism and consumer sentiment and purchasing power and a real sense of confidence returns.

    Every day I watch the young people in my town who are in these age brackets and even younger: they’re increasingly disaffected, they’re increasingly skeptical and embittered about their futures. I had a conversation about it at the local market the other day, one of those “around the cash register” discussions – and my contribution was:

    “When I started my business four years ago, by this time I had expected to have at least 10 employees if we were even moderately successful with a single large customer and marginally successful with the rest of the business model. There was enough work at the time for me to confidently project that even if I was 75% starry-eyed optimistic, I’d still meet my goals. Now I do everything I can just to keep the lights on. How can I hire someone I can’t pay? How can I offer them a future of any kind, or even a transitory placeholder job, good work but just temporary, if I can’t afford to pay myself a salary?”

    The chasm that has opened since 2007 is stark and it’s frightening. There are talented people out there who want to learn and want to work, and there are jobs that they could be trained for and would do very well – but there is no place I have to put them.

    In the past three years I’ve had to sell every asset I own just to hold on to what I have and keep trying. Some of that is because of technological change and its impact on my business (direct mail) but certainly not all of it, or even the majority of it. The problem is that the potential business landscape looks a lot like a parched Texas desert.

    You’re on the money with the spirit of this post: the candidate who can successfully make the case that they will stop the desertification and bring even a modicum of rain to this economy will win the election. I’ll vote for them. I want to hire people and pay them a salary and benefits, help them get started in their lives, and hopefully give them some experience and good advice. So much talent is being wasted.

    • kowalski

      The story is from USA Today h/t Drudge.

      http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/washington-whispers/2011/11/07/7-in-10-blame-economy-for-hiring-freeze

      If anything, my sense is that this is sugarcoating the real case by quite a bit. Businesspeople, particularly the surviving members of the small-and-midsize entrepreneurial class, are *optimists* and *fighters* by nature and so if anything these polling numbers are optimistically biased. The reality is worse.

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        nt.

        • kowalski

          77 percent of small business owners have sought access to financing this year; 67 percent found it more difficult to obtain financing than in the past; 61 percent were able to obtain the financing they were looking for.

          Almost 4 out of 5 respondents in this poll have indicated that they’re *trying* to get access to capital to grow their businesses. They’re not throwing in the towel! They’re actively seeking to grow their businesses! But it’s very difficult to make the case and it’s also very difficult to manage the financing in this business climate. It’s the world’s worst double whammy: your credit has been dinged by the past three years, you need capital to stay alive, and even though you are trying to get it, you can’t.

          This also says to me that there is a lot of “pent up” motivation that is waiting to be unleashed. I know there is right behind the monitor where I’m typing this message. But before that happens, some real Change has to take place.

      • kowalski

        I don’t need this story to tell me what I already abundantly know, but it’s nice to see that someone has tried to measure it and report the numbers.

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    since 2000 we have lost 5 million manufacturing jobs (the kind of jobs these people used to get that actually could support a decent living). This was somewhat ameliorated by the housing bubble and temporary increase in construction employment in the last decade (which was unsustainable). Now that the housing bubble is gone, we have to deal with the huge loss of the jobs that those lower educated workers used to fill and there really are no easy answers to this problem. And no, a simple change in taxes or change in the regulatory climate isn’t going to fix the problem either, as this is primarily a trade and technology issue.

    • lineholder

      that changes in taxes and regulatory climate alone won’t be enough. I’ve been pursuing a second career field for the past 3 years and working primarily in the retail sector for the time being.

      I do think there are changes, mostly in methodology, that could be made within the manufacturing sector that might at least give us a chance to be competitive with foreign trade, but after working in the mfg. sector for as long as I did, I just don’t see people at mgmt. levels willing to take that risk.

      We’d almost need to something drastic at this point to turn the tide re: employment, wouldn’t we? Something that is innovative and creative. Problem with that is that this isn’t usually a strong point for Republicans.

    • Raven

      Manufacturing jobs are going away because of technology. Same as with farming. We have a tiny fraction of the farmers and manufacturing jobs that we used to have and produce more from both.

      That’s what technology does. That’s why we need the freedom to innovate and create new jobs in other fields.

      Stop crying about manufacturing. It’s a good thing.

  • kowalski

    Of a jukebox rigged to play this song by the Cowboy Junkies all day, every day, nonstop.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-My2AkcZeE4

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    It is unreliable. It is a chimera.

    What can happen is that a good leader who actually does some real reforming when in office can gain a section of the youth vote and change them permanently to conservatism. This happened with Ronald Reagan.

    But I doubt it can happen with any of the bunch we have running now.

    • kowalski

      But it does make a difference in people minds (young and old alike) when they drive through their towns and don’t watch more and more properties shuttered with big “For Rent” and “For Sale” signs on them. I drove through northern suburban New Jersey about six months ago and man, it looked like a ghost town in some places. You have young people looking for summer jobs and thinking about their futures and all they hear is their parents bickering about who is going to get stuck with the house payments when the divorce comes, and there’s no place to work even in formerly bustling areas, and it’s not just a matter of minor “consumer woes.”

      When I was 17 and in high school in northern New Jersey (this is 1987), the problem wasn’t finding a place to work, it was choosing the place I *wanted* to work for the summer. Everyone was hiring. You could walk in and say: “I’m a good student and I need a summer job and I know X and Y and Z and…” boom you had a job the next day if you wanted one. It was hard to screw it up.

      • kowalski

        You could stay employed in a good economy, in a clean, safe work environment that paid decently well in an area not far from where you lived. If you were a mope, you got fired and went a mile away and got a different job. The economy was so good, in other words, that it was even supporting the borderline unemployable – to say nothing of the people who actually *wanted* to be there.

        It’s not like that any more.

    • renl57

      A lot of young people were attracted to Reagan’s pitch because of its upbeat, optimistic themes–”Morning in America.” The 1980 GOP Convention emphasized that things would get better.

      I don’t see that sort of thing from any of the GOP candidates this year. Romney and Perry have the right words–but they don’t have the right music. They’re not emphasizing optimism and hopefulness, just “We gotta stop Obama.” OK, after we replace Obama in the White House, then what? Will the nation be better off in 2016? In what ways?

      Have we just stopped believing in America having a bright future?

      • kowalski

        You have to get yourself free before you can have the morning where you wake up and live for tomorrow. What we’re seeing right now under this Administration is the reverse. It’s the rosy fingers wrapped tightly around the Dawn.

  • geoph

    The candidate who offers the most to those unwilling to supply it for themselves will win.

    We are living the Russian Revolution with a twist. At least in Russia, by definition, the Proletariat rising to overthrow the Bourgeoisie were working for a living. Today it appears the Bourgeoisie is creating a non-working class to overthrow the Proletariat!

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Which is why this entire paradigm has to be changed. People need to be convinced that the subsidies are a dehumanization. A non-working class becomes like a rusted beam underneath an overpass. The whole thing eventually collapses.

  • geoph

    If only THAT was what Obama meant by repairs to our infrastructure!

    In a “We” v “They” battle, only when enough Americans realize the true fight is against the government (They), will “We” have a chance. Sending politicians to restore Washington is crazy. Election breeds corruption, and today’s politician will let the earth crumble around them before they would kill their Golden Goose.

  • kowalski

    .

    • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

      nt

  • nathanalbright

    One of the reasons I am in Thailand right now teaching hill tribes young adults is because for two years, despite two master’s degrees (one in military history and and the other in engineering management, with a bachelor’s in structural engineering), I couldn’t find anything to do other than sales jobs with no salary and very unsteady commission. Daily calls to engineering headhunters got the same litany of responses, “We’re not looking for civil engineers at this time.” I was overqualified for most of the jobs that were available, and the best I could find was 40 hours a week of grading exams for high school students for between $10-$11 an hour. And I am by no means a lazy person. If you want young adults to feel optimistic again (I’m 30, for the record), it will be necessary to show that there is still opportunity. That’s something that is hard to see right now for many of us in the younger cohorts.