« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

PCCC Wipeout

Democrats are busily trying to explain why yesterday’s massive defeats don’t actually mean the public disagrees with Democratic policies. But in one area, the evidence could not be more clear.

In October, the PCCC (“Progressive Change Campaign Committee”) launched a “Net Neutrality Protectors” pledge, signed by 95 Democratic candidates. How did it work out for PCCC and the 95 Democrats who supported regulation of the Internet?

0 for 95.

PCCC’s Adam Green spins:

What’s left to say after this wipeout? – Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, says this: “Democrats lost because party leaders never truly fought for popular progressive reforms like the public option and breaking up the big banks, leaving voters uninspired to come to the polls and vote Democratic…. Progressives will be stepping up and insisting that the Democratic Party be bolder, not weaker. We will demand boldness, reward bold leaders, reject ‘leaders’ in name only, and hold Democratic politicians accountable when they don’t fight for popular, progressive change. In short, these next two years, progressives will push Democrats to fight strongly for popular progressive reforms — and save the Democratic Party from its own incredible weakness that savaged Democratic candidates in 2010.”

Notice what he didn’t mention? Net neutrality. That’s no surprise, considering how every single Democrat who signed on just learned their “reward” for taking PCCC’s “popular progressive reform” pledge was unanimous defeat.

Maybe Democrats are finally learning that it doesn’t pay to chase an unpopular distraction manufactured by Moveon.org.

Incidentally, do you know who ran the Moveon.org net neutrality campaign? Adam Green.

COMMENTS

  • http://reaganiterepublicanresistance.blogspot.com/ reaganiterepublicanresistance

    Try this country doesn’t want your rubbish- how bout that

    And even if some of the reforms you mentioned were “popular” and needed, Americans DO NOT trust goverment to do them-

    Obama’s shady cancellation of white, Republican Chrysler and GM dealers and unconstitutional power grabs like firing Rick Wagoner means the Dems will not be nationalizing, breaking up, or otherwise manhandling our nation’s industrial and financial infrastructure… that’s why the Dems got beat like a rug, Adam

  • elizabeth bennet

    Things like this (along with things like states like Minnesota and Wisconsin and Maine going Republican in their state legislatures) are what make me believe that this election truly was a tsunami. They just don’t realize it yet.

  • powertothepeople

    continue to dwell in stupidity and arrogance. It will make our job that much easier come 2012. If they think the country is interested in their progressive policies, we should encourage them to try. It is obvious from the responses from the left they have not learned any lessons, lets hope they do not learn any between now and 2012.

  • http://xmmlbchat.blogspot.com katesmith

    I noticed he gave a few thousand under his name in June 2010. Naturally he can give secretly via numerous groups. He lost a few battles on Tuesday.

  • Dave_in_Fla

    When we gained 63 seats? Something doesn’t make sense in this story.

    • sirbleh
  • dmartin

    ?Democrats lost because party leaders never truly fought for popular progressive reforms like the public option and breaking up the big banks,”

    Had they really wanted this, we would have had real bankruptcys instead of bailouts.

    I hope Green means what he says, a bold push for hardcore liberal policies would be the best thing that could happen. I have no interest in compromise with Green or idiots like him, only in tth complete destruction of their ideology.

  • spim

    AWESOME

    … in the very real meaning of that word

    0 for 95

    “total repudiation” has no better example

    THANK YOU for pointing this out and sharing it with us

    just . . . awesome