« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

The Arab Spring Leads To A Cultural Sunset

Barack Obama Does For World Peace What His Stimulus Did For The Unemployment Rate

Symbols of Pagan Idolatry

Who can forget the joyous Hosannas, the ringing accolades, the self-congratulatory puffery that emanated out of the DC chattering classes as Middle Eastern tyrants such as Hosni Mubarak and Kaddafi were overthrown in spring of 2011. It was called the Arab Spring, and was set before the American People as proof that President Barack Obama was a foreign policy visionary who would lead the world into a new era of peace and coexistence.

This was all fun and games until the Muslim Brotherhood actually came into power. Then, the façade of niceness went the way of Lara Logan’s safety in Tahrir Square. With Muslim Brotherhood Party Member Mohammed Morsi elected Egypt’s new President, they have now embarked upon a course of barbaric religious “purification” which will take Egypt backwards culturally and economically. It will also endanger everyone who lives in a nation adjacent to the failed state that we formerly knew as Egypt.

One immediate manifestation of this retrograde trend involves the Great Pyramids in the Nile Valley. Modern Islamic clerics see these Egyptian monuments as idolatrous and are demanding their destruction. Raymond Ibrahim reports below.

According to several reports in the Arabic media, prominent Muslim clerics have begun to call for the demolition of Egypt’s Great Pyramids—or, in the words of Saudi Sheikh Ali bin Said al-Rabi’i, those “symbols of paganism,” which Egypt’s Salafi party has long planned to cover with wax. Most recently, Bahrain’s “Sheikh of Sunni Sheikhs” and President of National Unity, Abd al-Latif al-Mahmoud, called on Egypt’s new president, Muhammad Morsi, to “destroy the Pyramids and accomplish what Amr bin al-As could not.”
…While most Western academics argue otherwise, according to early Muslim writers, the great Library of Alexandria itself—deemed a repository of pagan knowledge contradicting the Koran—was destroyed under bin al-As’s reign and in compliance with Caliph Omar’s command.

While the desire to destroy the Great Pyramids reminds us of the aesthetic sensitivity you can expect from a religious reformation, recent social changes also represent a desire on the part of the Islamists to return to what they consider a prior “Golden Era.” Old-fashioned Islamic “Sex-Slave Marriages” have returned to Egypt as well. Raymond Ibrahim writes on this as well.

Last Monday, on the Egyptian TV show Al Haqiqa (“the Truth”), journalist Wael al-Ibrashi began the program by airing a video-clip of a man, Abd al-Rauf Awn, “marrying” his “slave.” Before making the woman, who had a non-Egyptian accent, repeat the Koran’s Surat al-Ikhlas after him, instead of saying the customary “I marry myself to you,” the woman said “I enslave myself to you,” and kissed him in front of an applauding audience.

According to Ibrahim, this was not just one sick individual who found himself a masochist. He describes the current movement among Islamists to bring about the return of sexual slavery below.

While this may be the first sex-slave marriage to take place in Egypt’s recent history, it is certainly not the first call to revive the practice. Earlier, Egyptian Sheikh Huwaini, lamenting that the “good old days” of Islam are over, declared that, in an ideal Muslim society, “when I want a sex-slave [I should be able to go] to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her.” Likewise, a Kuwaiti female politician advocated for reviving the institute of sex-slavery, suggesting that Muslims should bring female captives of war—specifically Russian women from the Chechnya war—and sell them to Muslim men in the markets of Kuwait.

Remember, according to Barack Obama, these people are the good guys. One of his first acts as President was to give a speech in which he apologized for how America had offended these people. David Goldman describes the role Barack Obama and his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, had in making sure Morsi could rapidly get to work on blasting great pyramids and allowing all those life-affirming sexual slave marriages.

Why, then, is Mohamed Morsi picking a fight with the military? As Jackson Diehl put it in the Washington Post July 8, “Last month the administration leaned heavily on the ruling military council to recognize Morsi’s victory in a runoff election. Lobbying by [US Secretary of State Hillary] Clinton and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta may have prevented the council from handing the presidency to its favored candidate, a former prime minister. But it infuriated the generals, Egyptian Christians and some US supporters of Israel, who fear the Islamists more than the old regime.” With backing from the Obama administration, and enormous pressure from his political base, Morsi has rolled the dice with the military. The result is likely to blow up in his face as well as the Obama administration’s.

By supporting the worst elements of leadership driving the so-called Arab Spring, Barack Obama’s foreign policy has allowed a cabal of ruthless religious thugs to take Egypt backwards to a “Golden Era” of sexual slavery. This will ultimately destroy economies all over Northern Africa and destabilize a region that spans from Morocco to Palestine. Somebody should give this guy a Nobel Prize or something.

COMMENTS

  • General_Confusion

    * Terms and conditions apply
    Must not be female, Christian or any other non-Muslim religion or non-Muslim historical structure. Significant other restrictions apply, consult your local imam for additional details.

  • aesthete

    this is less a Barack Obama problem than a Washington problem. For the past 15 years we’ve been given a song and dance about how democracy will cure what ails the ME, “regional transformation”, etc, and now that it has actually come to pass in some countries, it’s clear that the ME isn’t a wastebasket solely on account of their autocratic leaders — and that Middle Easterners aren’t particularly enlightened, secular, or pro-US just because they give the thumbs up to Coca-Cola and Mickey D’s.

    Whoops.

    • goodgovernance

      Mubarak and Kadaffi were goners anyway. I can criticize Obama for the way he handled the situations, especially Mubarak, who was our ally, but I can’t say we should have come out on their side.

      Democracy’s the best form of government in the long term. This Muslim Brotherhood stuff is just going to be something we all have to deal with as the Middle East gets it through their system.

      In the meantime, we need to worry about this spreading to Saudi Arabia. If there’s ever a reason to develop our own resources and get off foreign oil, an uprising in Saudi Arabia would be it.

      • JSobieski

        Just remember that 86% of Egyptians favor the death penalty for religious apostasy. Without a foundation of basic human rights, you can’t have democracy. The Sharia goals of the MB are directly in conflict with a western style democracy.

        • JSobieski

          nt

      • aesthete

        Democracy is just a tool. If it doesn’t protect freedom, it’s not of any value. Our country, and many other free countries, were relatively free with a limited or no franchise. Plenty of countries behind the Iron Curtain and in the interwar period voted themselves tyrants who provided them with panem et circenses. Plenty of regions in sub-Saharan Africa are still reeling from decisions made by a generation that voted them into violence, poverty, and all manner of problems. The US has a very bad habit of being naive about this sort of problem — this is only the most recent iteration, but pressuring rapid decolonization and voting in much of the third world during the Cold War was another. Hayek lived to see his native (and autocratic) Austria-Hungary’s constituent states vote themselves tyranny of either the fascist or communist variety. “One man, one vote, one time” is the state of affairs in countries with poor institutions — hard to believe, but Islamists, Communists, and other assorted riff-raff abroad don’t hand power off peacefully just because they entered into power democratically.

        Democracy on the terms of a populace that supports the death penalty for apostasy is nothing to relish. A functional liberal autocracy is far preferable, though should also not be looked at as a permanent institution.

      • michaelbowler

        much as in Europe, Socialism is to democracy.

        “Democracy” isn’t necessarily all that great. For it to result in a society the likes of which we would describe as desirable, the underlying culture has to have built in respect for the individual. Islam is “submission”, by definition a system that holds the individual secondary.

        We see the states of Europe failing, as much as the US, financially, primarily as result of the prevailing belief in the primacy of the whole over the individual. As we get further away from our focus on individual rights and into the good of the whole, democratic institutions increasingly make poor decisions.

        The populations of the ME are under educated enough that democracy is just another word for mob rule, not really a high ideal.

        • goodgovernance

          without proper institutions, democracy isn’t exactly the most stable system, and you eventually get someone stepping in to be the new king or dictator, from Napoleon on down.

          But if people want to give democracy a shot, it’d be really bad if we even looked like we were standing in their way.

          And who knows? Maybe it’ll work out, in the end. Or are you saying the entire Iraq war was predestined to be a useless fiasco as well?

      • funwithknives

        are the least likely for a M E style scenario.
        So far the lesser monied countries , with the attendant unemployment and bleak jobs availability, added to the various blatant prior opressions, build the framework for the M E’s entry.

        Saudi Arabia and some others assure their populations stabilty and oodles of ‘free stuff’. Like people everywhere many will be happy with what they have, after comparisons with what they see elsewhere.

        …and do not forget The Wahabs and Sunni Mainstream are in S A . Look up their both histories as far as dissention.

        Knowing these facts who would ‘fight’ for something so obviously less ideal?

  • PGDeFreese

    Obama, I am sure there are plenty of young women in Egypt that look like your daughters.

  • http://www.political-woman.com politicalwoman

    From my Twitter feed: http://soundcloud.com/bbc-africa-have-your-say/a-resident-in-timbuktu-speaks

    The sad part about this is that when the Islamists came to destroy the centuries old mosque, the mosque’s Imam warned his people to do nothing. Of course, he’s afraid for them, and for himself.

    I read a similar article,
    http://frontpagemag.com/2012/raymond-ibrahim/muslim-brotherhood-destroy-the-pyramids/

    and what I found most interesting is “”Islamists have no national identity, identifying only with Islam?s ?culture,? based on the ?sunna? of the prophet and Islam?s language, Arabic.”

    Who lost Iraq? Who lost Afghanistan? Who lost Egypt? Who lost Syria? Someday, I hope we won’t be asking, who lost Israel.

  • Tbone

    consider the Left’s toleration of the tenets of Islam.

    Everything the Left believes in is a capital sin. Idiots.

  • gawken

    in March 2001, they blew up the 1,700 years old Buddist statues in the Hindu Kush. They were the world’s two tallest Buddhas, well over 150 feet tall.

    Then-UN head Kofi Annan had negotiated, then pleaded with the Taliban not to destroy them.

    Well, we all know how well THAT turned out…( snicker, snicker)

    And let’s NOT forget, six months AFTER trhey blew up the two statues, well, they sort of decided to blow up TWO much bigger structures.

    So, after the three pyramids of Giza are reduced to rubble, what THREE targets will be next?

    And, hey, why stop at the Pyramids isnide Egypt. The Sphinx has got to go also. It sor of looks like Obama anyways.