« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Rape, Knock-Out King and Gun Control.

All Three Show the People How Much Government Cares

The Advantages of a Disarmed Citizenry

This time You People are gonna’ learn. Your betters have tolerated your quaint old-fashioned attitudes for longer than you deserve. But now they’ve grown tired of the (expletive)-dance. The Brilliant and Morally Superior Charles Blow tells you how serious serious can get in today’s NYT.

“The White House is weighing a far broader and more comprehensive approach to curbing the nation’s gun violence than simply reinstating an expired ban on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition, according to multiple people involved in the administration’s discussions.” According to The Post’s sources, this could include measures “that would require universal background checks for firearm buyers, track the movement and sale of weapons through a national database, strengthen mental health checks, and stiffen penalties for carrying guns near schools or giving them to minors.”

This is obviously happening because Big Brother loves you. They want to protect you. This is because our government demands safe streets. It’s because, unlike evil gun makers, they care about the children.

Except that anyone reasonably familiar with crime news from St. Louis, MS, would know this was a line of BS. That’s because of a new fad, a new way of local kids being kids. Let me introduce you to the Good Old Game of Knock-Out King.

The St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, too, knows of the violent ritual. “The ‘knockout game’ is played by a group of kids who, as outrageous as it sounds, go around with the goal of knocking people out, for apparently no reason,” says Chief Daniel Isom.

So obviously the authorities are getting Charles Blow Serious about putting the kibosh on this one. It threatens people’s safety. A group of school social workers in St. Louis showed just how much serious and morally superior people cared what was happening.

The social workers, Wallace reports, “are not interested in talking about it.” University City Police Department spokesman Mike Ransom says he has heard nothing of Knockout King and cautions, “We don’t want to give people any ideas.”

Now certainly a society of Thinking People would care deeply about the gang rape of an 11-year-old girl. It would be particularly troublesome if these thugs ranged in age all the way up to 27 years old. If there were 17 of them, it might just chap a few sensitive and caring (expletive)-holes. Maybe – unless these sensitive people wrote for the New York Times. Here’s how much the Times cares about the safety of 11-year-old girls when the issue doesn’t involve guns.

“It’s just destroyed our community,” said Sheila Harrison, 48, a hospital worker who says she knows several of the defendants. “These boys have to live with this the rest of their lives.” ….. Residents in the neighborhood where the abandoned trailer stands — known as the Quarters — said the victim had been visiting various friends there for months. They said she dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said. “Where was her mother? What was her mother thinking?” said Ms. Harrison, one of a handful of neighbors who would speak on the record. “How can you have an 11-year-old child missing down in the Quarters?”

So we can reasonably ascertain that by and large society really doesn’t care about your individual safety. You can be randomly punched into next week if you have the audacity to walk the streets in St. Louis, Mo. Your daughter can be gang-raped in Houston, Tx. and The New York Times will all but shove a microphone up your nose and ask you why you trick her out like The Whore of Babylon.

The people who govern you could care less if you took a dirt nap tomorrow. As this diary at Redstate suggests, the AR-15 may well be the cure, not the cause of your personal safety problems. So why is there this sudden push to protect you from guns? It’s all about the control.

Attorney General Eric Holder is on record stating that “Gun Owners should cower in shame like smokers.” This is a man who has no problem with armed New Black Panthers patrolling the polls on Election Day in Philadelphia.

As Vice-President Biden prepares to meet with the NRA to tell them how he intends to “protect them” against their will, he talks about outlawing all unregulated gun sales in America. It will work about as well as Meth and Heroin control – meaning that it will do nothing to make you safer, but the government will gain precipitous power at the expense of your rights as a citizen. This, in the eyes of Huey “The Kingfish” Biden, will make any measure of gun control that gets enacted a smash-hit success. He could think of himself as a Knock-Out King.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • plumely

    As always R M J a great diary.

  • norris

    Just to show they are really serious about the danger of being around guns,all government officials should disarm their body guards for their own protection.
    The problem is the mental health of the killers. Why didn’t the police find all the drugs in the Lanza home and run checks on her pharmacy records.
    The killers had problems in public schools , and most had a past record of unresolved mental illness.

    • kowalski

      They’re not that interested in reporting the facts until after the laws are passed, apparently.

  • kowalski

    I see you’re getting up to speed here. It’s a steep learning curve, I admit.

    I say that not condescendingly, but I’m glad you’re taking the time to really suss this out.

    The problem is the sale of guns between private parties: that’s what they want to stop absolutely cold – everywhere in the United States. Family members, two police officers, lawful gun owner to lawful gun owner, it doesn’t matter: you’re going to have to report the sale to the federal government, serial numbers, models and all, along with your personal information and the equivalent personal information of the recipient party.

    In Massachusetts, when you buy or sell a firearm (of any kind) to anyone else, you are required by law to go through the online system (this is recent, previously you had to submit a form called an FA-10, and now they have an E-FA-10 form to correct mistaken FA-10s that have been outdated by the online system) to inform them of the private sale/transfer.

    Here’s the web page:

    https://mircs.chs.state.ma.us/fa10/action/home?app_context=home&app_action=presentHome

    “Massachusetts General Law c. 140, §§128A and 128B, requires all individuals who sell, transfer, inherit, or lose a firearm to report the sale, transfer, inheritance, or loss of the firearms to the Department of Criminal Justice Information Services Firearms Records Bureau (FRB). This on-line system will allow you to report the sale, transfer, inheritance, or loss/theft data electronically to the FRB.”

    Notice it’s not just sales, transfer or inheritance. If you *LOSE* a firearm you are also required by law to report the loss. So burying your gun in your backyard and claiming you lost it – if you didn’t send in that form – is a felony. I’m not sure what happens if you report losing a firearm and then you find it later and want to reinstate it as one of your possessions. I’m just not that advanced, I guess.

    They want to stop people from buying and selling (or “losing”) firearms between each other – basically engaging in private sales or “loaning” firearms – without sending notification of the sale to the government in every state in the nation. In this way any guns sales that have not been reported – or even misplacing a weapon – are illegal. So if the weapon is discovered in someone else’s hands without the report of the transfer being filed, there’s a felony conviction.

    The wonks are already busy with their sharpies writing it up on the Federal level. It’s already Massachusetts law, and we’ll see whether it’s coming to a state near you. Might be by Executive Order. It probably will be because then it’s going to be challenged – I don’t think they have the votes to pass it in Congress.

    This is why I cannot, in Massachusetts, ever loan my guns to anyone, even if they have a license, unless I do the full transcation and submit the form. The instant I do that, I have (I’m sure MA courts would decide it this way) “transferred” it to the second party, and without submitting the form, I’m a felon.

    So what will happen is that if you want to lend your rifle to someone for a week, and you don’t submit the form, you’ll be putting yourself in grave legal jeopardy.

    • eltuba

      This seems to be a much more likely scenario than the all out “gun grab” fears that so many people have. Regulations like you outlined can be ratcheted up a little bit at a time over a number of years until the 2nd amendment dies the death of a thousand cuts.

      • kowalski

        Nobody serious is unaware of that. C’mon it’s old news. 1993, Charles Schumer on NBC:

        “We’re going to hammer guns on the anvil of relentless legislative strategy. We’re going to beat guns into submission!”

        Hammer. Relentless. Beat. Submission. And he considers himself to be a middle of the road kind of guy! (It’s worth noting again at this point that according to the FBI in 2011, hammers and clubs beat rifles of every variety by very significant amounts as the weapon of choice in murders. Schumer is a “hammer” guy, I suppose. Let’s outlaw Home Depot. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/03/FBI-More-People-Killed-With-Hammers-and-Clubs-Each-Year-Than-With-Rifles)

        If any gun owner in this country said they were going to “hammer non gun owners” on anything “relentless” they’d all be locked up.

        Everyone understands the principles of “nudge.” It’s not just nudge, it’s “push” and nudge, and push back, and nudge and push some more. It’s “designing choice environments.” A sophisticated way of saying: “Using soft propaganda combined with hard legislation to influence public opinion.” It’s behavioral management on a societal scale, accomplished by carefully controlling the parameters of acceptable discussion. We know what it’s about, and we know what the end goal is. Charles Schumer is the extremist: everything he does is to work to the endpoint.

        Cass Sunstein provided a lot of the recent apparatus:

        http://www.audible.com/pd?asin=B002V8L28I&source_code=GO1DG9048SH080912&mkwid=plaB002V8L28I&gclid=CPGj7ZCY37QCFYl7Qgodh0AAvg

        Nobody who has been awake since 1993 (and before that) is unaware of this. I’ve known it for a long time: the endgame is taking almost all gun rights away from Americans. They want England, except stricter. Law school deans have told me this, point blank, with no hint of irony. To them it’s just a matter of continuously tightening the restrictions.

      • checkmate2012

        Just curious kowalski- why wouldn’t everyone in Mass bury their gun and then submit the claim that their gun has been stolen? Seems a logical way of keeping your arms w/o threat of confiscation or future crimes tied to you? Hey, I filled out the form properly to say that I lost control of my gun, someone broke in and stole it…sorry.

        • kowalski

          Totally the opposite. Everyone in Massachusetts has already sent all their information to the government – the local chiefs of police know them and they also know which guns they have. What you’re talking about is a 100% complete insurrection and in Massachusetts you’d not only need everyone to do it (which is impossible) but you’d also need everyone in a position of authority to throw up their hands and not investigate it (which is impossible). It would last about 6 minutes.

          It’s one of those ideas that just couldn’t be done. Heck, it’s hard enough to get 5 people in any community to agree on the same thing, much less something like that.

          • checkmate2012

            lol- it just seemed logical to me! Easier to move out I suppose :)

          • kowalski

            I updated that post. It’s one of those ideas that sounds great in theory but would last about 6 minutes in practice. Believe me, someone’s girlfriend or boyfriend would tattle about 6 minutes into it, and that’s the end of that.

            That, by the way, is why conspiracy theories don’t work. Stupidity persists, but conspiracies never last long because someone eventually blabs. Even in the mafia, someone eventually blabs. Unjust and ridiculous systems come undone, which is why we shouldn’t try to create them. :)

          • kowalski

            Also let’s say for the sake of argument you could get all of the gun owners in Massachusetts to agree on the super-secret plan to bury all their guns and report that to the State. All the people around them who don’t own guns will start reporting to their local police: “What are all these people doing with shovels out there?” Won’t work, even on a small scale.

            Really the best option is to defend your rights legally and vigorously and completely out in the open. :)

          • checkmate2012

            Got it and defending our 2nd Amendment right is the way to go, agree.