« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Let’s get serious about domestic energy

In his speech at Georgetown University this week, President Obama acknowledged the alarming increases in prices at the gas pump, which in many states are approaching $4 per gallon.  The president restated some vague platitudes about the need to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, but offered no concrete plans to rein in those prices, which are putting a strain on family budgets across the country.

On his recent trip to South America, the President expressed hope that Brazil would aggressively develop its resources so that the United States could become one of the “best customers” of Brazil’s oil industry.  This comes on the heels of his administration sending a loan of more than $2 billion to Brazil to expand its offshore drilling operations.  Obama reaffirmed that insulting endorsement of boosting Brazil’s energy economy in his speech yesterday, leaving drivers across the country wondering why we continue to import over 60 percent of our nation’s total oil consumption from foreign countries and leave vast resources here untouched.

What we need is a strong energy policy that starts, first and foremost, with developing our abundant resources here at home to spur our economy, reduce our reliance on oil from unfriendly regimes overseas and bring down the deficit. Today, I laid out my plan by introducing new legislation, 3-D: The Domestic Jobs, Domestic Energy, and Deficit Reduction Act of 2011.  It would unleash our vast domestic energy potential to create American jobs, help free us from our reliance on foreign oil and begin to reduce our $14 trillion dollar national debt. The 3-D Act speeds up the permitting process while ensuring the responsible development of our abundant domestic resources.

The 3-D Act would also put us back on a revenue-producing fiscal path.  Energy production is second only to your tax dollars as a source of revenue for the federal budget.  And yet in his speech yesterday, President Obama restated his desire to shift us away from a revenue-producing energy economy – one that develops our own proven resources – toward massive subsidies for unproven energy sources like wood chips and switchgrass.

That approach won’t bring down our catastrophic levels of debt.  Like other Obama policies that shift power from the free market and toward entitlements and government subsidies, it will only make them worse.

We can’t afford to shut off our most valuable natural resources and just hope for a miracle. We’ve had too many job losses already due to the Obama administration’s shutdown of our energy economy; allowing them to multiply across the country would be devastating. Given the recent unrest in the Middle East, placing our energy security in the hands of unstable dictators isn’t a “plan;” it’s self-destructive.

We can take concrete steps to build a more secure foundation for our economy – one based on developing our own resources, creating good American jobs and lowering the deficit.  I’m starting in Congress with 3-D: The Domestic Energy, Domestic Jobs and Deficit Reduction Act of 2011.

COMMENTS

  • citizenjerry

    Senator Vitter’s article is another example of pointing our the grave damage this current regime has done to our fair nation.
    We need to be developing every type of domestic energy we can, but it’s not going to happen until we rid ourselves of the poseurs who are intent on destroying us.

  • drfredc

    Obama’s energy speech is basically a CYA speech to get some rhetoric out there to the uneducated masses listening to the PRESSSSident at 6 oclock about how Obama is supposedly pro energy, when the opposite is true.

    He’s building a burm that opponents will have to knock down. Given the GOP Losership’s terrible record on proactively standing for anything or fighting the Dems in short simple sound bites, any Obama CYA burm on energy can easily turn into a mountain range in a few months.

    Over the next few months, expect to hear more and more of the same sort of CYA BS on this and other issues where Obama’s re-election team deems him to be weak. The astute should note he’s basically feeding you a roadmap of what issues he’s weak in… Expect more BS on deficits, jobs, debt, wars and overspending… He’d mix it up with a few things he’s strong on… Aka spending and regulations on this or than BLUE or Green special interest… Which shows another thing he’s weak on — anything not Blue or Green…

    Again, don’t expect much help from this from the GOP Losership. They’re focused on their oxymoron task of cutting spending while also lining their pockets with more campaign cash… They know how to do the later, but not the former…

  • ohiohistorian

    and now he’s rhetoricizing about buying foreign oil? This man is the sleaziest used car salesman we have ever had in the White House. And my apologies for putting used car salesmen in the same dung heap as the President.

    Impeachment is too good; needs to be deported as a threat to the US.

  • ohiohistorian

    24 hours a day, 365 days a year, for about 4 years to cover all the areas he is weak in. Can you name one that he is STRONG in?

  • averagevoterdotcom

    Defeat

    Democrats for a

    Decade (4 cycles) !

  • renny

    so $5 is coming soon to the East Coast.

    We have to do everything possible to get rid of o and his admin. or the US and employment will simply not exist.

    We need more money, more cons. willing to attack and oppose the lefty creeps, and more more more more of everything or the unions and minorities will take the country to the dustheap of history.

  • Common_Cents

    To implement common sense in our energy policy.

    I hate to help out this disastrous administration. $4-$5+/gallon gas needs to be hung squarely around Barry and his gang. Short term pain for hopefully long term change to back to reality.

  • 1stRichard

    Start with the emission laws that have almost doubled our use of oil, over in Europe they have been driving these turbo diesels for years that get 60 or more MPG, we are forced to use gas at 30 MPG or less. Granted we are now seeing costly technology that now allows us to drive some of these turbo diesels but the damage is done. This problem dates back to the seventies with such things as the EGR valve, unplug it you get more HP and better MPG but slightly worse emissions and eventually a set of burnt valves. This is a gigantic problem, yes we want cleaner air but at what cost and some of the answers are worse then the cure, they end up polluting more. These laws are so crazy you can?t even make improvement to your car, check it out it is nuts.

    Next problem would have to be the red light, do you realize how many MPG you get stopped at a red light a big fat zero. I have seen studies that say improving the traffic flow can improve emission and MPG as much as fifteen to twenty percent, so why not? Then on to safety standards or their weight, this weight costs MPG. There is a natural law here, you can not idiot proof and idiot but the government wants to put us all in the same boat load of idiots. Yes, I want to be safe but I want to make the choice on compromising this.

    I apologize if my liberation side frightened or alarmed anyone but the simple fact is that we could cut the cost of driving by half, if only the government stopped telling us what to do. A strong energy policy starts with a common sense look at the laws that force us to use more and pay more.

  • Ann_W
  • edwyrd

    There has been a lot of talk on Redstate about the republicans on capitol hill cowering in fear of a “government shutdown”. That the democrats are just spoiling for the opportunity to “brand” the republicans as ruthless and indifferent with their “vast left-wing branding machine”.

    But this is how to reverse to momentum and stiff-arm the branders, and deliver a series of hard rights to the leftie jaw,
    SELECTIVE SHUTDOWN.
    this would allow you to FRAME the debate, force the dems to defend insane liberal agenda items one by one, each one a blow to the political jaw.
    1) defundind obamacare—body slam! (please don’t fear THIS fight!)
    2) defunding individual regulatory budgeting items restricting oil lease approvals ( this includes spanking the EPA)—hard RIGHT to the jaw!
    3) defunding the NLRB, and exposing it’s corrupt alliance with unions—Smackdown!

    and we could run the gammit of democrat campaign contribution money laundering, tax payer extortion schemes such as the dept of energy, dept of education, and on and on ad infinitum

    You have the unenviable fate of being in the toughest place, doing the toughest job, at the worst possible moment. We will support you! Don’t back down! GIVE THOSE JACKASSES A DOSE OF FOUNDER FORTITUDE!!

  • http://pocketchangeproductions.net/ anotherindyfilmguy

    The O is on record stating he wants $8/gal gasoline so it will
    force the US to go green in his twisted view of reality.

    Pretty much gonna have to wait until after the 2012 elections and a hOpefully new administration.

  • cableguymn

    Lying and B.S. production

  • macwell

    1) convert our cars trucks and buses to run on natural gas.
    2) open up and drill, drill, drill, EVERYWHERE!
    3) plan and build 100 new nuclear powerhouses, (2 per state)
    4) tell the mullahs and shmollahs to eat their oil
    5) stop ALL foreign aid to muslim countries
    6) secure America’s borders.
    7) rid America of any and all persons who refuse to assimilate to our way of life.
    See?
    problems solved

  • politicalqrm

    country run by a Marxist .. Oh, yes, that’s what I want my tax dollars spent on. I want that money back.. in oil. I don’t want to be a CUSTOMER of Brazil. Just give it back in oil. Then we should drill in this country: then you’ll see Brazil as our customer. I don’t want to bring these third world countries up to our level with our money. Tell them to work for it.

    My job requires I drive to my clients and the gas prices are already taking a chunk of my salary.

    Honestly, if this guy even has a ice cube’s chance in hell of being re-elected, people in this country need some serious psychotherapy.

    Get the feeling I’ve had it?

    http://politicalqrm.com/

  • papakilo

    “What we need is a strong energy policy that starts, first and foremost, with developing our abundant resources here at home to spur our economy, reduce our reliance on oil from unfriendly regimes overseas and bring down the deficit….” Exactly the sentiments in Brazil, which, as the largest country in the hemisphere is poised to compete with the USA.

  • skorrent1

    You forgot 1)a!! While you’re busy “convert”ing our 300,000,000+ vehicles to natural gas, you are also changing the tens of thousands of filling stations in the country fron gasolene to natural gas dispensers, and training the hundreds of thousands of mechanics on the proper maintenance of NG vehicles.

    No big deal, right??

  • bigjohn555

    He is seriously attempting to create chaos in this, as well as many other areas, so that Americans will accept Communism as a means of getting life back to normalcy.