« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Bring Out The Gimp!

When Dems Spend Money To Nominate ?Real Conservatives? As Their Opponents

Only The Mouth-Zipper Prevents Him From Being The Democratic Choice In The GOP Primary

Nobody in their right mind would vote for (fill in the blank). Gray Davis, Patrick Leahy, or Claire McCaskill pretty much fit that description. All three are (or were) useless intestinal parasites on the bowels of state. But what if they ran for re-election against The Gimp? Or at least an opponent who held held delusional beliefs in something called a “legitimate rape.” This is what Senator McCaskill and the Democrats have accomplished in the State of Missouri by spending $1.5Million to help nominate their GOP opponent Todd Akin.

In real life, even I’d poll well against the Gimp. The zipper across the mouth of his leather mask gives him an advantage Joe Biden and Todd Akin both lack. Other than that; he’s not your ideal candidate. So how does a useless rotter of an incumbent go about getting the other side to nominate the poor guy who never made further than a bit part in Pulp Fiction? In the sad cases of Davis, Leahy and MacCaskill, the magical elixir was money and organization – lots of it.

During the 1998 Vermont GOP Primary, Senator Leahy’s backers sensed an opportunity. A semi-retired Dairy Farmer had recently acted in a film entitled “Man With a Plan” about a farmer who runs as outsider and makes it to Congress. Vermont has an open primary system which the Dems gamed by pushing Fred Tuttle on to the GOP as a nominee. This enabled Senator Leahy to run against an opponent who 1) endorsed him for re-election, 2) appeared with him at campaign stops and reiterated the endorsement, and 3) vowed to spend no more than $16 on his campaign. Leahy managed to win a squeaker. He remains in Washington and remains exactly what Dick Cheney said he is.

The Democrats also successfully executed the Bring out the Gimp Strategy when unpopular California Governor, Gray Davis was prepping to run for his second term in 2002. When local media started referring to Davis as “Governor Lowbeam” for how he handled being swindled by The Enron Corporation on electrical power, he was an incumbent in serious trouble.

Yet Davis had a pretty awesome ace in the hole. He had spent his early years as governor furiously raising money and had $27Million in the bank. He used this money when he saw himself polling well behind GOP candidate Richard Riordan. Davis helped select his electoral victim the way the Harlem Globetrotters go out of their way to schedule games against The Washington Generals. CNN described Davis’ GOP Primary advertising strategy below.

He was helped by Davis, who spent more than $10 million on an ad campaign targeting Riordan, a move the former mayor blasted as an effort by the governor to handpick the weaker candidate for the general election.

As we all know, it worked. Davis was re-elected by 7% despite the fact he was heartily detested. In state without a recall initiative, he would have served four more years. He didn’t have to be likeable. He just had to be more likeable than The Gimp.

Thus, in the wake of Missouri GOP Senate Nominee, Todd Akin’s disastrous “legitimate rape” gaffe, I’m not shocked in the slightest to learn that Claire McCaskill had a guiding hand in Mr. Akin’s success. The Washington Examiner describes the $1.5 Million advertising strategy that the Democrats employed in the Missouri GOP Primary below.

There’s a reason why Democrats spent over $1.5 million trying to help Akin win his three-way primary. He was the most conservative candidate in the field — and the most unpredictable one. He shook up his campaign staff late last year. He recently released a head-scratching and jumbled campaign ad. And Democrats have already launched a microsite highlighting his controversial statements that won’t play well with moderates. (“America has got the equivalent of the stage III cancer of socialism because the federal government is tampering in all kinds of stuff it has no business tampering in,” Akin once said.)

So Claire McCaskill has invested wisely in the less intelligent members of the GOP electorate. Maybe she should send them a flower basket or thank them in a tangible way by voting like less of a Left-Keynesian the next time a healthcare overhaul comes before the Senate. She won’t. She has no reason to. As long as she can buy the GOP Primary and select her own opponents at will, she’s like Don King arranging the Tyson vs. McNeely Title Bout.

So what do we all learn from this fiasco? To me, the lesson here is bloody well obvious. If the Dems are buying advertisements to help a GOP contender it would behoove any thinking Conservative to figure out why. In this case, it’s obvious. Nothing could save the odious and unpopular Claire McCaskill. She was the ultimate piece of plastic about to be chucked in the recycle bin. But that won’t happen with Todd Akin still in the race. When given The Gimp as an opponent the good voters of Missouri will hold their noses and vote for Claire Force One.

COMMENTS

  • commonsenseobserver

    And has placed an ad buy for the end of this month.

    Happy days are here again.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      If there’s time and resources enough at hand, this is the chance the Tea Party has awaited. Field a 3rd Party, write-in candidate as an antidote to Todd Akin and McCaskill. Run ads describing how McCaskill bought the GOP Primary and why Akin is an unfit member of the US senate.

      • jonerik

        It may be possible to run a third party actually on the ballot, instead of as a write-in. This would have a higher chance for success I should think. Its a litle like Murkowski in AK, but probably would have all of Republican backing.

      • snowmonkey

        How do you think we ended up with Romney?

        Tell me the Democrats did not know, from the start, how many flaws Romney has? Tell me they didn’t know about the poison pills in his tax returns. Chances are that he took advantage of the 2009 amnesty for illegal overseas accounts, and that’s why we’ll never see those tax returns. Tell me the Democrats, who control the IRS, didn’t know about that.

        Can you imagine Rick Santorum refusing to release his tax returns? Can you imagine Rick Santorum changing his position with every whiff of polling breeze? You know I am no fan of Newt Gingrich. In fact, I think he’s a serial adulterer with a Messianic Complex. I’m starting to think even Newt would be a better candidate than Romney.

        There’s an old saying – Be careful what you wish for, you might just get it. I’m going to vote for Romney, because he’s all we have, but I wonder who the real Romney is, what he really believes in (if anything), and how he will govern.

        If you want to talk about a Tea Party third party, let’s start at the top. Anybody have Rick Santorum’s telephone number?

        • nepanyrush

          Your facts are way off. If you remember, the unions and Obama supporters were spending millions against Romney early in the GOP primary, such as in Florida. It was clear they were most concerned about Romney from the start. They were trying to Leahy/Davis/McCaskill Romney in favor of someone they had an easier chance to beat, such as Gingrich.

          • nepanyrush

            Your railing against Romney, inaccurate understanding of the primary, and trying to drum up a third party with Santorum makes a clear suggestion to that possibiilty.

            Again, early in the primary, the Obama campaign and the unions spent millions trying to derail Romney. From your first sentence it is clear you don’t know what you are talking about.

          • snowmonkey

            I think the Democrats would have preferred to run against Gingrich. Who wouldn’t? There’s not enough time to list all his negatives.

            I’m not so sure they wanted someone other than Romney. Remember how they eviscerated Bachmann? Remember the fear they had when Santorum was leading the pack?

            It’s all opinion. You have yours, and I have mine. If I were running that side, though, Romney would be my preferred opponent. You trying to tell me they didn’t know about his income tax problems? Come on.

            If they were so afraid of him, why didn’t they trot out all these negatives in the primaries? The income taxes. The horse. The flip-flopping. None of that came out, because our guys were too honorable, and the Democrats just sat back and let Romney win.

            Do you honestly think Romney is our strongest possibility? We were all for Santorum and Bachmann, and we took Romney with gritted teeth.

    • sayoung80913

      from aceofspadeshq
      Since PPP decided it can’t help itself, I’ve done you all a service.
      I went through their ridiculous R+9 sample and ONLY changed the D/R/I proportions to match previous elections, and an even turnout.
      With R+9, PPP’s headline screams Akin up by 1. It is an obvious, sick ploy to get this delusional Bio101 flunkie to stay in and cost us a seat.

      Here are the real numbers:
      If turnout in November matches 2008 (it won’t):
      McCaskill 49.25% Akin 39% (this is a D+6 turnout model)

      If turnout in November is even, an incredible feat for the GOP considering heavy turnout in St Louis and Kansas City during an election year:
      McCaskill 47% Akin 40%.

      If turnout in November matches the best we have ever seen in the state (R+3 during 2010):
      McCaskill 45% Akin 41%.

      McCaskill is a dead duck if we dump Akin. The other candidates from the primary were crushing her up and down. To trail her by four in a best-case scenario is inexcusable at this point.

      The fact that PPP had to triple the best R margin ever just to get Akin over McCaskill screams agenda polling, but they will never admit to that, so I’m calling them out on it, and it’s time for you to spread the word. PPP’s “Akin still leads” poll is garbage, the approval rating for Akin with this huge R spread is a God-awful 24%, and McCaskill hasn’t cut one rape ad yet.

      Akin.
      Must.
      Go.
      Akin is going around touting these numbers, as said elsewhere, “pride goeth before the fall” and ” you can’t fix stupid” applies as well

      • wintermute

        I saw the same thing, I was immediately suspicious by the single fact it was a PPP poll. Looking at it, it was clear it was a sad ploy.

        • fredflintlock

          How many Tea Party chapters are active across the country? Start passing the plate at those Tuesday night meetings.

          This is a very cool idea. You just got me off the fence about Akin. Hopefully he’s still in after 5, and somebody with a brain attached to a strong spine is paying attention.

          • inovrmihd

            I would donate if asked.

  • sayoung80913

    on another blog someone wrote about his 12 year old son saying something along the lines of “if the coach from the other team was yelling for a player from our side to be put in the game, I would hope it would be obvious what was going on.” The same thing happened with MLame. Will we never learn our lesson?

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      I missed that analogy, but it’s a good one.

    • writescribe

      but doesn’t the coach bear any blame for, you know, actually putting the player from our side into the game?

      Look, I don’t like what Claire did any more than anyone else here. However, let’s talk about some personal responsibility here. Have we absolved voters on our side of all responsibility such that we can’t even presume they will think for themselves? If we are that lazy/dumb/distracted/[insert adjective of choice], then perhaps in this instance we deserve the candidate we have.

      • writescribe

        I was referencing the coach from our side in my earlier comment. Thank you.

        • jimmyg

          The last time the NRSC became involved in a primary was the Crist Rubio Florida primary for which they were roundly criticized. Once burned twice shy. I do not see the NRSC getting involved in a primary involving an open seat as long as the tea parties hold power, and that power is evident in the primaries.

  • smagar

    Dems routinely advertise in GOP primaries out here. They also advertise for third-party candidates in the general election, too. One of the big reasons Jesse Kelly lost to Gabrielle Giffords in 2008 was the big media buy the Democrats made on behalf of the clueless Libertarian candidate in the race. He pulled enough voters away from Kelly to reelect Giffords.

    The local media community is pro-Dem, and many Tucson-area reporters end up working for Democratic candidates. Not surprisingly, they’re mostly silent on this technique. So, I can’t blame the Democrats for continuing to use it.

  • reggie1

    Drudge reporting that Biden’s SS has sent an advance detail to Tampa ahead of his arrival. Huh?

    • commonsenseobserver

      Romney should be ready with a clear message on jobs, schools, debt, and health, and cement the contrast between two records and two visions.

      • reggie1

        no mssg

  • Kyle-MI

    Pray tell how did that work out?

    Frankly, I think it is foolish to worry about what the other side is thinking or doing. We should be self vetting out candidates no matter who the Dems want. The only change I would make is to push for closed primaries, for both parties.

    • satchman3

      I have to admit I wasn’t aware of these cases. I find these actions to be very offensive and they should be criminal.

      • Kyle-MI

        What happened in Vermont was unethical, immoral and severely undermined democracy. I can never think of VT voters as anything less than worthless scum who do not deserve voting rights. They literally turned the democratic process into a joke.

        However, as bad as that was, I see no way to prevent this by act of law. You can put up some legal barriers (like closed primaries) but they will only make this type of gaming more difficult and not entirely prevent it.

    • JSobieski

      The price of lie and spin is nothing. The cost of money is a different thing altogether. Spending money to pick your opponent is entirely different.

      Operation Chaos involved lengthening the process, not picking the winner. Operation Chaos was a success, but McCain was simply to weak of a candidate to avail himself to the benefits.

    • renl57

      I’m most familiar with my neighborhing state of New Hampshire, whose state law requires open primaries.

  • Darin_H

    /heard on the internet

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      -nt

  • kentucky

    We can’t get out of our own way.

    If he doesn’t drop out today, the party will have to find a candidate to run as an independent, throw its money behind that person, have them build a solid lead over Akin, convince Akin to drop out before the September drop-dead date, and pay for the ballot reprinting.

    While party-types are putting this plan in motion, some single issue groups will throw all of their support behind Akin, and actually get him some money. Win or lose, he can spend the next several years writing a book and giving a poor little me speeches in front of these single issue groups. And we will still have Obamacare, a wishy washy Supreme Court, a status quo tax code, and no law to responsibly handle entitlement spending.

    Nice going, Missouri.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Getting outsmarted by Claire McCaskill is almost a feat of intellect. Unfortunately, that is what the GOP managed.

  • Kyle-MI

    Granted, rape is a very emotional issue and the actual term “legitimate rape” may not be the best one to use. I am appalled though by many conservatives who are pushing the liberal spin.

    While we need to treat the victims of rape with compassion, we also need to recognize that there are instances where alleged victims have abused the system and sent innocent people to jail. We need to maintain the integrity of the judicial system and the principle of innocent until proven guilty. I am extremely concerned that those who are scoffing at the term “legitimate rape” may be willing to railroad innocents based on the emotions of the charge. That may not be their intentions, but it will certainly be the result.

    We can argue what would be the most politically proper term to use and whether Akin’s statements were foolish, but we should not get sucked into the liberal meme. Unless there is any other evidence, we should not be assuming the worst meaning by Akin. We should be doing this based on pure morality, but we also need to recognize that this goes well beyond the current political race.

    I am not defending any other part of Akin’s statements.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      http://www.redstate.com/repair_man_jack/2009/09/29/the-tragic-plight-of-roman-polanski/

      Even if he mispoke, and even if it was demagouged, I have a wife, a mother and a daughter. I have no desire to see Mr. Akin wielding significant power in the public sector. He was the best GOP nominee the Democrats could buy.

      • Kyle-MI

        I am seriously asking what do you think it means and what do you think Akin meant by it?

        • satchman3

          When I heard the context in which Akin used ‘legitimate rape’ it seemed to indicate a rape that does not result in pregnancy. Conversely, I would conclude that he meant that an illegitimate rape is one that results in pregnancy.

          That doesn’t make a lot of sense but that seems to be the context.

          His clarification was that he meant an actual rape as opposed to a falsified rape accusation. That also makes sense to me in the context he used it and is certainly less bizarre.

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          Akin meant to say it was a “Rape-Rape”. That is he meant that no one could construe the rape as anything other than a rape. So Todd Akin, like Whoopie Goldberg, didn’t intentionally intend to say rape was ever legitimate as a chosen behavior. Now, here come the manifold problems.

          1) Most people don’t have to actually stipulate this. You know rape is sick, just like you know pedophilia isn’t a good evolutionary strategy for society either. Why was he even going there? There aren’t 50 shades of gray here. Sexual contact is either consensual and life-affrming or it is an act of violation and brutality. 1 or zero, A or B.

          2) It was ready-made for demogouging. It is the “She’s not a witch, she is you!” of Campaign 2012.

          3) We all know the media environemnt and the public perception deficit that Conservatism faces in the modern environment. Every Todd Akin moment is probably worth about 5 more Conservatives who lose their races to destructive liberals who will make our nation a worse one to live in.

          Those are just the problems I can envision on fairly short notice. Many more exist.

          • Kyle-MI

            I don’t think you are deliberately misinterpreting his phase, but I do think you are letting your emotions cloud your judgement. You are assuming the worst about him and his statement without any other evidence.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            What epistemological argument would overwhelmingly convince an audience of 50 fair-minded and sober voters that I was off the beam here? Or better and more germane question would be this: How does Todd Akin overwhelmingly and completely prove I was wrong? That is what he will spend most of the rest of his brief tenure as a politician doing.

          • Kyle-MI

            I agree that because of the political practical implications he should withdraw, but we should not assume the worst of him. We should not jump aboard the bandwagon of calling him evil. We can stop at saying the statement was stupid and the wording was wrong. We should defend his intent.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            He might be a totally cool guy to drink beer and play horseshoes with. He made a morally wrong statement. Whether that was inadvertant or intentional thing doesn’t matter beyond the categorization of whether he is good or evil which is partially independent of whether he is fit or unfit for office.

            In other words, defining deviency down the way Akin did by suggesting there were “legitimate rapes” as opposed to “fake rapes” or “kinda-sorta rapes” was a moral fallacy. I can’t argue as to whether it was a deliberate moral fallacy but don’t care to. When you talk about important positions where you make big decisions moral fitness is a GO/NOGO requirement. You don’t care why Akin failed to display the trait.

          • Kyle-MI

            You are posting stuff here for the public to read and implying that Akin is evil.

            That should be reason enough, but if it is not, you are also possibly damaging conservatives and the pro-life cause. That may not be your intention, but it may be the effect.

            That is the difference between the political practicality and the bigger picture of the issue.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            That does not, ipso facto make him a totally evil creature of Morder. We are all sinners who fall short of the glory of God. Good people do evil things. Todd Akin did something evil with the legitimate rape comment. He may or may not be an evil human being. That cannot be ascertained based upon one evil deed.

          • Kyle-MI

            You are still absolutely blinded by your emotions.

            Can you, at least, acknowledge that he might not have meant what you are assuming?

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            I totally trust my gut on this one. If a politician gets up on a public stage and say things that suggest that a rape in anything other than a rape than a non-zero probability our society will get more rapes as a direct result. What Todd Akin said was inexcusable. Period.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            -nt.

          • http://www4.webng.com/rickbull/lostlucky/ rickbull

            Does the Republican Party really need its own version of Joe Biden in Washington? (This is provided that the man has a snowball’s chance in hades of beating clAirehead McCaskill)

          • PowerToThePeople

            that is not what he meant and anyone being intellectually honest would agree.

            While a poor choice of words, all legitimate meant was what the definition of the words means. He simply meant real rapes, not the ones that are claimed falsely. Not that hard to understand.

            Certain women scream rape where no rape occurred, prime example, the Duke players, and these are the ones deemed not legitimate.

            Surprised you jumped on the bandwagon RMJ considering you past voice of reason. He spoke poorly, nothing more, and there was nothing evil to it.

            The way so many of you are crying and screaming about this, one would assume Akin got up, announced he was a member of NAMBLA, and then proclaimed the sanctity of man/boy love, not simply used a poor choice of words to describe Godly convictions.

            Shame on all of you.

        • thomasinga

          Was the not-so-subtle implication that a woman that gets raped could not possibly be pregnant because you know if it was a legitimate rape the female body ?would have taken care of that?. So all those rape camps in Bosnia, well the women there must have really enjoyed it because a lot of them got pregnant.

          This kind of thinking does not belong in the modern age. The only place in the world where people think like this is in backward countries like Iran and the most backward of Arab cultures. Akin has no business in public office. I dare say thoughts like this aren’t even very Christian. Move this person off the scene and get someone who can legitimately express the pro-life cause.

          • Repair_Man_Jack

            I’m seeing an entire fall of Taliban Dan ads being run by the DNC aginst the GOP over this.

          • sayoung80913

            Maybe it is because we were both women(and I have a twenty year old daughter), but I watched this interview last night a few times with one of my church’s Iranian refugees. She was just absolutely shocked that someone in our country could hold that view. It is very similiar to the same belief from her country and one a lot of rapists use to get away with their crime. The woman rarely even reports rape over there, why? Because she must have four male witnesses and even then,most women are judged and found guilty anyway. They are either cast off from their families,stoned, hung whatever. The man MAY get a whipping, MAY because the men are seldom found at fault. This is why rapes are seldom reported and GOD HELP the woman who didn’t report it and finds herself pregnant when she should have been a virgin in her family and society’s eyes. In the U.S. even, reporting rape is vastly less than it should be. Speaking solely for myself, I lost my first born son to SIDS and just cannot imagine myself aborting a child, rape or otherwise. Should I have been raped and found myself pregnant I would have kept the baby but moved heaven and earth to make sure no one, especially the baby knew it was the product of rape. That could also be the reason the so called pregnancy rate seems low. What mother would tell her child that? Maybe that is the reason for Akin’s crack pot theory. My Iranian friend , however left my house nauseated to know that we have political leaders who would even utter the phrase “legitimate rape.” for wherever there is a legitimate rape there must also be the alternate- illegitimate rape that is acceptable. do I think that is what he meant? Probably not, but she who fled her country because of precisely this kind of thinking? Oh, you had better believe she did think he meant precisely what he said. No place in polite society for idiots like this who can write laws.

        • znjs

          Sounds like he’s strongly suggesting that rape is usually something the woman wanted or she’s making it up. You’re right that I’m sure there are instances of a woman crying rape to get back at someone. But at the same time, rape is extremely difficult to proof, to the point that many woman don’t even try. Even if she does try, the defense is always going to be “she wanted it, now she’s just changed her mind after the fact”. Trials trying to prove that a woman was raped are emotionally painful and usually end with the woman having her name drug through the mud during the process, even if she eventually wins. Suggesting that many woman who do come forward to say they were raped are making it up or weren’t “really” raped is amazingly insensitive for all those who have gone through that process.

          • Kyle-MI

            What about these two incidents:
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_lacrosse_case
            http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57449395/man-falsely-accused-of-rape-a-winner-in-nfl-tryout/

            Do you think the guys in these cases should just be summarily sentences without a trial?

          • znjs

            I never said anything about changing laws, I just pointed out that rape convictions are hard, and almost always the woman is called a liar during it. To tell all woman who get pregnant from rape that there rape wasn’t real rape is incredibly insensitive.

      • Kyle-MI

        I hope not.

        Do you think that nobody has ever been falsely charged with rape?
        Do you think that someone should be convicted of rape with the only evidence being the accusation of a woman?
        Should we toss the principle of guilty until proven innocent in rape cases?

        • znjs

          But when Akin’s first response being asked a question about rape and abortion is to suggest that many rapes, and every rape that results in pregnancy, aren’t “legitimate” rapes it suggests he has a very backwards view of the issue.

          • Kyle-MI

            And that is not what Akin said. You are putting words into his mouth to fit your narrative.

        • kcdude

          immediately after the gaffe with a video statement that said ‘There are no legitimate rapes. I meant to say a legitimate claim of rape’ and included a mention of something like the Duke lacrosse team false rape accusation and then immediately focused on the fact that he fully understands rape is a horrible act and crime that should not then be followed by the horrible act of killing a baby, he may have had an opportunity to get out of this. He may still but I am not so sure.

          I think any politician claiming to be a conservative should know that this type of question is coming. He was not prepared.

          • http://www.TerriersOfTheRight.blogspot.com Flagstaff

            This guy is the stealth Democrat candidate in the race, otherwise known as a stalking horse. It is what will happen in Arizona if we approve the koo-koo concept of the “top two primary.” Republicans will knock each other off and we’ll be left with two Democrats to choose from.

            If I were in Missouri I wouldn’t vote for McCaskill, but I’d have to take a clothespin into the voting booth with me. He clearly doesn’t have the interests of the public at heart and doesn’t deserve to be elected.

        • sayoung80913

          I think he is just a devoutly pro life man and cannot see any reason for abortion, which is my view as well. He should have just stopped there. it was the convoluted thinking and trying to explain using junk science that got him into trouble. In my husband’s army unit, one of our senior officers was accused of rape(falsely) and it ruined his marriage and career. He was found not guilty eventually, but how does one get back his career,marriage and good name after that. I see the alternate side too for the women and know some who won’t hesitate to cry foul for whatever reason(revenge,not wanting a baby,second thoughts,etc). I’m pretty sure it was those women he was referring to, but he just really jacked it up. Unfortunately, it is clear(at least to me) that he really believes his justification,including the science and had no idea his words would offend so many. I’m sure he thought his views were mainstream. and the immediate push back was a shock. His words were rash, poorly thought out,insensitive, and factually inaccurate. He gave the dems a picture perfect soundbite to run again and again and again and he has lost us a seat in the senate because of it. now he refuses to bow out and it is becoming quite hard to justify it other than to say that he must really like all the power and perks in D.C. and is so egotistical that he actually believes that fake PPP poll and thinks he is the only savior worthy of the job.

          • Kyle-MI

            I am just worried that in our zeal to distance ourselves from Akin’s statement that we are going too far.

          • renl57

            So have I.

            Nationally, only about 20% of respondents say that abortion should be illegal in all circumstances.

            It’s nowhere near a majority view. There are millions of Americans who call themselves “pro-life” but stop short at suggesting that a woman who is forcibly raped must bear the rapist’s child.

            Akin was trying to find a way to weasel out of it, by claiming that with forcible rape, pregnancy doesn’t happen all that often.

            It’s strikingly similar to the weaseling we see from Planned Parenthood on partial-birth abortion: Don’t worry about it, it just doesn’t happen all that often.

  • thomasinga

    Missouri has a Republican Governor and the legislature is controlled by Republicans (26-8 in the Senate) and (105-54 in the assembly). Just pass a fracking law allowing for a runoff for the general election this November for statewide office, like they have in Georgia and other places. That way, if this idiot Akin doesn’t get out of the race today, a viable Republican can run as an independent (even as a write-in). So long as that independent receives more votes than Akin, they will almost certainly be assured to face McCaskill in the runoff, because we all know that she won’t get more than 50% of the vote unless the only alternative is Akin.

    Will somebody in the Missouri legislature who is reading this, get on this quickly!

    • jimmyg

      The Mo. legislature could set out a statute doing what you suggest for future elections, but not for this election.

    • kcdude

      nt

    • thomasinga

      I say have the legislature pass the runoff bill and dare Nixon to Veto it. It may go through either way. I don’t see why this wouldn’t be legal. Didn’t Mass change the election laws late in the game in 2004 to prevent then governor Romney from selecting Sen Kerry’s replacement if he won. Then didn’t they change it back in 2009 to allow the now democratic governor to appoint Kennedy’s replacement? Seems legal to me if we can get it passed.

  • absdoggy

    Now we have Steve King (R) Iowa in an interview yesterday on KMEG who was asked about cases of statutory rape and incest, saying that he “hasn’t heard of that being a circumstance that’s been brought to me, and I’d be open to a discussion about the subject matter”.

    So now girls don’t get pregnant from statutory rape or incest? Because, this is how this is going to be reported! Oh, and you’re open to a discussion about the subject matter? Great, the party’s platform today properly adopted language calling for a constitutional amendment against abortion, including rape and incest, but now Steve King is open for a discussion about it.

    This race is already rated a Toss-Up by RCP, Ras, etc. Vilsack may be a sack of ___ but now King’s going to get pulled into this mess trying to defend him.

    We have 2 choices – an Aiken firing squad or a circular firing squad. You’re choice.

    • PowerToThePeople

      spell his name correctly, which shows you are just an uninformed outsider wanting to put their two cents in, then do not lecture anyone on what AKIN should do.

  • http://www.sourceoftitle.com skymutt

    He’s a 6-term Congressman who has won by wide margins in an affluent suburban St. Louis district. Mike Huckable and Michelle Bachman did endorse Akin.

    Sure, Claire McCaskill wanted to run against him– who wouldn’t– but let’s not pretend that she invented the guy. The fact is that a lot of you guys reflexively support the most outspoken and aggressively far right candidate and don’t look too close for character flaws. If you listen to McCaskill’s radio ad, there is really nothing significantly misleading about it, save for the fact that McCaskill did not explicitly state her motive for running the ad. She simply laid out Akin’s far-right positions and aggressive far right statements, and said that they were too far right for Missouri.

    If you all want to call a truce on interfering in the other guy’s primaries, I can go for that. But in our current no holds barred political environment, McCaskill’s sneaky political ploy hardly stands out as outrageous to me.

    • Repair_Man_Jack

      Never mind that Stark once walked up to J.C. Watts and asked him how many of his kids were illigitimate. Pete Stark has spent over a decade in Congress.

      • http://www.sourceoftitle.com skymutt

        He said it in a House Committe Hearing, on the record, according to the Washington Post. That is pretty far out of line!

        Stark is obviously a bomb thrower– I’m not going to contenst that part of your point. I would not vote for him, nor a lot of other Democratic Reps, if given any alternative that could fog a mirror. There are a lot of Reps on both sides that I would consider unfit for office.

        However, using Stark as the example, my thesis is this: If Pete Stark were put in a Democratic Senate primary against two more reasonable alternatives, and the Republicans put out an ad pointing out how liberal Stark is and how far left his statements are, would that help him in the Democratic primary? I claim the answer is NO. It would hurt him even in a liberal state like California. The far left tail does not wag the dog in the Democratic Party to the extent that the far right wing does in the Repubican Party.

        And of course, Stark never became a serious candidate for Senate or any other higher office, much less earn the nomination. Can you point to an example of a Democratic Senate primary where you think that an opposition strategy like McCaskill’s would have worked?

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          Although the Far Left wagged the tail of the dog w/o any GOP encouragement in that scenario.

        • JEM

          The only reason Stark’s survived this long is that his district has been a gerrymandered gooseneck of a thing, taking a big chunk of center-to-center-left suburban real estate and diluting it with a ribbon of inner-city Oakland and heavily immigrant secctions of Hayward and San Leandro.

          Two big things have happened recently in this state: one was the jungle-primary law that puts the top two vote-getters on the general election ballot regardless of party, and the other was the ‘nonpartisan’ redistricting initiative; the Democrats gamed the crap out of the selection of the redistricting commission while the GOP slept through the whole thing.

          Oddly, though, what should have been an utter and complete disaster for what little exists of a California Republican Party hasn’t worked out all that badly. Some of those Dem-drawn districts haven’t fallen into line as expected, and others like Stark’s have ended up in a big blue-on-blue oil-wrestling match.

          So here’s the question: if you have a district that’s been the hereditary property of an utter and complete crackpot since I was in elementary school, are we better or worse off if that seat falls to what might be a saner Democrat?

          I’m not sure. Stark was a reliable Pelosi-wing vote, but in most other ways he’s been pretty much marginalized within and without his Party.

  • http://www.sourceoftitle.com skymutt

    Lieberman had taken positions that were hostile to mainstream Democratic views, in particular on the war, He did not represent what I would call a reasonable alternative to many. Lieberman had already distanced himself from the party, and left the party when he lost the primary. By 2008, he was endorsing the Republican Presidential Candidate! Akin’s opponents In the Missouri primary didn’t do anything in particular to disqualify themselves as reasonable alternative, in a partisan sense– in other words, there was nor significant reason to believe they would not be fairly loyal Republicans. What are the chances that either of them becomes a Democrat within two years? Pretty slim!

    Also, Lamont wasn’t a far left bomb thrower, and he was not obviously unfit for office. If you were a Democrat who was against the war, he would have fit the bill as a reasonable alternative to Lieberman. I would have voted for him. When the far left came in on his side, it was because they hated Lieberman so much, not because they loved Lamont. His major weaknesses were that he was an uncharismatic and unskilled politician and a poor debater. I particularly remember the Republican, who had no shot to win, crushing him in the debates, and even the very corny Lieberman outshining him.

    There’s just not that many similarities.

  • runner12

    Anytime the Left is backing one of our candidates in a primary, we should pause to ask why.

    I am praying that Akin will do the right thing at the last minute and bow out.

  • pdawk

    A few of us got ripped by some regulars for suggesting he had destroyed his candidacy when this story broke. They were ignoring the obvious truth…..that Akin is a loser and will get beat by double digits in November. He makes Christine O’Donnell look like Marco Rubio. He is selfish and delusional and probably guarantees Romney has to deal with a Dem controlled Senate the first 2 years.

  • ennaneko

    He used the word legitimate as a synonym for “real.”

    There are real and fake rapes. You have to be a damn idiot to believe women never lie about rape. There is science in Akin’s favor.

    Did the GOP lose its testicles or did Akin refuse to kiss the right ring? I’ve never seen so many Republicans dog pile on someone.

    The GOP gave the Democrats and militant feminists a scalp by joining in on the slaughter. I’m disappointed.

    Akin is in for a penny, he might as well go in for a pound and lash out on militant feminists and all around liberals now. Nothing to lose.

    The Gray Davis part of this blog entry… Davis won because he ran in California. Jerry Brown is Gray Davis… just better with the BS.

    GOP had to turn the recall into a circus and give California a Hollywood liberal Republican married to a Kennedy to unseat him.

    • demsaresatanic

      That is consistent with the remainder of his statement, as I pointed out a time or two before the Akin hysteria here became overwhelming. The allegation that Akin was talking about false rape claims is right out of the Alinsky playbook with no basis in fact so far as I have seen from the verbatim reports of the comments.

      You are so right on the remainder, good for you.

      • ennaneko

        Alinsky? Are we talking about the allegation that white women lie about black men? NO.

        There is real rape and then there are fake rape. Fake rape being false rape accusations and what militant feminist groups consider rape. Have you even read some of things they consider rape… dirty joke within earshot of woman.

        Forcible rape is also the won that’s easiest to prove. Stuff like date rape is hard to prove because it usually involves women placing themselves in “he said, she said” scenarios. As with anything goes… if you can’t prove it… it didn’t happen. Innocent until proven guilty.

        Women have used accusations of rape as a weapon for centuries. Women who often didn’t have many rights would use the accusation of rape to get men in their families or men in the law to hurt men they didn’t like or men that had spited them. You have to be naive to believe that women never lie about rape. .

        Look at how liberals want to use “rape” as a door stop to keep abortions legal and as a reason to expand the practice of abortions. They want to make people believe that the country will fill up with rape babies if abortions aren’t more widespread.

        • demsaresatanic

          sperm selection, not false rape allegations. Involuntary intercourse is a factor in female sperm selection, false reporting of rape is unrelated to female sperm selection. The statement viewed in context supports my position, not yours.

          Taking statements out of context to twist meanings is a routine Alinsky/Drat tactic, not your motive of course.

          I don?t know what you are talking about with the ?allegation that white women lie about black men,? kindly explain that.

  • commonsenseobserver

    He’s got to rally the base and then totally ignore Akin.

  • Pingback: Renetta Servidio

  • Pingback: Osvaldo Donhoe

  • Pingback: electronic cigarette

  • Pingback: my maid service

  • Pingback: Welcome to My Blog

  • Pingback: Automobile Forum

  • Pingback: redirected here

  • Pingback: zakopane noclegi

  • Pingback: Fisch Futter

  • Pingback: HGH Advanced reviews

  • Pingback: Portal randkowy

  • Pingback: ropa para bebes cheeky

  • Pingback: Investment Opportunities

  • Pingback: Wedding ideas

  • Pingback: landscaping

  • Pingback: แทงบอลออนไลน์

  • Pingback: jesus adrian romero 8 septiembre bogota

  • Pingback: homemade alcohol

  • Pingback: Investment Opportunities

  • Pingback: check my weblog

  • Pingback: descargar musica gratis one direction

  • Pingback: gameplay

  • Pingback: click here

  • Pingback: bridal diamond earrings

  • Pingback: Attorney Jobs

  • Pingback: kozmetika pre muzov

  • Pingback: Koi

  • Pingback: home water distillers

  • Pingback: dieta protal

  • Pingback: new york asian escorts

  • Pingback: Myles Petter

  • Pingback: su comentario es aquí

  • Pingback: recaning service dallas

  • Pingback: serwis randkowy

  • Pingback: baby shower party favor gift

  • Pingback: Video on Demand

  • Pingback: check this particular out

  • Pingback: buy cheap wow gold

  • Pingback: Sherita Soroka

  • Pingback: Elnora Zumpfe

  • Pingback: randki internetowe

  • Pingback: darmowa strona randki

  • Pingback: florida no fault insurance quote

  • Pingback: Aquariumfilter

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: umow sie na randke

  • Pingback: Solomon Parthemore

  • Pingback: Nubia Allanson

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: odszukaj milosc swego zycia

  • Pingback: Teachers

  • Pingback: dark chocolate gifts

  • Pingback: Tanner Acoba

  • Pingback: payday loans onlinePayday Loans

  • Pingback: online customer survey

  • Pingback: Explore Talent Contact Us

  • Pingback: cartier engagement rings

  • Pingback: Nanny Agency

  • Pingback: thecandidadiet cleanse diet

  • Pingback: scrapebox error 407 proxy authentication required

  • Pingback: edu link building

  • Pingback: randki za darmo

  • Pingback: http://www.streamdownload.net/portfolio/mtv-music-downloader-for-mac

  • Pingback: randki

  • Pingback: Arkadas Ara

  • Pingback: super randka

  • Pingback: randka przez internet

  • Pingback: electronic cigarettes

  • Pingback: rewelacyjny portla randkowy

  • Pingback: with Bing

  • Pingback: Peroxide Whitening Products

  • Pingback: instant payday loans

  • Pingback: casino gaming

  • Pingback: video 2 mp3 converter

  • Pingback: Steve Kane

  • Pingback: Morris Stuedemann

  • Pingback: Irwin Cucufate

  • Pingback: chemical free dry cleaners

  • Pingback: Emory Stasny

  • Pingback: click in such cases

  • Pingback: secrets revealed

  • Pingback: pmu resultat du quinte du jour

  • Pingback: Carie Bazan

  • Pingback: organizzazione matrimoni toscana

  • Pingback: initial source

  • Pingback: Francie Douse

  • Pingback: ipl laser hair removal alexandria

  • Pingback: Tune Up

  • Pingback: my solution

  • Pingback: produced here

  • Pingback: Egil

  • Pingback: Forest

  • Pingback: Forest

  • Pingback: Marlin Borchardt

  • Pingback: Lou Skeans

  • Pingback: Jeremiah Rohrdanz

  • Pingback: Belk

  • Pingback: this

  • Pingback: An excellent replaced

  • Pingback: Kelvin Sojo

  • Pingback: Raymond Hein

  • Pingback: Darwin Glatt

  • Pingback: Zachery Tesar

  • Pingback: alfileres de boda

  • Pingback: Tessa Krakowiak

  • Pingback: Bobby Gaiter

  • Pingback: Marty Nobis

  • Pingback: Mason Vititoe

  • Pingback: Mack Paugh

  • Pingback: Luanne Courtney

  • Pingback: Eliza

  • Pingback: Delano

  • Pingback: Ghislaine

  • Pingback: Lacy

  • Pingback: Frederick Pelletier

  • Pingback: Shae Roddick

  • Pingback: Stephen Benedetti

  • Pingback: adult friends

  • Pingback: Lender of Payday Loans

  • Pingback: Alcohol Detox

  • Pingback: my latest post

  • Pingback: Egil

  • Pingback: sofy rozkładane

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: John Markin

  • Pingback: green coffee extract

  • Pingback: Rosetta Toguchi

  • Pingback: Work at home jobs

  • Pingback: Delaine Coteat

  • Pingback: Darron Zarro

  • Pingback: Gaston Arciola

  • Pingback: Very yrev test

  • Pingback: Anisha Jarreau

  • Pingback: bixenon

  • Pingback: honda ruckus for sale

  • Pingback: texas driver education

  • Pingback: Automotive Forum

  • Pingback: Delfina Kritikos

  • Pingback: get payday loan without checking account get payday loan without bank account get payday loan bad credit get payday loan no bank account get payday loan online get payday loan fast online payday loan store online payday loan stores payday loan reviews pay

  • Pingback: Cyprien

  • Pingback: facebook likes, no username or password needed, buy likes using paypal

  • Pingback: Your #1 urban lifestyle destination

  • Pingback: www.eztraffic.org

  • Pingback: www.premiumseodomains.com

  • Pingback: golfkeuring

  • Pingback: randka przez internet