« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

It’s Time For Congress To Act Like A Branch Of Government

Congressional Review Act Gives Congress The Power To Stuff The HHS

The Congressional Review Act (5 USC 818-808) passed both houses of Congress in 1995 and was signed into law. It allows the US Congress to pass a resolution of disapproval any time it doesn’t want a major regulatory reform or ruling to go into effect. This would apply directly to the HHS contraception mandate that Secretary Kathleen Sibelius handed down earlier this month. Here’s how the process works.

The agency submits the rule to both Congress and the Comptroller General. Each house of Congress than sends the report to its committees to determine what changes need to be made to existing law to accommodate the new regulations. Or, the Congress can do something else. They can refuse to change existing law to accommodate the new regulation. They can, in fact, pass a joint resolution of disapproval and kill the new regulation. The USC reads as follows.

For purposes of this section, the term “joint resolution” means only a joint resolution introduced in the period beginning on the date on which the report referred to in section 801 (a)(1)(A) is received by Congress and ending 60 days thereafter (excluding days either House of Congress is adjourned for more than 3 days during a session of Congress), the matter after the resolving clause of which is as follows: “That Congress disapproves the rule submitted by the XX relating to XX, and such rule shall have no force or effect.” (The blank spaces being appropriately filled in).

Interestingly enough, the law enabling Congress to pick this mandate off was passed in conjunction with The Contract With America. There is a candidate in the GOP Primaries this year who should have at least a nodding familiarity with The Contract With America. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich won the Speakership running on its ideals.

If he wanted to gain some really rapid traction prior to Super Tuesday, he should be reminding the GOP-controlled House that his legislation made it possible. He should be riding this out on the campaign trail like a tricked-out Harley.

The House GOP could bring this up by next week. They could whip their caucus, pass it in a day and dump this hand grenade right in Senate Majority Leader Reid’s lap before we even reach the Ides of March. The Senate GOP would need the signatures of 30 supporters to force it on to the Senate Calendar for an up-and-down majority vote. No filibusters apply. Former Congressman David McIntosh describes the law below.

The Congressional Review Act (CRA), which I authored while serving in Congress, gives legislators 60 days to introduce Resolutions of Disapproval to nullify a rule after it has been published. The Resolutions of Disapproval enjoy expedited procedures and therefore serve as the perfect tool for Congress to move expeditiously to make Team Obama’s unconstitutional rule history. The law allows 30 senators to discharge any committee action and bring it to the Senate floor, where it can be passed with a majority vote after no more than five hours of debate.

(HT: NRO)

But meanwhile, this option goes ignored. The rule will take effect by the end of March and the opportunity to stop this in its tracks will go by the wayside. Unless, of course, we all think something different…. Congress made a Contract with America in 1994. They passed legislation as if they were intending to honor said document.

We can attempt to make this Congress do its job properly, against its will. Go to the House of Representatives Website. It has an app that allows you to find your Congressman’s website and contact info. From there, you can contact these people and tell them you expect a Resolution of Disapproval to emerge from the House of Representatives and you expect it out of there prior to March 15. It’s time for Congress to start behaving as if it were an independent branch of government and putting the brakes on the Obama Administration.

COMMENTS

  • quill67

    That is, does Obamacare specifically give this power to HHS to perform this function. If so, older laws might not apply.

    Only problem with this vote is that every vulnerable Dem would vote for it. Obama’s HHS would say it no longer applied because of Obama’s “compromise” that just required insurers to provide it for free.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      They may well weasal, but make them weasal. Make them weasal publically, right before the election.

  • chuckludd

    They are in the permanent campaign to keep their leadership positions and not to advance liberty.

    Congress definitely needs to reassert its propoer role. The president may be head of state but Congress is first among equals. It is Congress which passes laws, not the president. If there is a regulation which Congress does not approve of or is not within the confines of the relevant statute, they should assert themselves. I have some questions whether the Congressional Review Act is constitutional but it certainly does no harm for Congress to express its opposition — and then let the Supreme Court review it.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      It’s why I felt like spending my time this fine and lovely AM calling these chicken-(edits) out….

  • johnt

    A momentary ray of sunshine, a smidgen of optimism.
    Imagine, actually smacking down the bureacracy! Now all that needs happen is for the Speaker to find his cojones. That’s the hurdle.

  • sharrondeer

    instead of passing actual legislation. This is one step up from naming post offices, which is most of what Congress has accomplished this year.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      A joint Resolution of disapproval specifically repeals the HHS regulation.

  • aesthete

    but considering the nonsense that is being bandied about vis a vis our Presidential nominees’ breaks from conservatism being OK because, hey, Republican President — I doubt that will be coming for some time.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I wish Calvin Coolidge would rise from his grave. Just slap some makeup on the old boy. We could all keep cool w/ Coolidge. He’s always room temperature.

      • acat

        Zombie Reagan, Repair Man Jack?

        Mew

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          I’ll settle for anyone w/ BRAAAIIIINNNNNNNSSSSS!

  • mystryda

    In response to asking Rep. Austen to support a Resolution of Disapproval I got a letter with this paragraph. Anybody ever heard of HR 1179?

    “As you may know, H.R. 1179 was introduced by Representative Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE) on March 17, 2011. If enacted, this legislation would amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) to permit a health plan to decline coverage of specific items and services that are contrary to the religious beliefs of the sponsor, issuer, or other entity offering the plan or the purchaser or beneficiary (in the case of individual coverage) without penalty. Declares that such plans are still considered to: (1) be providing the essential health benefits package or preventive health services, (2) be a qualified health plan, and (3) have fulfilled other requirements under PPACA.”

    • MF

      Yes, HR 1179 is great. But in what way does passing RMJ’s resolution interfere with this? HR 1179 also requires full passage in the Senate, including overcoming the filibuster and Reid’s bill scheduling hurdles, an insurmountable task. RMJ’s overcomes both of those obstacles.