« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

My Endorsement This Year: Rick Santorum 2012

If The Mitt Don?t Fit Than You?d Better Commit

Pro-Life's Last Stand In 2012

If you watch politics long enough, you’ll see a moment where the tragedy of a losing campaign gets so bad that you actually stop and laugh. It was the “Taliban Dan” ad back in 2010 that convinced me that Alan Grayson was off to his next stop on his professional career. Examples of this have abounded in the 2012 Republican Presidential Primary. Who can forget the Michelle Bachman “Retardasil Interview?” By throwing in with Dr. Wakefield and the vaccination nut-jobs, she ended her campaign before the first Caucus convened. With Governor Perry, it was the “Vulture Capitalism” comment that finally branded him as ready for the Presidency as Ronald Reagan – in 1968.

So suffice it to say, there seems to be a conspiracy afoot to force me into supporting Mitt Romney athwart my instinct, values and will. The latest member of The Borg, attempting to assimilate me into the unpalatable, was none other than Newton Leroy Gingrich. Once you’ve ordered up a few thousand robocalls that accuse your opponent of denying holocaust survivors a proper kosher menu, Stephen Colbert throws up his hands. You are now impossible to effectively parody. Like Herman Cain just now realizing that The People’s Liberation Army liked developing nuclear weapons, “Nuke” Gingrich has successfully self-immolated. He’s cute, funny, but should now do Conservatism one final favor and please just go away.

So where does that leave us. Wasting away again, in Obama-Cronyville? Looking for that lost shaker of salt? Not. Just. Yet….There still stands one plausible Anti-Mitt.

His name is Rick Santorum, and he is the last Pro-Life Candidate who is still electorally viable. He has never signed a Planned Parenthood petition supporting the principles of The USSC decision reached in Roe Vs. Wade. He has never hired an environmental advisor who co-authored a book with the Ehrlichs entitled Ecoscience which called for forced abortions and sterilizations.

If the issue in question is Environmental extremism and energy policy, Rick Santorum wins hands-down. Mitt Romney tells us the following about Anthropogenic Global Warming.

“I believe the world is getting warmer, and I believe that humans have contributed to that,” he told a crowd of about 200 at a town hall meeting in Manchester, New Hampshire. “It’s important for us to reduce our emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases that may be significant contributors.”

(HT: Rueters.com)

Rick Santorum also takes a position on Anthropogenic Global Warming. It is diametrically opposed to Mitt Romney’s. Rick Santorum beautifully describes the Global Warming problem below.

….it’s a beautifully concocted scheme because they know that the earth is gonna cool and warm. It’s been on a warming trend so they said, “Oh, let’s take advantage of that and say that we need the government to come in and regulate your life some more because it’s getting warmer,” just like they did in the seventies when it was getting cool, they needed the government to come in and regulate your life because it’s getting cooler. It’s just an excuse for more government control of your life, and I’ve never been for any scheme or even accepted the junk science behind the whole narrative.

(HT: Rush Limbaugh)

Now the detractors point out problems with Rick Santorum. He spent too much in the US Senate and thereby added to the problem of our over-empowered government..This is a valid criticism. It would disqualify him if he were running against a solid Club For Growth Conservative. Against Mitt, I’m left to ask the following. “Opposed to what? RomneyCare? Take away the Death Panel and RomneyCare is a guaranteed fiscal sucking chest wound.”

He also bears the dubious distinction as the man who endorsed Arlen Specter over Pat Toomey for the US Senate in 2004. That’s bad. If had gone any further to the port side of the GOP that year, he could perhaps have endorsed Mitt Romney. I hated Arlen Specter with a passion and shed no tears when he went over to the Dems. However, I also understand that Clarence Thomas, Sam Alito and Chief Justice Roberts probably don’t sit on The Supreme Court without Arlen Specter watching each man’s six-o-clock. Even at his worst, Rick Santorum did some good.

And yes, there’s the electability thing. Rick Santorum was quite forcibly ejected from the US Senate by Governor Casey’s lick-spittle son. Would he be similarly thrashed by Barack Obama? It’s a fair question. He polls behind Obama in hypothetical match-ups right now. But then again, compare how John F. Kerry polled against George W. Bush before he was well on his way to being nominated in May 2004 to afterwards.

To me, this election will be far more than just “jobs, jobs, jobs.” Do not believe that “it’s the economy, Stupid” unless you typically let people address you as Stupid. Mitt Romney believes that Roe Vs. Wade was morally valid jurisprudence, Global Warming justifies government regulation and that Individual Mandate healthcare plans are not a fundamental violation of our rights as Americans. Perhaps he stands oblivious as to how Barack Obama just sawed The Catholic Church off a limb.

Mitt Romney believes all of these crazy and stupid things because he ultimately believes that empowering the government is a greater good than protecting the life and welfare of individuals. It thus surprises me none whatsoever when Soledad O’Brien reports that Mitt Romney just told us the following.

Romney says, “I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs a repair , I’ll fix it. I’m not concerned about the very rich…. I’m concerned about the very heart of America, the 90-95 percent of Americans who right now are struggling.”

(HT:CNN.com)

What we need is a President who is concerned about the value of every life. We need a President who isn’t concerned about what group you are in or how big that group happens to be on the first Tuesday of November. We need a President who will focus on returning as much power as possible to individual at the expense of the overgrown state. On that criteria, by a substantial margin, Rick Santorum more is suited to the Presidency than Mitt Romney. Rick Santorum 2012.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • Ausonius

    Nothing is over yet, in spite of the inevitablitiy sold by the MSM.

    An excerpt from Kristol’s comments:

    “What if Santorum does as well or better than Gingrich in the Nevada caucuses Saturday, or in the Minnesota and Colorado caucuses next Tuesday? What if Santorum is competitive with Romney in the Missouri beauty contest primary next Tuesday, where Gingrich isn’t on the ballot? Couldn’t non-Romney voters begin to move nationally from Gingrich to Santorum? Couldn’t populist and Tea Party leaders like Sarah Palin do so as well?

    In the Gallup tracking poll today, Gingrich is at 28 percent, Romney at 27, and Santorum at 17. Romney will surely move up several points over the next few days–but couldn’t Gingrich fall enough and Santorum rise enough that Santorum’s number approaches or passes Gingrich? Couldn’t Santorum move into second place?”

    See:

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/santorums-chance_620805.html

  • Leon H. Wolf

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I’ll raise you Jimmy Connors to your John McEnroe

      • bcochran1981

        …gentlemen, meet Wally Backman

        • BillC

          • BillC

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uv23pqH9iG0

          • bcochran1981

            …BATMAN

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            That’s not even safe for the environment, much less work…

  • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

    The difference between Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney is that Santorum is a guy with a long moderate record who has tuned his rhetoric to sound like a lifelong conservative, while Mitt Romney is a guy with a long moderate record who has tuned his rhetoric to sound like a lifelong conservative.

    • lineholder

      Fiscally speaking, that’s exactly how it is. Socially, there might be some difference between them. Fiscally, they both like big-government programs that supposedly exist for the purpose of “helping” us…as if we don’t have enough of those blood-sucking leeches draining the lifeblood out of our economy as it is!

    • Finrod

      .

    • Justin Spagnolo (standardcandle)

      and one voted for Democrats, while the other supported a would be Democrat turncoat for both Senate and President (at the time Specter was technically a Republican, but let’s face it… he just became more honest before losing his last election).

    • fightnright

      Santorum and Romney both have similar records, both have A+ family values backups.

      Santorum has far better pro-life bona fides. Mitt has been attacked for being too good-looking, too plastic haired, too wind-up Ken in his presentation. Yet Santorum has been dismissed because he is less attractive, has less personal stature, and was less disciplined and organized in his delivery.

      As a science and logic lover, I don’t immediately sign off on the conclusion that *the* reason that Mitt won Florida was his spending and ad presence (correlation=causation fallacy). But if Rick had had a serious war chest and the wherewithal to attract top handlers and coaches from the starting gate, he might have been one of the two final competitors in a far differently evolving primary race (shoulda woulda coulda, I know)

    • Return to Revolution

      I live in PA, and yes, I voted for him and hated to see Casey win but Santorum did it to himself.

  • jkines

    of protectionism (as Senator did he ever find a tariff he didn’t like) and opposition to right to work laws are a non-starter. Such policies are as economically harmful, if not more so, than the blight of Obamneycare. Clearly our best course of action at this point is to divert all resources into supporting senate and congressional republican candidates. This crop of republican presidential candidates is an abject failure none of whom merit party support.

    • Risky

      I’m old enough to think of it as a core conservative belief.

      • aesthete

        The fundamental premise of those against free trade for economic reasons is that trade does not benefit both parties. Given that this is the axiom on which all free market economics is based, it beggars belief to state that a believer in managed trade will not behave similarly when it comes to managed economies as opposed to free ones.

  • mbrat42

    There has been too much hand wringing among conservatives. People don’t seem to want to pick someone and stand by them. This is keeping the split going between all the anti-Romneys and this split will garantee a Romney nomination. Time is ticking and Santorum has to surge now in order to have any chance. Super Tuesday will be here before you know it.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      but it’s him or Mitt Warmney…

      • http://thethinkingvoter.blogspot.com abierubin

        to endorse .Rick Santorum especially since many false anti-Santorum lies were spread here amongst diaries such as that he supported individual mandates although there’s video of him in 1994 strongly opposing it.

        It’s true he isn’t perfect, but no one is and he’s by far clearly the best of the current field.

        Thank you for your honesty and boldness in the face of unpopular opinion on this site. Hope the tide turns here over the next several weeks, and if it does, you surely had a hand in it!

  • krish

    Dont fall for this fraud Kristol – he wants Romney to win & am seeing a pattern among RINOs push for Santorum – they are scared that the conservatives will fall behind Newt. Do Not fall for this ruse by the establishment

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      That would scare me into full Gingrich compliance mode every time…

    • Lesstressrx

      You are right on.

  • colonelflagg

    on a thoughtful and reasoned post. Social conservatives still have one safe harbor and it ain’t named Romney or Gingrich.

  • Trubador

    I lived in PA from birth until I was 31. I know Rick Santorum well. My last vote as a Pennsylvanian was for Rick in ’94 for Senate. Too much has been made about his backing Arlen Specter over Toomey. Rick sacrificed his political career on principle because he knew how important the US Supreme Court is in turning around the liberal/progressive tide.

    Arlen was the high ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He helped shepherd in Thomas (during that vicious battle) and also Scalia.

    Without Specter on that committee there is NO WAY we would have eventually gotten Roberts and Alito. In the end, Specter is now gone, and Toomey is now a PA Senator.

    Now, I have not been thrilled with the line-up of candidates (those who threw their hat in the ring, and this who didn’t). Of all the candidates that DID officially run, only two have impressed me with their credentials and track record: Rick Perry and Rick Santorum. Newt is a distant third due to his Contract With America and his leading the 1994 Republican takeover of Congress after over 40 years.

    Two people I will NEVER vote for with a supposed “R” next to their names: Ron Paul (an absolute crank) and Romney (too many adjectives to count that describe my disdain for him, his policies, his track record, his personality, etc.).

    My state’s primary is in June. Things may very well be settled by then. I will vote for one of the three people I mentioned above, choosing at that time depending on what the lay of the primary landscape is at that time.

    I have towed the line patiently and diligently for a looooong time. I voted for Bush Sr. in ’92 even though he went back on his word re: taxes. I swallowed Dole in ’96 when he placated the conservatives by picking Kemp as his running mate. I voted for Bush W. when he placated conservatives by picking Cheney as HIS running mate in 2000. And I held the line and re-elected Bush W. in ’04 even though he and the Republican congress started going off the reservation. I held my nose and voted for McCain when HE placated conservatives by picking Palin.

    That’s it. I’m done. No more.

    I vote my conscience. In the primary as well as in the main.

    If Romney is the nominee, he could pick the re-incarnation of Reagan as his running mate.

    I

    DON’T

    CARE

    Third Party Candidate, Write-in candidate, our a non-vote for president. That will be my choice come November.

    I was part of the masses that cried foul when others voted for Perot in ’92 and ’96. “Don’t throw away your vote,” I screamed. “We must vote for [insert candidate's name here] to stop [insert opposing candidates name here],” I yelled in 2000, 2004, 2008. But enough is enough. I will no longer follow the Republican Establishment anymore. I vote my conscience, and let the chips fall where they may.

    I’m done.

    There is no home for true (social, fiscal, national security, common sense, constitutional) conservatives anymore.

    • krish

      I am also tired of people (talk show & many in posts here) saying, a No vote is a vote for Obama! I echo your sentiments – Do Not care – last time people listened to this nonsense reasoning, voted GW Bush & what we got were fiscally irrespobsible policies that led to Democrats control & then Obama (of course, McCain helped!).

      I am Not buying that argument anymore – facts indicate that it is False. RINO Romney will set us back.

      Agreed No one in the primary is really very good this time – but a Romney would be a disaster! I wish Newt & Santorum join forces & not split the conservative votes in the South….

      • jakeofalltrades

        • Trubador

          I am not an Obama shill. Go to my blog which has been running since 2004.

          ArbiterOfCommonSense.blogspot.com

          • jakeofalltrades

            by splitting the opposition to him. You cannot deny that that is the consequence of your actions and your advocacy here.

            Your lack of strategic thinking at best – and treachery at the worst – belies the quality of your thinking and therefore your blog.

          • Trubador

            What a condescending jerk you show yourself to be.

            If you even bothered to check it out for two seconds you’d see that it’s not some leftist rag. Far from it. Anybody who knows me knows from which political spectrum I reside (and have resided for many years). And it’s to the right.

          • Trubador

            That “strategy” worked reeeeeeally well in 2008, didn’t it?

    • Leon H. Wolf

      -nt

      • texastaxpayer

        Just sayin… ;)

        • Leon H. Wolf

          Between being unhappy you lost and saying “If my guy doesn’t win, I’m taking my ball and going home.” We’re all subject to the former, most of us grow out of the latter by the time we’re 7 or so.

          • texastaxpayer

            While I am not taking my ball and going home personally. There are a lot that claim they are. Sad thing is I don’t really like any of the candidates left. I just like some less than others. It’s more of a whom do I hate the least exercise for me at this point.

          • romansdaughter

            I am like texastaxpayer I don’t really like any of the candidates left and will not vote for any of them in the primaries. That being said, even though I am an independent I will most likely pull the lever for whomever just cause I can’t stand Obama. But I will say that the longer Mittens is in this race and the more I see of his paying off everyone for Presidency and his lying and smearing I am starting to wonder if I should pull the lever for him. There seeming to be no distinct line between Obama and Mittens as time goes on.

    • Lesstressrx

      I feel your pain. My man was Rick Perry. Fox News blackballed him, Tea Parties didn’t stand up for him nor did the religious group in SC. I was never so disappointed when he suspended his candidacy. I think he should have stayed in, but maybe the money was gone. I feel sad that the Tea Parties have been silent.

      I will tell you this, the election in 2012 is about one thing and that is to get rid of Obama. 4 more years and we will not have an America. Any one of the candidates left standing will be better than a man that has promised to fundamentally change America and he is on his way to doing just that. The people need to get organized, be prepared for 2016 and in the meantime work hard to get the House and Senate in 2012. Rome wasn?t built in a day and this move to change Washington will take baby steps. We can?t throw up our hands and quit. That is what Obama, Soros and the liberals want. They have worked hard to destroy the real constitutional conservative candidates.

      We will have to be more prepared in 2016 and make sure our candidate wins. Rick Perry was the real thing and we lost him. Maybe due to bad timing, the fact that the establishment republicans didn?t want the change he would have made in Washington, or that it wasn?t God?s plan for him. Please don?t give up on our wonderful country. If you do, they win.

    • votemout2012

      Final vote that sealed Obama Care came from Arlen Spector. Just saying. Santorum no Fiscal Caonservative.

      • votemout2012

        CONSERVATIVE

    • Change Jar Conservative

      If you won’t vote for Romney in the general then you don’t care about our country.

      In the primary, do as you will, but if Obama wins a second term, it will be because of people like you.

      If you want a better candidate get out a checkbook and write Rick a check or get on the frontlines.

      But this third party crap doesn’t fly here at redstate.

      Romney’s like my 4th choice, but if he wins the GOP primary, he’ll be my first.

  • benko

    Santorum supported Arlen Specter over a real PA conservative Pat Toomey.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      So we should get revenge by supporting Mitt ROmney over a real Republican?

      • benko

        and as Erick has indicated in his original post I see Santorum as social conservative, but for big gov’t and would rather gamble with newt.

    • http://online.logcabin.org/about/ suzieQ

      In 2003 Romney endorsed Rock Anderson, a liberal democrat and Daly Kos diarist, for mayor of Salt Lake City Utah. Romney actually supported a liberal democrat over the republican on the ballot. I’ll take Santorum.

  • http://online.logcabin.org/about/ suzieQ

    And you haven’t even touched on Romney’s ant-gun record, or tax raising record, or a litany of other liberal issues.

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    Romney who is going to be “Obama-lite” if elected.

    Gingrich who is willing to change positions on major issues to get elected and has so much baggage the media doesn’t have to dig on him.

    Santorum… whose flaws are way less in magnitude to Gingrich and whose views are closer to center/right than Romney can ever really claim.

    To me it’s a no brainer to go with Santorum as long as he doesn’t quit or implode tremendously. I just don’t trust that the other two will either beat the O or that if they are elected they’ll be in any way effective* at keeping promises of real change for the better.

    *or that they won’t sell out for political convenience at the first opportunity or that they’re not just saying what needs said to get elected and once they’re in then it’s whatever they want versus whatever they said…

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    have you heard about the primary challenge to Bachus in AL-6?

    State Rep. Scott Beason & Probate Judge David Standridge (Blount County) are running as well as Al Mickle and Stan Pate. Beason was huge in getting the immigration drafted and passed & is an AL fan. I’ve heard Mickle is a good guy, a veteran & an AL fan, but not much more than that. I don’t know anything about Standridge, and I’ll keep my opinion to myself about the 4th challenger along the lines of if you can’t say anything nice…

    So this isn’t a total threadjack, I moved Santorum ahead of Romney weeks ago, and you just explained why. Well done and Roll Tide!

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      He is the author of the Al. Immigration Statute and took down a lot of high-rolling sons-of…..when he pushed investigations into the gambling syndicates like Victoryland. If he caught fire, it would get people pumped like 2010 again. I like Beason.

      • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

        Our local tea party is having a candidate forum for the 6th district challengers. Beason, Standridge and Mickle have accepted. Here’s a link to the info if you or anyone you know is interested in the 6th district race.

        RDP

  • http://www.nighttwister.com NightTwister

    **no*text**

  • Finrod

    Santorum is a joke and has absolutely no chance of winning the nomination– if for some reason Gingrich did collapse and Santorum managed his way into second, Romney would just drop 8 figures worth of negative ads on Santorum (like he did against Gingrich) and his support would plunge to single digits.

    I recommend trying to get the Brantisvogan Civil Service to acknowledge a change of address card, or learning how to play the Octaventral Heebiephone. You’ll have a better chance with that.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      This is how things worked out last night in Flo-Rida.

      Newt had a Gender Gap that requires modern air travel to bridge.
      http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/31/women-abandon-gingrich-this-time-by-22-point-margin/
      Talk me through how that gets better vs. Obama.

      Operation Moon Base enabled Newt to only lose The Space Coast by 10%
      http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/31/newt-loses-floridas-space-coast/

      And Miami, where he ran the ad about Mitt Romney denying seniors kosher food? Romney won Hispanics by 25% and cities over 50,000 by 14%.

      Gingrich smply needs to vanish quietly and enjoy those grandkids during his golden years.

      • Finrod

        Newt even beat Rick amongst evangelicals. Your argument distinctly lacks even a shred of evidence of how Santorum could beat Romney. Gingrich got more than double Santorum’s support in Florida despite all of Romney’s negative ads.

        Santorum is this election cycle’s Huckabee: too stubborn and stupid to drop out, and too poor of a candidate to do anything but finish way behind the leaders after an initial surge in Iowa.

      • clowngirl

        Newt had a couple game changing debates and moved the dial by 24 points. Santorum had his best debate performances yet and yet only increased his vote share by .4%

        Newt’s been in the lead or tied for the lead in national polls for the majority of the last more than 2 months. Santorum has yet to ascend the lead for a single day.

        This while being outright trashed by the media.

        Santorum has yet to even be vetted.

        He seems like a nice enough guy but the only race he performed well in was one in which he was lucky enough to be the unvetted non-Romney when multiple candidates and some key media figures decided to invest a great deal of time, money and energy in bringing down Newt Gingrich — who had previously been leading him by 20-25 points.

        If you want to endorse Rick Santorum because he’s more vocally pro-life or for whatever reason, that’s your choose. But he’s not the guy who can beat Mitt Romney or Obama.

        And it’s pretty obvious that Romney agrees.

  • unclefred

    I take it as a given that all of us love this nation enough not to subject it to four more years, regardless of the eventual nominee. I have been and remain ABR in the primary season. Should Romney secure the nomination I will work my tail off to get him elected, to hold the house and to get to at least 55 Republican Senators.

    At this point the notion that Santorum can stop Mitt is pretty foolish. He is even more lacking in staff, structure, and money than Newt. I would be interested in someone analyzing whether there is a better shot for a brokered convention with both Newt and Santorum in to the end, or if Santorum drops out. I’m unsure that a brokered convention would be a good thing, but it is probably the only shot available to stop Romney.

    The lesson that we need to take from this campaign is that this coming December, once we oust Obama from the white house, is the time to start selecting and uniting behind a SINGLE conservative candidate for 2016. The time to start building the required national infrastructure is not summer of 2015, it is this winter.

    We suffer the disadvantage that we have no conservative “establishment” to select a candidate, but we’ll have to find a way. This will also have the salutary effect of keeping Romney, should he be the nominee, honest.

    We all have real jobs and real lives, and I’m sure that none of us relish the idea of spending the next four years organizing a presidential campaign, but that is the only way we’re going to win the battle for the Republican party.

    Make no mistake, there is NO third party option that does not guarantee the left holds total power for at least twelve years. If you look at the damage they did in only two, it must be obvious that our only path is to restore conservatism to the Republican party.

  • deVere

    Santorum holds that the 14th amendment protects the right to life of all unborn children. Presumably he plans to stock the Supreme Court with Justices who agree with him, and then get an anti-Roe decision outlawing all abortions nationwide.

    Rick Santorum criticizes Ron Paul’s view that abortion is a matter left for the states under the 10th amendment. Paul very sensibly points out that Roe v Wade could be overturned tomorrow by a majority in Congress denying the federal courts jurisdiction over abortion cases. That would leave laws on abortion where they were in 1973 and prior; a matter for the 50 states to decide.

    On this matter I agree with Ron Paul and disagree with Rick Santorum.. I further believe that Santorum’s extreme position on the abortion issue might easily cause him to lose a national election.

    As for Ron Paul, he is still 90% correct and 10% insane.

    • formotioncreative

      http://herestheblood.com/

      and then get back to us on this issue.

  • gbenton

    for the nominee against Obama – if only because the economy is improving and if we want a strong hand, building on a x factor like counting on bad economy is risky.

    Besides… enough people still feel ‘Bush Did it’ that Obama can prattle on about how the car was in the ditch, etc.

    Which of the last men standing in the primary can make THIS argument against Obama…

    * Arrogant Big Government power grab – Obamacare, Dodd Frank, intends to increase energy costs, shut down off shore drilling, and all the rest… LONG list.

    * Corrupt Crony: Solyndra etc., huge money from Wall Street, even BP, Unions, Acorn, etc.

    * European vision: huge debt, slow growth, high unemployment, and Europe is burning

    * Radical: OWS talking points, Van Jones, Valerie J., and all the rest of the far left loons, Soros, etc.

    * And the report card: golf while jobs lost, Obamacare while jobs lost, campaigning for full term, and his many, many blunders on foreign policy

    It may be that Santorum is the best one to make the moral case against Obama. Economics and Romney’s plan will put people to sleep. Newt could sell the vision with his Alinsky comments, but he seems all too likely to make the case in a way that back fires.

    I can’t advocate Ron Paul.

    I maintain that Romney will have a heck of a time making the moral case against Obamacare and the big government power grab due to his own Romneycare – and I think that may be a fatal flaw that costs the election when combined with his Richie Rich Wall Street scion card board cut out persona in a great recession.

    The Tea Party rose up in reaction to wild spending and Obamacare, not so much unemployment…

    I agree that Santorum’s achilles heel will be his hard line on social issues, sadly, in this day and age. But this post has me wondering if maybe he IS the best to make the moral case against Obama the socialist.

    Obama’s biggest strength is that people still basically like the guy (gag) – and that is the balloon our nominee needs to pop to win.

    It’s not just the economy, stupid… business turn around won’t be enough because economic talk bores people.

    But done correctly, I believe Obama’s greatest weakness is his arrogance and his unAmerican past and present and vision for the future. Tie the OWS violence to him, the class warfare, and shine a spot light on how arrogantly he rammed through Obamacare while ignoring the economy and spending our children into oblivion.

    Which Republican is willing to go THERE?

  • aesthete

    Those tasty choices are making Ron Paul look good — also, Homeless Bum #48 and Tom Cruise post-Xenu.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      You saw what we got last time we voted for a candidate who appeared on Oprah…

      But yeah, we let the JV take the field this year.

      • aesthete

        I thought Sarah Palin lost that election :P

  • Risky

    I’m a few thousand miles east of most of your so some translation is sometimes needed. What confuses me is how AGW is listed as the second most important issue for you after abortion.

    Other than the near-nazi population control types I can’t see how this is a life issue.

    Personally I am sceptical but unwilling to take either position while the science clearly needs time and space to work. Futhermore I am very harsh on dumb policy built on theory, but I don’t see this as a belief issue. My science degree was in physics, I don’t know how the science will turn out and don’t see how a degree in law would make it all simple.

    • deVere

      Clearly Mitt and Newt are plenty smart enough to figure out that the evidence for AGW is at best extremely shaky. But the strong pressure to conform got the better of them.. Santorum & Perry may not have the IQ test scores of Romney and Gingrich, but they are clearly superior in thinking for themselves.

      When I was a child I was a subject and then paid worker in a replication of the Asch conformity test. Sadly most children will testify that nonsense is true of they are in a room ful of other children who insist that nonsense is the truth. That’s eesentially what Romney and Gingrich have done on AGW, and Santorum and Perry have refused to do.

  • Risky

    I just think that saying you’re certain it’s not true is as dumb as saying it’s all true.

    My takeout is that warming migth be plausible but it’s way off being proved and I sure as hell don’t want to concoct too much dumb policy on that basis. However energy efficiently (note I don’t talk carbon-nonsense) is good on grounds of economic efficiency (stating the obvious) as well as national security grounds.

  • joereagan

    Are just Romney endorsements, not worth paying much attention to. I’d really like to see Santorum’s disclosures ASAP. I have a feeling he’s getting Romney money to keep going, or will be soon.

    • Jill1066

      It may have been helpful to Romney to have someone siphoning off conservative votes from Newt, but he’s made a poor investment if he’s pushing money into Santorum’s campaign.

      Rick Santorum was the first candidate to effectively point out how Romneycare would harm Romney’s ability to contrast himself with Obama. He went after Romney with great skill and really drew blood on that issue. It’s amazing it took 17 debates before someone really exploited that gaping weakness. Rick came back at him over 3 debates and Romney still couldn’t make an effective rebuttal. Astonishingly, even with Rick blazing a trail for him, Newt didn’t effectively follow up on that issue with Romney.

      So if Romney decided to put money into Santorum’s campaign (which I highly doubt), he’s made a mistake.

  • Jill1066

    I’m a PA native. As a moderate, pro-choice Republican Rick Santorum wasn’t originally my favorite politician, but I always respected him. He stands up for what he believes in. He got me to reconsider supporting gay marriage because of the risk it would wind up allowing polygamy to become legal. His support of Specter over Toomey in 2004 was a product of having owed Specter for supporting him in his first Senate run and concerns that Toomey would lose the seat in a Presidential year when PA runs Blue. Toomey, a fine guy, had a very close race in 2010 despite the red wave helping him out.

    My choice for 2012 was Tim Pawlenty, and I’m still sad that he dropped out after that stupid, worthless Iowa straw poll. In hindsight, this might have been a very different race if he’d stayed in and gotten a second chance like Gingrich, Santorum, etc. Oh well.

    Newt is a brilliant man, but he has a ton of baggage and a distressing tendency to speak without thinking. I’m not sure he’ll be able to beat Romney, and I’m not confident of how he’d do against Obama. In my opinion, Newt belongs in a Think Tank and commenting on the news – not serving as commander in chief.

    Rick is clearly not perfect. I disagree with him on a lot of social issues, but he was a darn fine Senator and his positions put him closer to the majority of Republican voters. He wouldn’t have lost as badly in 2006 if a bunch of PA conservatives hadn’t decided to sit home to punish him for endorsing Specter. He’s strong on my #1 issue of national security. He sounds like he’s seen the light on the fiscal conservative front.

    Rick is my choice to be the not-Romney. Whichever Republican wins the nomination will get my vote in 2012. We’re still dealing with the damage from the Carter presidency and the disasters from Obama 1 are incalculable. It is unthinkable to give Obama even a chance at a second term. He must be voted out of office.

    • David123

      I’d much rather win with Santorum than lose with Gingrich or Romney.

  • Pingback: Signe Ponds

  • Pingback: Maximo Narro

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: maid services

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: total stranger

  • Pingback: zakopane noclegi

  • Pingback: Egal Gabbay L.A, CA

  • Pingback: skype

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: Melatrol reviews

  • Pingback: cv wzór

  • Pingback: Wedding ideas

  • Pingback: Additional resources

  • Pingback: distilling tequila

  • Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  • Pingback: Lemonade diet pills in stores

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: Continued

  • Pingback: Related Site

  • Pingback: descargar musica gratis una vaina loca

  • Pingback: BBCAT

  • Pingback: useful site

  • Pingback: montage

  • Pingback: foreclosure attorney

  • Pingback: Payday Loans Online

  • Pingback: Koi

  • Pingback: diet 600 calories a day

  • Pingback: recommended you study

  • Pingback: Fusevision.com.sg

  • Pingback: Aquaristik Bücher

  • Pingback: Pool Shop

  • Pingback: su respuesta

  • Pingback: dallas chair recaning

  • Pingback: click right here

  • Pingback: homemade baby shower favor

  • Pingback: buy cheap swtor credits

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: cheap florida auto insurance

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: wielu ludzi w jednym miejscu

  • Pingback: znajdz milosc

  • Pingback: payday loans online

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo

  • Pingback: chocolate truffle dessert

  • Pingback: http://jtloweryphotography.com/sellmyhousequicktoday.info/relocation-shipping-costs/

  • Pingback: Payday Loans Online

  • Pingback: 100 questions survey

  • Pingback: smartnet edge modem

  • Pingback: mall jewelry stores

  • Pingback: college football final helmet stickers

  • Pingback: task management software android

  • Pingback: private proxy scrapebox

  • Pingback: Look Here

  • Pingback: portal randkowy

  • Pingback: http://www.streamdownload.net/get-free-music-from-pandora-by-streaming-download-software.html

  • Pingback: super randka

  • Pingback: darmowy serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: Arkadaslik

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo

  • Pingback: School

  • Pingback: darmowa strona z randkami

  • Pingback: beat maker

  • Pingback: randki w rzeszowie

  • Pingback: use this specific link

  • Pingback: 1 hour payday loans

  • Pingback: Investment House

  • Pingback: casino gaming

  • Pingback: Amy Peters

  • Pingback: dry cleaning

  • Pingback: I was looking over this

  • Pingback: pmu.fr resultat et rapport du quinte

  • Pingback: wedding planner italy

  • Pingback: for new persons

  • Pingback: ipl Laser Hair Removal waterloo

  • Pingback: Tune Up

  • Pingback: by simply Yahoo

  • Pingback: this good level

  • Pingback: Diamanta

  • Pingback: Lacy

  • Pingback: Franklin

  • Pingback: Sears

  • Pingback: investment opportunities

  • Pingback: Johnny Bobeck

  • Pingback: alfileres de boda

  • Pingback: marketplace

  • Pingback: Diseño web barato

  • Pingback: Luanne Courtney

  • Pingback: Javier

  • Pingback: Kip Auer

  • Pingback: adult friends

  • Pingback: Detox at Home

  • Pingback: Cyprien

  • Pingback: dieta proteica dia a dia

  • Pingback: Learn More Here

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: green extract coffee

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: phone locator

  • Pingback: Very yrev test

  • Pingback: bixenon

  • Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  • Pingback: texas driver education

  • Pingback: cheap dedicated server

  • Pingback: Teichfolie

  • Pingback: Diamanta

  • Pingback: facebook likes, no username or password needed, buy likes using paypal

  • Pingback: Your #1 urban lifestyle destination

  • Pingback: www.eztraffic.org

  • Pingback: www.premiumseodomains.com

  • Pingback: Shoz tech

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: portal randkowy za darmo