« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

In Artur Davis And Erskine Bowles The Democrats Lose Two Serious People

Both Opt Out Of The Brainwashed ?99%?

If you claim that doom awaits, but in 50 years, only the 1% of the population with the brains and character to think ahead are going to care about what you’re talking about. The 99% are going to change the channel.

(HT: Brett Stevens)

I’ve been harshly critical of The “Democratic Wing” of The Democratic Party for organizing itself as a Visigoth Holiday that eats out the sustenance of the productive citizens of the American Republic. Fairness demands that I recognize that not *every* Democratic occupies a similar biological niche to the intestinal parasite. Some even manage to remain Democrats for several years despite their ability to think over long time horizons and address the insidious threats that seek to undermine American greatness while the rest of their fellow partisans demand government-sponsored birth control, education and cradle-to-grave health insurance. It is of more than passing interest that both Erskine Bowles and Artur Davis have chosen to disassociate themselves from the current Democratic Party Presidential Administration.

When Erskine Bowles flatly rejected the speculation that he could succeed Timothy Geithner as Secretary of The Treasury, the Democratic Brand took a hit. Bowles was the liberal partner in the Simpson-Bowles Coalition to reduce the long term national debt. This refusal marked a major blow to the credibility of a President who got elected in 2008 promising to cut the current account deficit in half during his first term. If anyone in The Democratic Party had the chops to seriously engage this project, Erskine Bowles was he.

He would have been a major upgrade to President Obama’s cabinet over Timothy “I don’t have a plan, but I know I don’t like yours” Geithner. The difference between Bowles and Geithner on current account spending is the difference in gravitas between a serious adult and a “Choom-Smoking” teenager. Appointing Bowles would have given President Obama’s agenda greater respect than it currently enjoys. It is a telling sign that Mr. Bowles will not work for Mr. Obama.

Artur Davis used to serve as a Democratic Congressman from The State of Alabama. He attempted to become Alabama’s first African-American Governor, but suffered a colossal political humiliation in the 2010 Democratic Primary. He was beaten down hard by a political apparatchik who went on to a similar defeat at the hands of current Alabama Governor Bentley.

To Davis’ great credit, he seemed to both learn and grow up after taking a professional smack-down. He has since moved to Virginia to restart his career as a more moderate politician. He authors a thoughtful blog and sometimes guest posts at National Review.com. Some have suggested he run for Congress as a Republican.* Davis, who understands the rigors of the job, and may feel personal qualms about switching sides, hasn’t reached a definitive decision.

I encourage him to consider carefully and decide well however he chooses. He still has the potential to redeem his defeat and become a great statesman and leader. He describes the goal of his blog below.

Politics is rife with orthodoxies and a lack of imagination. This website represents a different point of view that does not belong to the traditional left or right. My perspective is that upward mobility matters, a growing economy beats dividing a shrinking pie, reforming our schools requires radical effort, politics is too dominated by narrow elites and the way we approach race and culture is diminishing our nation by breaking it apart. Above all, I believe civil, informed discourse is the most powerful value in a society that believes it can do better. That is the voice I bring.

So the Democrats won’t have the service of two of the smartest and most capable people in their party. Bowles and Davis don’t win every election they run in and sometimes stray off the reservation. The Daily Kos crew wouldn’t miss them for a heartbeat. Either one of them would tell Julia to grow up and accept personal responsibility. Neither would accept the likes of Brett Kimberlin as a political operative. They would both probably want to raise my taxes and add power to the Federal Government. From my perspective, either man is a mixed bag in terms of politics and policy.

What each of these men brought to DC was a serious commitment to doing good deeds and improving the nation. When the Democrats lose people of this caliber, they become the party of the purblind and the myopic. They become addicted to subsidies and short term fixes. They hand out favors instead of justice and seek to eat the seed corn at their Bacchanalian Revels. People like Bowles and Davis at least offer the Democrats some sense of vision. Absent leaders of this caliber, the Democrats are increasingly blind. It becomes more imperative to vote against having them lead our nation.

* – Moe Lane even wants him to switch.

COMMENTS

  • commonsenseobserver

    Artur Davis said that if he runs for office, it will be as a Republican.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      But I’d *love* watching Jim Moran react to having Davis as an opponent!

      • tomkinney

        Shows a little tolerance for the left here Mr. Repair Man. Good for you. We need two strong parties to make America work. Whereas we on the right have the right answers at this point in history, we have been on the wrong side of things, like civil rights, at some times in the past. Once any man or any gets too full of themselves, they’re in for a fall, as we’re seeing with the left now.

        The challenge is staying the course when times are flush and you’re in control. That’s when people and parties get out of hand.

        • tomkinney

          last sentence, first graph…Once any man or party gets too full of themselves….etc.

        • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

          If you knew history, you’d know that “we” were not on the wrong side of civil rights.

          Some suggested reading for you, especially the first article which links to an article written by Bob Parks, a black conservative.

          here

          here

          here

          here

        • barleycorn

          “Whereas we on the right have the right answers at this point in history, we have been on the wrong side of things, like civil rights, at some times in the past.”

          What ARE you referring to? When were Republicans on the wrong side of the “things, like civil rights”?

          Was it when the party was founded largely to fight slavery? Was it when the Republicans in Congress voted in a higher percentage for the Civil Rights Bill than did the Democrats?

          Or by “right” were you referring to the racist wing of the Democrat Party? But then why “we”?

          Please please please explain. We await with breathless anticipation.

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            The Troll has been escorted back to HuffPo and DKos where he belongs. Mark it off to Markos’ favorite talking point and flush it in the toilet where it belongs.

          • renl57

            …had opined that according to the principle of federalism, the Federal Government had no right to force Southern states to end their policy of racial segregation. Buckley had written:

            “The central question that emerges?and it is not a parliamentary question or a question that is answered by merely consulting a catalog of the rights of American citizens, born Equal?is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically? The sobering answer is Yes?the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race. It is not easy, and it is unpleasant, to adduce statistics evidencing the median cultural superiority of White over Negro: but it is fact that obtrudes, one that cannot be hidden by ever-so-busy egalitarians and anthropologists. The question, as far as the White community is concerned, is whether the claims of civilization supersede those of universal suffrage. The British believe they do, and acted accordingly, in Kenya, where the choice was dramatically one between civilization and barbarism, and elsewhere; the South, where the conflict is by no means dramatic, as in Kenya, nevertheless perceives important qualitative differences between its culture and the Negroes?, and intends to assert its own….

            “National Review believes that the South’s premises are correct. It is more important for the community, anywhere in the world, to affirm and live by civilized standards, than to bow to the demands of the numerical majority. Sometimes it becomes impossible to assert the will of a minority, in which case it must give way, and the society will regress; sometimes the numerical minority cannot prevail except by violence: then it must determine whether the prevalence of its will is worth the terrible price of violence.”

            http://tinyurl.com/8xml62r
            also
            http://www.brinklindsey.com/?p=131

            Buckley was wrong.
            And it wasn’t too long before he admitted he was wrong.

            But in the 1950s, the National Review was prepared to allow Southern states’ rights to trump the rights of individual black citizens who lived there.

  • bk

    They purge anyone who doesn’t follow their marching orders in lockstep, which is why boll weevil Democrats and (later) yellow dog Democrats are both pretty much extinct species.

    But they LOVE to scream about the GOP when a RINO is expunged.

    • acat

      because they’re trying to game the system, perhaps?

      Mew

      • Repair_Man_Jack

        I still remember the investment we made int he futile effort to keep Lincoln Chaffee. Yes, that sentence was written as intended. We really threw away money in 2K6 to keep Lincoln Chaffee. If there were ever a guy who we could have made an example out of, Linc would have qualified w/ an Oak Leaf Cluster.

        • acat

          well, another several dozen, but one in particular.

          Who kept letting this guy back in?

          Mew

          • gekster

            The American plitical system.

            They let ‘anybody’ in.

            And I mean that litterally.
            RP is proof.

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        You get out of line, you end up making hostage videos on You Tube (Corey Booker) or sending in apology letters to the NY Times (Steve Rattner).

    • avagreen

      Democrats. bluedogs are “conservative” democrats”, of which I used to be before joining the Republican party.

      A “yellow-dog” Democrat is a Dim who says they’d rather vote for a “yellow dog” than a Republican and notoriously vote straight Democrat regardless of who it is or what they stand for and is used in a manner of praise. Yellow Dog Democrats embody loyalty.

      • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

        The Yellow Dog Democrats were way right of the Blue Dogs. They just included a fair number of racists that the Democrats were willing to welcome, while the Republicans shunned them.

        Yes, it was the Democrats who had a Southern Strategy from Reconstruction to when the old Jim Crow generations were dying off.

        • mikeymike143

          jim demint is a real conservative. scott walker is a real conservative. richard mourdock is a real conservative. the word ”democrat” and ”conservative” should not even be used in the same sentence.

          • Dave_A

            Which is a group that some elements which traditionally fall on the ‘right’ would like to see us integrate into the GOP…

            EG, they’re populists instead of leftists, but still not Chicago-school, supply-side conservatives…

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            You don’t vote for the Nancy Pelosi agenda if you’re a Jacksonian, sorry, that’s just false.

          • Dave_A

            And the BDs have defected from the Pelosi radicalisim at times…

          • texasref

            I encourage you to explore the saga of Representative Stupak. Classic case exemplifying Neil’s point.

          • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

            It’s foolish to believe them when they campaign on principles right of their party.

      • bk

        There were 50+ just a couple of years ago. They were halved in the 2010 elections and most of the rest are retiring this year or were primaried out by liberal Dems. Ref: WaPo

  • lineholder

    who do still have a greater loyalty to this country and to her people rather than to the agenda of “progression” and “fundamental transformation of America” that Obama and the left have been promoting for the last three years.

    I’m glad to see them making this kind of choice.

  • earlgrey

    activists claiming me as one of their members!!!

    I know it is OT, but had to get it off my chest.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I’m a Civil Servant and I *hate* being informed that I’m disloyal to “The Party of Government.”

  • Melody Warbington (rwm52)

    tweeted that “The Dems in AL knowingly drove away the best thing they had.” I agree.

    If the Dems had run Davis, the 2010 governor’s race would have been much closer, and he’d have garnered a lot of name recognition for a future try. Although I differed with Davis on more than a few of his Congressional votes, I respected him.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Sadly, Davis made a shrewd decision. Even if he still iked and sympathized w/ Al Dems, he couldn’t work witht hat level of blatant disrespect. The AL GOP has a long pipeline. I don’t think A. Davis is any more willing to take a number and stand in line than my personnal favorite guy “Pawka Gwiffith.” Davis is a net loss of IQ points to the state of AL, but he did what he had to do if he still wants a career in politics.

  • clintonformccain

    Harvard Law School graduate. Rising young gun of the Democrat party, along with Wasserman-Schultz. One of the very first Obama endorsers.

    Smart move on his part. A coalition of Republicans, centrist independents, and a smattering of African American support could be a winning combo in Virginia politics.

    He is a potential player in national Republican politics.

    • bk

      is that the Dems will throw that vile liar DWS under the bus and maybe we’ll never have to suffer through seeing her mug on camera again.

  • lineholder

    Female, named Jo Ann Nardelli.

    Reason for switch: President Obama’s support of SSM (Nardelli is Catholic)

    http://dailycaller.com/2012/05/29/penn-democratic-leader-defects-to-gop-cites-catholic-faith-as-reason/

  • Repair_Man_Jack

    http://moelane.com/2012/05/30/rsrh-prominent-state-pa-democratic-party-organizer-flips-to-gop/

  • renl57

    Or–given his moderate Dem leanings–would he be viewed as a RINO and hence be primaried by a more conservative Republican?

    It seems inconsistent to get rid of Specter and Scozzafava yet welcome Davis, whose views probably are closer to Specter’s than to the Tea Party.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Or alternately, in what Republican primary is Davis being backed over a conservative?

    • stumpy

      honest man. I believe Davis is actually in politics to help America rather than himself. That is the difference between Specter and Davis. Davis has the good of the whole in mind, even though I’ll disagree with him from time to time. Davis is also honest about where he stands. He will not pretend to be one thing and then govern as another. He is open to persuasion and different ideas.

      Davis wrote on his blog that he would run as a Republican if he decides to run. He also stated that he would have to have a reason and goal to run, not just the desire to be a Congressman.

      Davis was skewered by the Democrat party machine because he wasn’t a lock step liberal. They backed an incompetent, puppet, hick who was owned by the corrupt Alabama gambling interest. Davis likely would have lost given the massive Republican sweep of 2010, but he would have come much closer than Sparks.

      Davis is a man of the highest integrity. I would much rather have a person like Davis, that I agree with less ideologically than say a pocket-lining crook like Spencer Bachus. We would all be better off.

      I read Davis’ blog regularly. It is nice to have a reasonable perspective that isn’t always exactly as I think. His blog is called the Official Artur Davis if anyone is interested. I enjoy it because he can level and say things that we all know to be true, but that most politicians, D or R, can’t or won’t.