« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Iran Gains Seat on UN Commission on the Status of Women. Obama Administration Silent

Last week, Iran was appointed to the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women. Iran. Making decisions and giving advice on the status of women.

NEW YORK — Without fanfare, the United Nations this week elected Iran to its Commission on the Status of Women, handing a four-year seat on the influential human rights body to a theocratic state in which stoning is enshrined in law and lashings are required for women judged “immodest.”

Just days after Iran abandoned a high-profile bid for a seat on the U.N. Human Rights Council, it began a covert campaign to claim a seat on the Commission on the Status of Women, which is “dedicated exclusively to gender equality and advancement of women,” according to its website…

The Commission on the Status of Women is supposed to conduct review of nations that violate women’s rights, issue reports detailing their failings, and monitor their success in improving women’s equality.

That’s right. Iran, a country where women are routinely lashed for baring an ankle, is now assigned the task of improving women’s equality. The United States Ambassador, Susan Rice, appointed by President Obama, was silent and did not even attend the vote. In fact, she wasn’t even in the building. Apparently, the administration believes that Iran will help shatter that glass ceiling with stray rocks, used as they stone women to death for being raped.

A week later, and they remain mum.

Not one word of denouncement from President Obama, who is too busy demonizing one of our own American states and ignoring devastating floods. Too bad we can’t call ourselves “Los Women”. Maybe he’d give a hoot then. Ambassador Rice also refuses to comment, which is the status quo with her, evidently. The State Department, headed by Hillary Clinton, she of “not staying at home baking cookies” because that would be demeaning fame, is silent. Except for one anonymous official, who said this:

“We’re not going to stand up and cheer,” the official said. “By the same token, that is less onerous than the Human Rights Council because women in Iran, relative to other countries in the region, actually have greater rights.”

“You don’t have women placed in head-to-toe burkas in that country,” the official said. “You have women elected to the legislature in the country.”

Oh, well, as long as you don’t cheer. It’s not like it’s human rights and all. It’s just pesky women! And it’s not like they require head to toe burkas!  And by not required, he means they totally are required. It’s national law and Iran recently announced they are cracking down on it, especially if a woman dares to be suntanned.

In some areas of north Tehran we can see many suntanned women and young girls who look like walking mannequins.

“We are not going to tolerate this situation and will first warn those found in this manner and then arrest and imprison them.”

Of course, no denouncement of that either. Which isn’t really surprising; the left appears to hate suntans as well. They’ve penalized those who frequent tanning salons in the health care bill by way of a punitive tax. Why do Leftists hate tan women? Is it because they are jealous, being all pasty pale themselves from remaining trapped inside scrawling out their screeds against the “unfairness” of life?

Thank goodness feminists have spoken out for women worldwide! It’s funny, because it’s not true. All that has come out of their quarters is the sound of crickets. Screeching and whining crickets, but crickets nonetheless. Jezebel.com made one note of Iran’s appointment to the council with this headline:

Iran Named To UN Gender Equality Group Despite Obvious Issues

Just some “issues”. No big whoop. It’s not like Iran denied global warming or anything. Sheesh! Relax, wingnuts! (the comment section will confirm that line of thinking). Feministing has no mention. Pandagon has no mention, but they did bring up another item from Iran’s fabulous record as it pertains to women. Boobquake. You see, an Iranian (the new arbiters of women’s rights!) cleric claimed that earthquakes were caused by immodestly dressed women. You know, women who actually show their faces and stuff. The ever inane Amanda Marcotte defended the cleric, by claiming we are worse for insisting that an embryo is a life.

But we have plenty of woman-hating religious claims in our culture that are taken seriously.  Take for instance, the claim that an embryo is a fully formed human being with rights, and so women’s bodies have to be routinely commandeered against their will in order to gestate them.  That’s a religious claim, as much as anti-choicers pretend otherwise.  It’s based in the idea that godsaidit—god said it’s a person, so sorry, women!

Yes, Amanda. Being against infanticide is exactly the same as raping and torturing women for speaking.

Iranian women have long demanded freedom and gender equality; they have employed both individual and group strategies, initiated various campaigns, and faced insults, threats, arrests and imprisonment in the process. Many of these women are currently in prison.

Over the past eight months, the protest movement that emerged following the disputed presidential elections has been suppressed by mounting violence. Physical and psychological violence – through arrest, torture, rape, extended imprisonment, and even execution – has been exercised against civil and political activists in Iran. As of now, numerous women activists from various movements – women’s, workers, students, civil, and political – are detained and/or have received heavy sentences. The list of detainees grows everyday.

See, unlike y’all, including our President and his administration, I actually read things about bad guys and don’t just pretend that they don’t exist. You should try doing the same. You know who else would want you to do so?

Neda. Does anyone at the UN remember her? I do. Here is a reminder (via Hot Air)

“We were stuck in traffic and we got out and stood to watch, and without her throwing a rock or anything they shot her,” he said. “It was just one bullet.”

Blood poured from the right side of her chest and began bubbling out of her mouth and nose as her lungs filled up.

“I’m burning, I’m burning!” Panahi recalled her saying, her final words.

She was killed by the people who are now the new United Nation’s bastion of Women’s Rights. For being on the street. Peacefully.

By remaining silent, the administration is in effect condoning the appointment of Iran to the Commission on the Status of Women. Spitting in the face of the beautiful life that once was Neda. And every woman like her. Women who live in constant fear for their lives, who are tortured and beaten and stoned to death merely for being women.

Condoned. As a way of “tolerance” and appeasement.

Beyond shameful.

(Cross-posted at NewsReal)

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://www.libertytreehugger.com reverelth

    Makes you wonder how low the bar is when it comes to this POTUS’ “Muslim outreach.” It’s not extreme to say getting someone killed, or looking the other way after the same, is not too high a price for him to pay.

  • http://www.redstate.com/biggator5/ BigGator5

    I wonder how many times The Commission on the Status of Women has cited the United States for unequal pay for women?

    If they haven’t done it already, I bet you anything now that Iran is there they will.

  • mitchsf

    No, that time was a long time ago. Why we bother with this bloated waste of time is a mystery that the last few administrations should have explained to all Americans, including why we pay one-third of their costs.

    • shaitra
      • constitutionalconservative

        We need conservatives who are willing to take this on as an issue.
        Our presence in the U.N., and the specter of global governance it raises, are simply not in our national interest.

        For example, I personally opposed the Iraq war, but I opposed 1000X more the degradation of our sovereignty that happened when our top government officials were forced to go begging hat in hand to the UN for “permission” to pursue policies directly related to our own security.

    • RedBeard

      …we would have the very entertaining spectacle of the controlled implosion of the vermin-infested UN buildings, followed by the profitable rise of a nice condominium/office complex.

      Presumably, the new condo dwellers would actually pay their parking fines, unlike the supercilious twits from the UN.

  • Tbone

    US out of the UN and the UN out of the US.

    • crassus

      There was a vote on this in the 1990s- about 55 Republicans in the house voted for it, unfortunately, and you can be sure about this, the Bushies, Cheneys, McConnells of the world are adamant about staying so we can “spread our values”. Really? How’s that working out?

      • crassus

        Look at the $108 billion to the IMF. One day, the U.N. will regularly be stealing hundreds of billions each year from us. You just wait.

  • tropicgirl

    After reading her profile, I believe Lori should have known better than to write this article. A very important women’s issue was twisted into a rant against Iran. Why is that, Lori?

    And this is what happens when conservatives don’t understand their own beliefs. That’s how you get duped over and over.

    As a woman, I can tell you that the American women’s movement and the UN, for gods sake, are not interested in the welfare of women or families as the results of the movement are tragically known to us now in retrospect.

    Minority women fared far worse than whites, and still do. From latchkey kids to welfare moms without men to aborting mostly minority kids, the women’s movement has been a sham, ultimately resulting in the degradation of women in many ways. If you were a conservative, you would understand that and more. And since then they are totally on board with the worst element of the progressives.

    And, if you were a feminist you would realize that women will be on the committee that want to wear a burka, want to keep their traditions and families intact. They want and need to be protected from our the predators in our world society that want to break down their traditional family structure for their own purposes. It is one of the tools of war, but maybe you do know that.

    Women’s rights should be respected, not just the women you agree with. That is not feminism.

    And Neda was an unfortunate, yet ignorant woman who thought that America and Israel had her best interests at heart when they fueled the clueless revolution in Iran. They don’t.

    Lori, you either need to go back to school or live a few more years. You will see what the UN has in store for women around the world and what it has already done to them, someday.

    This was the right decision for Iranian women.

    • seattle_ite

      I’m sorry that you feel this way. I am a father to three beautiful, independent women. In no way, would I wish them to be hidden behind burqua’s, subjected to the will of a twisted, hateful wife-beater, or otherwise made to feel like a second class citizen.

      I like tradition, and am not at all opposed to one practicing a religion that I may not agree with. However, a nation-state that stones women for being raped, has no place on a ‘women’s rights’ commission.

      The U.N. was a good idea, that failed in it’s implementation.

    • Uma Richie

      Wow, despite all of Obama’s ill-treatment of Israel, a poster sympathetic to one of Israel’s enemies writes above that the Iranian uprising last year was incited by the US and Israel. Tropic girl, my take on it was the Iranian people realized that with a feckless American president, a war with Israel was more likely and that it was up to them to stop it, ’cause the cavalry wasn’t coming.

      Second tropic girl, your comment very optimistically asserts that Iran’s pro-family culture will have a positive impact on the UN that will outweigh the legitimization of the Iranian regime. Isn’t it possible that Iranian women will get the worst of both worlds from this deal? Continued second class status, a saber rattling pseudo-theocrat, and Planned Parenthood to destroy their family structure?

  • burgerkang

    Don’t worry. Iran was given this seat, not for what they’ve done for women’s rights in the past, but what they could POTENTIALLY accomplish with the seat. Just like Obama, who was given a Nobel Peace Prize, not for what he has accomplished, but for what he could POTENTIALLY do for world peace. It’s like giving the loser at a little league game a trophy, too. Encouragement! All that hope and change. It’s in the air. So, just sit back, relax, have a drink, and get ahead of the fashion trends by start picking out burkas, ladies.

  • RedBeard

    The UN is now seeking candidates for the administrative board of UNICEF. All applicants must be pediphiles with a proven record of child abuse and/or molestation. Arrests and convictions will be considered favorably. Apply at the World Turned Upside Down Pavillion.

  • aesthete

    Why are we funding this, again? We had the right idea when we left the League of Nations, and the UN is even more deserving of a discontinuation of our support.