« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Racetrack 2012.

Is Barack Obama Running Out Of Gas Early?

If the Presidential Election were to take place tomorrow, Barack Obama would win a 2nd term by a razor-thin margin. He has basically led Mitt Romney from wire-to-wire thus far, but has failed to put him away. However, a confluence of recent trends in fundraising, burn rate and overall enthusiasm suggests that Barack Obama will have to significantly change his current trajectory if he wants to beat Mitt Romney this November. Romney is willing or able to do things that Barack Obama can no longer afford in the run-up to the nominating conventions.

One anecdotal example involves how both men are attempting to use NASCAR events to reach out to blue collar white voters. The Democrats can’t or won’t use the Charlotte Motor Speedway as was originally planned. Details of how a DNC funding shortfall has curtailed the party’s approach follow below.

“While we regret having to move CarolinaFest away from our great partners at the Charlotte Motor Speedway and the City of Concord, we are thrilled with the opportunity that comes with hosting this event in Uptown Charlotte,” said Dan Murrey, the executive director of the Charlotte in 2012 Convention Host Committee.

What Mr. Murrey really meant to say was the following.

The move comes as party planners are grappling with a fundraising deficit of roughly $27 million, according to two people familiar with the matter who requested anonymity to discuss internal party politics. With a party ban on direct contributions from corporations, the host committee has raised less than $10 million, well short of its $36.6 million goal, said one of the people.

Unless my front page colleague Moe Lane was correct in suggesting other forces may have been at work here.

Mitt Romney has been working hard to fill the vacuum left by Obama’s shrinking outreach to working class, Southern voters. CBS News details Romney’s efforts in the State of Virginia below.

Also, there are two NASCAR races in Virginia just before the election – in Richmond and Martinsville. Both of those are areas where each campaign is clawing for middle-class votes. Romney staffers say they hope their candidate will be able to attend the races, but even if he’s not there, it’s quite certain that they will be.

All of this is compounded further by a sense that mcuh of what President Obama has done in his first term does not enhance the commonweal for residents of Appalachian Mountain regions in Virginia and North Carolina. The MACT regulations recently set forth by the EPA are particualrly threatening to people who earn a living mining coal. In a recent Senate Vote, the GOP attempted to stay this regulation but lost 53-46.

The potential economic impact of what is now being dubbed “Obama’s War on Coal” combined with Mitt Romney’s overtures to voters throughout the Appalachian Mountain Region could create a difficult climate for President Obama’s re-election in states running from Georgia all the way up the mountain range to Pennsylvania. This would give Romney a key wedge in several states that voted for Obama in 2008 if Mitt Romney could succeed in gaining traction.

And it just may be that these efforts are coming to fruition. A polling outfit named We Ask America polled both the Presidential Race and The Virginia Senate Race and posted results quite favorable to Romney’s belief that Virginia can be flipped back to red in 2012. They have 1106 Likely Voters favoring Romney by 48 to 43 with 9 percent undecided. A close-to-even split of these voters would give Romney a 52-48% victory.

While campaign attendance of NASCAR events won’t decide close Southern states, it shows something that Romney does better than Barack Obama. It shows attention to detail and research. Mitt Romney is finding out where voters actually live and spend time, while Barack Obama is inviting them to his gala fundraisers and wondering why they are so rude and don’t show up. As they say in NASCAR – Romney needs to keep the hammer down. His current approach is superior to what Barack Obama is doing and it very well could win him the presidency.

COMMENTS

  • jude68

    You are dead wrong….if the election was held today Obama would lose!! I will take Dick Morris’s analysis over yours anytime. Obama has not been able to bet above 46 percent in any LIKELY VOTER poll….registered polls with slants of 5,6,7,9 or more Dems does not cut it. Dick Morris has said repeatedly that undecideds break 8 to 1 to the Challenger. He has done polling in all the battleground states and Obama is losing…Morris uses Likely Voters and will tell you 40 percent of Registered Voters DO NOT VOTE!! and they slant D…Rasmussen has had Romney 47-48 percent over close to last two weeks…Obama has not gone over 45 percent….LIKELY VOTERS….new poll out in Ohio has Romney 49 to 42…and that is Ohio….No you are wrong…it held today Obama would lose and that is without more bad economic news coming and continuing and Obama running out of money and Fast and Furious, Amnesty Act from two weeks ago and more.

    Sorry Dick Morris has been spot in since March about watching Obama in the polls…and he is one of the best in the business!! and even Charlie Cook came out today and said IT IS GOING TO BE HARD for Obama to win!!

    Obama’s recors is there and more is catching up to him and with his FIATS from yesterday (telling DHS to not Help Arizona Law Officials and his Amnesty Act two weeks ago) this man is showing his true colors!

    I agree with you about November but I do not think at all Obama would win today narrowly but would lose!

    • gflyer3364qt

      I was about to post something similar about the incumbent rule, but now I don’t have to. You already did. I’ll add that the Hispanic vote deciding the election is rubbish put out by the Obama kissing media to make it look like Obama can’t lose, trying to make people who don’t like him think it’s not worth voting against him because he somehow can’t lose. The Hispanics they refer to are located mostly along the southern borders in California, Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico. And everyone knows these states don’t decide the election. Also, not all of them are in the tank for the “O”nnointed one as the media may have people believe. As always white independents and angry voters swing the elections. I’ve come to like the electoral college after being opposed to it in my younger years. We have a Constitutional Republic not a direct democracy. “DEMOCRACY” is the cry of the typical socialist. “Republic” is the everlasting essence of the US Constitution.

      • ctredstater

        I am in the Morris camp. The World’sGreatest Orator, the Citizen-of-the-World President would be blown out if election held tomorrow.

        I think his ratings continue to be artificially propped up by respondents wanting to be “well thought of”.

        This would be 1988 all over – and may be heading towards 1980/84.

        Governor Romney – a reasonably conservative platform – and a Congress significantly to the right – highlighted by good Senate pickups – and the country is back headed in the right direction.

    • SoFiMil

      .

      • jude68

        Not sure what you mean but I am not trying to influence people but state my opinion as others do….but thank you for the advice!

        • PowerToThePeople

          to overuse the cap lock key and exclamation points. But at least it is more entertaining than your opinion.

          But since you do not seem to be able to understand what SoFi meant. let me make it easier for you. Act like an ass as you have, get treated like an ass. Be nice even in disagreement, get respect. Is that easier for you to understand.

        • SoFiMil

          Speaking of politics, I care about truth, not opinions (be they respectful or disrespectful). Your all caps is annoying. And your “I’ll take Dick Morris’ analysis over [Repair Man Jack's] anytime, was over-the-top rude, completely unnecessary, *and* analytically hasty (and incorrect).

          RedStare has astute analysis and common sense solutions. Beltway pundits are not the be1all and know-all. In fact, they rarely get it right.

    • wintermute

      Go look at his analysis leading up to 2008… he had Arkansas as completely blue and Louisiana as a toss up… his analysis’ sole purpose is always to drive a narrative.

      The polling you’re mentioning is polling that Dick Morris neglects to release any information on. That’s b/c its imaginary.

      I don’t know who would win if the election were held right now, but the popular vote would be DARN CLOSE.

      • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

        I never miss him if I see him on one of the talking head shows. but his ability as a prognosticator is crap.

      • jude68

        Excuse me but what campaign did you run? Oh that is right Morris had Clinton elected and kept him popular during his tenure even during Lewinsky. He knows his stuff. In 2008, Obama was an UNKNOWN and there was NOBODY that could exactly pinpoint the numbers. By the way, the only correct poll for 2008 was Rasmussen and he has Romney up by anywhere from 4-5 points! Which runs in line with Morris. You need to go look at undecideds against an INCUMBENT President. Morris has ti right back to the 60s. Obama was NOT AN INCUMBENT in 2008. HISTORY shows Incumbents get about 1 out 8 undecideds. The only exception was 2004 in which BUSH pulled out many Evangelicals that were not polled! And the Economy in 2004 was humming along!! Guess what the Economy is NOT humming along here is it??

        And who does not know Obama that is undecided??? That is the point Morris touhces on? That is why Incumbents only get 1 out 8 votes!!

        So with all due respect Morris is no Stooge. He is a polling guru which can be annoying yes but he knows his stuff….and he had 2010 pretty darn close!

        • wintermute

          La went by 19.

          There were a bunch of other problems but those 2 are enough to destroy any credibility.

          Oh and guess what? During that same period he talked about the mystical independents throwing themselves at McCain. Lol guess what happened? The opposite of what he said.

          • wintermute

            What Im saying is pointing to Dick Morris for anything other than laughs IS.

          • jude68

            You can stick with your 2008 point. And you keep missing the point. I will say once more for you….THERE WAS NO INCUMBENT IN 2008. That is what Morris is talking about comparing 2008 to 2012 is as silly as NBC using a poll with a 12 plus Dem advantage for 2012 when Obama did not even have that in 2008 which was a banner year for Obama. But Morris is talking about INCUMBENTS and Obama is NOW running with a record….2008 he was the Messiah with no record….you show me anywhere anyone predicted that 2008 spot on!! Except Rasmussen on the final total based on daily tracking!

          • wintermute

            Got it.

          • barleycorn

            He’s not God so he doesn’t actually know what will happen. I just read some of his columns from the Fall of 2008 and while he certainly wasn’t clairvoyant he was reasonably close on his general handicapping of the McCain- Obama election.

            Do you have links to back up your assertions? For instance you mention Louisiana and Arkansas, yet at this link,

            http://www.dickmorris.com/electoral-vote-predictions/

            Morris shows Arkansas leaning McCain and Louisiana as McCain.

            Morris is bombastic and mainly seems to exist to promote Dick Morris but he does know a thing or two about the game of politics.

        • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

          where he should be. But I don’t hold Morris up as a guru the way you do. He did well with the Clinton campaigns, but since then, as a political pundit, he has been more wrong than right as far as I can remember.

    • renl57

      Here’s the Electoral College map from 2004, in which Bush won 286 electoral votes (16 more than needed to win):

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ElectoralCollege2004.svg

      Now thanks to the 2010 Census, some Republican-leaning states do pick up a handful of additional electoral votes. But that is mostly negated by the loss of New Mexico to the Dems, so that’s a wash.

      For Romney to get to 270, he needs to do nearly as well as Bush in 2004. Romney can’t afford to lose both Nevada and Virginia, for example.

      Right now, Nevada, Virginia, Colorado, Ohio are still iffy at this point.

      • exitsfunnel

        Barring some game changing event, I expect Romney to win FL and OH and Obama to win CO, NM, NV. I think that VA will decide this election which makes me pretty nervous given how dependent that state is on federal monies and it’s relatively low unemployment rate. Either way though, I think that it’s the key.

        -exits

  • DerKrieger

    …affect EVERYONE, not just those involved in bringing them to market.

    I see a huge opportunity for Romney if he will take the time to explain to all voters regardless of color how much damage Obama and his wealthy, elitist, eco-Marxist funders are doing to their personal finances and their job opportunities.

    How can a man who exclaimed that under his policies energy prices would NECESSARILY, as in on purpose, skyrocket get reelected?

    How can a man who has driven up the price of gasoline through overt hostility to domestic oil production get reelected?

    How can a man whose energy policies have driven up the cost of all goods due to the increase in transportation costs get reelected?

    He should be defeated for hs energy policies alone.

    I want to wage war on the environmental movement. I’ve had it with them. Their vision of America is Logan’s Run. They will one day have us all living in giant habitrails, prevented from being outside infecting nature.

    The environmental movement are, IMO, the absolute worst of the Leftists and the most destructive to liberty, prosperity, and private property.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I hope you don’t mind me borrowing that some time in the future.

      • DerKrieger

        …I think it’s accurate given their actions and rhetoric.

  • conservativemusician

    Don’t know what polls you are following, but Rasmussen has had Romney up for quite awhile now. I don’t want to get overconfident, but we are potentially looking at Reagan ’84 type landslide numbers.

    • gflyer3364qt

      Reagan carried New York and California both times and the electoral vote makeup was different back then. Romney won’t win New York or California this election. If he has a productive first term though, that could very well change and he cold top 400 in 2016. I’d say Romney wins 32-35 states giving him 320-340 electors, the largest GOP victory since Sr. Bush in 1988 and the socialist nightmare can finally be over.

      • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

        Mondale won Minnesota and D.C.–13 EV’s.

  • texfella

    I don’t know where you get your stats my friend, but the economic, polling, and anecdotal evdence is starkly contrary to your analysis.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

      There you are.

      • tnfriendofcoal101368

        Ohio and Virginia in particular that RCP hasn’t caught up with. In addition, RCP’s average is a little flawed because Rassmussen and Gallup tracking take likely voters and undecideds at this point have a huge historical trend to break for the challenger (even if the election were held today). There is also some bad analysis out there around the Hispanic vote causing some polling flaws as well. As you say, the polling is moving in Romney’s direction; accounting for the undecideds it already has.

        • tnfriendofcoal101368

          No excuse but I am in a hurry to get out of here…

        • renl57

          First, mathematically the average can be pulled way off by outliers. And the Bloomberg poll is certainly an outlier.

          As for the other polls, how much credence should we give any poll of registered voters? Such polls ignore turnout as a factor. Yet if the diarist is right and the election is close, you can’t ignore turnout as a factor.

          The Rasmussen and Monmouth polls both deal with Likely Voters. And they have the difference between Obama and Romney to be within the margin of error–a dead heat at this point.

  • 1bunny

    with white democrats in one month. The immigration pander by O might be causing the drop hmm…

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/26/obama-immigration-pander-costing-him-support-of-white-democrats

  • 1bunny

    with white democrats in one month. The immigration pander by O might be causing the drop hmm…

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/06/26/obama-immigration-pander-costing-him-support-of-white-democrats

  • Viet71

    That’s not good for 0.

    My take: Romney wins a not terribly close election in the Electoral College.

    In law school, was taught a doctrine in Evidence: res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself). That’s going to be true, IMO, of the upcoming healthcare decision.

  • Jack_Savage

    Looks like that time has come.

  • unclefred

    “If the Presidential Election were to take place tomorrow, Barack Obama would win a 2nd term by a razor-thin margin.”

    If you examine the internals of the polls you will see that, were the polls to use voter demographics that reflect the current electorate as opposed to that of 2008, Obama would lose by a narrow margin.

    Simply put, he loses NC, Va, Iowa, Indiana, Ohio, Florida, Colorado, all the McCain states, and probably Nv, NH and Wisconsin.

  • unclefred

    Morris says that 80% of undecideds break against the incumbent. So it’s 4 to 1 not 8 to one, but the end result is the same

  • barleycorn

    But polls don’t win elections and we live in a highly changeable age. Given that BO has shown he will do just about anything to win I am far from sanguine about this election.

    That being said, Obama has a big problem that can’t be whistled away: His approval numbers are borderline at best. GWB was at 48% when he defeated Kerry in ’04. When you see polls with Obama’s approval down to 47, 46, and even 45, those are death numbers .

    The NBC Wall St. Jr. poll just out has Obama at 47 Approve, 48 Disapprove. Not good at all for His Oneness.

  • mikeymike143

    this is looking like deja vu of the 1980 reagan/carter race

  • tnguy

    ….is a testament to what a thoroughly pitiful candidate Romney is. And to what a sad state into which our country has fallen.

    • gekster

      Don’t just throw a statement out there, give some facts.

  • OccamsRazor

    a site such as RedState, and it’s readers, ought not to ever let down it’s guard unless its a rope a dope or its to garner enthusiasm.

  • http://lukos.com Ed54

    They declared corporations to be “enemies of the people” and tried to do the convention without corporate support. They tried reviving the economy the same way, and fell on their faces then too.