« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Amerigo Bonasera

Pay The WH Price For Admission and Kiss America Good-bye

Influence Peddling. A Business That Never Dies.


More broadly, ….those who donated the most to Mr. Obama and the Democratic Party ….were far more likely to visit the White House than others. Among donors who gave $30,000 or less, about 20 percent visited the White House, according to a New York Times analysis that matched names in the visitor logs with donor records. But among those who donated $100,000 or more, the figure rises to about 75 percent.

(HT: The New York Times)

There is another way America could die soon. It won’t even frighten you unless you see it quietly happening. It won’t even show up onarmageddononline. It happens a bit at a time, as more and more functions of American life are no longer handled by legitimate channels.

These things get taken care of by The Aristocracy of Pull. Things are always “different” for our current POTUS. The usual rules do not apply. His first executive order as President sealed every known record of his life from public view.

This was only the beginning. If you want him to hear your particular issue of the day, you need to appear before him at The White House along with your admission ticket. This admission ticket consists of a signed check to Barack Obama’s political operation for $35,800. Former Congressman Patrick J. Kennedy is remarkably unashamed as he describes the process below.

Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy (D-RI) is unabashed about such dealings, however. He personally signed a $35,800 check to Obama’s re-election fund while looking for administration support for one of his projects. “If you want to call it ‘quid pro quo,’ fine,” he told the Times. “At the end of the day, I want to make sure I do my part.”

(HT: Big Government)

If you want to call it “Quid pro quo”, you are probably being entirely too nice. Rampant influence-peddling and shameless and meretricious corruption would more accurately describe the current White House shakedown operation. Barack Obama increasingly runs the Executive Branch of The United States Government the way Vito Corleone ran his fictional crime empire.

So how is this bad? Why isn’t that “just how DC works?” It becomes an insidious evil when the only way to get heard and the only way to receive justice is to humiliate yourself before His Eminence the way Amerigo Bonasera did in Mario Puzo’s fictional masterpiece.

Don Corleone was gentle, patient. “Why do you fear to give your first allegiance to me?” he said. “You go to the law courts and wait for months. You spend money on lawyers who know full well you are to be made a fool of. You accept judgment from a judge who sells himself like the worst whore in the streets. Years gone by, when you needed money, you went to the banks and paid ruinous interest, waited hat in hand like a beggar while they sniffed around, poked their noses up your very asshole to make sure you could pay them back.”
The Don paused, his voice became sterner. “But if you had come to me, my purse would have been yours. If you had come to me for justice those scum who ruined your daughter would be weeping bitter tears this day. If by some misfortune an honest man like yourself made enemies they would become my enemies”– the Don raised his arm, finger pointing at Bonasera– “and then, believe me, they would fear you.”

The Godfather, Mario Puzo

But all of this generosity occurred for a price. A simple price of returning the favor whenever and however The Don commanded. The Don could commandeer your life at any point. Than was the deal.

Amerigo Bonasera translates from Italian to “America Farewell.” This is an accurate description for what happens when a person becomes beholden to The Don for anything. The Don may smile. He may promise you “Hope and Change.” Yet after all is said and done, once you rely on his favors, you are nothing but just another flunkie. America goes bonasera.

COMMENTS

  • docaja

    executive order sealing “every known” record of Obama’s life from public view. This post contains more fiction than Mr. Puzo’s novel. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize Obama, getting behind this sort of distortion only makes you look like a crank.

    • Joshua Persons

      RMJ has completely miconstrued Executive Order 13489. It’s almost the exact same order (12667) that Reagan put in place at the end of his term. It defines the process to handle requests by the Archivist of the United States to publicize records which had previously been sealed. It itself seals no records at all, least of all “every known record of [Obama's] life”.

    • wintermute

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_13233

    • greyeagle

      Actually there was such an order and it was the first day . It included all school records. His record at Harvard Law School, Community Organizer, all records from ILL. Senator and in the current Senate. All immigration records regarding him and his mother, and likely includes more, but I can’t think of them.

  • Viet71

    Your statement about sealing is fair and accurate, and your link backs you up.

    The jackals have become quite bold. They snipe even in EE’s diaries.

    Better bold jackals, I guess, than lame and lazy ones.

    • garfieldjl

      When Ronald Reagan wanted something sealed, we could all trust his motives were to protect this country, Obama has demonstrated that he’s about maintaining his grip on power and probably did it for political reasons.

      The WH committed plagerism when they gave the argument for the drilling ban, they altered the report after the scientists had signed their names to it. That isn’t National Security, that was an attempt to throw environmental leftists a bone.

      • Viet71

        That’s the point RMJ is making.

        We don’t know his grades at Columbia or Harvard. We don’t know how he got his part-time lectureship at U. Chicago Law School. His wife’s employment is Chicago is a big question mark. He lied on his application for a law license and had to give up the license.

        The three fools (or worse) who are sniping at RMJ want us to believe Obama’s like every other president in terms of his personal history.

        • aesthete

          we don’t allow benign or well-intentioned Presidents to create or expand sweeping authorities for a single man in government. Democracy (and any other system) only works when the public is informed: on issues outside of national security, there is very little that should be sealed off from the public, and certainly nothing that should not also require Congressional assent.

        • Joshua Persons

          “We don?t know his grades at Columbia or Harvard. We don?t know how he got his part-time lectureship at U. Chicago Law School. His wife?s employment is Chicago is a big question mark. He lied on his application for a law license and had to give up the license.”

          I’m not disputing any of this. What I’m disputing is the demonstrably false statement that Obama accomplished anything like this with EO 13489. If your claims here are true, it has nothing to do with what RMJ said. The EO idea is a self-beclowning rabbit trail.

          BTW, try actually addressing me next time. This passive-aggressive non-confrontational confrontation style is cute, but I’m calling you on it here and now.

      • Joshua Persons

        On top of that, your statement “When Ronald Reagan wanted something sealed, we could all trust his motives were to protect this country” shows you have no understanding whatsoever of the principle that the US is a nation of laws not men.

        NB: This post isn’t meant as an insult either to Reagan or EO 12667/13489, just to garfieldjl.

      • garfieldjl

        Obama has used Presidential powers to give groups special favors in this country, he often wields it like a corrupt Chicago politician would.

        He’s done recess appointments when Congress wasn’t in recess.

        I’m sorry, but this isn’t a situation of what the law actually says he’s able to do, cause Obama has shown he really doesn’t care what the law is actually intended for.

        RMJ is correct on this issue as is Viet71.

        • Joshua Persons

          “Obama has used Presidential powers to give groups special favors in this country, he often wields it like a corrupt Chicago politician would.”

          I really do. But that’s not what RMJ said. He said, foolishly, “His first executive order as President sealed every known record of his life from public view.” It’s demonstrably false, and reflects poorly on both Redstate and the larger point re Obama. This claim needs to be removed NOW.

    • Joshua Persons

      I don’t know who you are, but then again you don’t know who I am. Ad hominem attacks are fallacies and, in this instance, so false as to be laughable. It’s better to keep your mouth shut than speak when you don’t know what you’re talking about.

      As far as your analysis of the link … Well, I guess from your namecalling it shouldn’t be surprising that you trust some random Canadian blogger over the text of the EO itself.

      • Viet71

        I’m an open book. For example, I’m a 67-year-old tax lawyer who lives in Connecticut. Have an undergrad degree in electrical engineering. Served a year in Viet Nam as an Army intel officer. Was trained to speak and read Camdian. Have about 100 top-notch clients. And so on.

        I get to call you out because I’m a legit conservative, and you’re a young, inexperienced Dem interloper.

        Just that simple.

        • Joshua Persons

          All respect to your military service. I say that without irony or sarcasm. But the idea that you can wave your uniform to avoid any criticism is bunk.

          And stop trying to divine mobies where there are none. I’m not new to the conservative movement or to Redstate. I’ve been a member here coming on nine years now; I participated in the first-ever RS event (I believe), a Bush-Kerry debate party in Northern Virginia.

          • Joshua Persons

            no text

          • Viet71

            Tell me you were trained in Latin, law, and logic — you weren’t — and you’re using the term incorrectly.

            It means to atttack the person rather than his or her argument.

            You don’t make any argument, in the syllogistic sense. Your writing is hogwash. That’s a fair characterization, not an ad hominem attack.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            Call a truce. Walk away. I only regret that this diary has caused you guys to argue. I think you both are excellent posters and contribute significantly to the value of the website.

          • Viet71

            n/t

          • Joshua Persons

            And since I now know you’ve seen the discussion here, I trust you’ll consider my argument regarding the OP. I’ll leave this comment thread alone.

          • Joshua Persons

            Like, perhaps …

            “two of Kos’s jackals”

            “you?re a young, inexperienced Dem interloper.”

            Both provided as reasons to ignore my statement. And both completely false, but that’s beside the point.

            I’m no longer going to interact with you, viet71. Your deceitful rhetorical tactics are enough for me to call Hinz rule on you, at least for myself. Other RS readers can look at the rest of the thread and determine for themselves the truth of the matter.

          • Viet71

            That’s good enough for me.

            The reason for my comments is that RS has been best recently with Operation Hilarity interlopers.

            I failed to distinguish wheat from chaff.

          • garfieldjl

            Joshua since RMJ has vouched for you, I’ll apologize to you as well.

            I did the same thing to you that mbecker, APA_guy, gekster, and a few others have been doing to me and other Newt supporters, and would like to apologize.

          • gekster

            supporting Newt than bashing Romney, things would be different.

            But you have a 99-1 ratio bashing Romney.

            If it was at least 60-40, things would be different.
            For you it is easier to bash Romney than support Gingrich.
            You can’t blame me for that, or for pointing it out.

          • aesthete

            Build up a constructive posting history, and people will be more inclined to take attacks on a candidate as something other than Dem swill.

            I say that as one of the RS posters most critical of our options this primary season, to include Romney of course.

  • docaja

    included here refers to an article that makes the same statement but does not offer any documentation. Joshua Persons’ description of the actual executive order being discussed is correct.

    • jimmyg

      If you read the article the author is a birther, and alleges, within the linked article, that the birth certificate Obama presented was forged.

      • garfieldjl

        This is about how Obama abuses Presidential Powers and uses them in a manner that they were clearly not intended.

        • wintermute

          I just got home from work to see you accused me of possibly being from the daily kos for simply providing evidence that there is NOTHING in that executive order that does anything the writer alleged. Thats hilarious. Go write another diary crying about how we have already lost the election with Romney.

          All of our conservative arguments can win on the merits. We dont need to make stuff up. I still can’t believe its on the front page. It does nothing thats being alleged here with your support.

        • jimmyg

          “When he finally produced a birth certificate, forensic analysts deemed it a forgery.”
          http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45996

          I am not calling for anyone, specifically RMJ to be banned. RMJ linked to the above article authored by Alan Caruba in the Canada Free Press. I believe if he had wrote the above quote from the linked article, according to site rules, he would have been banned.

          Sorry for the confusion.