« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Congress Responds to CDC’s Decision to Deep-Six Abortion Surveillance Report

In the few hours since RedState originally ran this post, members of Congress have been weighing in on the apparently deep-sixed CDC report, and they are not pleased. As we reported earlier today, freshman Congresswoman Vicky Hartzler, who ousted Ike Skelton in MO-4 this year, excoriated the CDC’s decision, saying:

“This is the epitome of hypocrisy being exhibited by the Obama Administration as it hides facts and figures on abortion while claiming to want more transparency in government. This is a pattern that has become all too common with the Obama Administration, ranging from its distortion of the facts on taxpayer funding of abortions under ObamaCare to manipulated information to support repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy. It is time for the Obama White House to put a stop to its disregard for openness in government and to end its practice of distorting data for blatantly political purposes.”

RedState has also obtained a copy of a letter written by Senator Tom Coburn, which you can download here (warning, .pdf). In it, Coburn demands a response from HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius as to the CDC’s future plans regarding the report, and any internal documents touching on the decision to stop producing the report. In the letter, Senator Coburn notes:

Most Americans – regardless of their view on abortion – share the goal of reducing abortions. These statistics play an important role in determining whether our public and private efforts are effective. As long as abortion is legal in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should continue to provide doctors, health care providers, policymakers, and individuals with standard public health information. It is my sincere hope that the CDC does not intend to abdicate this most basic public health role.

I would respectfully request a response to this letter detailing your agency’s future plans regarding the Abortion Surveillance System. If your agency does not intend to collect or publish this data now and in the future, I would also request a detailed explanation as to why the agency has reversed its position on the public health benefits of abortion surveillance and all internal documents discussing this topic, including emails and memoranda.

Additionally, RedState has heard from Congressman Pete Olson (R-TX), who issued a statement saying,

“It strikes me as convenient for the Obama Administration that states are not required to provide data to the federal government on the number of abortions performed each year. It makes it easier to hide the amount of federal funds that go to abortion providers and robs taxpayers of a genuine accounting of the number of abortions performed annually, some by groups that receive federal tax dollars.

“In a GAO report that I requested – one that was completed after years of ignoring other Congressional requests – GAO determined that during a period of 7 years, almost one billion U.S. tax dollars were spent by groups that promote or perform abortions. I urge the President to stand behind his commitment to ensuring scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda and instruct the CDC to complete the report.”

Clearly, Congress does not intend to let this important public health report die quietly. Stay tuned to see how the CDC responds to this barrage.

COMMENTS

  • lisbeth

    Good thing the Bush Admin never hid climate change reports they didn’t like, or squashed estimates that said medicare prescription coverage would be higher than the official estimate, because such actions would have been wrong!

    • jimmyneutron

      if you are going to accuse them of something then you should probably produce evidence.
      Second, I don’t believe they ever hid climate change reports, they just ignored them because they recognized them for the politically inspired trash that they were.
      Third, conservatives of all stripes were screaming very loudly at Bush about the prescription drug benefit, he had to basically hand out bribes to get it passed and no one who didn’t want to be was in any way fooled into thinking that it would not cost a whole lot more than advertised.
      Finally, Eric has laid out in a very logical and easy to follow manner how the current admin is hiding yet again another piece of information they would rather not acknowledge and the silence from the left is deafening – not one single progressive voice is out there protesting this lie. This of course is exactly what we conservatives expect.

    • Darin_H

      I applaud your willingness to concede that the Obama administration is completely in the wrong here. It’s very noble of you not to even bother to mount a defense. Complete capitulation is impressive! I hope you continue to have the courage to speak out again on the very thing that Obama campaigned. May he one day follow your lead in such refreshing honesty.

    • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

      Although that run-on sentence cries out for readjustment.

      Shoo, and be thankful that I’ve had my first cup of coffee already.

    • rogershru2

      It kills me every time somebody responds condescendingly to a well thought out article or argument with “But George Bush!” without addressing or denying the point at hand.

    • terp116

      Lisbeth you are an idiot the climate hoax is not even close to the killing of our future. How does one so callously equate climate data where BILLIONS of our tax payer dollars has been flushed down the toilet to the death of the unborn. May God forgive your ignorance.

  • Right Reason

    quit with the exasperated letters and cut the damned purse strings!

  • talgus

    of the “climate changing”. The proof (real, not models) I need is of what did mankind do to cause this change. Murder in the womb proof is everywhere. Recently in Philly. It is not rare and it is supported by tax dollars. When will the “poor” realize their support from liberals politicians leads to “making more poor to obtain more votes”

  • hairbaggs

    Transparency is the abbreviation for don’t let anybody see it.

  • scarletb

    Miscarriage spontaneously occurs in 20 percent of pregnancies. However, many women may miscarry without knowing it-assuming their miscarriage is merely a heavier period. Therefore, the miscarriage rate may be closer to 40 or 50 percent of all pregnancies. Rather than bemoan all these lost lives, why not support the children who are already born by giving them the best education and healthcare possible?
    When a woman CHOOSES to have an abortion, it’s nobody’s business but her own. It’s her womb, her body, her decision. It’s creepy and weird that some people are so concerned with looking into other folks’ windows. MYOB.