« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Vote For Romney Because He’ll Owe Us?….Seriously?

Only One Man Alive Looks Worse In The Tank Than Jonah Goldberg

What Is It with Massachusettes Governors and Armored Vehicles?

There are actually some reasons to vote for Mitt Romney in this year’s GOP Primaries. I don’t personally find them compelling, and have endorsed one of Gov. Romney’s opponents. I admire the man’s ability to manage large projects and he does know how an executive office works. Voting for Mitt Romney may not be my personal predilection, but it isn’t quite as pointless as wearing a rally cap or tossing maidens down a well for good luck.

People have also offered sales pitches on Romney’s behalf that are about as believable as SpongeBob Squarepants discovering the Higgs Boson. One of the sadder aspects of Mitt Romney’s mild ride this year has been watching people I have deemed intellectually powerful perform about as well at ratiocination as my little boy’s favorite cartoon character would at advancing particle physics. When Jonah Goldberg of National Review Magazine wrote The Case For Romney about a week ago, I remembered what outstanding work he had done in the past, and therefore delayed this post until it could age a bit and marinate. I felt I owed him a better expression of my angst than “WTF?”

Goldberg states the hypothesis that Mitt Romney would make a great president for Conservatives because he would owe us. He states the following:

…there is an instrumental case to be made for him: It is better to have a president who owes you than to have one who claims to own you…..If elected, Romney must follow through for conservatives and honor his vows to repeal Obamacare, implement Representative Paul Ryan’s agenda, and stay true to his pro-life commitments.

Oh my! Is that really so? When he was Governor of Massachusetts, how did he repay all the Republicans he owed up there? Romneycare? Was it the complete and utter destruction of the state’s GOP infrastructure and popularity in his wake? Martha Coakley has done far more to help Republicans win high office in Massachusetts than Mitt Romney.

Jonah Goldberg tries to explain why Mitt Romney doesn’t quite gel with Middle Class and Working Class Conservative voters. He makes Romney sound like the slightly nerdy white guy sitting around studying mathematics problems in Southside Richmond, VA. Romney doesn’t dislike these people as much as he doesn’t grok their folkways quite, and can’t make himself look authentic.

I think this dramatically understates Mitt Romney’s problems with Conservative voters. To Governor Romney, Southern and Mid-Western Social Conservatives are like Dustin Hoffman’s character in the great Western Little Big Man was to the Cheyenne Indians who rescued him from death. Mitt Romney doesn’t even subconsciously believe he comes from the same species. The word Cheyenne, when translated literally, means “human being.” Those who were not Cheyenne were considered something else.

Mitt Romney, I’ve come to sincerely believe, considers those not from his own rather isolated Cheyenne Village to be something else. It explains how he could even accidently articulate the fact that he doesn’t worry about the very poor. He’s willing to be nice to people like myself, but it’s not like he’ll any more use for me after Election Day than he would for a prophylactic after an act of sexual intercourse.

I couldn’t make Mitt Romney understand who I am and where I come from even if he was really bored one afternoon and decide to amuse himself by actually giving a rat’s anus. There simply isn’t any way on God’s Green Earth that Mitt Romney would ever afford me the status of someone he would actually owe something to. If I ever were presumptuous enough to suggest such a thing it would serve as a profound affront to his self-image and dignity.

Like Ann Coulter in the wake of her “THREE CHEERS FOR ROMNEYCARE” debacle and the Massachusetts GOP, anyone foolish enough to believe Mitt Romney owed them something in return for a vote would quickly discover the finite limits of Lord Willard’s sense of noblesse oblige. Some reasons actually exist to support to support Mitt Romney for President. One or two of them might even be worthwhile. However, any sense that he feels a bond of honor to movement Conservatism is simply delusional.

I look back at all the great, wise and hilarious things Jonah Goldberg has written for National Review Magazine. This body of superb political commentary gives me reason to hope this endorsement he penned of Mitt Romney was just the lower tail of his Bell Curve. Jonah, for the sake of your honor as a man of intellect; climb down from the Mitt Romney Tank.

COMMENTS

  • freemkts

    If he wins it will be in spite of them. All the RINO’s would feel vindicated.

    Here’s what conservatives need to ask themselves. If Romney were president and Mitch McConnell tried to undercut John Boehner on some bill (hypothetically of course) who’s side do you think Romney would come down on?

    If Romney had to meet one on one with Dem leaders, like Obama did with Boehner last year, what do you think would happen?

  • krish

    If nothing else, conservatives & tea partyers learnt something for this point forward – who all can be bought or closet RINOs! Next election cycle, we will know who NOT to listen to!

    Thank you for exposing this fraud! The list keeps growing!

    Also, it is hilarious to listent o Rush take credit for Santorum indirectly – media is saying Rush supported Santorum last week? – Rush Not taking a stand against MA liberal is as bad as Coulter, Goldberg, Krauthammer support for Romney!

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I *like* Jonah. I hope this an aberration, a 24-hour flu-bug of some sort. I’m afraid it’s not.

      • wyowumin

        it’s a 24 hour bug. He has written at least two articles–when the ER’s were worried that Perry might catch on–about how he just couldn’t get at all enthusiastic about Perry because he was so “weary” of having to defend stupid sounding Southerner’s. He had quite a bit to say about it and shortly after I read the first article he was on Planet of the Clangers (aka Fox All Stars) just ripping Perry apart.

        That’s when I realized that I’d been had and he was just another faux Conservative in it for the dough and I’ve stopped reading anything else he has to say.

        Too bad since I used to like him a lot.

    • Leon H. Wolf

      .nt

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        The witch has to be dunked first.

    • renl57

      The GOP base (as typified by RedState.com) isn’t exactly blameless here.

      They bet all their chips on Perry. They went “all in,” without having first vetted Perry or even waiting for him to declare his candidacy first. I remember when they were all just waiting for Perry to jump into the race, so that he could sweep all before him and clinch the nomination ASAP.

      And we know what happened after that.

      That’s when the GOP really started flailing around: Bachmann, Cain, Gingrich, Santorum….

      Now me, I’m a more conservative poker player than that. I never go “all in” until after I’ve made my hand.

      • paladin1

        if you think your Romney hand is “made”.

        You are right though, about the fickleness of the GOP base. We managed to criticize and nitpick every conservative candidate in the lot until they were all gone, leaving us with the least desirable of the field. Much like kids in a candy store, we couldn’t decide because there was too much choice and now the store is closed. The best chance in a generation to elect a conservative president has been squandered and we are left with undesirable, unacceptable, no way, and crazy. I leave the faces to be pegged to whichever descriptor each reader wants.

  • redmymind

    n/t

  • kipling

    I also agree with what you wrote 100%. Thanks for writing the rebuttal from the average man to Lord Willard.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      NT.

  • sethellis

    I’m starting to think that having a politician that “understands you” is overrated. Those politicians that understand me the best are also the ones that screw me over the most. That understanding just gets used as a weapon against me.

    I’d rather have the one that understands the problem and solution. Despite Romney’s weakness, the other candidates have had trouble knocking him off. In order to do so they have to show that they are better equipped to tackle the issues. It is questions about ability that holds candidates like Santorum down.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Just not the one I wrote a diary to refute.

      Yet again, Mitt refuses to repudiate Romneycare after watching what BHO just did to religious organizations under the aegis of a Federalized version of what Romney enacted in Mass. I’m thinkiing Romney has some ego invested in Romneycare.

      If he were cold and calculating, he could calculate the impact of blatantly disrespecting the beliefs of a major religion on national morale. Is Romney bright enough to understand this point? It’s not just the economy…..

  • streiff

    1. Romney, if he’s elected, isn’t going to owe conservatives squat because he’ll claim he was elected despite us. And he may very well be right.

    2. I think that even if we’d supported him, Romney would immediately jettison conservatives because he isn’t one of us and he’d feel more at home governing using a Gang of 14 style coalition in the Senate.

    What is stunning is the degree to which NRO has utterly abandoned any pretense at integrity to get this guy elected and have done so in two different elections.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      “Like watching Romans turn into Italians.”

  • codenametimna

    Romney has given the perception he’s “out of touch” with the American people and seemingly not able to connect with on a personal level. Especially concerning the very poor which he really isn’t concerned about at all apparently.

    Mitt Romney hasn’t been able to give the American people the reassurance they need that he would keep the promises he’s now making on the campaign trail, especially when you consider he’s been a veritable “flip-flopper” on practically every major issue that is important to conservatives and most Republicans. Just a few short years ago (before he decided to run for president) Mitt Romney could well be considered a liberal Republican more in tune with Democrats than his own Party’s stances on the issues. He had the same problem in his 2008 election campaign where he tried to convince people he was a conservative but the American people knew better and most didn’t believe him. Many conservatives today still see him as an “opportunist” who only changed positions on issues because he wanted to run for the presidency, not that he really had a change of heart per se.

    I honestly think Romney’s decision to run for the presidency both in 2008 and 2012, are in part, simply a desire of his to accomplish what his dad George was unable to accomplish i.e. become President of the United States. Mitt Romney winning the presidency would vindicate his dad’s previous failure to do so and thus restore a sense of respectability to the Romney family that was lost from that previous defeat. As we know, the only way a Republican can garner the nomination is if he or she can convince other Republicans that they’re bona fide conservatives who are trustworthy and can appeal to the conservative base in order to obtain the golden prize of being the Republican nominee which would be unthinkable if the candidate was perceived as a Massachusetts moderate?? or liberal Republican more in line with Democratic Party ideals like Mitt Romney was just a few short years ago… before he decided to run for president.

    I have to admit that I kind of like Mitt Romney. He’s a likable guy, presidential looking, talks a good conservative talk, but there’s something radically missing from the equation in my opinion. I think the missing elements are a lack of “trustworthiness” and an extreme inability to “connect” with the American people, and more importantly, Republicans. He speaks but he doesn’t speak with conviction in my opinion. He promises many things but many people aren’t convinced he really means them.

    SNL did a skit that portrayed Romney as ‘robotic’ who had five “human” sons. His perception as a Teflon candidate might be an understatement. More like an android from the planet Zartel who just so happens to be a Republican running for the presidency. hahahaha

    In other words, it’s as if he’s a million light years away, living in a different dimension, and consequently, he’s immensely disconnected from the electorate he needs to garner the nomination, let alone, get elected. Rick Santorum’s three state sweep last night gives credence to that notion too. Mitt Romney needs to become “human” and start “connecting” with the American people if he wants to serve as their president.

    Plus the fact that Romney was born with a ‘silver spoon’ in his mouth. Which presents him as perhaps out of touch with ordinary Americans. He has a tendency to put his silver foot in his mouth on numerous occasions also. You have to care about ALL Americans, not just the middle class and wealthy. You may like to “fire people” but you needn’t say it to the world, especially during an economic recession! Automatic increases for the “minimum wage” is a disastrous idea and anathema to most Republicans. More importantly, it would discombobulate an already reeling economy if it was implemented. Mitt Romney should know better too. Having been a business owner and having worked many years in the private sector, it strikes me as very naive. Which also makes you wonder if Mitt Romney’s business savvy is really up to snuff, and if he became president, would he really know how to get the economy revving again and Americans back to work. Especially since he likes firing people so much. Hey, maybe that’s the real reason Donald Trump likes him so much?? Just sayin…

    • falconrap

      literally, our John Kerry. He’s a guy that’s lived a life of luxury, fails to connect with people (my feel they are beneath him), and has more flip flops than Clearwater beach.

  • tngal

    In fact, if truth be told we should blame all organizations, clubs, groups and what-nots that wear the “Conservative” banner who have allowed themselves to be associated with him.

    Their conservative cred gave him some kind of belief that he had conservative cred. The man has NO CONSERVATIVE CRED! IF he wants to speak at the NRC fine. But there’s a difference between a republican event and a Conservative event.

    When these various organizations (et al) embrace him and welcome him into the fold to speak or whatever it somehow legitimizes his claim of being a conservative. “Well, I uh, I did speak at CPAC last year you know so ergo I must be a conservative.”

    A little background check, that’s all I’m asking for.

    • Ausonius

      Which, among other things, would include a promise to repeal MAObamacare, not “fix it” or any other euphemism.

      It would include a promise – at the minimum – to freeze government spending for two years, and tax simplification + reduction of rates similar to e.g. Lithuania!

      http://www.worldwide-tax.com/lithuania/lithuania_tax.asp

      And such a contract to be signed preferably in blood. :)

      • tngal

        So far he’s just signed with money and lip.

        • Ausonius

          :)

          And the only real guarantee to keep Romney in line, assuming his election, is a majority of Conservative Republicans in the House at least.

          RINOS need to be rounded up and sent for a permanent vacation at SafariLand!

  • gawken

    ..We’d be reasonably assured that the Mormon Tabernacle Choir would appear at the WH for the next four Christmases..