« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Santorum, Really? Hmmm….

We?ve Heard Crazier Things This Season.

2012 Iowa Republican Caucus

Candidate 12/19 12/13 11/15
Mitt Romney 25% 23% 19%
Newt Gingrich 17% 20% 32%
Ron Paul 20% 18% 10%
Jon Huntsman 4% 5% 2%
Rick Perry 10% 10% 6%
Michele Bachmann 6% 9% 6%
Rick Santorum 10% 6% 5%
Other candidate 1% 2% 1%
Not sure 8% 8% 6%

(HT: Scott Rasmussen)


More than anyone else, Rick Santorum probably matches the demeanor and the values of Iowa conservatives. He’s Conservative, where Mitt Romney is moderate after a good, stiff lurch to the right. Santorum deals in street level reality, Newt Gingrich could live in a world of ideas that never intersects with where most of us live. Rick Santorum has a certain common touch to him, while Jon Huntsman could tell you in detail how the mizzenmast helps a yacht function. Santorum remains low-key, while Rick Perry remains somewhat the boisterous, irrepressible Texan.

Beyond these personality traits that appear to map well to the decent, taciturn, hard-working stereotype of the Iowa Caucus-goers, Santorum has focused on “Judeo-Christian ethic and the importance of family and faith to freedom.” This will drive critics crazy, but it’s an important issue that the other candidates have let slide. People may be noticing this gap. Rick Santorum’s four point rise in the Iowa polls may reflect that dawning awareness. Americans may genuinely wonder some days whether America should still be considered good.

While I defy you to develop an NP-Complete Metric of Evil, people see the anecdotal evidence of decline piling up in droves. Marriage rates decline, the median age goes up and over a million children a year are born out of wedlock. Our cities play host to callous and sadistic incidents of mass violence. Our children grow up thinking games of “Knockout King” are an acceptable form of amusement.

And yet, when our society is faced with this growing evidence of iniquity, in stark and unflinching terms, we turn away and make excuses. The New York Times committed this grave transgression against all things decent when it reported the story of a gang rape that occurred a year ago in Houston. The girl was sexually plundered by 18 different males ranging in age from 14 to 27. The acts were filmed and “sexted” all over the local schools. The New York Times excused the rapists based on their poverty, and demanded to know what the girl’s mother was thinking. That, increasingly, is how modern American society behaves on a daily basis.

Into this maelstrom walks a candidate who, in Santorum’s own words, “When I go out there and give these talks, no matter where I am, I talk about the moral issues.” This isn’t what the talking heads in either party want to hear. It ain’t sexy; but then again, the mature adults in the room don’t spend inordinate amounts of time or money trying. A quiet network of evangelical ministers and social conservative activists throughout Iowa are taking notice. Robert Costa describes what has recently happened on the ground.

Beyond his shoestring operation, the backing of prominent social conservatives is playing an important, often behind-the-scenes role in bolstering his quiet winter surge. Bob Vander Plaats, who heads the Family Leader, a social-conservative group, endorsed Santorum on Tuesday, as did Chuck Hurley, the director of the Iowa Family Policy Center. These high-profile reinforcements add heft to Santorum’s evangelical bloc in Iowa, which already included “well-connected and influential pastors like Cary Gordon of Sioux City, Terry Amann of Des Moines, and Albert Calaway of Indianola,” according to The Iowa Republican.

This may remind you of something that took place four years ago in Iowa. Santorum acknowledges an affinity for church groups but denies they are the entire gravamen of his slowly growing coalition. He expounds below.

“I do try to go to churches, and go to Mass every Sunday, and when I’m in Iowa, I make sure to go to one or two other churches, meeting the pastors and the congregants there. It’s not a specific focus, but it is part of what we do,” he says. “It’s the same approach I take with business groups, gun groups, pro-life groups, tax groups, tea-party groups. All of them are part of this grassroots effort.”

(HT: NRO)

All of this is not meant to imply America needs it’s very own Savonarola to ignite our version of a Falò delle vanità. However, it may well be that a significant plurality of voters are afraid this is where America could head if we allow our social morals to continue their present debasement without restraint. People who fear what we are becomming may well look fondly on a man with the guts to stand up and say it athwart the censure of our modern elites. Rick Santorum may well be the man to deliver that message. If he is, it could be 2008 all over again in the Iowa Caucuses.

COMMENTS

  • trickamsterdam

    If by “low key” you mean pacing the debate stage like a caged animal, then yes.

    I may have this wrong (I don’t think I do), but I believe he wants the equal protection clause to apply to the unborn.

    Not only would this be absolute death in the general, but do we really want nine unelected Justices making law for us…even if they are on our side?

    • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

      You continually harp on the least objectionable part of Santorum’s record. Do you have something against the unborn? What did they ever do to you?

      • CincoSolas_del_Bronx

        -sin palabras-

        • http://edgeinducedcohesion.wordpress.com nathanalbright

          …if we go about looking for happiness in corrupt and decadent ways.

      • trickamsterdam

        not electable (which is I think part of what this thread is about).

        The majority of Americans are not going to vote for a candidate, who appoints SCOTUS Justices, who rule that if a woman has a miscarriage while doing aerobics, it may in fact be negligent homicide (if the unborn are equal citizens, it would almost have to be…or at least could be).

        For people who don’t know, when you say “Again…”, you’re referring to a post I made on another thread, about how Santorum’s view on this, was comparable to Paul’s view on legalizing heroin (not defending Paul, just his right to debate, since he was/is in double digits).

        Putting the moral issues aside (which I know is difficult, but just for the sake of argument), they ARE similar: Both are outside the mainstream.. Both effectively make the candidate saying the opinion not electable.

        PS – But if that’s not good enough, check some of the other posts (on this thread) for opinions on Santorum’s “conservatism” (fiscal and social).

        I grew up in PA, and this guy is not who he is selling himself as…his conservatism is just as compromised as Newt’s and Perry’s, and he’s far less competent than Romney (and is less electable than all three).

  • mikefisk

    Looks like Santorum may be more or less perfectly siphoning support away from Bachmann, with maybe picking up a bit from Newt’s slide as well.

    Makes sense now why that evangelical leader was asking Bachmann to step down and endorse Santorum, though.

  • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

    …and we recall his big-spending [and anti-Toomey] history.

    • bobguzzardi

      Rick Santorum is well known to fiscal conservatives in Penna and not in a good way.

      In 2006, Rick Santorum received 797,000 fewer votes than he did in 2006. Had he held his 2000 voters, he would have won.

      As it developed, Rick Santorum migrated from Reagan Republican to BushRepublican to SpecterRepublican and aligned himself with Penna. Unions.

      In 2004, Rick Santorum campaigned, aggressively and relentlessly, for Arlen Specter against Reaganesque Pat Toomey.

      Rick Santorum received in 2006, $50,000 from John “Johnny Doc” Dougherty of Philadelphia Electrical Union, IBEW 98, and a lot more.

      Rick Santorum sold out Reagan ideas to be part of the Bush Compassionate Conservative inner circle.

      On a personal level, I have witnessed and even experienced his arrogant bad manners. Rick Santorum took his base for granted.

      Rick Santorum had moved from Erie, Penna to Virginia and lost touch with his base. And, just as well, Rick Santorum is not a nice guy unless you are rich and powerful.

      Rick Santorum is Big Government and Not the Guy.

      Rick Perry is The Guy.

      • http://www.doctor-bob.biz rsklaroff

        …but so are the others.

        He’ll be hired by POTUS-Perry.

  • Adrian

    Kudos on the computational complexity theory reference.

    Given that there is no perfect candidate, I wouldn’t be unhappy with Santorum I don’t think.

  • Change Jar Conservative

    Neither Bachmann or Santorum can win it all while Perry has the governance (as governor) and cash to make a play here.

    These are the days when politics just drives me nuts.

    #resignedtoromney

  • bobguzzardi

    The fiscal and social conservative base in Pennsylvania will not support Rick Santorum.

    How does Rick Santorum convince anyone that he will win Penna?

    Question, if the Family Values would even consider endorsing Newt Gingrich who has more wives than principles, solely because he gave the group financial support for opposing Iowa judges, what credibility does it have. They are hacks willing to sell principles for money.

    JOBS is the issue and Rick Perry’s hands off Texas Model works.

    Rick Santorum supports ethanol and farm subsidies which may be what is enough to buy Iowa voters but it won’t help our country fiscal disaster or create productive jobs.

    Rick Santorum has no experience, at all, in governance. Michele Bachmann is far superior candidate.

  • gipper823

    Yes, he’s been testy on stage, but apart from that, he has the right resume, he’s got the right principles. He just needs a coach to make him a little softer and he’d be a great candidate. Why not Santorum?

  • bobguzzardi

    On the ground, what appeared to be a Faith Initiative to use churches as vehicles for social improvement turned out to be another way of buying votes from Elmer Gantrys of Philadelphia.

    Not only fiscally irresponsible but it did not work either.

    Rick Santorum is Elmer Gantryl

    Look at Rick Santorum’s record, he makes Mitch McConnell and John Boehner look good

  • http://www.defenseoffreedomblog.com defenseoffreedom

    Santorum’s two endorsements of Republican-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter and Trey Grayson in Kentucky’s Senate race cost him any chance of my support. If he really is the “values candidate,” his endorsements make me question what his values really are.

    • marktx

      Santorum’s actions often times contradict his words. He was a big spender in the senate, and endorsed pro-choice Arlen Specter over the conservative candidate Pat Toomey.

      Santorum is nothing more than a surrogate for the Romney campaign.

      • racetraitor

        As a pro-lifer and as a Catholic, I am still angry with Santorum over his endorsement of Arlen Specter over Pat Toomey. Santorum says he’s a good, pro-life Catholic, but then he behaves as if his faith is irrelevant. How else could he sell out the unborn the way he did? And as far as I know (sombody please correct me if I’m wrong), he’s never come out and said, “I was wrong to endorse Specter, and I’m sorry.” I would at least be able to respect him if he did that. But I simply cannot trust a man who is willing, for political expediency, to betray the most innocent and defenseless.

        • David123

          In 2004 Santorum worked for Specter’s re-election. Specter worked to get Bush’s originalist judge nominations confirmed, and he had previously worked to get Clarence Thomas confirmed.

          Toomey would not have been a shoe-in in 2004 – had he won great, but we are much better off with Specter winning than we would have been with Toomey losing the general. Now we’ve got Roberts and Alito on the Supreme Court, and that is part of the solution to judicial activism. Santorum is also part of that solution.

          • http://www.libertygirlusa.com libertygirlusa

            He did a great job on judges!

  • penhall99

    Cons need to unite and support Rick Perry. He’s the most conservative person in the race with the best chance at beating Obama.