Senator Bob Corker (TN) is all over the place.
Yesterday, he voted for the new START treaty in committee, which is heavily skewed towards Russia’s interests, limits our missile defense capabilities, and sends an unmistakable signal of weakness to the rest of the world. According to Corker’s own constituents, in a letter on behalf of the Williamson Country Republican Party:
New START seriously threatens our national security. Among its other flaws, the Treaty limits America’s ability to field a robust missile defense system, which is our only defense against a nuclear missile attack. Further, because New START contains weak verification systems, Russian compliance with the Treaty is unlikely. New START also fails to stop rogue nations like North Korea and Iran from continuing to develop nuclear weapons.
Corker ignored these concerns, when he, Johnny Isakson (GA) and Richard Lugar (IN), joined 11 Democrats in voting for the treaty. I wish that was the extent of the damage he caused yesterday.
This morning, I read the headline, “Senate GOP Looks for Deal in Tax Debate.” (Nothing quite catches my eye like news of Republicans selling out.) The article states that “McConnell and Boehner, along with many conservative Republicans, are demanding that all the Bush-era [tax] cuts be made permanent,” but that a group of Republican Senators are now pushing for only a two year extension.
Worse, part of these Senators’ rationale for their alternative is to allow the disaster that is the fiscal commission to make its recommendation in the lame duck and presumably not have to look like they’re raising taxes.
“We need to change the debate totally from picking at each other over tax policy and which program gets cut,” said Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.).
A two-year extension would give Obama’s deficit-reduction commission time to complete its work and Congress a chance to debate its recommendations. “That’s page one,” Corker said. “Then we can develop policies that move us in that direction.”
What’s puzzling is why Corker believes that we should stop “picking” at Democrats when they’re trying to raise taxes and refuse to cut federal spending. And I don’t understand why these Senators—Corker, Susan Collins, Judd Gregg, and Lindsey Graham (the reporter must have forgotten to call Olympia Snowe)—would want to make it any easier for the fiscal commission to raise taxes unless they actually want to raise taxes after the election. These people simply don’t get it.
Unfortunately, this isn’t the first time that Corker has lead in the wrong direction. He was instrumental in negotiating “financial services reform” with Chris Dodd and failed to understand or admit that the legislation (which is now law) amounted to a permanent bailout of Wall Street.
Bob Corker is the type of Republican Senator that politicos love. He is “credible.” He “wants to get things done.” He is “bipartisan.”
It might be nice if he was actually “conservative.”
Caleb Howe
Jeff Emanuel
When is Corker up for re-election?
Change Jar Conservative (Diary) Friday, September 17th at 4:21PM EDT (link)We need to get him out of there in a primary.
********
Formerly know as “Oz” in these parts
elected in 2006
bannor Friday, September 17th at 4:32PM EDT (link)so 2012 should be rough on this clown
He is soooo gone
tn_red Friday, September 17th at 6:38PM EDT (link)People in TN are already talking about his replacement
Lugar, Corker and Isakson
SCGOP (Diary) Saturday, September 18th at 12:15PM EDT (link)All need to be primaried as this is unacceptable
But Russ,
romeg Friday, September 17th at 4:23PM EDT (link)If he were to become Conservative he might not get invited to be on Imus’ radio show.
“Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victim may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated, but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” – C. S. Lewis
Marsha Blackburn for TN in 2012!
athwart_history Friday, September 17th at 4:58PM EDT (link)Would love to see her take on Corker
The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, ‘I’m from the government and I’m here to help.’
Ronald Reagan
40th president of US (1911 – 2004)
Agree about Blackburn
mboyle1988 (Diary) Friday, September 17th at 5:19PM EDT (link)Or whoever. He needs to go. So does Lugar. So does Hutchinson. So does Graham. The weird sisters can stay and we have to be nice to them. If you are in a state north of the mason Dixon or west of Nevada (except Alaska), you are allowed to be Moderate. However, that means we should have close to 60 firebrand conservative senators, because there are at least 30 cherry red states in the country.
Disagree on START
onehutu Friday, September 17th at 5:38PM EDT (link)The new START treaty is none of the things mentioned in the first paragraph. It as an absolutely common sense, just look at who supports this treaty: Kissinger, Shultz, Jim Baker, Nunn, William Perry, James Schlesinger, Dick Lugar, and the three leaders of nuclear laboratories and 7 of the former commanders of nuclear forces. Since when does a county party dictate national security policy? And Mitt Romney’s criticism of this treaty was at best ill-informed and at worst completely off base. I have no opinion on Bob Corker but certainly don’t want to see anyone crucified on this this one. He has shown some courage in voting for ratification.
Agree with Disagreement
GreyCloak (Diary) Sunday, September 19th at 4:14AM EDT (link)I think it was Pogo who said we had enough nuclear bombs to blow the world to smithereens, and now we’re working on the smithereens.
START is a good treaty. Internal political posturing is not going to win us any leverage over Iran or North Korea, nor any cooperation from Russia.
Pandering to the defense establishment or playing on “national defense” fears may gain a few contributions or uninformed votes, The truth is, even reduced, our nuclear capability remains orders of magnitude of overkill.
Disagree, there are plenty of good reasons to oppose
JSobieski (Diary) Sunday, September 19th at 4:22AM EDT (link)none of which you address. Its late, but I will get to this in the morning.
Did you know that China has been losing manufacturing jobs since 1995? For the specific data, see Table 1 in the following link: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2005/07/art2full.pdf
Tipical
aposematic Friday, September 17th at 6:15PM EDT (link)Corker, like most politicians, are in it for how much money he can steal from the taxpayers. Why he would go along with destroying America’s ability to defend herself is a mystery though. Someone should look into just how Corker is going to make money off his vote; that would lead to a clue.
aposematic in VA
Stealing Money from Taxpayers
GreyCloak (Diary) Sunday, September 19th at 4:47AM EDT (link)… is often done by military contractors. Think about the recent $2 billion mobile cannon (project ceased) that could carry 48 rounds of ammunition, needed an entire transport plane to get TWO of its artillery train to the battlefield, and was so good that it could fire all of its ammunition in about ten minutes.
I refer you to a speech by a Republican President, more qualified than anybody to address the topic.
I am all for having the best military in the world that we have trained and equipped, but the political issue “defense” is what makes money for Congress. Corker cast an honest vote. Probably cost him money.
I look at Corker this way.
markvol Saturday, September 18th at 7:22PM EDT (link)The alternative was Harold Ford Jr. What the heck would any of
you folks done? It turned out to be one o\f those “lesser of two
evils” kind. How many Fred Thompsons do you expect us to produce?
Marsha should replace him in 2012, but Lamar? What do we do with him? Just think what it would be like with another Jim Sasser or
Algore. I think we’re okay for now. It was just a vote to get it out of the
committee. We’ll be okay, girls and boys!