« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The Crusade to Cave

I feel like a broken record, but it is just very hard to give some people the benefit of the doubt. It is one thing after another, day after day. House Republican Leaders are on a crusade to cave with the President.

Never mind that in the opinion of nearly every main stream political analyst the President is on the ropes. My inbox is flooded with news articles about his declining popularity in blue states and the aftermath of this week’s GOP special election victories. But House Republicans modus operandi is still to avoid the fight.

This week, it was their insistence on a continuing resolution (CR) at levels far above the Paul Ryan-House passed budget in order to align with the bad debt deal they passed earlier in the year (because they were unwilling to fight). Then it was their shadiness in passing a six-month highway extension at levels far above the same Paul Ryan-House passed budget without a roll-call vote. They’re only now beginning to criticize the President’s new stimulus plan such that the President’s only glimmer of hope is that the public still doesn’t know how bad or unworkable it is. Why? Because Republicans are afraid of being the party of no. I thought we put that meme to bed last year.

And now we find that tucked into the recently unveiled CR is the provision to bail out the Postal Service, which I wrote about yesterday. Who knows what else is in there.

The bailout is terrible policy, and it completely cuts the legs out from under Darrell Issa, Chairman of the Government Reform and Oversight Committee. (Whatever happened to deferring to committee chairmen?) But what is most troubling is what it illustrates about the state of Congressional Republicans.

They are fundamentally in their DNA unwilling to fight. Every day they have opportunities big and small to educate the public of needed reforms and ways to limit government, but if it distracts them from their pre-cooked, poll-tested “jobs” agenda in the least, then the default position must be to avoid it like the plague.

Conservative activists are not idiots. We can figure out that Republicans control only the House, and that some compromise is necessary. However, this is what we also know. House Republicans are not fighting because they know they don’t have it in them—they know they will cave eventually, so they might as well do it on the front end and lower the political stakes. Better that than risk a public backlash when the night terror of their dreams—the bully pulpit of the White House (such as it is, even with this President)—gets louder and louder with each hour of the increasing brinksmanship needed to win. Conservative activists don’t demand success. We do demand Congressmen who aren’t afraid of the night.

COMMENTS

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Yes, there is a difference, but when it comes to spending money, the difference is more apparent than real.

    How long before we can purge most of the spineless squishes?

    • hero43

      Ops! There I go again using a forbidden expression. Seems like most men and women (even more so) are not interested in freedom any more.
      A free bucket of oats for the stomach and pleasant lies in their ears. How many will reflect when things really get bad about the time wasted thinking of the latest soap opera? Not many.Then they will focus on how to get their hands on the assets of the rich. When they take all the wealth they will still be poor.
      I suspect when asked how much wage earners should be allowed to keep, the answer from the non- producers will be, ‘ nothin — it is my right to have what you-uns worked for

    • ihateliberals

      I trust a Liberal much further than I do a RINO because you know what a Liberal is and what a liberal will do. A RINO is like a renegade Indian, you never know when he will go off the reservation. John Boehner was figured out by the Democrats on the very first issue that came before them and that was the 2011 budget. What they learned from Boehner and have used it against him from day one is that if they put enough pressure on him he will cave at the last minute. so far that has been true. With a House Speaker like that Who needs a Democrat one.

  • oudbob

    My house republican is a wimp. I refuse to carry his petitions next year.

    • etlib

      Thankfully he has a primary challenger who I will support. It looks like redistricting will put me in a different district next year which has a strong conservative rep so I’ll still be able to campaign against the RINO even if I can’t vote against him.

  • mort

    They are the ones who need to be removed from office. Means we must find challengers in the primary as soon as the districts are re-aligned.

  • drfredc

    Ah, this must explain why I’ve been getting some calls for donations from the RNC in the past week or so. Typically, these calls precede the GOP LOSERship doing something stupid or spineless because they know afterwards, they’ll get nothing from conservative donors looking for a spine and coherency from their party leadership.

    You’d think they could figure out how to explain to folks that the ‘payroll’ tax cut that Obama is asking for is all about taking money away from Social Security… They ought to rename it the Defunding Social Security bill.

    At least the LOSERship figured out it didn’t need to mount a reply to Obama’s blow hard job’s bill.

  • paulplantowin

    He has no confidence in the strength of conservatism, and can’t interpret election results from 2010. He just doesn’t get it – he’s living in the past when the DC Rino’s had to kiss up to Dems
    New Speaker needed imo

  • JimmyGee

    It is clear that the tidal wave that the Tea Party brought into Washington has not yet reached critical mass. It has not changed the mindset of GOP congress members. We need to continue to be aware of how GOP members vote and be willing to primary them out of office. The first two I want to see primaried are Boehner and Cantor. They are the leaders, they decide which fight they will fight and how hard they will fight it. And frankly, I don’t think they have the stomach for it. They are still in the, “My friends across the isle” bull crap mindset. I realize that being the speaker is no picnic, but they knew that going in; they WANTED the power. What good is power if you neither want to use it, nor change the way Washington operates?
    My hope is that when President-elect Rick Perry is sworn in with a second wave of Tea Party members elected to congress and the senate in 2012; that we may finally tip the balance to create the critical mass this country so desperately needs.

    • tyman

      I really hope that once Perry gets the nomination (and I think the sooner the better), he will start campaigning on a conservative agenda that will show Boehner who the top dog is going to be.

      I’ve never liked Boehner as leader, and I’m not sure about Eric Cantor, either.

      We may be at the point that Republican congressional primary candidates have to say who they will support in leadership, if they get the nomination. I don’t know what the solution is.

  • sharp

    I lose interest in voting for a huge house majority if Boehner will be entrenched as permanent “Leader.”

    My proposal is that the Tea Party Caucus select their future leadership team, and run a national campaign on it. “Vote in another 70-80-100 Tea Party types, and we guarantee to run the House of Representatives.”

    Jim DeMint should attempt the same thing in the Senate. What will motivate voters to support a few good candidates if McConnell becomes the Majority Leader?

    Looking for actual leaders!!

  • earlgrey

    A new poll from Bloomberg puts blame for washington’s gridlock on GOP. Of course I thought that was why people elected the GOP. If they can’t right their ship people will quickly tire of their snake oil.

    They have to change or people like me will stop working for them. Nothing like giving up your Saturday for training while the GOP stabs us in the back.

    If GOP retains majority in the House than I don’t see them replacing Boehner or Cantor. It may be up to their districts. Maybe the tea party should target them in primaries. Tell me why this is a bad idea.

    • etlib

      “A new poll from Bloomberg puts blame for washington

  • AceInTX

    a deficit “Compromise” and the deck is stacked for a cave of EPIC proportions with Fred “RMSP” Upton in place tom compromise on tax increases…and the game they will play…having set themselves up for a fall by agreeing to automatic defense cuts if a “Compromise isn’t reached…they will come out and announce they simply have to compromise on tax increases lest we deny our troops in the field badly needed revenues to continue the fight.

    They’ll act like they are defenseless in the upcoming vote as if they weren’t the ones who voted for the “automatic cuts” that will require their capitulation on taxes in last years deal.

    and the suckers in the “Moderate” wing of our party will fall right in line with the puppet masters who are pulling their strings.

    I so LOATH these faux “Leaders” who play us for suckers over and over again and somehow never suffer for their betrayal!

  • kcjw33

    This is what happens when the “elected” representative puts party loyalty oath before their oath of office. The Repubs. are so desperate from having their collective asses kicked for 110 out of the last 144 years. They have a losers mentality and are willing to sell everyone out because that gutlessness is ingrained into the DC DNA of this party. As a former professional golfer if I walk onto the golf course convinced of poor performance or negative results that is almost always the direct result. Even the new blood has capitulated and flopped into line on many issues that are mentioned that the country will suffer from because of their lack of resolve. The people need to wake up and realize that until oath of office is the only oath honored by our employees then we will never truly be represented only disrespected and bankrupted!

    • funwithknives

      because *manners* and *honor* mean something to Moral Humans. BUT That Mindset will lose this thing, this time around. Gonna’ hafta’ get a little bit dirty, guys. Band-Aids& iodine will be required, for your upcoming Boo-Boos.
      Need some assistance with bullies? Call me or write, % of this site, I ain’t doin’ much.
      ” I’ve got all-of the time,.. in the world.
      Need a minute? Take your time,
      Need an hour? You can borrow mine.
      ‘Cause I got all,.. of the time,.. in the world.” (Borrowed from The Sub-Dudes, with apologies)

  • travis690

    Once again, we have a band of leaders that opposes the President in public, only to cave in to his wishes in private.

    Somebody better explain to John Boehner that the reason he is the Majority Leader is because the nation voted in enough people who OPPOSED the current occupant of the White House. We did not send them to Washington to sympathize with the Occupant-in-Chief, nor did we want them to choose a leader that would do the same. After all, the best they could come up with in the Senate is Mitch McConnell. And he would rather be Harry Greed’s friend than an articulate opponent of the President.

    Republicans: Get it right, or you will bring down the nation with your fecklessness.

  • eddie74

    We the People TEA party are going to them begging for GOP support & Democrat understanding & acceptance.. Let’s get that relationship turned around to where the GOP & the Dems. come begging for TEA party Support. We the People TEA party need to defiantly distance ourselves from both political parties and become a formidable, stand-alone Force of a “We the People Electorate.” We are getting close to that position and it is with Obama’s un-witting help in that more & more street-level democrats are abandoning the Democrat Party to become Independants.. That means that they are really standing at the Door to the TEA party position and we need to welcome them into the TEA party. Yes, they don’t want to be REpublicans and they are ashamed to be Democrats, so being Independant is their Chioce..

  • kenchely

    The unwillingness to take on this issue is based largely on the proposition that when Newt Gingrich went to the mat with Bill Clinton on the budget, it was political disaster for the Republicans. In the following congressional elections, there was virtually no change in the Congress. And Clinton was a fairly popular president, which Obama is not.

    So the political price isn’t as high as the GOP leaders think. The supposed debacle was a media creation of reporters who thought that Gingrich’s unwillingness to give in would be a political disaster. It wasn’t.